My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2019_01-22_PWETCpacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
201x
>
2019
>
2019_01-22_PWETCpacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/1/2019 2:04:30 PM
Creation date
2/1/2019 1:56:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
1/22/2019
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
136
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, September 18, 2017 <br />Page 22 <br />needs, but opined that it may be possible depending on the site acquired and how <br />much of it was developable based on permitted uses or what other uses may be <br />desired in the immediate vicinity. <br />Councilmember McGehee stated that she had spoken to City Attorney Gaughan <br />just now, who advised that impounded vehicles could be stored outside. Coun- <br />cilmember McGehee also asked Mr. Culver if hooking up to geothermal with the <br />existing building would generate any savings. <br />Ed Kodet, Architectural Group, Ltd. <br />Mr. Kodet reported that most maintenance buildings today use geothermal. How- <br />ever, Mr. Kodet noted that with geothermal and a new building, it would allow for <br />floor radiant heating in vehicle repair bays, creating a great use of geothermal <br />when dealing with floors and vehicles year-round. In response to Councilmember <br />McGehee, Mr. Kodet advised that there wouldn't be a great deal of energy sav- <br />ings in using geothermal in the existing building that would primarily be used for <br />vehicle storage unless the vehicle repair area was remodeled as well. <br />To clarify, Mr. Culver questioned if it would be difficult to retrofit the existing <br />space to use geothermal. <br />Mr. Kodet responded that it was dependent on what the space did; and if the vehi- <br />cle repair area was remodeled and the existing floor removed, geothermal could <br />then be utilized in the repair area, creating more efficiencies. <br />In response to storage of impounded vehicles, City Attorney Gaughan clarified <br />that it was the obligation of an agency (e.g., municipality) to secure impounded <br />property (e.g. fences) but also noted there were reasons to keep vehicles in as <br />good of a condition as possible pending their sale and monies returned to the city <br />based on their value. <br />Councilmember Etten noted that only the final option contained a wash bay, but <br />he also noted that when he toured the maintenance facility one of the problems <br />cited by staff was in washing trucks in the winter and since they currently stuck <br />out of the wash bay, it created a huge ice area outside. Councilmember Etten <br />asked if any discussion was held with renovations and fixing that problem that <br />appeared to be unusually difficult through the winter months. <br />Mr. Culver responded that in order to solve that problem, it required much less ef- <br />ficient use of any space added; and with expanding existing space it would not be <br />cost-effective or feasible based on the current building and what would be re- <br />quired to make it work. <br />Mr. Kodet concurred, noting that it involved how the total building functioned. <br />Mr. Kodet noted that today's wash bays were constructed much differently, with a <br />catwalk and wand to clean vehicles, under and over. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.