My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2019-02-26_PWETC_Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Minutes
>
201x
>
2019
>
2019-02-26_PWETC_Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/27/2019 2:42:56 PM
Creation date
3/27/2019 2:42:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
2/26/2019
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Acting Chair Wozniak thanked Ms. Morton and thought there was an item on the <br />agenda regarding the Green Steps program. He stated the Public Works <br />Environment and Transportation Commission is the Green Team that is probably <br />most responsible for taking on the Comprehensive Plan strategies and action steps <br />that would address climate change. He stated he shared Ms. Morton's concerns <br />about the lack of evident progress and have been a little disappointed, not <br />necessarily with the Commission, but with some attempts that some members of <br />the public have made and in many cases, not made, to address some climate change <br />issues and he would encourage the Commissioners to focus on this issue a little <br />more going forward. <br />Ms. Morton stated there are about five major construction projects either very <br />recently built or in progress that are within a mile of her house and four of them <br />have taken down acreage of trees and her thought was even if these are totally green <br />projects with completely green energy that is a net increase to the CO2 footprint. <br />She did not know if it was policy to replant trees and she did not think that was <br />necessarily a great solution but for any new development she wondered if the City <br />was putting stringent energy requirements on them because within thirty years these <br />may be mandated to be completely green on projects that have not gotten through <br />their lifespan of usefulness. It does not seem to her that the City is doing anyone a <br />favor allowing non -green energy to be constructed now and then in a decade or two <br />mandating the Company to switch over to something green as the climate gets <br />worse and the problem gets worse. <br />Chair Cihacek asked Ms. Morton what she meant by green energy. <br />Ms. Morton stated she meant non -fossil fuel. <br />Chair Cihacek noted solar or thermal energy or wind should be the only option then. <br />Ms. Morton indicated she was not sure, maybe nuclear energy was on the horizon <br />but right now the City has solar or wind. <br />Chair Cihacek stated the mandate has to be feasible so it is hard at this point for a <br />company to get to one hundred percent green energy. One percent is more feasible <br />right now. He indicated the City could review the building code to a degree to see <br />what the City can do to reduce or mandate other areas that improve the building <br />climate and overall climate because it is hard to mandate something at this point in <br />the private sector. <br />Ms. Morton noted people can opt to have one hundred percent clean energy on their <br />electrical and when digging in the earth the companies can build in geothermal. <br />She stated she was not saying this is what is imperative and does not have enough <br />information to say this is what we should do but it is the direction she believed the <br />City needed to go. <br />Page 2 of 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.