Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2020_07-28_PWETCpacketi� Resealle, AN 55113 Roseville Public Works, Environment and Transportation Commission Agenda Item Date: July 28, 2020 Item No: 3 Item Description: Approval of the June 23, 2020 Public Works Commission Minutes Attached are the minutes from the June 23, 2020 meeting. Recommended Action: Motion approving the minutes of June 23, 2020, subject to any necessary corrections or revision. Move: Second: Ayes: Nays: Roseville Public Works, Environment and Transportation Commission Meeting Minutes Tuesday, June 23, 2020, at 6:30 p.m. City Council Chambers, 2660 Civic Center Drive Roseville, Minnesota 55113 1 1. Introduction / Roll Call 2 Acting Chair Wozniak called the meeting to order at approximately 6:30 p.m. and 3 at his request, Public Works Director Marc Culver called the roll. 4 5 Present: Chair Joe Wozniak; Vice Chair Karen Huiett; and Members 6 Stephanie Hammer, Michael Joyce, Nancy Misra, Shane Spencer, 7 Jarrod Cicha and Youth Member Jana Lynch. 8 9 Absent: None. 10 11 Staff Present: Public Works Director Marc Culver; City 12 Engineer/Assistant Public Works Director Jesse 13 Freihammer; Civil Engineer Luke Sandstrom, and 14 Environmental Specialist Ryan Johnson 15 16 2. Public Comments 17 None. 18 19 3. Swearing in of New Commission Member 20 Mr. Culver introduced Jarrod Cicha and proceeded to swear him in. 21 22 Commissioner Cicha reviewed his background with the Commission. 23 24 4. Election of Officers 25 Mr. Culver reviewed the City of Roseville's Code regarding election of officers. 26 27 Member Misra nominated Acting Chair Wozniak for Chair of the PWETC. 28 29 Member Spencer seconded the nomination. 30 31 Acting Chair Wozniak accepted the nomination for Chair. 32 33 Mr. Culver asked if there was any other nominations. There were none. 34 Page 1 of 6 35 Motion 36 Member Misra moved, Member Spencer seconded, to appoint Member 37 Wozniak as Chair of the PWETC. 38 39 Ayes:7 40 Nays:0 41 Motion carried. 42 43 Chair Wozniak thanked the Commission for voting him as Chair of the PWETC 44 and looked forward to the Commissions input and wisdom in the coming year. 45 46 Member Misra nominated Commissioner Huiett as Vice Chair of the PWETC. 47 48 Member Hammer seconded the nomination. 49 50 No other nominations were made. 51 52 Member Huiett accepted the nomination. 53 54 Motion 55 Member Misra moved, Member Hammer seconded, to appoint Member 56 Hammer as Vice -Chair of the PWETC. 57 58 Ayes:7 59 Nays:0 60 Motion carried. 61 62 Mr. Culver reviewed the role of the Ethics Commission. 63 64 Member Joyce indicated he was interested. 65 66 Approved by consensus of Commission. 67 68 5. Approval of February 27, 2020 Meeting Minutes 69 Comments and corrections to draft minutes had been submitted by PWETC 70 commissioners prior to tonight's meeting and those revisions incorporated into the 71 draft presented in meeting materials. 72 73 Motion 74 Member Spencer moved, Member Huiett seconded, approval of the February 75 27, 2020 meeting minutes as presented. 76 77 Ayes:6 78 Nays:0 79 Abstain: 1 (Cicha) 80 Motion carried. Page 2 of 6 m 82 6. Communication Items 83 Mr. Culver provided a brief review and update on projects and maintenance 84 activities listed in the staff report dated June 23, 2020. 85 86 Youth Commissioner Lynch arrived at 6:58 p.m. 87 88 Member Misra indicated her appreciation to the staff for keeping everything 89 running as smoothly and seamlessly as it has been during the pandemic. She asked 90 for more information on the park land that would be dedicated as a result of the 91 development of the area on the east side of Lexington and would it be developed as 92 a park or more as a natural area. 93 94 Mr. Culver reviewed the plans with the Commission. 95 96 7. MS4 Annual Meeting 97 Mr. Culver explained in 2003, Roseville received a permit from the MPCA 98 regarding how the City manages the discharge of storm water into public waters. 99 He presented a summary of what the city's plan is to reduce the amount of sediment 100 and pollutants that enter surface water from storm sewer systems. He noted the 101 PWETC is asked to receive public comments. 102 103 Mr. Johnson made a presentation to the Commission. 104 105 Youth Member Lynch asked if the debris that is swept up good or bad. 106 107 Mr. Johnson indicated in this case from the stormwater side it is bad debris. It is a 108 lot of sediment, leaves and sticks. Once sediment gets into the water it gets really 109 expensive to pull out. 110 111 Mr. Johnson continued with his presentation. 112 113 Member Hammer asked if there has been any data comparison for salt used versus 114 temperatures because it appears that the salt usage has gone up over the years. 115 116 Mr. Culver indicated more salt is used in the winter months due to thawing and 117 refreezing of the roads which is contributed to the temperature changes in recent 118 years. 119 120 Mr. Johnson wrapped up his presentation. 121 122 Chair Wozniak remembers when the biggest threat to water quality was not 123 stormwater, it was industrial pollution and that is no longer the case. Now 124 stormwater quality is the biggest impact on surface water quality and is such a big 125 problem to control because it is non -point. It is really difficult to get people to Page 3 of 6 126 change their behaviors. He thought the city and staff are doing a great job but still 127 a lot of work to do. 128 129 Chair Wozniak opened the public hearing at 7:43 p.m. 130 131 There was no public comment. 132 133 Chair Wozniak closed the public hearing at 7:44 p.m. 134 135 8. Annual Green Team Update 136 Mr. Culver explained on May 7, 2018, the city Council approved Resolution 137 #11507 that named the Public Works Environmental and Transportation 138 Commission as the Green Step Cities Green Team. He presented the annual 139 sustainability update. 140 141 Environmental Intern Natalie Thompson reviewed her education background with 142 the Commission and presented the annual Green Team sustainability update. 143 144 Chair Wozniak asked how the Commission can track the progress of EPPP if it has 145 not been fully implemented yet and the process is still being developed. 146 147 Ms. Thompson explained she has created a packet of resources and 148 recommendations and will be going over it with city staff in the coming weeks. 149 150 Mr. Culver indicated in future yearly reports staffs intent will be to track what 151 purchases were made and if it was a more sustainable purchase. 152 153 Ms. Thompson continued with her presentation. 154 155 Chair Wozniak thanks Ms. Thompson for the presentation and thought it was very 156 impressive. He indicated this gives him a lot of hope that the Green Team can help 157 the city make substantial changes in sustainability. 158 159 Member Spencer asked what the "Maplewood Green Construction Code" was. 160 161 Mr. Johnson explained it is a lot like what St. Paul is doing where they are offering 162 incentives to go above and beyond what the typical construction codes are. 163 164 Mr. Culver explained this was touched on before as far as mandating higher energy 165 efficiency standards in the buildings, but the city cannot mandate energy efficiency 166 for new construction or even remodeling construction that increases the cost of 167 building. However, the city can develop a green code and promote building some 168 more of these components into the State Building Code so elements are mandated. 169 Incentives could be offered along with education. 170 Page 4 of 6 171 Chair Wozniak wondered how the Commission will address these items at the 172 meetings. 173 174 Mr. Culver noted staff will be spending a lot time over the next two years on these 175 items. A lot of these items can be built into the city's overall energy plan as well 176 that Xcel Energy will help develop. He indicated staff can give updates to the 177 Commission on what is being worked on each month. 178 179 Vice -Chair Huiett asked if anything surprised staff about what Roseville might not 180 being doing. 181 182 Ms. Thompson was not sure and really not surprised because she knew Roseville 183 was really just startingto get into this and tryingto be more sustainable in the recent 184 years. 185 186 Ms. Priscilla Morton appreciated staff for putting all of this together and everything 187 that has been done so far and is looking forward to continuing with this further. 188 She explained along with the city doing solar installation on city owned facilities 189 some residents in the city have also done solar installations and she wondered if 190 staff had a quantification for that at all such as how much solar has been installed 191 as a part of this program. 192 193 Mr. Culver indicated he was not sure if Community Development had a separate 194 permit specifically for solar. There are a lot of components to solar installation 195 such as structural and electrical, but he was not sure if there is a specific permit that 196 would be used for this in the city. 197 198 Ms. Morton thought it would be cool to know what is effective and encouraging 199 people to do that. She thought this information and what is being done is great. 200 201 Member Joyce wondered if Xcel Energy would share some data with the 202 Commission on focus areas to see some metrics. 203 204 Mr. Culver believed Xcel Energy would provide data on an aggregate level but will 205 probably not provide it on a by user level. 206 207 Member Misra asked when staff expects to hear about the PiE grants. 208 209 Mr. Culver explained applications are due July 15u' and he hoped the city hear 210 sometime in August on the results. 211 212 Member Misra thought if the city does receive one of those grants that the 213 Commission should think through how it would interact with that group that would 214 be guiding that process or driving it. She thought this is a real opportunity if it does 215 come through. 216 Page 5 of 6 217 Chair Wozniak agreed. 218 219 Member Hammer thought a sustainable Roseville is also a very equitable Roseville 220 and there seems to be a lot of connection. There is a lot of talk in the meeting about 221 building affordable housing, a lot of different housing varieties around Roseville 222 and that paired with this conversation gives her a lot of hope. She thought it would 223 be nice to know what the Commission is doing to bring this topic to the table and 224 connect all of the things that help the city be a more equitable and inclusive 225 community to live in. 226 227 Chair Wozniak thought that was great, equity is one of those cultural guideposts 228 that in the traditional set up of a city Commission seems to fall through the cracks. 229 He thought it was excellent it was brought up and should be added to the filters the 230 Commission uses to look at some of the issues that will be brought up from month 231 to month. 232 233 Mr. Culver noted that equity engagements, the city does take that very seriously in 234 Roseville and the HRIEC is going to be meeting with the city Council in July to 235 have some conversations about strengthening some of those goals and efforts and 236 he absolutely thinks that when the Commission gets into the engagement portion 237 of the Partners in Energy program that it will absolutely be apriority of theirs which 238 is to make sure they are inclusive in their engagement, deliberate about engaging 239 all parts of the community and not just the ones that generally speak up. 240 241 Chair Wozniak thought this is one of those things the Commission has not talked 242 about much as a PWET Commission and this is a high priority for the city and 243 should be on the Commission's list of things to consider when discussing things. 244 245 Chair Wozniak thanked Ms. Thompson for her presentation and looked forward to 246 continued updates on the long list of projects she is involved in. 247 248 9. Items for Next Meeting — July 28, 2020 249 Discussion ensued regarding the July PWETC agenda: 250 • City Ordinance Changes 251 • City Council Joint Meeting Preparation 252 • Preliminary 2020 Calendar, August —November. 