2020_0413_CCPacket - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

1 EXTRACT OF THE MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF 2 THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE 3 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of th 4 Roseville, Ramsey County, State of Minnesota, was held on the 13day of April, 2020 at 6:00 p.m. 5 The following City Council Members were present: 6 And the following absent: 7 City Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 8 RESOLUTION NO. 9 A RESOLUTION MEMORIALIZING THE DENIAL OF A REQUESTFOR 10 A ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT TO TITLE 10 OF CITY CODE PERTAINING 11 TO HEIGHT LIMITATIONS OF ACCESSORY DWELLINGS (PROJ0017) 12 WHEREAS, the City of Roseville received a complete application for a zoning text amendment to 13 Title 10 of City Code pertaining to height limitations of accessory dwellings on February 7, 2020; and 14 WHEREAS, the Roseville City Council at its regular meeting on March 23, 2020, reviewed the 15 application along with the record of the public proceedings, including City staff report and public 16 consideration, by and between the City Council, and denied the application based on the following factual 17 findings: 18 1.The proposed text amendments constitute a significant departure from the original intent of 19 accessory structure height limitations in City Code. 20 2.The proposed text amendments present uncertainty in outcomes of future projects 21 attempting to interpret the proposed language pertaining to gable height standards. 22 3.The proposed text amendments do not incorporate a formal process for neighborhood input for 23 particular projects under the Code. 24 4.Given that current events may be impeding appropriate public participation in Council actions 25 such as the present case, the proposed text amendments are best approved only after a more robust 26 public participation process. 27 5.The proposed text amendments cause concern over large accessory structuresbeing placed within 28 five (5) feet of side property setbacks. 29 6.The City Council might be more supportive of similar textamendments that involve development 30 and planning processes that provide for a more robust public participation process. 31 32 AND WHEREAS, said findings of fact underpinning the denial were reported to the applicant and 33 applicant in a letter dated March , 2020, 34 NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Roseville, Minnesota, 35 to memorialize for purposes of the record that the application discussed herein was denied March 23, 36 2020. 37 The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member 38 and upon a vote taken thereon, the following voted in favor: voted against. 39 WHEREUPON said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.