My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2018_1017 HRIEC Packet
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Human Rights, Inclusion and Engagement Commission
>
Packets
>
2018
>
2018_1017 HRIEC Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/11/2018 4:31:44 PM
Creation date
10/11/2018 4:27:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Human Rights Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
10/17/2018
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
138
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
7. Please describe an We have had several good focused open house events. They <br /> engagement initiative that usually target specific homes and businesses along the project <br /> went as planned. Describe area. One that comes to mind is the Storm Sewer Project along <br /> the initiative(s), who South Owasso Blvd private drive. We held two or three open <br /> participated, what were house meetings and had very good representation from all of <br /> the goals or preferred the residents. We also met several of them independently. <br /> outcomes of the Thanks to that engagement, we were able to design a project <br /> engagement effort? that addressed their concerns and helped address a direct <br /> discharge of stormwater into Lake Owasso. The residents, <br /> mostly, were happy to pay the assessments associated with <br /> the project. <br /> 8. Please describe an I am somewhat disappointed in the amount of engagement and <br /> engagement initiative that input we received with the transportation plan and pathway <br /> DID NOT go as planned. master plan efforts. We did have several public meetings, both <br /> Describe the initiative(s). independent and affiliated with other meetings related to the <br /> Who participated and overal Comprehensive Plan but really didn't receive a lot of <br /> who was your intended input. We did get some. And some of that was very good. But it <br /> audience? What were the would have been nice to try to target some of the bike users in <br /> goals or preferred the City, more transit users, etc. <br /> outcomes of the <br /> engagement effort? Why <br /> do you feel you didn't <br /> meet the intended goals <br /> or outcomes? <br /> 9. Are there specific areas A defined framework of levels of engagement for various types <br /> where you would like of efforts (projects, issues, studies, etc). Also, help with <br /> guidance to improve language and technology barriers. <br /> future outreach and <br /> engagement efforts? <br /> 10. Are there community Not from this department <br /> engagement best practices <br /> or resources that you <br /> would like to make sure <br /> the HRIEC is aware of? <br /> 11. Are there new Field not completed. <br /> initiatives that you think <br /> should be considered by <br /> the City? <br /> 12. The HRIEC plans to Field not completed. <br /> develop a strategy for <br /> building relationships <br /> with community members <br /> from a variety of <br /> backgrounds. Are there <br /> z <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.