My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2019_0318_CCPacket
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2019
>
2019_0318_CCPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/25/2019 1:50:04 PM
Creation date
4/4/2019 12:43:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Meeting Date
3/8/2019
Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
297
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Attachment B <br />Commissioner Hodder thought 2019 might be tight. <br />Mr. Miller stated at the end of 2018 the General Fund will be close to the floor of 35%. What <br />staff suggested to the Finance Commission and City Council is staff may have to consider, when <br />closing the books, if it looks like the General Fund will be below 35% to move some money in <br />the fund to make sure the fund does not drop below that. He noted that is something that can be <br />done quickly before staffcloses the books for the year. <br />Commissioner Hodder wondered if the Finance Commission needed to provide a policy <br />recommendation for what happens if this happened a certain way. <br />Vice-Chair McRoberts asked if the Finance Commission needed a recommendation such as “In <br />the event that, here is how the sweep happens, and in the event that one of them is short it can <br />deduct from the sweep fund”. <br />Commissioner Hodder thought there should be some contingencies. What happens in a situation <br />where the fund comes in below target? <br />Mr. Miller stated this was discussed at the last meeting as well. The question was if the fund <br />falls below the floor how would funds get transferred back into the fund to bring it back up. The <br />obvious answer would be to take some cash out of a fund that has excess reserve and shore that <br />up. <br />Vice-Chair McRoberts stated the theory being if the money is being swept up into the General <br />Fund, because the Finance Commission did not feel there was a value in creating a separate <br />sweep fund, what would the process be to get the funds put back into the fund that was below the <br />floor of that fund. He assumed the transfer would require the City Council’s approval based on a <br />recommendation from City Management. <br />Mr. Miller stated that was correct and staff would try to memorialize something like that in the <br />form of a Resolution where it is deliberate and documented. <br />Commissioner Murray asked if a resolution would be needed for every instance of a transfer of <br />money or would staff have a standing authority to move money if a fund fell below the selected <br />percentage. <br /> <br />Mr. Miller stated he did not expect this to come into play very often, so he would suggest to the <br />City Council to approve based on a resolution and staff can see if that tends to be more of an <br />overkill. He stated it needs to show on the books that the funds have the cash that needs to be in <br />there. <br /> <br />Commissioner Hodder stated the City does not want reserve levels to go below targets because <br />of the impact on the Standard and Poor’s and Moody’s bond rating. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.