Laserfiche WebLink
City of St Lauds Park Greenhouse Gas Assessment <br />City Operations, 2005 to 2015 <br />Table 3: Takeaways <br />Description X I Y Z <br />Scope 1 and 2 Consumption and Emissions <br />Compared to the 2005 Base Year, GHG tower in 2010 by X%and Y%in 2015. <br />-5% <br />-18% <br />On average over 10-year study period, the City's emission reductions offset the average emissions of <br />215 <br />about X St. Louis Park households, a total of Z households by 2015. <br />Primary fact" that resulted in GHG reductions was due to Xcel Energy's reduced mission factor. It <br />13% <br />22°i <br />was X% lower in 2010 and Y% lower in 2015 compared to 2005. <br />Compared to 2005, the reduced electricity emission factor resulted in the reduction of X tonnes in <br />(1,291) <br />69% <br />2015, which equals Y%of the total reduction. <br />Had the electricity ion ssiOn factor remained 9 the 2005 level, GHG emissions would have been X"A <br />5% <br />2% <br />higher in 2010 and Y%I ower in 2015 compared to the 2005 base year. <br />Weather did not have a substantive effect on emissions Although electricity is the dominant source of emissions and all bon 2 <br />years (2004 & 2009) during the 10-year study period had higher cooling -degree-days than the 30 -year 'b arm," nationally, only 5% <br />of el ectri city i a used for summer cooling. Winters with higher heating -degree-days (2008, 2013, 2014) tended to balance out <br />warm" winters (2006, 2012, 2015) over the study period <br />Changes to facilities were not a major change factor. The most significant change, the Municipal <br />Service FadEty,more thrm doubled in size but emissions increased from X tonnes in 2005 to Y in <br />504 <br />6]9 <br />35% <br />2010, only aY%increase. <br />Triple normalized GHG end ssions(weather, electric utility sort sail on factors, and changed accounts) <br />5% <br />were virually unchanged in 2010 and X%lower in 2015 compared to the 2005 Base Year. <br />Compared to the 2005 Base Year, a]echicity consumption to produce potable water in 2015 <br />decreased by X% Production of potable water decreased by Z%Thia yielded a Z%increase in <br />-15% <br />-1 w/ <br />0/. <br />electricity efficieutcy, ballons perkWh. <br />The 9 largest consumers of Energy include (largest to smallest): Potable water, Rec Center, liquid fnda, streetlights and signals, <br />Municipal Service Center Hamilton House, the 2 fire start ons, City Hall, and Pdi ce Dept <br />Compared to 2005, total Energy, consumption for the 9 largest energy commuters were X%high er in <br />4% <br />4% <br />2010 and Y%lower in 2015. <br />Compared to 2005, total GHG ehmisgiuhs for the 9 largest energy consumers were X%lower in 2010 <br />and Y%l ow" in 2015. The reduced emissions were due primarily to the reduced electricity -5 % -18% -22^/o <br />emission fact"; Z%lower in 2015. <br />Eight categories were responsible for virtually all of the reduced emissions in 2015 compared to 2005 (largest to smallest): Potable <br />WaterRec CenterSewers Hamilton House City Hall Police Dept, Li quicilibels, Municipal Service Center. <br />Compared to 2005, these 8 categories were responsible for the reduction of C1HG tonnes. <br />(1,880) <br />Xcel Energy's reduction in its emi ssi on factor was responsible for X of these tomes; Y96 of the total <br />(1,297 <br />67K <br />Reduced electri d ty conmumptiom among these l argest energy consumers resulted in the reduction of <br />000) <br />16/0 <br />X tomes; Y% of the total. <br />Reduced natural gas consumption among these largest energy consumers resulted in the reduction of <br />(219) <br />12/o <br />X tomes; Y% of the total. <br />The emission reductions from the 8 of the msj err facilities were offset by the increased emissi cars (X <br />146 <br />tonnes) from the 2 fire stations and dreetlightsdsignals. <br />Scope 3 Cmrsmrptim and Emissions <br />Scope 3 entissions were significantly lower in 2015 compared to 2005 (X tomes and Y%). This is <br />(3,216) <br />49% <br />primarily due to per -gallon emission reductions at the Metropolitan Treatment Plant. <br />Treatment of the citywide sanitarysewer cischarges at the Metropolitan Treatment Plantresultedin <br />33K <br />(3,160) <br />-59i <br />X GHG tonnes in 2015. This was Y tonnes less than in 2005, a Z%decrease <br />Management of solid waste management waste generated by City operations was X manes lower in <br />(62) <br />48°/ <br />2015 compared to 2005; a YIN, decrease. <br />The City relies OR private contractors for normal Public Works operations Fuel consumption from <br />private contractors censtilure about X"/o of total fuel consumed by Public Works. Associated GHG <br />7 % <br />3 <br />4% <br />emissions increased by Y tonnes and Z% in 2015 counaredto2005. <br />Surface and air travel for City business by staff and elected officials results in a relatively amau <br />13 <br />armoum of emissions; only X tomes in 2016. <br />ORANGE <br />ENVIRONMENTAL <br />