My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2019_0708
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2019
>
CC_Minutes_2019_0708
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2019 3:49:59 PM
Creation date
7/23/2019 3:49:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
7/8/2019
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,July 8, 2019 <br /> Page 22 <br /> Public Comment <br /> Ms. Priscilla Morton, 2593 Western Avenue <br /> Ms. Morton stated she is interested in reducing the city's carbon footprint as a <br /> priority. She was not clear by looking at this Priority Plan whether the "City" <br /> means City property or"city"meaning everything within in the city limits. <br /> Mayor Roe thought that was considered at the previous Council discussion and <br /> recalled it to be the City Government carbon footprint because that is what the <br /> City has the most direct control over. <br /> Ms. Morton indicated that does not move the City towards the 2040 Comp Plan <br /> which is the entire city. <br /> Mayor Roe thought there were some additional items with this Plan that did talk <br /> more broadly about that and what the Council had talked about with the PWETC <br /> as well. He did not think there was anything in the Plan about the carbon foot- <br /> print within the city limits, only for the City property. He recalled very early dis- <br /> cussions regarding zoning and other policies, but did not know if the City was at a <br /> point where it was prepared to add something to the plan for the entire city. <br /> Ms. Morton would like to see a broader range goal of making a plan to get to the <br /> 2040 or 2050 goal but would take a lot of effort. <br /> Ms. Morton hoped the goal of the City would be instructed to be or encourage to <br /> be something that would lead the city to the 2050 goal of eighty percent below <br /> 2015. She thought the city as a whole has only reduced its Xcel emissions, not to- <br /> tal emissions because there are other emissions that would be measured by one <br /> percent per year for the last three years. To get to 2030 goal, which the IPC says <br /> should be forty-five percent means the city would have to more than triple its ef- <br /> forts plus add the transportation component to make the kind of progress that is <br /> being told by a science is required for the city to get to a reasonable outcome, <br /> avoiding terrible outcomes. She thought it was a big goal. For a city on its own, <br /> it is a much more doable challenge because the City does not have to try to influ- <br /> ence other people and private property. She asked that the City goal would be a <br /> stretch goal, be resources for the rest of the City, and for the rest of the area, the <br /> suburban areas around the cities as to what works and what does not work. She <br /> encouraged the Council to do that. She also asked that the measurements put in <br /> place are something more visible than B3, which is on the Comp Plan. She noted <br /> B3 does not have public access to data, and only gives three stars. She requested <br /> the City make the data public and able to track it from now until 2030 to make <br /> sure the City is on track to meet the goals that are set. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.