253 254 10. Adjourn 255 256 Motion 257 Member Joyce moved, Member Huiett seconded, adjournment of the meeting 258 at approximately 8:43 p.m. 259 260 Ayes:7 261 Nays:0 262 Motion carried. Page 6 of 6 Roseville Public Works, Environment and Transportation Commission Agenda Item Date: July 28, 2020 Item Description: Communication Items Item No: 4 Public Works Project updates: • 2020 Pavement Management Project o The City awarded the project to Bituminous Roadways on February 24. Work has been underway since May. The project is approximately 80% completed. Work is expected to be completed by the end of August. • 2020 Sanitary Sewer Lining Project o Visu- Sewer was awarded the contract in November. o Work on the project is about 90% completed. Work will be ongoing through the end of July. 2020 Pathway Improvements o The City awarded the project to Bituminous Roadways. Work involves construction of new pathways on Dale Street and paving the pathway by the Legion baseball field. Some pathways in Willow Park and Central Park will be resurfaced as part of the project. The parking lot at Victoria Street on the east side of Bennett Lake, the parking lot at Langton Lake ballfields and the two parking lots at Acorn Park will be resurfaced as part of the project. Work is expected to be completed in August. 2020 Drainage Improvements o The City awarded a contract to Frattalone Companies. Work consists of installing a new iron -enhanced sand filter basin on Brenner Avenue near Millwood Street to reduce flooding and provide water quality treatment for Lake Owasso. Work also involves grading in Central Park and installation of a drainage structure in Acorn Park. Work should be completed by the end of July. • Galtier Lift Station o The project includes the upgrade of the sanitary sewer lift station at Galtier Street just south of South Owasso Drive. The project was awarded to Pember Construction, Inc. on June 8. Work is expected to begin in September. Ramsey County: • County Road C Reconstruction: Hwy 88 to Long Lake Road o All major work is completed. The City will complete the trail connection on Walnut Street in August. • Larpenteur Avenue — 4:3 Lane Conversion Project o Ramsey County will complete permanent improvements to finalize the four to three lane conversion that was started last fall. The project limits are Dale Street to I-35E. Work involves micro -surfacing and installing concrete medians, striping and signage. The road will be open during the work. Work is expected to begin in August and be completed by the end of September. Minnesota Department of Transportation updates: • I-35W MnPASS project- httD://www.dot.state.mn.us/metro/broiects/35wnorthmnDass/index.html o Construct MnPASS Express Lanes (one lane in each direction) in the middle of existing I-35 W between County Road C in Roseville and Lexington Avenue (County Rd 17) in Blaine. o Repave I-35W and ramps between County Road C in Roseville to just north of Sunset Ave (County Road 53) in Lino Lakes. o Replace and repair bridges along the project area o Install noise walls on the east side of I-35W just north of the County Road C ramps to County Road D. o Rosegate west of Cleveland Avenue will be closed through November to accommodate bridge reconstruction. o Contract was awarded in October 2018 to Ames Construction which had the winning Design/Build Proposal. Total cost is $208 million. o Work is ongoing and will continue through 2021. City Council Update: • The Civic Campus Master Plan was presented to the City Council a third time on July 20h'. The Commission will receive a full update of that presentation as part of the regular meeting tonight. • All Council and Commission meetings continue to be virtual. That will remain the case for at least one more month. • Roseville did implement a Required Mask Order on Monday, July 201h. However, the state implemented its own statewide mandate on Wednesday, July 22°d, superseding the City's order. • Several plats and developments were approved by Council over the past couple of months including an affordable housing project adjacent to Byerly's on County Road C, and a townhome development along Lexington Ave south of County Road C2. • The Council, acting as the City's Economic Development Authority, provided positive feedback and initial approval for the City to use federal CARES Act funds to provide financial support and relief to small businesses in Roseville. Major Maintenance Activities: • Street and Storm o Finished street message painting and refreshed all Parks parking lots. o Completed mulching Twin Lakes Parkway, County Road C and Larpenteur streetscape areas. o Ongoing irrigation monitoring and repairs as needed. o Completed 3rd mowing of City ROW areas. o Ongoing weed spraying and removals. o Ongoing spray patching and milling/patching delamination areas. o Started crack sealing project. o Ongoing every 3-week compost turning. o Ongoing dead limb removals on EAB trees ... wish the removals of EAB trees would increase to lessen Street Maintenance response to dead limbs. o Ongoing catch basin repair mortar profiling. o Ongoing Street sign repairs. Water and Sanitary Sewer o Cleaned carpeting in City Hall, PD and Maintenance Facility. o Attended the virtual Safety Committee Meeting. o Collected water samples for bacteriological and disinfectant by-product testing. o Completed the upgrades of the Fernwood sanitary sewer lift station. Currently working with engineers and contractor on the punch list items. o Continued working with city engineers and consulting engineers and contractors on the Galtier lift station and the Booster Phase 3. o Repaired 1 broken water main. o Continued the 2020 hydrant flushing and sewer inspection/cleaning programs. o Worked with our SCADA integrator (AE2S) on SCADA upgrades for 2020. o Continued exercising 12" and larger -sized water main valves. Attachments: A: 2020 Roseville Project Map B: 2020 PMP Project Map C: 2020 Pathway Project Map D: June Development Activity Report Attachmi COUNTY ROAD D e.„ r e d"He s� 8P Long Lake Lift Statior rLLW� O y COUNTY ROAD CC max,. COUNTY A ON D Lake wa w Joe— BRAGONEE AVE IRGERNEa P " ,.moo cuMIN $ 4 5 c" a s�® as. P M­B, DR 3 j iE PM TEADRACE DR g TORN IV � ¢ , 5 CAIRCRENT AV PL k Pe 9 OUIRcxE. _....__ orm�"xE ARSERICANST x.. )Nl•'S < i v 4�t J < p 3 8 1 qTo B/EELDRIDGE AVEELDRIDGE " g rc AVE a "RYAN w ! WE F S Loci DON9 A WE Po EmsEwtuo To AND OAKS '5 n.ewgJ aE�J Bow x nx $ x..x AVE w xessa „IN "xE xessawx AVE ONE 2020 All Projects " City Mill & Overlay o*V Watermain Pipe Replacement NCounty Project O Watermain Project NState Project • Storm Project /V� Parking Lot Pathway and Parking Lot Project SAW E v o �•� � Sanitary Sewer Lining • State Signal Project Prepared by: Q Sanitary Project Engineering Department March 23, 2020 Lake SI e�n .o e , - Josephine 9ii DR " aELVD S 4g LaLYSLWPer Gwe �Hy '" " 0 + Y IRAL AVE Louse Jasephns ¢ " x ,S A DOE IV a Fo °{ AVE Sx T `� Pmk uw000 Q P n e �H 1 aitter o O t� MUCLELAN �• v a toHe RD CC COUNTY COUNTY RD CC I Q CENTENNIAL DR o 4 F BRPCT VR IJUNDITH 4 .a dE TRDIT To „"� roxn y A WE wy 5 VAROCHILL my re", <p Park VAGoox oN ren al W Memorial Sf PPS — q 'COUNTY ROAD A COUNTY g ROAD A _; oa 3IV m vr) XEre ROSE IV CL RD raw & AVE La e it 8 EAVE CR.nor s . me ow$G E N N N �„ �x:5 e °O a g IV 1n'it a —-o aka E i V 5A AVE " Pje 2 TRAn's�, 5 AVE a OW g a E`RzoxomEw „ CE — c P VE E LOW LL AVE m,w,e.m,,, rEx r 6 AVE. ' "GRANDVIEW .x ON ELLoa o lakeA AVE SO TH IL o COPE � a � AVESHEAR- -01 xsror" _ z 5 VE 2 St'nwEy IV vrEw at Carl5 a g ` So mew eVE e Ile,yr« c " w oxca.�-r DR — ROAD a COUNTY ROAD R arm ar Pwk ements AVE BB, BEW �Hr m a • o W 9„ j a f p 4 AVE ® u AVE SHR YES E noux ar Pwk �o o Ig 10 E o x revn - AN a AVE " " re ,mil eE EAVE x.xaIE AV xAVE o ss Re ervotr Woods o r� Es �8uxx°�a s 4 k a.+wx 5 o a a E,VIa. sac �� SIR- B Rc n °n' Ew neeewair HDRE ri000six yoq v 9e L4Jte ;ca>FR DGE sr (f mr• i imi ri .m i k&� Tamaraek par Rov �rGanty ® r.Air. •�I'ST Pwk x ¢ eO H WE Pwk rc " <b S gJ?cAp:� j cotyA n ox E WE ood a ttionSEC a - IS �� apace ee '� �RT EMERALD e RICK NE, Bata Seurcesana Contacts. 0 500 1000 1500 2000 Feet ' Ramsey County CIS Base Map (1 Al .m'o ip) mv.:.dl pr.p.A •at of Roseville EngineeringBe Department p Farrno r maro n re o ra in m a cc me nts of me p m ntad. s a ). mapaeawepeEazozo nlwreienam;:a aty rR 1l Engineering Department e v vx e v map'. Pmposetl2626AIIPmjetlsptl( .m,eA. r,e u.....nd. ... �..mb. .e.e 2660 Civic Cente r Drive , Roseville MN .n4..amu. ... s.r.a°u.oavti,m..y..e.. Attachment B COUNTY ROAD D COUNTY ROAD D ik F S aw,� F pw° AD o'sw um.p BRENNER Gil a w d �ona.,.,a o-� J� AVE Lake �'S $ i a Poe fee � k & ;� Josephine n " c ? v=°p • n ° Nvm titi e IM", Q AD xa�, s cnnaren ... o so tBLVD w, �"� cmednnnnme a5 q 3 p , a ° 3� 0;=o sxmm��e 5 P .,,� _ pa Pam: Lw°°° E GORE in " 11 g £ Et. —a, 'Again, qIT AN $ Nrv��EsaS I4 NTY UNTY pD Cc $ - ry i rvry ° 1. aIr� I'll : et ° ID cc a° °e + S o rvCENTENNIAL DR [ FAA D, L ORCHARD To rRACE DR DR g ePM,nTERRACE t'DR DR I RD GUOTH AVE CT n>Es A ID AVE 8k AV IONA To AVE NA " W A NA To To IO D,w+ RAMELET IT BVII,end .x �Pp°e �e, a z MNry $PC V 4LOAD A ma ROSE • a n AL ° d.ROSE AL AL Ea:°°n ° r RD ry I n �° A m e €CIR I A ARCREST AVE ae,»ecc s 1 ° ®� 5 AVELake °xRED A VE V1 L 5 �, AVE �� m�IS AVE I NNITRAw qM S ��' _ g8x� < YN ARDWALo{,P JL p`tp oTANT _ & NEIT �o �vp� se: TAN a avE * LL RD BE DO RD BE T—ro DVIEWo o- S AVE rA OR Yy '3 a mmnm N a Re Al AVE IT R m.N,rei 5AVE 4 ail s^w 1 SHERREN AVE MAGESOTA $m a as VIEW e 3nreoe rvarae ° E sauA SANDURST°xCAR uurROAD B x AVE Derse gA, DR 5HURST COUNTY ROAD J ROAD B _ COuvry VE PARKER DROPS To AVE no yr nroaE a °¢ £ ,rv:o aEm°xr aoa a R To —AVE SKILLARAN J 'AVE SKILLAGN AVE KILL AVE x Q e zCA � S5 g N AVE NE� wDae°°° u e Baem nNq AV DPAR ` N E �° ° Furwav woods E x Me ° .o w �� °° a" n DR.N.xN xnE ¢ xn PER g e �E, °nx �aN P ae' N 9 wre,-.) E s s n R.esArrNY� c AVE ,rosEuwN AVE �.eE�rrN rr ELn g .weHe„-,��w. SSTT x, a.° dla�r RON ga e ST Proposed 2020 PMP Project n°GGLEaa, d` -ARDEN AVEa Tam axAVE I AVE y �vE F a j nmxDUNNE FmnseY finnyAVE �T OP— SP— e Proposed City Roads (5.33 miles) _ 9 No f�1CrF�vF Watermain Project (4615') MER ;a. RmpAOononemp0 J}i� I l I I Data Son ,eeaaniCantaeta =Ramsey County CID Based,Pil A/19) .amistom...dep.p.,. p 500 1ppp 1500 2000 Feet Prepared b P Y =atv nr Rneevlue Engineering Department m Engineering Department For furtherinformation regarding the contents °nnemap e°ntatt s a /. mapaea wepeseaz6zD PMRmxa November 21, 2019 atvra 11 Engineering Department, ..�.q�..ex.,x.nnssu. cnyx.m..r...e...�eA.onaeyu:e, u...p.ys.,.o..w.,mmvrts.n.n map: Proposed202O FMPpar 2660 avle Center Drlee, Roseville MN .rAA.A.hh ­a.r mvpA.e.e. _ N Attachme it AVE k g a ��„ AVE ACCate„ AVE WILLOW WILLOWB grEct ffi CIA To ANO r AVE e " N y, .wr TRANSIT AVE g /mom {`PpJE 9y F Y SECTRANT AVE nv b� y 3 COUNTY sExnxT AVE ool6di�f. g " die e r, A°§ A — VELI re,� s AVE OLLMAN RACE ILLMAN SEVACROD rh �a..a �e a,naErro� To DRAPEE VE MDOAKS To RONE.a AVE to�aAVE a 2020 Pathway Projects ^� 2020 New Pathway 2020 Pathway Resurfacing /NV Existing Pathway Prepared by: Engineering Department March 23, 2020 COLONIAL DE 11 1& NOR S AVE HEIR. ST ag uaa,E o s. AVE E~u cal SHO a AVE To AV 8 8 Sa.a YAN 0 0 V OR DE A AVE To uw TV SUMMER S7 g �RD tl S r o � I(\7 AVE ST \ ROMA AVE I AVE ¢ g t Na s. 3 _ � " EMNERALD rRIDGE ASCLAMER Data sources and Contacts 'RamAlsey County CIS Base Map (1 N -aty of Roseville EngineeringDe artmem p For further Information rearding me contents of this map contact City et Resevlge,Engmeering Department, m4hzAnd noiemmow`mv:yepaie.:'m�`�A.emby u.:`�ed: °mpiwy 2sao av�c wmerorme, Resevme Mm ,,,�o.,oru,.-- ... o,.. orOS. ,A.,,,. 1 be -' C M COU No A ,¢• ix —a 11r7 5 0 500 1000 1500 2000 Feet ma doc2020Paty ma doc 2020 es 1 map .2mBPalhruayProiafusput N Attachment D Jnaeph;ne Newborns Avid Hotel New home ■ oho / a..a. / Countyftcatl C2 a i pFc � Newborns 1 � Tareen Newborns ■ 1 Dermatology High Pines ■ Brewery Wheaton Woods coonry aoan c The Pointe counryftoaac Dayton ae.,rprr Freight ■ Hiway Federal Credit Union cuuntyftcatl92 ■ 0, "" Central Park Elementary Tradehome Rosedale Roseville Newhouse cuunyrn-d BP Shoes Center MnDOT High School Parkview 3 Cleveland Ave Center subdivision MX Child School Prolife of Welfare Farrington America Academy Estates cuuntyftcatl9 Newborns Fairview Community Center Newborns a N d a x o Haardinndin M d 2 Parkway Pi:u ftwAvenue !