2020_0622_CCPacket - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

RCA Attachment D 199 Commissioner Baggenstoss agreed that this proposal is premature for a vote. Especially, with the 200 amount of cash that would be accepted vs. the amount that the developer is asking for the parcel 201 across the street. 202 203 The developers noted that they do not agree with the $4,000/unit price. Also, they reiterated the 204 steep grading of the property and the difficulty that poses. 205 206 Commissioner Baggenstoss asked if they have a purchase agreement for the property. The developer 207 confirmed that they do have a purchase agreement contingent on the rezoning with a purchase price 208 of $1,000,000. 209 210 Commissioner Baggenstoss questioned why the smaller plat across the street of only 1 acre would be 211 worth $650,000? The Developer noted that the land is worth a higher value, they have more money 212 into that property already and the parcel has received final plat approval from the city. 213 214 Chair Hoag questioned how the Park Dedication will change if the rezoning of this property is not 215 approved. The Developer noted that they went with a medium density option for people who want to 216 live here but don’t want to shovel snow or mow their lawn. However, per Roseville regulation they 217 could put 20 single family homes on this parcel. Their proposal is to put in 19 town houses. 218 Therefore, the only reason for the density request change is due to the single family townhouse 219 project. 220 221 Commissioner Baggenstoss questioned what happens to the project if the city requests the parkland 222 on Co. Rd. B. The developer responded that they do not know if the project would still go and they 223 don’t know how the Parks Department would fit it in there and keep it in safe. 224 225 Commissioner Stoner motioned to defera Park Dedicationrecommendation for Midland Legacy 226 Estates - 2395 County Road B W.until staff can find out about the location across the street and 227 attempt to arrive at an agreeable price. Commissioner Baggenstoss seconded. 228 229 Staff noted that the parcel across the street is not tied to the Park Dedication recommendation item. 230 231 The Commission discussed the parcel across the street and zoning of the parcel. 232 233 The developer confirmed that regardless of the zoning they would be moving forward with 234 development of the property. 235 236 Commissioner Baggenstoss stated that we owe it to Roseville and especially the residents who live 237 in this area to table this and choose the best half acre location for a park on this parcel. 238 6 Page 8 of 33