My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2018-10-23_PWETC_Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Minutes
>
201x
>
2018
>
2018-10-23_PWETC_Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/29/2018 10:09:56 AM
Creation date
11/29/2018 10:09:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
10/23/2018
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Freihammer stated this item will be going to the Council on November 5I'. <br />He thought to do a major change staff and the Commission would need to have <br />more discussion on this. <br />Chair Cihacek stated that would be ok but did not want to push the discussion out <br />to far in the future. <br />Mr. Freihammer stated staff will work with the Council on getting that scheduled. <br />Commissioner Wozniak stated the City needs to reconsider how the rates are <br />presented because there is absolutely no discussion of policy in the report about <br />how rates can encourage water conservation and how infrastructure replacement <br />can be accelerated to mitigate future cost increases for items the City has no <br />control over. He stated this is just dollars and cents and trying to match revenues <br />and expenses and provide for contingencies. <br />Mr. Freihammer thought that was part of the reason why the City has the base <br />rates set up. The base rates do hit the capital side extremely well and the usage is <br />tied to what St. Paul Regional Water charges the City which is passed onto the <br />residents and then the same thing on the usage with the sewer. It is really <br />reflective on what is being charged to Met council. He thought the way that <br />structure is set up does make sense. <br />Member Wozniak did not think it was shown well in the tables because it is <br />shown as other expenses. He would like it all broken out. <br />Member Misra asked if the Finance Commission reviewing this as well. <br />Mr. Freihammer stated this was presented to the Finance Commission as well as <br />the budget was based on this information. <br />Member Misra asked when the Finance Commission reviewed this did the <br />Commission have more information about the reserves in these areas. She did not <br />remember getting that information. <br />Mr. Freihammer guessed the Finance Commission looked deeper in the <br />spreadsheets. <br />Member Misra stated when she read through the information that is what she <br />assumed but she thought it speaks to what Commissioner Wozniak is stating that <br />the perspective is more of a Finance Commission perspective and maybe it would <br />be of some interest to this Commission to set up a policy that addresses this or a <br />statement. <br />Page 9 of 15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.