Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, June 3, 2019 <br /> Page 16 <br /> Ms. Leslie Studenski, 3055 Woodbridge Street <br /> Ms. Studenski opposes the approval of the Conditional Use for increased density. <br /> She would like to point out that the first speaker tonight was at the Planning <br /> Commission meeting and in the minutes the speaker stated that if this adjoined <br /> her house, she would have many concerns. She stopped to ask the speaker what <br /> the concerns were and was told she was too busy and needed to leave. She would <br /> like to point out that all of these people at the meeting with the League of Women <br /> Voters and those that support homes for all is sure that their comments would be <br /> different if this building were going up in their backyard. Tonight's question is <br /> not about CommonBond and whether the Company is a good business or bad <br /> business. The question is rezoning. Does the City want to put high density, sixty <br /> units on that particular spot? She did not think so. The City is looking at studies <br /> that are paid for and conducted by CommonBond. There is a faulty traffic study, <br /> there is a questionable solar study, and there are a lot of unanswered questions. <br /> She did not think that approving rezoning based on so many questions are a good <br /> thing to do. She would like to see in that area a duplex or a four plex, some hous- <br /> ing, if needed, that looks similar that looks similar to the office buildings on the <br /> SE corner. Something that is two story, something that is not the monster. She <br /> thought that CommonBond is ignoring the biggest concern. CommonBond is <br /> talking to neighbors about fencing, and lighting and ignoring the neighbors that <br /> do not want a three-story building on that lot, the neighbors want a neighborhood <br /> house. She referenced an article dated May-June 2019 from the Roseville City <br /> News title Roseville Supports Home Ownership. The article stated that home <br /> ownership is also good for the economy and it provides social benefits for home- <br /> owners including better health outcomes, lower crime rates, children doing better <br /> in school and more involvement in the community. Roseville offers several pro- <br /> grams to encourage home ownership to help homeowners protect their invest- <br /> ment. She stated there are important things for the Council to consider throughout <br /> Roseville, home ownership and low-income housing and she hoped the City chose <br /> to put it in the right spot. <br /> Ms. Mary Heppner,3030 Woodbridge Street <br /> Ms. Heppner stated her family recently purchased their home, Saturday was the <br /> year anniversary of purchasing their first home in Roseville and normally it would <br /> be something to celebrate but unfortunately her and her husband were disappoint- <br /> ed. It is kind of hard not to wonder if what would have happened if their bid on <br /> another home was accepted. She stated her and her husband are no longer asking <br /> themselves if this was the right house, her family is now wondering if the right <br /> City was chosen. <br /> Ms. Gina Ciganik, 953 Lydia Ave W <br /> Ms. Ciganik and her family has been in this community for a long time. She was <br /> a renter when she first lived in Roseville and then could not afford it anymore and <br /> had to live in St. Paul briefly. She stated she was an affordable housing developer <br />