My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2019_0318_CCPacket
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2019
>
2019_0318_CCPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/25/2019 1:50:04 PM
Creation date
4/4/2019 12:43:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Meeting Date
3/8/2019
Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
297
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Attachment B <br />different fund when the general fund reserves can be used for what the City needs. There could <br />be more value if the other funds are included because then all of the excess funds can be pooled <br />together to use. <br />Commissioner Bachhuber stated the License Center would be the only one that could be a stand- <br />alone profit center. <br />Commissioner McRoberts stated there is no sense having prioritization if there are departments <br />that can be exempt from this prioritization. <br />Chair Schroeder stated if the capital was removed from these funds it would create more <br />consistency in the accounting and how each department is run. <br />Commissioner McRoberts asked if the Commission’s recommendation to the Council would be <br />capital should be split out and it should be included within whatever the Council deems to adopt <br />of the Commission’s recommendations for capital prioritization. Once the capital is taken out <br />the Commission could make a recommendation on the creation of a cash reserve fund. <br />Finance Director Miller stated the staff recommendation is already presented. He stated it would <br />be easier for this group if the capital were taken out of the funds but the Commission should <br />consider how it would be easier for the Council to make decisions. <br />Chair Schroeder stated the Council does struggle with determining what the excess and deficits <br />are for all of the funds. This is way the Council has discussed creating a cash fund because this <br />would allow them to see these surpluses and deficits. Taking the capital out would make it more <br />clear for the Council to see what the surplus or deficit is for each fund. <br />Commissioner McRoberts stated there were inconsistencies of the operating needs being <br />included in the budget when new capital expenditures were approved. If the capital were <br />separated out then it would be consistent for all departments. <br />Commissioner Bachhuber stated the Commission would want to establish a threshold for the <br />cash carry forward fund. The funds could be swept after the fund reaches the determined amount <br />or range. <br />Commissioner McRoberts asked if the intent was if one of the funds was over the threshold to <br />allocate these funds to another use or to adjust the expenditure for the next year. <br />Chair Schroeder stated the excess could follow the capital. <br />Commissioner Bachhuber suggested it get swept out and goes somewhere else. He would <br />recommend this because if it used for the next years budget it could create instability within the <br />fund in future years. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.