My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2019_0603
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2019
>
CC_Minutes_2019_0603
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/18/2019 3:54:23 PM
Creation date
6/18/2019 3:54:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
6/17/2019
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,June 3, 2019 <br /> Page 12 <br /> Mr. Peter Heppner,3030 Woodbridge Street <br /> Mr. Heppner expressed concerned about the proposed rezoning. He believed the <br /> rezoning will be extremely harmful to the neighborhood and will set a precedent <br /> that will have implications all across Roseville in years to come. He stated his <br /> concerns are also reflected in the overwhelming agreement that he has heard from <br /> his neighbors. He and his wife, along with several neighbors, have distributed a <br /> petition around the neighborhood asking the City to decline rezoning the proper- <br /> ties. This petition which has now been submitted to the City has gathered signa- <br /> tures representing more than eighty-five percent of the homes that are within the <br /> five-hundred-foot notification radius, excluding those owned by the owners of <br /> these properties in question. <br /> Mr. Heppner understood that from the City's perspective, this type of redevelop- <br /> ment may be an attractive proposal, especially when it leads to affordable hous- <br /> ing. He also understands that Rice Street is unlikely to remain in its current state <br /> forever as noted by the call for a special investigation in the 2040 Comprehensive <br /> Plan, however, to begin this rezoning and redevelopment of Rice Street without <br /> first performing that investigation and forming a plan for the future of the neigh- <br /> borhood will be extremely foolish. Certainly, if the decision is made tonight to <br /> rezone these properties, that decision will be carried on as the DeFacto plan going <br /> forward. Beyond its direct impact on the individual building, that decision will <br /> also have drastic impacts in the near term as well. For instance, consider the fact <br /> that the owners of the properties in question also own several properties that are <br /> adjacent to each other on the other side of Owasso Boulevard. If this rezoning is <br /> approved, it is almost certain that those properties will be next on the docket. <br /> Likewise, what is to prevent someone from purchasing other homes in the area <br /> and rezoning this as well? This proposal has significant consequences for the fu- <br /> ture of Roseville when the City demonstrates that it is willing to spot rezone well <br /> established neighborhoods to make way for redevelopment, it puts them one step <br /> closer to removing low density zoning all together. Once this type of rezoning <br /> starts where is the line drawn on whether it continues? That question is a much <br /> more difficult to decide then to simply decline to rezone at all. Therefore, he <br /> urged the Council to strongly consider the broader contexts of this proposal and <br /> the effect it will have on the City's policy going forward. Before any talk of re- <br /> zoning can begin, the City must carry out an investigation of what makes sense <br /> for the future of Rice Street and generate a thoughtful and well-reasoned plan. In <br /> light of these concerns and those of his neighbors that are sharing today he urged <br /> the Council to vote against the proposal. <br /> Mr. Randy Neprash, 1276 Eldridge Ave <br /> Mr. Neprash stated he was in favor of the proposal. The need for affordable hous- <br /> ing for seniors in Roseville is significant and thoroughly documented. As Leah <br /> pointed out, Roseville has not approved a unit of subsidized affordable senior <br /> housing since 1978, which is forty-one years. As a long-term resident of Rose- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.