My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2019_0318_CCPacket
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2019
>
2019_0318_CCPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/25/2019 1:50:04 PM
Creation date
4/4/2019 12:43:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Meeting Date
3/8/2019
Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
297
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Attachment B <br />though it had been accepted. He recommended marking item 2017-3 as accepted and adding the <br />new direction from the City Council to look at it again as a new item. <br />Commissioner Murray asked if 2017-6 was closed. <br />Chair Schroeder stated this item was closed at the City Council meeting on December 11. <br />Commissioner Hodder stated the Commission roles could also be closed as the City Council <br />approved this. <br />Commissioner Zeller stated he was not sure if the recommendation on the levy would be <br />considered accepted or rejected but would mark it was rejected based on the meeting. <br />Commissioner Bachhuber stated he would not consider this recommendation as rejected because <br />the City did recognize the need to address the CIP and the use of reserves and chose to be more <br />proactive than the Commission had recommended. <br />Establish 2018 Meeting Calendar <br />Chair Schroeder stated the August meeting would be changed to August 16. <br />Commissioner McRoberts stated that he would not be able to make the August 16 meeting. <br />Chair Schroeder suggested adding the date as August 16 as a tentative date and review it at the <br />next meeting when Commissioner Harold is present. <br />Continue Discussion on Establishing A Cash Reserve Fund <br />Finance Director Miller reviewed the cash carry forward fund that had been prepared by staff for <br />the City Council. Staff has recommended that this be limited to the general fund at this time. He <br />stated that several of the funds the Commission had discussed have funds set aside for specific <br />uses and the reasons for these warrants additional conversation before they are lumped into the <br />cash carry forward fund. He reviewed the summary results for various funds as requested by the <br />Commission at the last meeting. <br />Commissioner McRoberts stated looking at the IT Fund they are consistently spending under <br />budget. This could be something that is considered when looking at the levy and the budgets <br />could be adjusted to reflect the actual spend. <br />Commissioner Murray stated some items on a budget are predictable but other things are not. <br />There is a tendency to not use the average spend in the budget because this could create short <br />falls. On an average this would create a surplus. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.