Laserfiche WebLink
Attachment B <br />unemployment, or an employment concentration where an individual sector <br />(excluding education/health, government, and transportation, trade and <br />utilities) represents more than 30% of the nonfarm work base or tax base <br />concentration where the top 10 taxpayers represent more than 35% of the tax <br />base exists. <br />economy, with access to a broad and diverse MSAtherefore, we have applied <br />the subjective adjustment of 1.0 to reduce the overall economic score to 1.0. <br />This portion of the analytical framework, which the City of Roseville has <br />minimal control over, is weredit rating. <br />Therefore, the portion for the Economic Score is 0.3 (2.0 1.0) x 30%. <br />Based on the first two criteria, the sum total used to determine the City of <br />Management Score Assesses managerial decisions, policies, and practices that apply directly to <br />credit factors. <br />Financial Management AssessmentScore <br />Very Strong with Strong FMA1 (strong) <br />Strong with Good FMA2 (good) <br />Adequate with Standard FMA3 (standard) <br />Weak with Vulnerable FMA4 (vulnerable) <br />Very Weak5 (weak) <br />therefore, based on this factor, the <br />initial management score for the City is 1.0. <br />The positive subjective adjustment factors for this score include consistently <br />maintaining balanced operations and providing limited governmental services <br />thereby reducing operational risks. Negative adjustments would result from <br />management instability and the inability to execute reforms due to rapid <br />subjective adjustments will be made in this category. <br />This portion of the analytical framework, which the City of Roseville has some <br />control over, is weighted 2redit rating. Therefore, the <br />portion for the Management Score is 0.2 (1.0 x 20%). <br />Based on the first three criteria, the sum total used to determine the City of <br />7(0.2 + 0.3 + 0.2). <br /> <br />