- --- m - I � " `o I �a See Reverse For Project Details Residential Proposed ❑ Retait Proposed ❑ Office/Non-Retait Proposed ❑ Industrial Proposed Public/ Institutional Proposed Residential ■ Retait ■ Otfice/Non-Retait ■ Industrial ■ Public/Institutional I�0 1.DDD 2.DDD 3.DDD +�,j`� Development Projects: June 2020 ®Fee` Prepared ent sources Community Development Department camsey Doune o -nn Dlp June 25, 2W0 mmmuniry Development Departmem ROSEVILLE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Development Activity Report Updated: June 25, 2020 7R Project Name Address Project Description Applicant/Owner Information Starting/Occupancy Wheaton Woods Wheaton Ave & Dale St 17 single-family homes (15 issued / 2 empty) Golden Valley Land Co/TJB Homes/Accent Homes Summer 2016 / Fall 2019 Farrington Estates 311 County Road B 7 lot single-family subdivision (7 issued/6 complete) Premium Real Estate Solutions / Michael B. Oudin Winter 2016 / Summer 2019 The Pointe 2650 Lexington Ave New Construction (100 units) United Properties / Weis Builders Inc. Winter 2019 / Spring 2020 Cleveland Ave Subdivision 2227-2257 Cleveland Ave 5 lot single-family subdivision Bald Eagle Builders Winter 2019 / Summer 2019 Residential New Construction 907 Burke Ave New Single Family Home The Hopetown Group / Helin Company Winter 2020 / Spring 2020 Residential New Construction 315 County Road B New Single Family Home New Design Properties Winter 2020 / Spring 2020 Residential New Construction 1984 William St New Single Family Home Vanguard Builders Spring 2020 /TBD Residential New Construction 2024 Evergreen Ct New Single Family Home Murphy Bros Building & Remodeling Winter 2020 / Spring 2020 RESIDENTIAL Residential New Construction 1320 Rose PI New Single Family Home Shade Tree Construction Summer 2020 /TBD Residential New Construction 2227 Cleveland New Single Family Home Bald Eagle Builders Winter 2020 / Fall 2020 Residential New Construction 849 Grandview Ave New Single Family Home Bald Eagle Builders Spring 2020 /TBD Residential New Construction 3050 Victoria St New Single Family Home Noberg Homes Spring 2020 /TBD Residential New Construction 3044 Victoria St New Single Family Home Noberg Homes Spring 2020 /TBD Residential New Construction 2789 Churchill St New Single Family Home Lee Homes Spring 2020 /TBD Residential New Construction 671 Heinel Dr New Single Family Home Owner Spring 2020 /TBD Residential New Construction 2875 Fernwood St New Single Family Home Lee Homes Spring 2020 /TBD Residential New Construction 2251 Cleveland Ave New Single Family Home Bald Eagle Builders Summer 2020 /TBD Former Subway 2216 County Road D #C Shell Building Ungerman Inc Summer 2020 /TBD Parkway Pizza 1909 Lexington Ave Remodel Owner Winter 2019 / Summer 2020 RETAIL Tradehome Shoes 1595 Highway 36 #790 Remodel Commercial Systems Winter 2020 / Summer 2020 Hiway Federal Credit Union 2465 Fairview Ave Demo Kevitt Companies Winter 2020 / TBD High Pines Brewery 2704 Snelling Ave Remodel Midwest Custom Builders Winter 2020 / TBD Roseville High School 1240 County Road B2 Remodel Kraus Anderson Fall 2018 /TBD Central Park Elementary 535 County Road B2 Remodel Kraus Anderson Fall 2018 / Spring 2019 Avid Hotel 3015 Centre Pointe Dr New Construction Royal Construction Winter 2018 / Spring 2019 Dayton Freight 2560 Long Lake Rd Interior Remodel Reiner Construction Summer 2020 Parkview Center School 701 County Road B Tenant Remodel Kraus Anderson Summer 2020 Lutheran Church of the Resurrection 3115 Victoria St Remodel LS Black Constructors Summer 2019 /TBD OFFICE & NOW RETAIL Hand in Hand Montessori 211 North McCarrons Blvd Interior Remodel Vanguard Builders Inc Fall 2019 /TBD Prolife of America 1751 County Road B #300 Remodel St. Paul Construction Company Fall 2019 /TBD MN Child Welfare Academy 1711 County Road B Tenant Build Out Reiling Construction Winter 2020 / TBD Fairview Community Center 1910 County Road B New Community Center Kraus -Anderson Construction Winter 2020 / TBD MnDOT 1500 County Road B2 Interior Remodel Cirks Construction Spring 2020 /TBD SVL 2896 Centre Pointe Dr Interior Remodel St. Paul Construction Company Spring 2020 /TBD Tareen Dermatology 2720 Fairview Ave Shell Building Timco Construction Spring 2020 /TBD Roseville Public Works, Environment and Transportation Commission Agenda Item Date: July 28, 2020 Item No: 5 Item Description: Transportation Project Updates Background: There are several transportation projects and/or studies underway in the City of Roseville. Staff has selected a couple of projects that are either being implemented this year or are being studied for recommended improvements or even working towards a final design. The first project is one that is being constructed in a permanent stage this year; the conversion of Larpenteur Ave from 4 lanes to 3 lanes. This project starts in Roseville at Dale St and extends east towards 35E. We will focus on the segment in Roseville which was converted to three lanes last year as a trial. Larpenteur Ave is a Ramsey County roadway (County State Aid Highway 30) and the County responded to two fatalities in January of 2019 with a quick series of public meetings and a desire to convert Larpenteur from a four lane undivided roadway (no center median or left turn lanes) to a three lane segment which would have one lane in each direction plus a center left turn lane. They also discussed installing several median pedestrian refuges with marked crosswalks to provide better pedestrian access across the roadway. Ramsey County was able to install temporary medians and restripe the roadway in order to test the new roadway configuration. This year, they will be installing more permanent medians and restriping the roadway after a pavement treatment in order to provide a cleaner, more permanent look to the roadway section. The second project we will review is a project to reconfigure the intersection of County Road B2 and Lexington Ave. Both of these roadways are County facilities and the County applied for federal funds to add left turn lanes to County Road B2 at this intersection. They were successful in that application and a project is scheduled for 2022. We will review some material from a recent public meeting on this project and discuss a survey that's currently open to the public. The County has a project website with an interactive survey. Ramsevcountv.us/B2andLex Finally, we will review some material from recent and on -going traffic studies around Rosedale Mall. Prior to the pandemic, Rosedale had announced some aggressive plans for redevelopment of areas of the mall including the addition of several hundred apartment units. We assume those plans are still on the table, but the timing may be impacted by the current economic environment. We will review some traffic studies that document the traffic impacts of the area and we will discuss an ongoing study by Ramsey County to look at the County Road B2 and Fairview corridors around the mall. The full EAW (Environmental Assessment Worksheet) is being included with the packet. Due to its large size, we may have this setup as a separate download. Recommended Action: Review the enclosed material, receive presentation and provide input and feedback to staff on the referenced projects. Attachments: A. Larpenteur Ave 3 Lane Section Preliminary Layout B. County Road B2 at Lexington Public Meeting Display Boards C. Rosedale Environmental Assessment Worksheet (large file — may be separate download) wI �!Jffi 'MA i�i�TiT w A' LTA VAlk W, L [i � 1Y. r — — — — — — — — — — — — — _ 12 12' J ? 12' i 12' 12' ----------------- 12------------------ - 12' ----- 12 --- 1a —cmm all* 4 r AL q w In•L yam•"• S� • t _. « 12' 12' 14' _ WO 12' _ 12' — } y 7• } y — --� } y } y g•' - s. ■!i ► - s 71 12' — — — 12' 12' — — — 12' 10, i 11 14' ? ? 144F ? 11' 1 12' 12' • 12' --- y 71 �y ar AP yF} Y 12' 13' 12' 404? L- Ct, iR W T•,( ••v:r y T• u a 14' 4 1 C� bW • �h r. h7S i.. 0...\ a d .viyi a• Aw 5r 10, 12' }� — — a 11■■ �AW-Mbawy nor LA F11 d.UL two \ i • .am- _MA���{�i► 13L 11' 12' 12 .. \ a - s 11• 11' ? � t r 12•' tal- 11' 12'- 'i 13' — 3 10' - i` ter- i •V` r s� ► - � r + _ - - tom'. • Attachment B OlkRAiMSEWork COUNTY P County Road 62 &Lexington Avenue Intersection Reconstruction Open House z County Road B2 z a� s o z _ +-1 � o a� X J 0 o Roseville Area High School County Road B2 &Lexington Avenue Intersection Reconstruction County Road B2 Project Area Ramsey County and the City of Roseville are working to improve safety conditions at the County Road B2 and Lexington Avenue intersection. Reconstruction of the intersection is scheduled for 2022 and will include a new traffic signal and adding dedicated left -turn and right -turn lanes on County Road B2 to better control traffic from Roseville Area High School. The lack of turn lanes on County Road B2 combined with the high volume of school traffic creates safety issues at the intersection. Sight line issues - caused by drivers passing on the right of a left turning vehicle - are believed to have been a factor in many of the 21 accidents that occurred at the interchange from 2013-2015. Traffic analysis shows that widening the roadway and providing dedicated turn lanes on County Road B2 will lower crash rates. In a previous trial, right -turn lanes were painted on the roadway in each direction without widening the road, but they were removed due to traffic issues and confusion. Lexington Avenue already has dedicated turn lanes. 1 RAlic MwE Y COUNTY County Road B2 &Lexington Avenue Intersection Reconstruction 1 RAlic MwE Y COUNTY 2020 202 Community engagement and preliminary design. January -June 2020 Preferred layout selected in April 2020 Detailed design continues to project bidding. July 2020 -December 2021 Construction Summer 2022 County Road B2 &Lexington Avenue Intersection Reconstruction 1 RAlic MwE Y COUNTY _XISTING LEVEL * Delay measured in seconds per vehicle A level of service (LOS) analysis was conducted for the intersection. LOS indicates the quality of traffic flow through an intersection. The LOS results are based on the average delay per vehicle that goes through the intersection. Intersections are given a ranking of LOS A through LOS F. The level of service system is set up similar to a report card with W representing the highest quality operations and "F" representing the poorest operations. At LOS A, motorists experience very little delay or interference. On a roadway or intersection with LOS F conditions, motorists would experience severe congestion and extreme delay, i.e., gridlock. Although LOS A conditions represent the best possible level of traffic flow, the cost to construct intersections to such a high standard exceeds the benefit to the user. Within an urbanized or urbanizing area, it is generally regarded that LOS D provides an acceptable level of service. For intersections, level of service is primarily a function of delay which is dependent on volumes, intersection lane configuration, and traffic control. The intersection analysis was completed using average control delay as defined by the HCM. The threshold delay values for each level of service for unsignalized intersections are slightly less than for signalized intersections because motorists' expectations of the intersection differ with the type of traffic control. The level of service analysis criteria for signalized and unsignalized intersections are explained in the table below. County Road B2 &Lexington Avenue Intersection Reconstruction 1 RAlic MwE Y COUNTY r • . • w w 0 /'%k I . 1 Three -Year Crash Rate (2017=2019 Data) Intersection crash rates are expressed in crashes per million entering vehicles Average for high -volume, low -speed signalized intersections using MnDOT 2015 green sheets *** Critical crash rates are expressed in crashes per million entering vehicles with 0.95 confidence level County Road B2 &Lexington Avenue Intersection Reconstruction 1 RAlic MwE Y COUNTY OUR INPUTI Community engagement is important to project success. We want to know how you use the intersection. Take a moment to think about your experiences at the intersection and what changes you think Ramsey County should consider. Examples of experiences and questions for you to consider: Where do you go? What time of day do you u the intersection? at mode of travel do you 3e (walk, bike, car, bus)? How often do you use the intersection? What do you like? What do you dislike? What would you change to make the intersection better? ■ ■ %'i Share your feedback on comment cards, post -it notes on maps, !i .. 