My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2019-02-26_PWETC_Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Minutes
>
201x
>
2019
>
2019-02-26_PWETC_Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/27/2019 2:42:56 PM
Creation date
3/27/2019 2:42:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
2/26/2019
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
in and tell a manufacturing plant they have to manufacture different that is really <br />fuzzy ground and not sure what is to be gained by that. <br />Chair Cihacek recommended as the neat step to look at the irrigation use first <br />because he thought it made sense to get everyone in the City to use less water, <br />whether it is commercial or residential. <br />Mr. Culver stated the City is trying to get people to conserve water. He thought <br />there are some things staff would like to do about trying to subsidize or provide <br />rebates for smart irrigation controllers that will reduce the amount of water people <br />are using for irrigation rather than arate change. This is something the City is going <br />to do eventually. He wondered if there was something more the Commission wants <br />to do from a rate structure perspective to try to force conservation. <br />Member Misra stated the fact the Commission is considering different rates for the <br />summer, addressing irrigation specifically is saying the City is providing an <br />incentive for that conservation and without that incentive people might not make <br />the changes that would be made with an incentive. <br />Chair Cihacek agreed. He did think the Commission should look specifically at an <br />irrigation rate and mandating irrigation meters to start enforcing that rate with other <br />incentives for conservation from a rate structure perspective. <br />7. Items for Next Meeting —March 26, 2019 <br />Discussion ensued regarding the March PWETC agenda: <br />• Continue discussion on Commercial Rate Analysis — Irrigation <br />• Irrigation Technology Review <br />Mr. Culver commented Member Trainor will not be continuing on the PWET <br />Commission and last meeting will be in March. Member Trainor was the Ethics <br />Commission representative. <br />Chair Cihacek asked if any member on the PWET Commission would like to sit on <br />the Ethics Commission. <br />Mr. Culver reviewed the responsibilities of the Ethics Commission. <br />No one volunteered at this time. <br />Chair Cihacek indicated he would be atthe March Ethics Commission meeting. He <br />suggested forming a sub -committee for the "Green Team". <br />8. Adjourn <br />Motion <br />Page 10 of 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.