My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2019_1007_CCPacket
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2019
>
2019_1007_CCPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/18/2019 4:09:24 PM
Creation date
10/18/2019 4:08:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Meeting Date
10/7/2019
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
184
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
September 26, 2019 <br />Jamie Becker-Finn <br />559 State Office Building <br />100 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd <br />Saint Paul, MN 55155 <br />Alice Hausman <br />453 State Office Building <br />100 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd <br />Saint Paul, MN 55155 <br />RE: Housing Affordability Institute Report on City Building Permit Fees <br />Dear Representatives Becker-Finn & Hausman: <br />On behalf of the City of Roseville, we are writing to express our concerns regarding the report recently <br />released by the Housing Affordability Institute titled “Building Permit Fees: Boosting the Bottom Line for <br />Minnesota Cities”. This report lacks the complete picture and doesn’t reflect what is happening locally in <br />Roseville. The purpose of our letter is to provide some general information that supports our belief the <br />report lacks necessary context, but also to share information specific to Roseville. Our hope is you will <br />consider these points as this conversation continues at the legislature and support future forums that <br />offer a more balanced discussion. <br />To our point, we offer the following information: <br />The report only examined years 2014-2018, which were strong economic growth years. If the <br />report examined the five years prior to 2014, the data will tell a very different story where building <br />permit revenue was not sufficient to support City expenses related to development. We would <br />advocate to examine ten years of data, which would include both an economic slump and surge <br />and likely show cities are not profiting on the backs of development as this report suggests. <br />The data collected for the report did not fairly account for all City costs related to development. <br />This includes administrative, engineering, planning, and zoning expenses. To ensure fair and <br />accurate data collection, we would advocate the reporting forms for the Department of Labor and <br />Industry be revised to ensure cities are accurately reporting all costs they incur related to <br />development. <br />State laws provide that building permit fees are based on valuation, including labor and materials, <br />and builders and developers are the ones setting those valuations during the permitting process. <br />Although this report focuses on City fees, a complete picture should include the fact that the <br />largest variable for building a home is labor and materials at 48-55% of the total cost, followed <br />second by land costs (noted in the report). Further, the value of a home varies greatly from <br />community to community. <br />This report is suggesting City fees are contributing to an inability to create enough affordable <br />housing. However, the report uses examples of homes with an average price of nearly $400,000, <br />includes fees for improvements that are elected by the builder (such as a pool), and excludes <br />2660 Civic Center Drive • Roseville, MN 55113 <br />www.cityofroseville.com <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.