0 iA or online at https:Hwsb.mysocialpinpoint.com/b2-lex County Road B2 &Lexington Avenue Intersection Reconstruction 1 RAlMwE Y COUNTY Attachment C Rosedale Center Environmental Assessment Worksheet February 2020 Prepared for: Prepared by: Kimley>Morn Table of Contents 1. Project Title.................................................................................................................................................1 2. Proposer......................................................................................................................................................1 3. RGU..............................................................................................................................................................1 4. Reason for EAW Preparation..................................................................................................................2 5. Project Location........................................................................................................................................2 6. Project Description....................................................................................................................................2 7. Cover Types...............................................................................................................................................4 8. Permits and Approvals Required...........................................................................................................4 9. Land Use.....................................................................................................................................................5 10. Geology, Soils, and Topography/Land Forms.................................................................................6 11. Water Resources...................................................................................................................................7 12. Contamination/Hazardous Materials/Wastes...............................................................................11 13. Fish, Wildlife, Plant Communities, and Sensitive Ecological Resources (Rare Features) ........ 13 14. Historic Properties................................................................................................................................15 15. Visual .....................................................................................................................................................15 16. Air.................................................................................................................................................................. 15 17. Noise......................................................................................................................................................17 18. Transportation......................................................................................................................................18 19. Cumulative Potential Effects............................................................................................................21 20. Other Potential Environmental Effects............................................................................................22 RGUCertification .............................................................................................................................................23 List of Tables Table1: Project Magnitude.............................................................................................................................3 Table2: Cover Types.........................................................................................................................................4 Table 3: Permits and Approvals Required....................................................................................................4 Table 4: Soil Types within the Project Limits...................................................................................................6 Table 5: MPCA WIMN Sites Within 100 Feet of the Project Site...............................................................11 Table 6: State -Listed Species Within the Review Area.............................................................................14 Table 7. Approaching Volumes for Surrounding Roadways...................................................................16 Table 8: Short -Term Build (2024) Level of Service Summary ....................................................................19 Table 9: Short -Term Build (2024) with Improvements Level of Service Summary.................................21 List of Figures Figure1: County Map.....................................................................................................................................25 Figure2: USGS Map.........................................................................................................................................26 Figure3: Existing Project Site..........................................................................................................................27 Figure 4: Water Resources.............................................................................................................................28 Figure 5: MPCA WIMN Sites Within 100 Feet of the Project Site..............................................................29 Rosedale Center EAW i February 2020 List of Attachments Attachment A: Concept Site Plan Attachment B: SHPO Correspondence Attachment C: Traffic Impact Analysis Attachment D: Pedestrian Connections Rosedale Center EAW ii February 2020 July 2013 Version Environmental Assessment Worksheet This Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) form and EAW Guidelines are available at the Environmental Quality Board's website at: http://www.eab.state.mn.us/EnvRevGuidanceDocuments.htm. The EAW form provides information about a project that may have the potential for significant environmental effects. The EAW Guidelines provide additional detail and resources for completing the EAW form. Cumulative potential effects can either be addressed under each applicable EAW Item, or can be addressed collectively under EAW Item 19. Note to reviewers: Comments must be submitted to the RGU during the 30-day comment period following notice of the EAW in the EQB Monitor. Comments should address the accuracy and completeness of information, potential impacts that warrant further investigation, and the need for an EIS. 1. Project Title Rosedale Center 2. Proposer Proposer: Jones Lang LaSalle (JLL) Contact Person: Bill Moston Title: Senior Vice President, National Retail Development Address: 200 E Randolph Drive City, State, ZIP: Chicago, IL 60601 Phone: 312-228-2403 Email: bill. moston4am.ill.com 3. RGU RGU: City of Roseville Contact Person: Thomas Paschke Title: City Planner Address: 2660 Civic Center Drive City, State, ZIP: Roseville, MN 55113 Phone: 651-792-7074 Fax 651-792-7070 Email: thomas.paschke4citvofroseville.com Rosedale Center EAW 1 February 2020 4. Reason for EAW Preparation Check one: Required: ❑ EIS Scoping ❑x Mandatory EAW Discretionary: ❑Citizen petition ❑RGIJ discretion ❑ Proposer initiated If EAW or EIS is mandatory, give EQB rule category subpart number(s) and name(s): Minnesota Rules, part 4410.4300, subpart 32 - Mixed residential and industrial -commercial projects; subpart 14 - Industrial, commercial, and institutional facilities; subpart 19 - Residential development 5. Project Location County: Ramsey City/Township: Roseville PLS Location (1/4, 1/4, Section, Township, Range): NE Y< and SE Y< of Section 9, Township 29, Range 23W Watershed (81 major watershed scale): Mississippi River -Twin Cities Tax Parcel Numbers: 092923420005, 092923420004, 092923410005, 092923410003, 092923130038,092923130037,092923130031,092923140030 At a minimum, attach each of the following to the EAW: • County map showing the general location of the project (see Figure 1) u US Geological Survey 7.5 minute, 1:24,000 scale map indicating project boundaries (see Figure 2) • Site plans showing all significant project and natural features. Pre -construction site plan and post -construction site plan. (See Figure 3 and Attachment A. Attachment A shows the general building locations and uses; however, building footprints may vary as specific users are identified and will be incorporated into the final plan.) 6. Project Description a. Provide the brief project summary to be published in the EQB Monitor (approximately 50 words). Jones Lang LaSalle (JLL) is proposing an expansion to the existing Rosedale Center in Roseville, MN. The proposed expansion includes 350 market rate residential units, 215 active adult housing units, two hotels with up to 340 hotel rooms, 90,000 square feet of office, and 200,000 feet of retail space. b. Give a complete description of the proposed project and related new construction, including infrastructure needs. If the project is an expansion, include a description of the existing facility. Emphasize 1) construction and operation methods and features that will cause physical manipulation of the environment or will produce wastes; 2) modifications to existing equipment or industrial processes; 3) significant demolition, removal, or remodeling of existing structures; and 4) timing and duration of construction activities. Rosedale Center EAW 2 February 2020 JLL is proposing an expansion to the existing Rosedale Center in Roseville, MN. Rosedale Center is located between Fairview Avenue and Snelling Avenue (Trunk Highway (TH) 51) north of TH 36 and south of County Road B2 W. Rosedale Center opened in 1969 and is currently an approximately 1,290,000 square foot shopping center. It is currently served by four signalized access points (one on Fairview Avenue and three on County Road B2 W) and a one-way internal ring road. The proposed expansion includes 350 market rate residential units, 215 active adult housing units, two hotels totaling 340 rooms, 90,000 square feet of office, and a net increase of 200,000 square feet of retail space. To accommodate the proposed development, the vacant Herberger's building would be demolished and the surface parking on the southeast quadrant would be converted to residential buildings and structed parking. The proposal includes conversion of the existing one-way internal ring road to a two-way internal ring road. No new access points are proposed. The illustrative site plan is included as Attachment A. Construction is anticipated to begin in spring of 2020 and end in early 2023. c. Project magnitude Table 1: Project Magnitude Measure Total Project Acreage Magnitude 72.8 acres Linear Project Length Not applicable Number and Type of Residential Units 565 units (350 market rate and 215 active adult housing) Commercial Building Area (square feet) 290,000 square feet (90,000 square feet of office and 200,000 square feet of retail) Industrial Building Area (square feet) Not applicable Institutional Building Area (square feet) Not applicable Other Uses - Hotel Hotel: 340 Hotel Keys (165,000 square feet) Structure Height(s) 85 feet maximum d. Explain the project purpose. If the project will be carried out by a governmental unit, explain the need for the project and identify its beneficiaries. The purpose of the project is to redevelop the Herberger's department store and expand Rosedale Center with a mix of uses. e. Are future stages of this development, including development on any other property, planned or likely to happen? ❑ Yes ® No If yes, briefly describe future stages, relationship to present project, timeline, and plans for environmental review. Not applicable. f. Is this project a subsequent stage of an earlier project? ❑ Yes 9 No If yes, briefly describe the past development, timeline, and past environmental review. Not applicable. Rosedale Center EAW 3 February 2020 7. Cover Types Estimate the acreage of the site with each of the following cover types before and offer development. Table 2: Cover Types Cover Type Wetlands Before (Acres) 0 After (Acres) 0 Deep Water/Streams 0 0 Wooded/Forest 0 0 Brush/Grassland 0 0 Cropland 0 0 Lawn/Landscaping 5.5 7.3 Impervious Surface 67.3 65.5 Stormwater Pond 0 0 Total 72.8 72.8 8. Permits and Approvals Required List all known local, state, and federal permits, approvals, certifications, and financial assistance for the project. Include modifications of any existing permits, governmental review of plans, and all direct and indirect forms of public financial assistance including bond guarantees, Tax Increment Financing, and infrastructure. All of these final decisions are prohibited until all appropriate environmental review has been completed. See Minnesota Rules Chapter 4410.3100. Table 3: Permits and Approvals Required GovernmentUnit of . - of Application State Minnesota Department of Health Watermain Permit To be applied for Minnesota Pollution Control Agency NPDES Permit To be applied for Regional Ramsey County Right -of -Way Permit To be applied for Rice Creek Watershed District Stormwater Permit To be applied for Local City of Roseville Preliminary/Final Plat To be applied for Building Permit To be applied for Erosion Control, Grading, and Stormwater Permit To be applied for Demolition Permit To be applied for Right -of -Way Permit To be