My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2018_0813
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2018
>
CC_Minutes_2018_0813
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2018 4:15:51 PM
Creation date
8/29/2018 4:15:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
8/13/2018
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,August 13,2018 <br /> Page 3 <br /> Mayor Roe asked if the City code differentiates between stormwater ponds and <br /> wetlands in terms of what their setback requirement are. <br /> Mr. Culver indicated they would have a structure setback for both. He did not <br /> think they required a formal buffer, like a vegetative buffer, around a stormwater <br /> pond but there are setback requirements. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte stated it appeared to her the driveway off Lexington <br /> will be a right-in/right-out and asked for confirmation. <br /> Mr. Culver stated they will share the access with the existing Cherrywood Devel- <br /> opment, which is a full access across from the Fire Station. Their full access <br /> driveway connection will be there. <br /> Regarding Conditional Use approvals, Mayor Roe asked City Attorney Gaughan <br /> what specific nexus there needs to be between conditions that they might apply in <br /> what is being asked for with the height addition application. He wanted to make <br /> sure they are on good grounds if they decided to add a condition related to a buff- <br /> er or setback when the Conditional Use is for height. <br /> City Attorney Gaughan stated this is a Conditional Use for the height of a build- <br /> ing and he was not sure whether the height of a building implicates wetland buffer <br /> needs. He advised there would have to be some reasonable relation between the <br /> conditions imposed and the structure, noting this is merely a height requirement. <br /> The question would be what the increased height has to do with needing greater <br /> wetland buffering. <br /> Mayor Roe asked if there was anyone in the audience that wished to speak. <br /> Mr. Dave Young, Project Manager for United Properties <br /> Mr. Young stated he has been working with staff to develop this project. He stat- <br /> ed the wetland has been delineated and the site plan proposed earlier in the pro- <br /> cess was very conceptual. Now that they know the required setbacks for the buff- <br /> er area, they are maintaining the required buffer areas within that wetland area. <br /> On top of that, there is treatment of all stormwater via infiltration and bio- <br /> filtration basins. The application is being submitted to the Watershed District, on <br /> August 14, 2018 and they are confident it will be acceptable. He noted the Wa- <br /> tershed District has already provided input on the initial application. Mr. Young <br /> stated he would appreciate approval of this request. <br /> Councilmember McGehee thanked Mr. Young for that information. She indicat- <br /> ed she was satisfied with that, but it was clear to her from the drawings in the <br /> packet that this was not the case. She stated she was glad it has been clarified. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.