Laserfiche WebLink
EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING OF THE <br /> CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE <br /> Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of <br /> Roseville, County of Ramsey, Minnesota, was held on the 21st day of October 2019 at 6:00 p.m. <br /> The following Council Members were present: Willmus, Groff, Ettem, Laliberte, and Roe; none <br /> were absent <br /> Council Member Willmus introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br /> RESOLUTION NO. 11642 <br /> A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PROPOSED AMUSEMENT AREA AS A CONDITIONAL <br /> USE AT 1955 COUNTY ROAD B2 (PF19-019) <br /> WHEREAS, Strange Stars Entertainment LLC/DreamTrace, Inc. and Roseville Properties, LLP <br /> have submitted a valid application for approval of a proposed amusement area as a conditional use at 1955 <br /> County Road B2; and <br /> WHEREAS,the property is assigned Ramsey County Parcel Identification Number 09-29-23-23- <br /> 0023, and is legally described as: <br /> [legal description needed for recording] <br /> WHEREAS,the proposed use conforms to the definition of an"amusement area" in City Code <br /> Chapter 303 (Amusement Areas), which requires approval of the proposed amusement area as a <br /> conditional use, and City Code §1009.02.0 establishes general standards and criteria that pertain to all <br /> conditional uses; and <br /> WHEREAS, the Roseville Planning Commission held the duly noticed public hearing for the <br /> request on October 2, 2019, and having closed said public hearing, voted to recommend approval of the <br /> proposed amusement area based on the public record and the Planning Commission's deliberation; and <br /> WHEREAS, the Roseville City Council has made the following findings regarding the general <br /> standards and criteria established in §1009.02.C: <br /> 1. The proposed use is not in conflict with the Comprehensive Plan. The 2030 Comprehensive Plan <br /> does not speak directly to the proposed use or the subject property, but the proposal is generally <br /> consistent with the goals of the Comprehensive Plan because: <br /> a. It represents the Comprehensive Plan's broad goals promoting high quality reinvestment. <br /> b. A high-tech amusement use among the office, retail, personal service, and other uses that <br /> surround it contributes to the commercial-area goal of"promot[ing] an appropriate mix of <br /> commercial development types within the community." <br /> 2. The proposed use is not in conflict with any Regulating Maps or other adopted plans. The site is <br /> not subject to any regulating map or other adopted plans. <br /> 3. The proposed use is not in conflict with any City Code requirements. Based on the plans that <br /> have been received and reviewed thus far, staff have not uncovered any City Code conflicts, and <br /> the proposed amusement area must meet all applicable City Code regulations, or the applicant <br /> Page 1 of 2 <br />