My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2018-10-23_PWETC_Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Minutes
>
201x
>
2018
>
2018-10-23_PWETC_Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/29/2018 10:09:56 AM
Creation date
11/29/2018 10:09:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
10/23/2018
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Freihammer stated he did not know. He thought another way the reports <br />could show comparisons is with other cities on the same system buying wholesale <br />from St. Paul. He noted staff will work on that for 2019. <br />Member Trainor stated he was surprised to see in the recycling the City is forecast <br />to lose $24,000. He was surprised the rate was not raised more especially with <br />the uncertainty in the recycling market. <br />Mr. Freihammer thought that reflected where the fund balance is and part of it is <br />the City has a contract that does help to know future costs. <br />Member Trainor thought it was interesting to see the City was negative $30,000 <br />plus in interest that the City normally receives and accounted for. He thought it <br />speaks to the amount of risk that the City is assuming with the lower backup <br />funds. He thought it was a lot of money to lose. <br />Member Wozniak thought it was explained for one of the fund balances that it <br />was because of the lift station work and staff expects the reserves to increase. <br />Mr. Freihammer stated on the water and sewer the fund balance is getting low, but <br />it is because of some large capital expenditures. He noted the City is investing a <br />large amount of money into the City booster station which is why the City backed <br />off on the water meter replacement. The fund balances will come back up rather <br />quickly within the next five years. <br />Member Misra asked if the City had similar perspectives on how the City <br />Commercial rates and usage works with other cities. <br />Mr. Freihammer stated commercial is a little more challenging to compare. He <br />stated if looking at the City structure, that is probably very similar where the cities <br />charge based on the meter size, based on what the single-family rate is. He <br />thought Roseville base rates are leaning higher than most cities. <br />Member Misra stated she would be interested in the future to take a look at that to <br />see how Roseville compares to similar cities. <br />Mr. Freihammer indicated staff could look at this and try to do an analysis for <br />future presentation. <br />Member Misra thought if the residential use is on the high end overall then is the <br />commercial use also on the high end. <br />Mr. Freihammer stated staff will look into that. He thought some cities might <br />charge the commercial users more than residential users. <br />Page 7 of 15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.