applied for Conditional Use Permit To be applied for Planned Unit Development Cancelation or Amendment To be applied for Rosedale Center EAW 4 February 2020 9. Land Use a. Describe: Existing land use of the site as well as areas adjacent to and near the site, including parks, trails, and prime or unique farmlands. The project site is an existing retail/commercial development (Rosedale Center). Land use adjacent to the project site includes retail and commercial west of Fairview Avenue and north of County Road B2 W, single-family residential and office east of TH 51, and multi -family residential, office, and retail and commercial south of TH 36. A city trail is located north of the project site along County Road B2 W. There are no parks or prime or unique farmlands within or adjacent to the project site. ii. Planned land use as identified in comprehensive plans (if available) and any other applicable plan for land use, water, or resource management by a local, regional, state, or federal agency. The City of Roseville's draft 2040 Comprehensive Plan identifies planned land use for the project site as Core Mixed -Use, as well as the City of Roseville's adopted 2030 Comprehensive Plan' identifying planned land use for the project site as Commercial - Regional Business, which are both defined as including large - footprint commercial development, shopping centers, large-scale institutions, office buildings, high -density residential uses, and other uses that generate more traffic, noise, and intensity than other mixed -use districts. Transportation considerations noted for Core Mixed -Use include access to multi -modal facilities and connections, preserved pedestrian and bicycle access in high vehicular traffic areas, and access to commercial areas from residential uses and transit hubs. iii. Zoning, including special districts or overlays such as shoreland, floodplain, wild and scenic rivers, critical area, agricultural preserves, etc. The project site is zoned as Regional Business, which is designed for businesses that provide goods and services to a regional market area, including regional - scale malls, shopping centers, large -format stores, multi -story office buildings, and automobile dealerships. The project site is not in overlay or special zoning districts. b. Discuss the project's compatibility with nearby land uses, zoning, and plans listed in Item 9a above, concentrating on implications for environmental effects. The project is compatible with existing and planned land use and zoning for the project site and adjacent areas as outlined in 9.a.i above. c. Identify measures incorporated into the proposed project to mitigate any potential incompatibility as discussed in Item 9b above. 1 Available at https://www.citvofroseville.com/DocumentCenterMew/25237/2030-Comprehensive-Plan- AII-C ha pters Rosedale Center EAW 5 February 2020 The project is compatible with existing and planned land use and zoning. No mitigation measures are needed. 10. Geology, Soils, and Topography/Land Forms a. Geology - Describe the geology underlying the project area and identify and map any susceptible geologic features such as sinkholes, shallow limestone formations, unconfined/shallow aquifers, or karst conditions. Discuss any limitations of these features for the project and any effects the project could have on these features. Identify any project designs or mitigation measures to address effects to geologic features. According to the Geologic Atlas of Ramsey County,zthe bedrock beneath the project site is Decorah Shale, which is approximately 100 feet below the surface. The Decorah Shale Group is typically 0-95 feet thick and is comprised of green calcareous shale with thin limestone interbeds. The Decorah Shale Group is stratigraphically followed by the Platteville and Glenwood Formations, the St. Peter Sandstone, the Prairie du Chien Group, the Jordan Sandstone, the St. Lawrence formation, the Tunnel City Group (formerly known as the Franconia Formation), the Wonewoc Sandstone (formerly known as the Ironton and Galesville Sandstones), and the Eau Claire Formation. There are no known sinkholes, unconfined/shallow aquifers, or karst features present within or near the project limits. Given that the Decorah Shale is 100 feet below the surface, it is not considered a shallow limestone formation. b. Soils and Topography - Describe the soils on the site, giving NRCS (SCS) classifications and descriptions, including limitations of soils. Describe topography, any special site conditions relating to erosion potential, soil stability, or other soil limitations, such as steep slopes or highly permeable soils. Provide estimated volume and acreage of soil excavation and/or grading. Discuss impacts from project activities (distinguish between construction and operational activities) related to soils and topography. Identify measures during and offer project construction to address soil limitations including stabilization, soil corrections, or other measures. Erosion/sedimentation control related to stormwater runoff should be addressed in response to Item I I.b.ii. According to the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Web Soil Survey, there are two soil types within the 72.8-acre project site. Urban land makes up approximately 98 percent (71.2 acres) of the project site, while the remaining 2 percent (1.6 acres) is an urban land -Hayden -Kingsley complex, 3 to 15 percent slopes. The Web Soil Survey includes Erosion Hazard Ratings that indicate the hazard of soil loss from off -road areas after disturbance activities that expose soil surface. Both soil types within the project site are not rated. Table 4: Soil Types within the Project Limits z Available at https://conservancy.umn.edu/handle/I 1299/58233 Rosedale Center EAW 6 February 2020 The current elevation of the site ranges from 940 feet to 970 feet. The proposed project would require approximately 60,000 cubic yards of excavation in the southeast portion of the site. 1 1. Water Resources a. Describe surface water and groundwater features on or near the site below. Surface Water- lakes, streams, wetlands, intermittent channels, and county/judicial ditches. Include any special designations such as public waters, trout stream/lake, wildlife lakes, migratory waterfowl feeding/resting lake, and outstanding resource value water. Include water qualify impairments or special designations listed on the current MPCA 303d Impaired Waters List that are within one mile of the project. Include DNR Public Waters Inventory number(s), ifany. There are no surface waters within the project site. A Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) Public Water Wetland (Zimmerman 62-53 W) is located 0.2 miles to the east of the site. One impaired unnamed stream is located 0.8 miles north of the project, which connects Little Lake Johanna to a Public Water Wetland (Oasis 62-205 W) to the south. The unnamed stream is also a Public Ditch/Altered Natural Watercourse (PWI ID 62014a) (see Figure 4). The stream is impaired due to high levels of chloride. The project will not contribute to the impairment of the stream or any other surface waters near the site due to the implementation of stormwater best management practices (BMPs). ii. Groundwater -aquifers, springs, and seeps. Include 1) depth to groundwater; 2) if project is within a MDH well protection area; and 3) identification of any onsife and/or nearby wells, including unique numbers and well logs, if available. If there are no wells known on site or nearby, explain the methodology used to determine this. A geotechnical investigation conducted in 2016 within the project site measured groundwater at an elevation of approximately 920 feet. However, based on the lack of water observed in other borings, the investigation concluded that the water likely represents a perched condition. Perched water could be encountered at various elevations across this site, depending upon the soil layering. The project is not located within any Wellhead Protection Areas or Drinking Water Supply Management Areas. According to the Minnesota Department of Health's Minnesota Well Index,3 there are no wells within the project site or within 150 feet of the project site. 3 Available at httas7//mnwellindex.web.health.state.mn.us/ Rosedale Center EAW 7 February 2020 b. Describe effects from project activities on water resources and measures to minimize or mitigate the effects below. Wastewater - For each of the following, describe the sources, quantities, and composition of all sanitary, municipal/domestic, and industrial wastewaters projected or treated at the site. 1) If the wastewater discharge is to a publicly owned treatment facility, identify any pretreatment measures and the ability of the facility to handle the added water and waste loadings, including any effects on, or required expansion of, municipal wastewater infrastructure. Based on the Metropolitan Council's Sewer Available Charge determination standards for the proposed improvements with the proposed uses (see site plan in Attachment A), the additional wastewater flows are projected to be approximately 179,760 gallons per day (GRID). Wastewater is expected to be equivalent to domestic strength wastewater. In the event a specific user would have wastewater stronger than domestic strength wastewater, a pretreatment facility would be required to be installed. The sanitary sewer service will be provided by the City of Roseville. The existing system currently has the capacity to handle the increase in wastewater generated by this type of development based on coordination and discussions with the Public Works Department. It is connected to one of Metropolitan Council's nine Metropolitan Wastewater Treatment Plants. A sewer line will be stubbed off of the existing sanitary main on -site and provide connections to the proposed additions. The proposed buildings will be connected to this main line. Manholes will be provided every 200 feet to provide access to the main line on the site for serviceability and monitoring. All sanitary sewers are located outside the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) required setbacks from a well. No on -site wells have been identified; however, if any wells are encountered, they will be properly sealed per the MDH code prior to construction of the proposed development. 2) If the wastewater discharge is to a subsurface sewage treatment system (SSTS), describe the system used, the design flow, and suitability of site conditions for such a system. Not applicable. 3) If the wastewater discharge is to surface water, identify the wastewater treatment methods, discharge points, and proposed effluent limitations to mitigation impacts. Discuss any effects to surface or groundwater from wastewater discharges. Not applicable. ii. Stormwater - Describe the quantity and quality of stormwater runoff at the site prior to and post construction. Include the routes and receiving water bodies for runoff from the site (major downstream water bodies as well as the immediate receiving waters). Discuss any environmental effects from stormwater discharges. Rosedale Center EAW 8 February 2020 Describe stormwater pollution prevention plans including temporary and permanent runoff controls and potential BMP site locations to manage or treat stormwater runoff. Identify specific erosion control, sedimentation control, or stabilization measures to address soil limitations during and after project construction. Existing conditions stormwater on the project site flows to a private storm sewer system on the property that connects to the public storm sewer system within County Road B2 at Snelling Avenue. The public storm sewer is conveyed to Little Lake Johanna, which is an impaired water. There is very minimal pervious surface coverage (about 5.5 acres), and it is mostly located within parking lot islands and around the perimeter of the parking fields. Total existing impervious area within the project site is approximately 67.3 acres. As part of the proposed project, stormwater will be managed on site with a series of underground stormwater filtration systems. The project will be designed to maintain the current drainage patterns to the public storm sewer system. The proposed development will require compliance with the standards of the Rice Creek Watershed District and the City of Roseville for water quality, volume control, rate control, and erosion control. As required by the City and Rice Creek Watershed District, the quantity and rate of stormwater runoff from the 2-, 10-, and 100-year, 24-hour rainfall events