My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2018-10-23_PWETC_Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Minutes
>
201x
>
2018
>
2018-10-23_PWETC_Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/29/2018 10:09:56 AM
Creation date
11/29/2018 10:09:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
10/23/2018
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
seventy years old and will need to be replaced. He stated Roseville is in the <br />replacement phase. <br />Mr. Freihammer stated the City has had a lot of discussion on establishing a <br />different rate structure for the water and that is not included in the report. That is <br />something the City Council will consider but as a separate action next year. The <br />Commission's recommendation has not been considered yet by Council. <br />Mr. Freihammer reviewed the City Sanitary Sewer Operations with the <br />Commission. <br />Chair Cihacek asked if the sanitary sewer charge based on volume or based on the <br />type of thing being treated. <br />Mr. Freihammer stated it was based on volume. <br />Member Wozniak stated he would like staff to look at other services and charges <br />in this report as well and break it out for future reporting. He wondered if the <br />costs are increasing by eight percent because the City is using a higher percentage <br />of water than other communities did a year ago. <br />Mr. Freihammer indicated that was correct. He stated the City seen a decrease in <br />the peak flows. It is a year after the fact but staff was surprised at the number and <br />expected the City to be at average or less because staff thought the City did better <br />improvements than other cities but there are still things in the City that need to be <br />improved. <br />Mr. Sandstrom indicated this report is based on 2016 flow data. <br />Member Wozniak suggested incorporating that information into the discussion <br />because it suggests that water conservation efforts might slow cost increases for <br />waste water treatment in the future because the sewer charges are based on water <br />usage. <br />Mr. Freihammer stated that was correct. A lot of it too is related to Inflow and <br />Infiltration (I&I) because when it peaks, any clear water that goes into the system, <br />the Met Council has meters that record when the water comes into Roseville and <br />when it leaves, and the City pays the difference between those meters. <br />Member Joyce asked if this breaks it out between commercial and residential for <br />usage. <br />Mr. Freihammer stated this is the overall, what the proposed budget would be, but <br />the City does track that. <br />Page 4 of 15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.