Laserfiche WebLink
EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING <br /> OF THE <br /> CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE <br /> Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Roseville, <br /> County of Ramsey, Minnesota was duly held on the 23rd day of September 2019, at 6:00 p.m. <br /> The following members were present Etten, Groff, Laliberte, Willmus, and Mayor Roe <br /> and the following were absent: None. <br /> Member Etten jntroduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br /> RESOLUTION No. 11634 <br /> RESOLUTION APPROVING A VARIANCE FROM CITY CODE SECTION 405.03, <br /> HOURLY RESTRICTIONS ON CERTAIN OPERATIONS FOR RYAN COMPANIES, <br /> FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2820 CLEVELAND AVENUE N. <br /> WHEREAS, Ryan Companies has requested a variance from City Code Section 405.03, Hourly <br /> Restrictions on Certain Operations, which requires construction activities to <br /> occur between the hours of 7:00a.m. and 9:00p.m. on any weekday, or between <br /> hours of 9:00a.m. and 9:00p.m. on any weekend or legal holidays; and <br /> WHEREAS, Ryan Companies is requesting this variance for efficiency of construction and <br /> scheduling purposes. Allowing one extra hour during weekdays and three extra <br /> hours on Saturdays may allow for this construction project to be completed in a <br /> timely manner. This variance also may potentially allow for the new facility to <br /> open and begin operations sooner than expected; <br /> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the City of Roseville, Minnesota, <br /> hereby approves the variance from City Code Section 405.03, Hourly Restrictions on Certain <br /> Operations, for Ryan Companies for the property located at 2820 Cleveland Avenue N.,based on <br /> the following findings and one condition: <br /> Findings: <br /> 1. There are no residential properties within a 500 foot radius of the property; <br /> 2. As of the writing of the accompanying Request for Council Action for this resolution, <br /> no public concern has been raised regarding the request; <br /> 3. The surrounding uses are all commercial or industrial in nature; and <br /> 4. The additional construction hours may not have substantive noise impacts <br /> considering the freeway noise that exists within the area. <br /> 5. No noise complaints were received under the previously approved variance and the <br /> proposed variance mirrors the additional hours allowed for construction activities. <br />