My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2018_10-23_PWETCpacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
201x
>
2018
>
2018_10-23_PWETCpacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/29/2018 10:15:16 AM
Creation date
11/29/2018 10:13:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
10/23/2018
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Roseville Finance Commission <br />Agenda Item <br />Utility Rate Peer Comparisons <br />The graphs below depict a number of water and sewer rate comparisons with other peer communities for <br />single-family homes. For this analysis, peer communities include first -ring suburbs that serve a <br />population between 18,000 and 50,000, and which are not simply an extension of a larger entity's system. <br />Maplewood for example, is excluded because they're part of St. Paul's system. This group was selected <br />to try and approximate stand-alone cities with similar age of infrastructure which can have a significant <br />influence on the cost of services. <br />It should be noted that broad comparisons only give a cursory look at how one community's rates <br />compares to another. A more precise comparison would also incorporate each City's individual <br />philosophy in funding programs and services. <br />For example, Roseville does NOT utilize assessments to pay for water or sewer infrastructure <br />replacements like many other cities do. Instead we fund infrastructure replacements 100% through the <br />rates. As a result, Roseville's utility rates are inherently higher when compared to a City that uses <br />assessments to pay for improvements. Other influences on the rates include whether or not a community <br />softens its water before sending it on to customers, and the extent in which communities charge higher <br />rates to non -single family residential customers. <br />The following chart depicts the peer group comparison for combined water base and usage fees for a <br />typical single-family home on a quarterly basis. <br />$100 <br />$80 <br />$60 <br />$40 <br />$20 <br />2018 Water Fee Comparison: SF Residential <br />eroxro� <br />cPv <br />As is shown in the graph, Roseville's total water charge (base + usage) is the highest in the comparison <br />group. One of the primary reasons why Roseville's water rates are higher is due to the significant increase <br />in infrastructure replacements in recent years, which unlike many other cities, are funded solely by the <br />rates. <br />The following chart depicts the peer group comparison for combined sewer base and usage fees for a <br />typical single-family home on a quarterly basis. <br />Page 8 of 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.