Laserfiche WebLink
7 pertaining to business and activity licenses regulates this sort of use as an “amusement,” which is <br />8 defined as: <br />9 \[A\]ny for-profit enterprise or business which provides areas within a building, room or outdoor space <br />10 with capacity for eight or more customers at one time, wherein customers play games, watch game <br />11 playing, wait to play or que to enter or are being entertained. Examples of such business uses are: <br />12 video, laser, pool or other table game areas; arcades, carnivals and circuses. This definition excludes <br />13 physical exercise or health centers, theaters, private lodges or clubs, restaurants and bars and all tax- <br />14 exempt operations <br />15 Uses fitting this definition are then required to receive approval as a conditional use and an annual <br />16 business license. Chapter 303 also includes a requirement that conditional use approvals and the annual <br />17 license applications address the following list of 13 items: <br />18 A.Insurance Coverage 25 H.Signs <br />19 B.Security Guards 26 I. On-Site Manager <br />20 C.Exterior Lighting Plan 27 J. Employee Training Program <br />21 D. Traffic Management 28 K. Food/Sanitarian Inspection Report <br />22 E.Indoor and Outdoor Pedestrian Plans 29 L.License Fees <br />23 F. Emergency Evacuation Plan 30 M. Noise <br />24 G. Maintenance Building Report <br />31 Although these items are to be addressed upon the conditional use being approved, the applicant has <br />32 provided some preliminary information about how they would comply with the list of plans and <br />33 information required for their eventual license application. This information is intended to demonstrate <br />34 the applicant likely can obtain a license, so as not to waste effort and cost undergoing the conditional use <br />35 process only to be denied the necessary license. This information, along with the applicant’s description <br />36 of the proposed use is included with this RPCA as Attachment C. <br />37 When exercising the “quasi-judicial” authority on conditional use requests, the role of the City is to <br />38 determine the facts associated with a particular proposal and apply those facts to the legal standards <br />39 contained in the ordinance and relevant state law. In general, if the facts indicate the application meets <br />40 the relevant legal standards and will not compromise the public health, safety, and general welfare, then <br />41 the applicant is likely entitled to the approval. The City is, however, able to add conditions to <br />42 conditional use approvals to ensure that potential impacts to parks, schools, roads, storm sewers, and <br />43 other public infrastructure on and around the subject property are adequately addressed. <br />44 Although the Zoning Code does not specifically identify “amusements,” one can assume that different <br />45 types of amusements generally function in a way that is similar to other uses that are identified. An <br />46 escape room, for example, might function like a family counseling office, in which small groups of <br />47 people reserve approximately hour-long blocks of time to be in that place together. A paintball center <br />48 might look a lot like a spinning studio, where 20 – 30 people enter and exit at regular intervals. These <br />49 examples are permitted uses in the RB-2 zoning district, and if the scale of the current VR proposal is <br />50 assumed to fall somewhere between the uses just described, it can be treated as a permitted use on the <br />51 subject property in accordance with Title 10 of the City Code (Zoning). As discussed in the preceding <br />52 Background section of this RPCA, however, the City’s business license regulations require approval of <br />53 an amusement area as a conditional use in whichever zoning district the amusement use might be <br />54 allowed. Chapter 303 does not establish any specific conditional use approval criteria to review when <br />55 considering such a request for conditional use approval. <br />56 Roseville’s Development Review Committee (DRC) met on September 5 and September 19, 2019, to <br />57 review the proposal. Some of the comments and feedback based on the DRC’s review of the application <br />7d RCA <br />Page 2 of 4 <br /> <br />