Laserfiche WebLink
REDA Meeting <br /> Minutes—Monday,September 16,2019 <br /> Page 2 <br /> exploitation by this developer. The developer has not been charged or <br /> convicted of a crime and stands by their reputation for constructing high <br /> quality multi-family and office development. She explained staff has worked <br /> with EDA Attorney Ingram to address those concerns by incorporating <br /> language that is in section 4.4 of the contract. In addition to that language, <br /> other language has been added to section 9.1 regarding the developer and if it <br /> is found guilty of any crime it would be an understanding of default under the <br /> contractual agreement with them. That means the EDA would have the right <br /> to withhold any TIF payments at that time. She noted there is no financial <br /> assistance upfront and is a pay as you go note TIF. <br /> Attorney Ingram explained EDA staff has been extremely responsive to the <br /> concerns that have been raised and has been very proactive about approaching <br /> her with requests for language that can safeguard that the EDA is protected in <br /> case there is any evidence of wage theft on this project. <br /> President Roe asked for clarification on the assistance using TIF. He asked if it <br /> was correct to describe the source of the funding for the TIF assistance <br /> provided as coming only from taxes paid by properties within the TIF district, <br /> and no other city taxpayers, and that the assistance was only provided on a <br /> 'pay-as-you go' basis using the collected increment each year to reimburse <br /> allowable development expenses <br /> Ms. Kelsey explained that was correct. She noted every year when property <br /> taxes are paid twice a year there is a portion that comes back to the city and <br /> that is the TIF assistance. <br /> Member Groff thought if there were any issues during construction or because <br /> of wage theft or other abuses, because the TIF is not paid up front, that would <br /> come up before that money is paid out. <br /> Ms. Kelsey indicated that was right and would be a reason for default and for <br /> the city to withhold any payment. <br /> Mr. Nick Walton, part owner of Reuter Walton Construction, Inc., made a <br /> short presentation of the history of the company and the current proposed <br /> project. <br /> Mr. Walton explained regarding TIF, it is not only taxes generated within the <br /> District, it is taxes, literally, that are generated by the project's specific <br /> building. The project has to create the tax before any TIF is received. He <br /> indicated since the project is fully approved, tonight would typically be more <br /> of a formality in the TIF process, especially since the due diligence process to <br /> approve TIF has already occurred. His company was told that the Carpenter <br /> Union was at the city and trying to enter this conversation at the eleventh hour <br /> and, in their words "kill the deal", which is why he was at the meeting <br /> speaking. Walton noted that until now, the city has been interacting with Kyle <br />