in post - development conditions will be managed to not exceed the existing conditions. Infrastructure will be constructed to convey stormwater to proposed underground stormwater filtration basins, which will be designed to help achieve this water quantity requirement. The soil across the project site has generally low permeability rates and is not suited for infiltration. The required treatment volume is determined by the Rice Creek Watershed District and is a function of new impervious area. Due to the low permeability rates, Rice Creek Watershed District will require all development within the project site to provide filtration (volume reduction) for 2 inches of runoff from all proposed impervious areas (streets, buildings, parking areas, driveways, etc.). The proposed filtration basins will be required to drawdown within 48 hours after a rainfall event. Stormwater modeling of runoff will be completed as part of the final design of the project. The modeling will be performed to ensure conformance to all City of Roseville and Rice Creek Watershed District standards. With the construction of the project, a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) will be created and used to prevent erosion and stabilize the site during and after project construction. The SWPPP will document that the sitework contractor is to immediately initiate stabilization of exposed soil areas and complete the stabilization within seven calendar days after the construction activity in that portion of the site temporarily or permanently ceases. The SWPPP will also direct the contractor to construct temporary sediment basins for common drainage locations that serve an area with five or more acres disturbed Rosedale Center EAW 9 February 2020 at one time. These specific items will be noted in the SWPPP to satisfy the impairment requirements of Little Lake Johanna. iii. Water Appropriation - Describe if the project proposes to appropriate surface or groundwater (including dewatering). Describe the source, quantity, duration, use, and purpose of the water use and if a DNR water appropriation permit is required. Describe any well abandonment. If connecting to an existing municipal water supply, identify the wells to be used as a water source and any effects on, or required expansion of, municipal water infrastructure. Discuss environmental effects from water appropriation, including an assessment of the water resources available for appropriation. Identify any measures to avoid, minimize, or mitigate environmental effects from the water appropriation. Water appropriation is not anticipated for the project. However, if dewatering is required for construction, a permit will be obtained from the DNR. No wells have been identified within the project site; therefore, no well abandonment is anticipated. iv. Surface Waters 1) Wetlands - Describe any anticipated physical effects or alterations to wetland features, such as draining, filling, permanent inundation, dredging, and vegetative removal. Discuss direct and indirect environmental effects from physical modification of wetlands, including the anticipated effects that any proposed wetland alterations may have to the host watershed. Identify measures to avoid (e.g., available alternatives that were considered), minimize, or mitigate environmental effects to wetlands. Discuss whether any required compensatory wetland mitigation for unavoidable wetland impacts will occur in the same minor or major watershed, and identify those probable locations. No wetlands are located within the project site; therefore, no impacts to wetland features are anticipated. 2) Other surface waters - Describe any anticipated physical effects or alterations to surface water features (lakes, streams, ponds, intermittent channels, county/judicial ditches) such as draining, filling, permanent inundation, dredging, diking, stream diversion, impoundment, aquatic plant removal, and riparian alteration. Discuss direct and indirect environmental effects from physical modification of water features. Identify measures to avoid, minimize, or mitigate environmental effects to surface water features, including in -water Best Management Practices that are proposed to avoid or minimize turbidity/sedimentation while physically altering the water features. Discuss how the project will change the number or type of watercraft on any water body, including current and projected watercraft usage. There are no lakes, streams, wetlands, or intermittent channels proximate to the project site; therefore, no impacts to these resources are anticipated. Ramsey County Ditch 4 is located in storm sewer along County Road 32 and Fairview Avenue adjacent to the project site (see Figure 4) but would not be Rosedale Center EAW 10 February 2020 impacted. The Site falls within the Rice Creek Watershed Flood Zone Management Zone. Therefore, the runoff rates from the site must provide at least a 20% reduction in the runoff rates. This reduction will reduce the flows in Ditch 4 and reduce downstream flooding. 12.Contamination/Hazardous Materials/Wastes a. Pre -project Site Conditions - Describe existing contamination or potential environmental hazards on or in close proximity to the project site, such as soil or groundwater contamination, abandoned dumps, closed landfills, existing or abandoned storage tanks, and hazardous liquid or gas pipelines. Discuss any potential environmental effects from pre -project site conditions that would be caused or exacerbated by project construction and operation. Identify measures to avoid, minimize, or mitigate adverse effects from existing contamination or potential environmental hazards. Include development of a Contingency Plan or Response Action Plan. MPCA's What's In My Neighborhood (WIMN) database was reviewed to determine if any known contaminated properties or potential environmental hazards are located on the project site or within 100 feet of the project site, and 20 sites were identified (see Table 5 and Figure 5). Of the 20 sites, 11 have activities that are listed as active. Using the following criteria established by the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT), the sites were classified into high, medium, and low risk sites: • High risk: In general, sites with high environmental risks are properties that have documented releases of chemicals or hazardous or regulated substances (e.g., active and inactive state and federal cleanup sites, active and inactive dump sites, and active leaking underground storage tank sites), strong evidence of contamination (e.g., soil staining, stressed vegetation), or storage of large volumes of petroleum or other chemicals (e.g., bulk storage tank facilities). • Medium risk: Sites of medium environmental risk are properties where smaller volumes of petroleum, chemicals, or hazardous materials are frequently stored and used (e.g., registered underground and aboveground storage tanks, vehicle repair facilities, metal working shops), but at which no evidence of spills or releases exists, or properties with documented releases that have been "closed" (signifying no further cleanup actions deemed necessary) by the MPCA. Closed sites, such as closed leaking underground storage tank sites, are considered medium risks because residual soil or groundwater contamination may exist. • Low risk: Low environmental risk sites include properties where minor volumes of chemicals or hazardous materials have been used or stored (e.g., hazardous waste generators, and possibly some farmsteads and residences). Table 5: MPCA WIMN Sites Within 100 Feet of the Project Site Rosedale Center EAW 11 February 2020 Site I D Site Name Activity Activity Status Risk Ranking Montgomery Wards Auto Hazardous waste, very 22902 Active Low Express small quantity generator Hazardous waste, very 26442 Macy's North - Rosedale Active Low small quantity generator 30221 Proex 1538 Hazardous waste Inactive Low Ritz Camera 395 - Rosedale 32413 Hazardous waste Inactive Low Shopping Ctr 50439 Hollister Co - Rosedale Hazardous waste Inactive Low 49873 Abercrombie & Fitch - Rosedale Hazardous waste Inactive Low 50672 Abercrombie - Rosedale Hazardous waste Inactive Low 122836 AnnTaylor Store 0335 Hazardous waste Inactive Low Hazardous waste, very 139170 Victoria's Secret 161 Active Low small quantity generator 139178 Bath & Body Works #58 Hazardous waste Inactive Low Hazardous waste, minimal 146926 Talbots Inc 338 Active Low quantity generator Hazardous waste, very 149806 Express 58 Active Low small quantity generator Hazardous waste, verysmall 226094 Von Maur, Inc. Active Low quantity generator 129248 County Road B-2 Construction stormwater Inactive Low TH 51 & County Road B2 220407 Construction stormwater Active Low Intersection Improvements 97234 Rosedale Center- CSW Construction stormwater Inactive Low Petroleum remediation - 192546 Roseville Mall Inactive Medium Leaksite 115745 Rosedale Shopping Center Underground tanks Active Medium 30197 Rosedale Center Hazardous waste Inactive Low Two of the 20 sites were categorized as medium risk: a closed petroleum remediation leak site (Site ID 192546) and registered underground tanks (Site ID 115745). A Response Action Plan will be developed that outlines the safe handling and disposal of any contamination and hazardous materials found on the site during construction. b. Project Related Generation/Storage of Solid Wastes - Describe solid wastes generated/stored during construction and/or operation of the project. Indicate method of disposal. Discuss potential environmental effects from solid waste handling, storage, and disposal. Identify measures to avoid, minimize, or mitigate adverse effects from the generation/storage of solid waste including source reduction and recycling. Demolition debris and earth materials would be generated during demolition of the vacant Herberger's building and surface parking lot. Demolition debris is inert material such as concrete, brick, bituminous, and rock. The solid wastes generated during demolition would be recycled or disposed of at a state -permitted landfill. For solid waste generated from the completed project, a source recycling/separation plan would be implemented, and wastes that cannot be recycled would be managed in accordance with state regulations and guidelines. Rosedale Center EAW 12 February 2020 Construction of the proposed development would generate construction -related waste materials such as wood, packaging, excess materials, and other wastes, which would either be recycled or disposed of in the proper facilities in accordance with state regulations and guidelines. c. Project Related Use/Storage of Hazardous Materials - Describe chemicals/hazardous materials used/stored during construction and/or operation of the project including method of storage. Indicate the number, location, and size of any above or below ground tanks to store petroleum or other materials. Discuss potential environmental effects from accidental spills or releases of hazardous materials. Identify measures to avoid, minimize, or mitigate adverse effects from the use/storage of chemicals/hazardous materials including source reduction and recycling. Include development of a spill prevention plan. No new aboveground or underground storage tanks will be added to the site. Any hazardous waste materials used/stored during construction and/or operation of the project will be disposed of in the manner specified by local or state regulation or by the manufacturer. A spill prevention plan will be developed, and proper spill prevention controls will be in place for any vehicle refueling or maintenance that occurs on site during construction or storage or hazardous waste as described in the section below. d. Project Related Generation/Storage of Hazardous Wastes - Describe hazardous wastes generated/stored during construction and/or operation of the project. Indicate method of disposal. Discuss potential environmental effects from hazardous waste handling, storage, and disposal. Identify measures to avoid, minimize, or mitigate adverse effects from the generation/storage of hazardous wastes including source reduction and recycling. Regulated material and/or waste will be managed in accordance with state requirements. No known toxic or hazardous wastes are anticipated to be generated on site. If any toxic or hazardous waste is generated on the site, it will be properly handled to current state and federal regulations. Toxic or hazardous wastes to be stored on site during construction will include fuel and oil necessary for maintaining and running heavy construction equipment and during operations may include commercial cleaning supplies. 