Res_11661 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

3. The proposed use is not in conflict with any City Code requirements. The plans that have been submitted are conceptual, without much detail to review,but the proposed amusement area must meet all applicable City Code regulations, or the applicant must secure any necessary variance approvals, in order to receive the required tenant improvement permits in accordance with the Building Code. Because the use will be occupying an existing tenant space, it is unlikely conflicts with City Code would materialize. Nevertheless, a conditional use approval can be rescinded if the approved use fails to comply with all applicable City Code requirements or any conditions of the approval. 4. The proposed use will not create an excessive burden on parks, streets, and other public facilities. The proposed amusement area with a variety of activities will not create an excessive burden on parks, streets, or other public facilities because its impacts are expected to be comparable to many of the other uses permitted in the O/BP-1 zoning district. 5. The proposed use will not be injurious to the surrounding neighborhood, will not negatively impact traffic or property values, and will not otherwise harm the public health, safety, and general welfare. Consistent with the preceding findings, the proposed amusement area will not create adverse traffic impacts or surrounding property values, and will not cause harm to the public health, safety, and general welfare, especially when compared to other uses permitted at the property. These findings are based on the applicant's narrative, which states most of the business is pre-booked, with minimal queuing. The applicant also notes the primary business hours do not align with the primary business hours of other tenants of the multi-tenant building, limiting opportunities for pedestrian and/or vehicle conflicts within the parking lot. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the Roseville City Council, to approve the proposed amusement area as a conditional use at 1975 Oakcrest Avenue,based on the public record and City Council deliberation, with the following conditions: a. Pursuant to the memo from Police Department staff in Attachment D of the RCA reviewed with this application, the applicant shall submit an extra copy of the insurance policy required among the license application materials, which City staff will provide to the Police Department for review. b. Pursuant to the memo from Fire Department staff in Attachment D of the RCA reviewed with this application, all locked escape rooms shall have emergency release equipment located within the rooms near the doors for emergency and panic exits. c. Hours of operation and pre-booking of business shall be managed, as described in the applicant narrative in Attachment C of the RCA reviewed with this application, to ensure sufficient parking and circulation can be maintained througout the multi-tenant site. d. A business license is secured in accordance with City Code. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Willmus and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Etten, Willmus, Laliberte, Groff, and Roe, and the following voted against the same: None WHEREUPON said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Page 2 of 3