2019_0225_CCPacket - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

45 lot boundary, which conforms to the 6-foot minimum side yard building setback requirement in 46 the CB zoning district. 47 The table below identifies the improvement area and on-site parking stalls for each of the three 48 proposed lots, as well as the improvement area limit, and the minimum number of parking 49 required for a bank (on Lot 1), a retail building (on Lot 2), and a coffee shop (on Lot 3.) Improvement Improvement Parking Parking Area Area Minimum Proposed Limit Proposed 18 39 64% Lot 1 58 54 85% 57% Lot 2 10 31 59% Lot 3 50 51 (included as part of Exhibit C) discusses existing (and future) cross parking easements that more 52 than make up for this apparent deficiency. Exhibit C also i 53 more conservative calculation of minimum parking requirements. Recognizing the former 54 Golfsmith building could be renovated into an office facility, 55 indicates 75 parking stalls would be required for an office building of that size and illustrates 56 how additional parking stalls could be built on the site to meet this requirement. Similarly, the 57 existing coffee shop on Lot 3 only requires 10 parking stalls, but the 31 stalls incorporated within 58 the lot boundaries would be sufficient for a fast food restaurant, in the event the building is 59 redeveloped in such a way in the future. 60 Easements 61 Section 1103.03 of the Subdivision Code requires drainage and utility easements, 10 feet in 62 width, abutting rights-of-way or roadway easements where such easements are determined to be 63 necessary. Because a complicated arrangement of various easements already exists around the 64 the approval of the 65 proposed plat includes a condition that the applicant work with staff to satisfy this requirement. 66 P UBLIC C OMMENT 67 Planning Division staff has not received any questions or comments from members of the public 68 about this application. 69 R ECOMMENDED A CTION 70 Adopt a resolution approving the proposed Roseville Plaza plat of the commercial property 71 at 1780 1820 Highway 36, based on the content of this RCA, the public record, and City 72 Council deliberation, with the condition that the applicant work with Public Works staff to 73 dedicate drainage and utility easements that will satisfy the requirements of §1103.03 of the City 74 Code. 75 A LTERNATIVE A CTIONS 76 A) Pass a motion to table the item for future action. An action to table must be based on 77 the need for additional information or further analysis to make a decision on the request. 78 Tabling beyond May 6, 2019, may require extension of the 120-day action deadline 79 established in Minn. Stat. 462.358 subd. 3b to avoid statutory approval. 7.e RCA Page 3 of 4