Laserfiche WebLink
moving regulated articles from currently un-infested areas. The level of monitoring needed to reassure <br />these entities is not known at this time. <br /> <br />Option 2: Create a new EAB regulatory program <br />In this scenario, the MDA would continue to regulate EAB but with changes to the current regulations. <br />For instance, there are some changes that could provide much of the benefit of the current program but <br />with fewer constraints on the movement of materials. <br />One such change would be to redefine the articles regulated for EAB. Currently, the articles regulated <br />for emerald ash borer are: <br />1)Ash logs and lumber (excluding 4 cornered dimensional lumber) <br />2)Ash tree waste <br />3)Ash chips and mulch <br />4)All hardwood firewood (all hardwood firewood was included in federal and state regulations for <br />EAB due to the inability of many users of firewood to discriminate between ash and other types <br />of wood) <br /> <br />These definitions could be edited to remove “All hardwood firewood” and broaden the ash logs and <br />lumber to include any ash wood in any length, split or unsplit. This would reduce the regulated articles <br />to only those that may actually move emerald ash borer. Although emerald ash borer has been <br />documented to infest white fringe tree in Ohio, there is no risk of emerald ash borer infesting common <br />non-ash firewood species such as oak, birch, maple, etc. This change would simplify emerald ash borer <br />restrictions for firewood producers with the ability to exclude ash and aligns with the rules adapted by <br />the Minnesota DNR for DNR managed lands to exclude ash firewood. Messaging around this change in <br />regulations would emphasize that if in doubt, wood should be assumed to be ash and not moved. Also, <br />the safest wood for consumers to use is MDA certified heat-treated firewood which should continue to <br />be promoted as the best option for consumers. <br />Another possible change would be to redefine the way that areas are regulated for EAB. Currently, <br />emerald ash borer is regulated at the county level. This is a simple way to identify regulated areas. <br />However, since infestations are not always found in the middle of a county, it is not a perfect way to <br />define an infested area. For example, Wright County was quarantined after EAB was found in the <br />Clearwater area. However, eastern Stearns County is much closer to the infestation and at greater risk <br />than eastern Wright County. This change would rely on the MDA EAB online map to define areas <br />regulated for EAB: www.mda.state.mn.us/eabstatus. It would be the responsibility of any entity moving <br />articles regulated for EAB to insure the articles were not from an infested area. <br />An opportunity for a new approach to EAB regulation unrelated to the current quarantine regulations is <br />to transition the Tree Care Registry into a Tree Care Certification Program. This change would insure that <br />tree care providers possess knowledge of best management practices to avoid spreading invasive <br />species such as EAB. It would also provide the MDA with an opportunity to promote the importance of <br />using a certified tree care service to the public. <br /> <br />Some of the complications present in Option 1 also exist in Option 2. Again, an exterior quarantine <br />would need to be put in place to replace the work previously done by USDA. Also, like in Option 1, it <br />27 <br /> <br />