13. Fish, Wildlife, Plant Communities, and Sensitive Ecological Resources (Rare Features) a. Describe fish and wildlife resources as well as habitats and vegetation on or near the site. The project site has been previously disturbed through construction of the existing Rosedale Center. There is no habitat within the project site besides sparse pockets of deciduous tree cover (boulevard trees) and lawn (turf grass). Due to the fragmented and low -quality urban habitat, the wildlife that inhabit this area, if any, are generalist species adapted to highly disturbed conditions. These species are Rosedale Center EAW 13 February 2020 generally more tolerant of human presence and activities and have demonstrated by their presence that they adapt readily to the human environment. The project is not located within any regionally significant ecological areas (RSEAs). b. Describe rare features such as state -listed (endangered, threatened, or special concern) species, native plant communities, Minnesota County Biological Survey Sites of Biodiversity Significance, and other sensitive ecological resources on or within close proximity to the site. Provide the license agreement number (LA-843) from which the data were obtained, and attach the Natural Heritage letter from the DNR. Indicate if any additional habitat or species survey work has been conducted within the site and describe results. A review of the DNR Natural Heritage Inventory System database was conducted (LA- 965) for the area within approximately one mile of the project, and three species were identified (see Table 6). Given the highly disturbed nature of the project site, there is minimal likelihood of finding suitable habitat for these species. Table 6: State -Listed Species Within the Review Area c. Discuss how the identified fish, wildlife, plant communities, rare features, and ecosystems may be affected by the project. Include a discussion on introduction and spread of invasive species from the project construction and operation. Separately discuss effects to known threatened and endangered species. No impacts to fish, wildlife, plant communities, rare features, or ecosystems are anticipated. The proposed project would not result in the introduction of invasive species. Disturbed areas would be reestablished using appropriate native and stabilization seed mixes. d. Identify measures that will betaken to avoid, minimize, or mitigate adverse effects to fish, wildlife, plant communities, and sensitive ecological resources. No adverse effects to fish, wildlife, plant communities, and sensitive ecological resources are anticipated as a result of the proposed project. Bird -friendly construction methods will be used for the proposed residential and office buildings such as outer building materials, window treatments, and lighting, to avoid and minimize impacts to migrating birds to the extent practicable. Rosedale Center EAW 14 February 2020 14. Historic Properties Describe any historic structures, archeological sites, and/or traditional cultural properties on or in close proximity to the site. Include 1) historic designations; 2) known artifact areas; and 3) architectural features. Attach letter received from the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO). Discuss any anticipated effects to historic properties during project construction and operation. Identify measures that will be taken to avoid, minimize, or mitigate adverse effects to historic properties. A search of the Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office's Statewide Inventory Database was requested to identify known historic properties and archaeological sites in the project vicinity. Within Section 9, Township 29, Range 23W, no archaeological records and four historic property records were identified (see Attachment B). The names of the four historic properties are: • TH 51 • TH 51 - Larpenteur-Hamline • KSTP Transmitter • Rosedale Shopping Center None of these properties are listed in or determined eligible for the National Register of Historic Places. The proposed project would not adversely affect TH 51 (Snelling Avenue) or the KSTP Transmitter, which is located approximately 'Amile north of the project site along Snelling Avenue. The proposed project would result in changes to the Rosedale Shopping Center; however, numerous improvements and changes have occurred to the Rosedale Shopping Center over the years. No adverse impacts to historic properties are anticipated. 15. Visual Describe any scenic views or vistas on or near the project site. Describe any project related visual effects such as vapor plumes or glare from intense lights. Discuss the potential visual effects from the project. Identify any measures to avoid, minimize, or mitigate visual effects. The project site includes an existing retail center that is not near any unique scenic views or vistas. The proposed project would result in the construction of structures up to 85 feet high, which is consistent with the existing development, and lighting would be in conformance with city ordinances. Views would be similar to those experienced currently, and no visual impacts are anticipated. 16.Air a. Stationary Source Emissions - Describe the type, sources, quantities, and compositions of any emissions from stationary sources such as boilers or exhaust stacks. Include any hazardous air pollutants, criteria pollutants, and any greenhouse gases. Discuss effects to air quality including any sensitive receptors, human health, or applicable regulatory criteria. Include a discussion of any methods used to assess the project's effect on air quality and the results of that assessment. Identify pollution control equipment and other measures that will be taken to avoid, minimize, or mitigate adverse effects from stationary source emissions. Rosedale Center EAW 15 February 2020 No stationary source emissions are anticipated; therefore, no mitigation is required. b. Vehicle Emissions - Describe the effect of the project's traffic generation on air emissions. Discuss the project's vehicle -related emissions effect on air quality. Identify measures (e.g., traffic operational improvements, diesel idling minimization plan) that will be taken to minimize or mitigate vehicle -related emissions. Motor vehicles emit a variety of air pollutants including carbon monoxide (CO), hydrocarbons, nitrogen oxides, and particulates. The primary pollutant of concern is CO, which is a byproduct of the combustion process of motor vehicles. CO concentrations are highest where vehicles idle for extended periods of time. For this reason, CO concentrations are generally highest in vicinity of signalized intersections where vehicles are delayed and emitting CO. Generally, concentrations approaching state air quality standards are found within about 100 feet of a roadway source. Further from the road, the CO in the air is dispersed by the wind such that concentrations rapidly decrease. MnDOT has developed a screening method designed to identify intersections that will not cause a CO impact above state standards. MnDOT has demonstrated that even the 10 highest traffic volume intersections in the Twin Cities do not experience CO impacts. Therefore, intersections with traffic volumes lower than these 10 highest intersections will not cause a CO impact above state standards. MnDOT's screening method demonstrates that intersections with total daily approaching traffic volumes below 82,300 vehicles per day will not have the potential for causing CO air pollution problems. None of the intersections in the study area exceed the criteria that would lead to a violation of the air quality standards. Table 7 identifies the approaching volumes for the surrounding roadways Table 7: Approaching Volumes for Surrounding Roadways Intersection Fairview Avenue & TH 36 EB Ramps •.• Long Term SAT Peak Hour 2745 D. 27,450 Fairview Avenue & TH 36 WB Ramps 3,995 39,950 Fairview Avenue & Mall Entrance #1 3,840 38,400 Fairview Avenue & County Road B2 4,165 41,650 County Road B2 & Mall Entrance #2 2,960 29,600 County Road B2 & Mall Entrance #3 3,235 32,350 County Road B2 & Snelling Avenue SB Ramps 3,295 32,950 County Road B2 & Snelling Avenue NB Ramps 1,760 17,600 c. Dust and Odors - Describe sources, characteristics, duration, quantities, and intensity of dust and odors generated during project construction and operation. (Fugitive dust may be discussed under Item 16a). Discuss the effect of dust and odors in the vicinity of the project including nearby sensitive receptors and qualify of life. Identify measures that will be taken to minimize or mitigate the effects of dust and odors. The project would generate temporary fugitive dust emissions during construction. These emissions would be controlled by watering, sprinkling, or calcium chloride application, as appropriate or as prevailing weather and soil conditions dictate. Dust emissions are not anticipated during operations as all surfaces will either be impervious or vegetated. Rosedale Center EAW 16 February 2020 The construction and operation of the project are not anticipated to generate objectionable odors. Dust and odors are not anticipated to have a significant impact on human health, quality of life, or the environment. 17. Noise Describe sources, characteristics, duration, quantities, and intensity of noise generated during project construction and operation. Discuss the effect of noise in the vicinity of the project including 1) existing noise levels/sources in the area; 2) nearby sensitive receptors; 3) conformance to state noise standards; and 4) quality of life. Identify measures that will be taken to minimize or mitigate the effects of noise. Noise Sources The project site is an existing retail center surrounded by state highways and county roads. The existing traffic noise sources at the site are Fairview Avenue, TH 36, County Road B2, and Snelling Avenue. The surrounding roadways are not being modified as a result of construction of the proposed project. All improvements for this development will be on site and not on the public roadways. Construction Noise The Roseville Code of Ordinances regulates both the hours of operation for construction equipment and allowable noise levels. Construction of the proposed project would comply with these requirements. Operational Noise The Roseville Code of Ordinances and the MPCA regulate mechanical noise associated with building operation. The occupancy of the proposed project will comply with these requirements. Noise Sensitive Areas The site includes residential (FHWA Activity Category B), Retail (FHWA Activity Category F), Hotel (FHWA Activity Category E), office (FHWA Activity Category E). The lowest activity criteria level is the residential FHWA Activity Category B. Outdoor spaces are proposed within the residential portion of the site. Highway noise is anticipated to be the primary source of noise in the project vicinity. Reasonably available noise mitigation measures will be employed to abate noise, per the Statue requirements for the proposed development. The site plan has been designed so the residential outdoor spaces are buffered from the surrounding roadways by the buildings which will act as a noise barrier to mitigate some of the traffic noise from the surrounding roadways. The residential buildings are also a few hundred feet from the nearest roadway which also provides a buffer between the residential areas and the surrounding roadways. Building materials and other strategies will be utilized during the design and construction of the hotel and residential buildings to minimize noise for the tenants in those buildings. Rosedale Center EAW 17 February 2020 18.Transportation a. Describe traffic -related aspects of project construction and operation. Include 1) existing and proposed additional parking spaces; 2) estimated total average daily traffic generated; 3) estimated maximum peak hour traffic generated and time of occurrence; 4) source of trip generation rates used in the estimates; and 5) availability of transit and/or other alternative transportation modes. The existing site includes approximately 5,687 parking spaces in lots distributed around the site. The total proposed parking would provide 5,725 spaces. Rosedale Center is currently served by four signalized access points (one on Fairview Avenue and three on County Road B2 W) and a one-way internal ring road. The proposal includes conversion of the existing one-way internal ring road to a two-way internal ring road. No new access points are proposed. Trip