My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2018_10-23_PWETCpacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
201x
>
2018
>
2018_10-23_PWETCpacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/29/2018 10:15:16 AM
Creation date
11/29/2018 10:13:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
10/23/2018
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
310 <br />311 Chair Cihacek stated since this will be by one of the City's largest park systems, <br />312 could the City potentially use that site and that container to pilot out organics <br />313 collections after park events to that dumpster. He wondered if other non-essential <br />314 users put stuff in the dumpster, which might add more value. <br />315 <br />316 Member Wozniak thought the County would be open to something like that. <br />317 <br />318 Chair Cihacek stated he would try to scale down the site to match the City use and <br />319 potentially have other businesses, events, organizations other then residential that <br />320 are located within Roseville being able to drop off at the site as well. <br />321 <br />322 Member Trainor indicated he would like to see this move forward and once built <br />323 he thought people would use it. He thought the education portion is important, but <br />324 a baseline has to be established first and then build from there. <br />325 <br />326 Mayor Joyce thought the twenty percent of residents that were indifferent to this <br />327 were uninformed and were not knowledgeable on this type of recycling and if <br />328 educated there might be more involvement. <br />329 <br />330 Mr. Culver thought as the City gets more of these drop off sites more people will <br />331 end up using it, people who are not aware of it will be exposed to it more. He <br />332 thought it will propagate in the use as people understand it more and the benefits of <br />333 it. <br />334 <br />335 Member Wozniak thought there may be a need by residents for smaller trash <br />336 containers as a result of this and managing waste separately. He did not think the <br />337 County would support changing the size of their "cookie cutter" enclosure at this <br />338 point. <br />339 <br />340 Chair Cihacek noted the pad would still be the same size but the container could be <br />341 smaller. <br />342 <br />343 Member Wozniak agreed. <br />344 <br />345 Member Kruse asked if the County has asked for this before and the City indicated <br />346 it would be thought about. <br />347 <br />348 Mr. Culver stated the County approached the City. He believed it has been over a <br />349 year now since the City was approached regarding this item. <br />350 <br />351 Member Wozniak stated the County is reaching out to a number of communities. <br />352 The ones that are not currently served by a County yard waste site, Roseville being <br />353 one of them. <br />354 <br />Page 8 of 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.