My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2019-07-23_PWETC_Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Minutes
>
201x
>
2019
>
2019-07-23_PWETC_Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/30/2019 3:48:48 PM
Creation date
8/30/2019 3:48:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
7/23/2019
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commission meeting as a part of the public meeting and agenda setting process, <br /> which is a way to engage them or try to co-partner again with the Watershed District <br /> and sit in that environment and co-host both meetings for greater engagement. He <br /> noted another option would be for the Commission to change the calendar structure <br /> so one month is more environmental focused, one month is transportation focused, <br /> one month is Public Works focused so people will have a better sense of when <br /> topics of their concern come up which might encourage more public conversation. <br /> Member Misra asked what staff saw as an advantage to putting another group of <br /> citizens between staff and City Council. <br /> Mr. Culver did not know if he saw it that way, he would see it as working with a <br /> group of engaged citizens that are not necessarily appointed and are not an official <br /> committee or subcommittee of the city. The group would not necessarily get <br /> assigned a staff liaison or have staff time but would give some additional <br /> perspective, ideas and maybe have done some additional research for staff that staff <br /> does not necessarily have time to do. Maybe bring some new ideas to staff and the <br /> Commission. He would not place the group between staff and the Council he would <br /> say staff is still between them and the Council. <br /> Member Misra asked if there are examples of citizen groups that work with some <br /> staff that is completely separate from the Commissions. <br /> Mr. Culver stated he was trying to think of a group and the one he thought came <br /> close to that is Friends of Roseville Parks. This is a very organized group of citizens <br /> that are separate from the city and have several events raising money for parks and <br /> also bring ideas and lists of improvements the group would like to see in the parks. <br /> He thought there were a couple of different groups that do that for parks. <br /> Member Misra asked if public participation meetings could be held without the <br /> Commission. <br /> Mr. Culver indicated a group could. The Commission is an official body because <br /> of appointment as representatives of the city. With that appointment comes rules <br /> as to how the members can meet and when the meetings can occur, public notice <br /> and quorums. A different group that has interest in sustainability efforts within the <br /> City of Roseville that have ideas and meet on their own with their own structure <br /> but were not appointed by the city can certainly work offline and research ideas to <br /> bring forward to the city in an organized meeting format. <br /> Chair Cihacek asked if staff develop a calendar with all of the mandatory topics the <br /> Commission must do and see if there is a natural clustering of these areas, things <br /> that are reappearing each year and how those items are currently scheduled to see <br /> if that would build itself into a natural calendar. <br /> Page 6 of 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.