My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2018_1022
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2018
>
CC_Minutes_2018_1022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/30/2018 10:37:16 AM
Creation date
11/30/2018 10:37:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
10/22/2018
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, October 22, 2018 <br /> Page 9 <br /> ness in McCarrons' community and felt it would go a long way in the revitaliza- <br /> tion of the Rice and Larpenteur area and would bring in businesses. <br /> Mayor Roe closed the public comment with no one else coming forward. <br /> Council Discussion <br /> Councilmember McGehee asked if was possible to get clarity on the one question <br /> that was raised regarding the policy on LGBTQ+ if the representative was pre- <br /> pared to answer. <br /> Mr. Thompson stated he was not prepared because he was not a policy writer, but <br /> the values of the Montessori School is to welcome all, that is their value. <br /> Laliberte moved, Willmus seconded, adoption of Resolution No. 11547 (Attach- <br /> ment D) entitled, "A Resolution Approving an Amendment to the Comprehensive <br /> Land Use Plan Map Designation from Low Density Residential (LR) to Institu- <br /> tional (IN) for Property Located at 211 North McCarrons Boulevard (PF18-016)." <br /> Council Discussion <br /> Councilmember Laliberte stated she did not want to dismiss the long process the <br /> City took previously to consider the original building as something the City would <br /> take on, which did not seem something the City was in the position to do at that <br /> time and to talk about the housing needs that are in the community and this was a <br /> place where those needs could be met. She still thought the City still had some of <br /> the medium to low density needs but this building is already in the City, is beauti- <br /> ful, this sounds like a very good plan, and she appreciated the presentation and <br /> getting questions answered. She stated she was in support. <br /> Councilmember Willmus stated he will be supporting this motion as seconder. <br /> He was appreciative of the pause for a couple of years after the City decided not <br /> to pursue this property and liked that private sector came forward with this effort. <br /> That effort and down-zoning the property from Institutional Use to LDR is what <br /> has brought this to the Council today and to have an opportunity to gather the in- <br /> put that has come in. He thanked the residents for taking the initiative to go out <br /> and talk to their neighbors about this. He stated one of the concerns he did have <br /> was in regard to traffic but in having an opportunity to talk with Public Works Di- <br /> rector Marc Culver, those concerns were alleviated. He indicated he did not have <br /> any issues with this item going forward. <br /> Councilmember McGehee stated she is supportive of this item and toured the <br /> property. She thought this was a beautiful building worthy of being maintained <br /> and she was very excited about the natural playground and delighted about the <br /> pond and walking paths. She stated as a former teacher and home schooler, hav- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.