My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Res_11664
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
11xxx
>
11600
>
Res_11664
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/7/2020 4:18:56 PM
Creation date
1/7/2020 4:10:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Resolutions
Meeting Date
1/6/2020
Meeting Type
Regular
Resolution #
11664
Resolution Title
A Resolution approving appointment of Assistant weed inspector
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING <br /> OF THE <br /> CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE <br /> Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City <br /> of Roseville, County of Ramsey, Minnesota was duly held on the 6th day of January <br /> 2020, at 6:00 p.m. <br /> The following members were present: Etten, Willmus, Laliberte, Groff, and Roe. The <br /> following were absent: None. <br /> Member Etten introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br /> RESOLUTION No. 11664 <br /> RESOLUTION APPROVING APPOINTMENT OF ASSISTANT WEED INSPECTOR <br /> WHEREAS, Minnesota State Statute 18.80 Subp. 2, requires the mayor of each city to act <br /> as local weed inspector of the municipality; and <br /> WHEREAS, Minnesota State Statute 18.80 Subp. 3, allows a municipality to appoint one <br /> or more assistants to act on behalf of the appointing authority as a weed inspector for the <br /> municipality; and <br /> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF <br /> THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE, MINNESOTA the appointment of the City of Roseville <br /> Community Development Department Building Official as Assistant Weed Inspector for <br /> the municipality. <br /> The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member <br /> Willmus and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Etten, <br /> Willmus, Laliberte, Groff, and Roe, and the following voted against the same: None <br /> WHEREUPON said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.