My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2019-5-7_PR_Comm_Min
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Parks & Recreation
>
Parks & Recreation Commission
>
Minutes
>
2019
>
2019-5-7_PR_Comm_Min
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/6/2019 10:12:11 AM
Creation date
6/6/2019 10:12:10 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2026-??? $112,000 $112,000 $0 <br />(250???) <br />TOTALS $634,968 $677,032$725,000 $579,000 $8,000 <br />(1795)(1476) <br />*Average cost assumption = $400 to remove and $450 to replace. <br /> <br />This program would create a substantial change to the landscape of the Roseville urban <br />forest. However, the above rough draft provides for a 5-6 year program (with residual in final <br />year) to substantially eradicate EAB on public property and maintain a reasonable canopy <br />throughout time. <br /> <br />Staff noted that the recommended procurement method would be through the Best Value <br />proposal process (not low bid). A Request for Proposal (RFP) would include solicitation of a <br />single vendor that could manage a multiyear contract to complete the job. <br /> <br />The above proposal covers public trees on boulevards and manicured park areas (not forested <br />park areas). This does not cover private trees and education would need to be considered for <br />residents on what options are available for their private trees. <br /> <br />Commissioner Dahlstrom asked how accurate the removal pricing is that is listed in the plan. <br />Staff stated that it is current accurate prices based on the current caliper inches of the trees. <br /> <br />Commissioner Heikkila questioned if there is an inventory of the current Ash Trees. Staff <br />confirmed that there is an inventory of all public trees in the Davey Treekeeper tree database. <br /> <br />Vice-Chair Hoag encouraged staff to extend the treatment of trees to help retain the tree <br />canopy for a slightly longer timeframe. Staff confirmed they would be asking the experts to <br />provide proposals that would help achieve Roseville’s short and long-term canopy goals. <br /> <br />Commissioner Stoner stated that he would be uncomfortable committing money to tree <br />replacement when we do not know the outcome of the Guidant John Rose Minnesota OVAL <br />bonding at the legislature. <br /> <br />The Commission discussed the potential timeframe for removals and different options for the <br />accelerated program. <br /> <br />Commissioner Arneson proposed the idea of allowing residents to donate or sponsor a tree. <br /> <br />Commissioner O’Brien moved that the Commission talk with City Council at their joint <br />meeting in June of their strong support in using the excess reserve balance beyond the target <br />amount towards helping to solve the Emerald Ash Borer epidemic in the city. Vice-Chair <br />Hoag seconded. Motion passed unanimously. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.