CC_Minutes_2019_0603 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular City Council Meeting Monday,June 3, 2019 Page 27 and have done a thorough job of working with the community and coming through all of the open house processes and the public hearing. For her, she was not going to support it, but it is not for her about CommonBond at all or the need for affordable housing or the need for affordable senior housing because she is ac- tually in support of all of those components. This is about this particular area of the City which the Council has not done due diligence of determining that this is the best use for this spot. Councilmember Laliberte stated she did feel she had stated for the last year and a half to two years that the City has a lot of high density residential and she contin- ues to bring up that the density and intensity tends to be what she has pause about and have advocated for other housing options as transitions, buffers, whatever the City wants to define them as and even if she were supportive of this tonight of the rezoning, she would not be supportive of the Conditional Use and increased den- sity. Councilmember Etten stated the County Road C and Dale was an example for him about something that had changed even after it was started. The difference here is the whole process and conditions give the City a lot of control because it is a Conditional Use. He stated the City has some control over the type and the im- pact of that. To the idea of a study of Rice Street, he was open to that and if the Council wanted to add that later to the goals, he would be open to doing that. He was not sure that this has to wait in that process but that is clearly a concern and sure should raise the level of engaging the community and engaging the neighbor- ing communities and that is the challenge. The City has seen that challenge at Rice and Larpenteur and not an easy thing and staff may ask how to do both, so the Council needs to figure out how to make that reasonable. He wanted to state publicly that he would be open to how the City can move forward with that over time. Finally, to the Comp. Plan, the City has just finished going through a pro- cess with the 2040 Comp. Plan, but the City has regularly changed Comp. Plans to fit pieces that come before the Council, whether it is City or staff driven or whether it is a developer coming in. The Comp. Plan is certainly not a fixed doc- ument and not one that anticipates all and is set in what everything will happen in the future. This is something that is okay despite not fitting the current map. Councilmember Groff stated he would concur with Councilmember Etten's re- sponses and wanted to point out when talking about affordable housing, that the Council does not necessarily choose the sites and then go and get a developer. The developer comes to the City with a proposal so when saying this is not the right site, he was sure CommonBond looked at those other sites and this is the one that fit with what was needed. He stated if the Councilmembers are for affordable housing then he thought each Councilmember needed to vote for affordable hous- ing and not just stated that the Councilmember is for it.