My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2019_03-26_PWETCpacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
201x
>
2019
>
2019_03-26_PWETCpacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/22/2019 2:43:01 PM
Creation date
3/22/2019 2:42:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
3/26/2019
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
309 cheaper than the one larger meter and that alone might be a savings. The sewer <br />310 charge would be the biggest reason because if a company is not tracking irrigation <br />311 the company can save on that as well. <br />312 <br />313 Member Wozniak stated by including infrastructure costs in the base fee are <br />314 residential users in a way subsidizing commercial users. <br />315 <br />316 Mr. Culver stated the commercial users have a much higher base rate than <br />317 residential users. He noted based on the meter size the base rate is $55.80 for a 5/8- <br />318 inch meter, $69.75 for a 1 inch, $111.00 for a 1 1/2 inch, $209.00 for a 2 inch and it <br />319 goes all the way up to 6 inches which is $1,600 a quarter. The commercial user is <br />320 paying a lot more into the infrastructure costs then residential. <br />321 <br />322 Mr. Freihammer stated residential takes more infrastructure in some ways because <br />323 there are more lots spread out and more pipe is put into the ground, it might not be <br />324 as large of a pipe though. <br />325 <br />326 Member Misra stated she was concerned about the fact thatthe City is incorporating <br />327 residential into the commercial because she did think the multi -unit dwellings are <br />328 an efficiency for the water system because the extensive water supply systems are <br />329 not being built into each residence. There is a lot of piping being concentrated for <br />330 the sewer system as well and there are a number of things where those users are the <br />331 same as other residential users in terms of what is being used internally in the units <br />332 but probably increasing efficiency for water use in the other areas. She thought <br />333 there was a reason to look at commercial differently when it is a manufacturing <br />334 system or a commercial system that is able to bill their customer but when a <br />335 customer is a resident that feels different and she felt like that should be classified <br />336 very similar to a residential unit. <br />337 <br />338 Chair Cihacek asked if Member Misra's recommendation would be to create a <br />339 separate section or tier for housing, whether it is condo's or apartments. <br />340 <br />341 Member Misra thought for water use that made sense. She thought there would be <br />342 more efficiency to have one kitchen, such as at Cherrywood rather than a kitchen <br />343 in each residential unit. <br />344 <br />345 Chair Cihacek asked staff if data could be examined to see if the places that have <br />346 congregate dining are actually more efficient than those that don't. <br />347 <br />348 Mr. Freihammer indicated he did not know if the City will have the data on what <br />349 amenities every facility has. It could be broken out by types of units. <br />350 <br />351 Member Wozniak asked if the base rate would stay commercial, but the variable <br />352 would be something else. <br />353 <br />Page 8 of 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.