My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2018_0813
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2018
>
CC_Minutes_2018_0813
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2018 4:15:51 PM
Creation date
8/29/2018 4:15:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
8/13/2018
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,August 13, 2018 <br /> Page 15 <br /> vestment in the solar garden and the second piece is the return on that investment <br /> through this process. <br /> Councilmember McGehee stated this is the first time a solar proposal has been <br /> brought forward where there is not a significant risk to the City. The City does <br /> not have the responsibility for the solar panels. She agreed there is a desire to go <br /> forward with the GreenStep Cities steps and make a commitment as a City to this <br /> type of solar garden. From that standpoint, she was happy with this proposal. <br /> Councilmember McGehee agreed with Mayor Roe that this is not a savings. She <br /> was also happy with starting out small and wondered how the developer and de- <br /> veloper's partner make their money in this process. She stated she understood the <br /> tax credits in doing this and wondered if that was all the developer was interested <br /> in. <br /> Mr. Kampmeyer stated tax credits and depreciation takes care of about 55% of the <br /> project. The balance is a small fee imposed on an annual basis from the energy <br /> produced. They make approximately five to six percent, which is typical. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte agreed with Councilmember McGehee but wondered if <br /> there was anything that was time sensitive regarding this. <br /> Mr. Kampmeyer stated they have many more subscriptions than they can current- <br /> ly fill and there is great interest from school districts, counties, and cities across <br /> the Twin Cities. He explained this is time sensitive and the program tax credits <br /> will begin to fall in 2020 so they are not sure what kind of development will occur <br /> after that. In addition, Xcel Energy is reportedly 884 Megawatts under develop- <br /> ment or being developed and will likely reach their capacity for renewable energy <br /> credits required for State mandates. Also, the system itself may not be able to <br /> handle much more than that given the amount of development. <br /> Mr. Kampmeyer stated for perspective, in 2012 there was fifteen to twenty meg- <br /> awatts of solar in the State and now they are approaching almost 900 megawatts. <br /> There has been rapid development over that time period. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte stated even though it is time sensitive, all of the entities <br /> mentioned move as slowly as the City does. She asked what has the Public <br /> Works, Environment&Transportation Commission recommended on this. <br /> Mr. Culver stated they presented the same information to the City Council in <br /> May. They are more interested in pursuing some of the on-campus solar options <br /> and did not make a formal recommendation to go forward with the community so- <br /> lar garden. He stated they understood some of the value in doing that as a short- <br /> term measure and indicated they did not oppose it. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.