generation for the additional retail space was based on turning movement counts performed in January and February 2019. Based on the counts, there was approximately 2,205 trips generated during the weekday PM peak hour and 3,480 trips generated during the Saturday peak hour. Based on the existing 1,150,000 square feet of leased space, the weekday PM peak hour trip rate equated to 1.76 trips per 1,000 square feet and the Saturday peak hour trip rate equated to 3.03 trips per 1,000 square feet. These trips rates were used to determine the amount of traffic generated by the proposed retail space. The Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) Trip Generation, Tenth Edition, was used to calculate the anticipated net new external project trips for the remaining land uses assumed for the proposed development (residential, hotel, and office uses). Internal capture was calculated consistent with the ITE Trip Generation Manual. The proposed expansion is anticipated to generate 575 new trips during the weekday PM peak hour (280 entering and 295 exiting) and 845 trips during the Saturday peak hour (470 entering and 375 exiting) (see the Traffic Impact Analysis included as Attachment C). The Rosedale Transit Center is located within the project site and is served by the A Line and Routes 32, 65, 87, 223, 225, 227, 264, and 801. There is a second transit stop within the project site by the entrance to Big Bowl that is served by Routes 87, 223, 225, 227, and 801. Additional transit stops served by these routes are located on Fairview Avenue and County Road B2 W. Existing and future pedestrian connections have been identified within the project site. These existing and future connections tie into the existing sidewalks within the project vicinity and surrounding area as shown in Attachment D. The pedestrian ring road crossings will be improved by making them more prominent and visible to vehicles. Raised table top crosswalks, overhead flashing lights, and improved signage are examples of the pedestrian improvements that will be incorporated as portions of the mall are redeveloped or reconstructed. The widths and materials of the pedestrian connections will comply with the City of Roseville requirements. Rosedale Center EAW 18 February 2020 b. Discuss the effect on traffic congestion on affected roads and describe any traffic improvements necessary. The analysis must discuss the project's impact on the regional transportation system. If the peak hour traffic generated exceeds 250 vehicles or the total daily trips exceeds 2,500, a traffic impact study must be prepared as part of the EAW. Use the format and procedures described in the Minnesota Department of Transportation's Access Management Manual, Chapter 5 (available at. http://www.dot.state.mn.usl accessmanagement/resources.htmo or a similar local guidance. Intersection level of service (LOS) analysis was performed (see Attachment C) for each of the following intersections using the signalized and unsignalized analysis methodology found in the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) and Trafficware's Synchro/SimTraffic version 10: • Fairview Avenue & TH 36 (eastbound) • Fairview Avenue & TH 36 (westbound) • Fairview Avenue & Rosedale Center Driveway # 1 • Fairview Avenue & County Road B2 W • County Road B2 W & Rosedale Center Driveway#2 • County Road B2 W & Rosedale Center Driveway#3 • County Road B2 W & Snelling Avenue (nouthbound) • County Road B2 W & Snelling Avenue (northbound) • Major internal ring road intersections LOS is a qualitative letter grade (A through F) based on seconds of vehicle delay due to the traffic control device at an intersection. By definition, LOS A conditions represent high -quality operations (i.e., motorists experience very little delay or interference) and LOS F conditions represent very poor operations (i.e., extreme delay or severe congestion). This study used the LOS D/E boundary as an indicator of satisfactory traffic operations. Table 8 provides Short -Term Build (2024) delay and LOS for both the weekday PM and Saturday peak hours. The analysis represents 5-year growth in the background volumes to 2024 and the addition of proposed project traffic. Table 8: Short -Term Build (2024) Level of Service Summary WeekdaySaturday Delay Delay (seconds/• • Fairview Avenue at TH 36 EB Signal vehicle) 13.3 B vehicle) 19.1 B Fairview Avenue at TH 36 WB Signal 28.6 C 56.3 E Fairview Avenue at Rosedale Signal 18.5 C 29.1 C Center Driveway # 1 Fairview Avenue at County Road Signal 27.6 C 44.2 D B2 W County Road B2 W at Rosedale Signal 11.1 B 18.0 B Center Driveway #2 County Road B2 W at Rosedale Signal 19.0 B 29.4 C Center Driveway #3 Rosedale Center EAW 19 February 2020 Weekday.. Intersection Control Delay Delay (seconds/.. County Road B2 W at Snelling Signal vehicle) 23.6 C vehicle) 32.1 C Avenue SB County Road B2 W at Snelling Signal 7.8 A 17.4 B Avenue NB Internal Intersection # 1 A Stop Control 2.9 / 6.8 A / A 6.6 / 15.5 A / C Internal Intersection # 1 B Stop Control 5.0 / 8.8 A / A 12.0 / 17.1 B / C Internal Intersection #2 Stop Control 6.1 / 7.1 A / A 20.2 / 34.6 C / D Internal Intersection #3 Stop Control 6.6 / 10.3 A / B 8.1 / 16.5 A / C Internal Intersection #4 Stop Control 1 5.3 / 9.0 1 A / A 1 3.6 / 11.9 1 A / B Three intersections have movements that are not anticipated to operate at an acceptable level of service during the weekday PM peak hour and/or Saturday peak hour: • Fairview Avenue at TH 36 (eastbound): During the Saturday peak hour, the westbound left -turn movement is anticipated to operate at LOS F. This is due to the queue spillback from the westbound right -turn movement. • Fairview Avenue at TH 36 (westbound): During the Saturday peak hour, the northbound left -turn and through movements are anticipated to operate at LOS F. This is due to poor lane utilization for northbound traffic where the majority of the through traffic is utilized the outside lane to position themselves to enter Rosedale Center at the downstream intersection. • Fairview Avenue at County Road B2 W: During the Saturday peak hour, the eastbound right -turn movement is anticipated to operate at LOS F. All other intersections (and their movements) are anticipated to operate at LOS D or better during the weekday PM peak hour and Saturday peak hour. c. Identify measures that will betaken to minimize or mitigate project related transportation effects. Improvements to the traffic network in the study area will be required to help mitigate excessive queuing and delays. Only those improvements that could be implemented without major reconstruction of the roadway and surrounding area were considered as mitigation. The following improvements were assumed for the 2024 build -out year and will need to be explored further with the City of Roseville, Ramsey County, and MnDOT: • Fairview Avenue at TH 36 (eastbound) o Convert the westbound right -turn from yield control to a free movement o Optimize splits and offset for the traffic signal • Fairview Avenue at TH 36 (westbound) o Convert the northbound right -turn lane into a third northbound through lane. This will require modifying the existing channelized islands on the east side of Fairview Avenue, in addition to the relocation or replacement of the northbound and eastbound approach signal poles and mast arms. Rosedale Center EAW 20 February 2020 o Construct a new northbound right -turn lane that serves the on -ramp to TH 36 (westbound) o Traffic signal modification. Optimize splits and offset for the traffic signal. Fairview Avenue at County Road B2 W o Construct an eastbound right -turn lane (if right-of-way is available) o Optimize splits and offset for the traffic signal With the recommended improvements, all intersections are anticipated to operate at an acceptable level of service for Short -Term Build (2024) conditions during the weekday PM and Saturday peak hours (see Table 9). Table 9: Short -Term Build (2024) with Improvements Level of Service Summary Fairview Avenue at TH 36 EB Signal 13.2 B 13.5 B Fairview Avenue at TH 36 WB Signal 26.7 C 28.9 C Fairview Avenue at County Road B2 W Signal 24.1 C 27.1 C Many of the improvements are necessary due to the significant retail growth adjacent to the Rosedale Center and not directly associated with the project. All the intersections are anticipated to operate at an acceptable level of service for the 2040 analysis year with the recommendations above in place. It is recommended that the Fairview Avenue and County Road B2 W corridors be retimed sometime before the horizon year to improve the operations of the two corridors. 19.Cumulative Potential Effects a. Describe the geographic scales and fimeframes of the project related environmental effects that could combine with other environmental effects resulting in cumulative potential effects. Cumulative effects are defined as "the impact on the environment which results from the incremental impact of the action when added to other past, present, and reasonable foreseeable future actions regardless of what agency or persons undertakes such actions." The geographic areas considered for cumulative effects are those areas adjacent to the project site, and the timeframe considered includes projects that would be constructed in the next five years b. Describe any reasonably foreseeable future projects (for which a basis of expectation has been laid) that may interact with environmental effects of the proposed project within the geographic scales and fimeframes identified above. No reasonably foreseeable future projects have been identified adjacent to the project site. c. Discuss the nature of the cumulative potential effects and summarize any other available information relevant to determining whether there is potential for significant environmental effects due to these cumulative effects. Rosedale Center EAW 21 February 2020 Because no reasonably foreseeable future projects have been identified, there is no known potential for cumulative effects. Impacts from future developments adjacent to the project site will be addressed via the regulatory permitting and approval processes and will be individually mitigated to ensure minimal cumulative impacts occur. 20.Other Potential Environmental Effects If the project may cause any additional environmental effects not addressed by Items 1 to 19, describe the effects here, discuss the how the environment will be affected, and identify measures that will be taken to minimize and mitigate these effects. All known environmental effects are addressed in the preceding sections. Rosedale Center EAW 22 February 2020 RGU Certification The Environmental Quality Board will only accept SIGNED Environmental Assessment Worksheets for public notice in the EQB Monitor. I hereby certify that: • The information contained in this document is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. • The EAW describes the complete project; there are no other projects, stages, or components other than those described in this document, which are related to the project as connected actions or phased actions, as defined at Minnesota Rules, parts 4410.0200, subparts 9c and 60, respectively, • Copies of this EAW are being sent to the entire EQB distribution list. Sign Title Date Rosedale Center EAW 23 February 2020 Figures Rosedale Center EAW 24 February 2020 Figure 1: County Map wr T Anoka County Project Location Hennepin County Dakota County 0 0 1.5 3 Miles Washington County Rosedale Center EAW 25 February 2020 Figure 2: USGS Map Legend ® Project Site J I � w , r w£T Yqq I r i {3 � I - LB U1 �1 �rkcoN s7 ( VVV • M1 lr oli S � •' r ,�,- '� LpRaFvreu 0 0 1,000 2,000 Feet �— i 1CRRCN `�'F l ne' �kt SKRLMi•N ��cl � ir'fAri c 17 Rosedale Center EAW 26 February 2020 Figure 3: Existing Project Site Legend 'i Project Site E yE > I S - � I � {'T- - `fir I, � � � q • � - � •+. s • - _ - " w_1 s � - r County ROa17B2 51 � 4 � ,� ➢ s Yr �f� d 36 '° S rvice • r - - 4 .+ `P 0 250 u 500 I Feet a ..• WA Rosedale Center EAW 27 February 2020 Little Lake Johanna 1� K *SAN 19 - _ 62.58 P Oasis 62-205 W Legend Project Site �1 Mile from Project Site Public Water Basins or Wetlands Public Ditch/Altered Natural Watercourse — Public Water Watercourse Approximate Ramsey County Ditch 4 Location (partially within storm sewer) ® Impaired Lakes - - - Impaired Streams PWI ID 62014a Zimmerman 62-53 W ■ i F � tiI .a 51 ♦,: 0 0 1,OOD 2,000 sommo== Feet Rosedale Center EAW 28 February 2020 Figure 5: MPCA WIMN Sites Within 100 Feet of the Project Site Legend Project Site What's in My Neighborhood Sites Within 100 Feet of the Project Site ® m i i Oakcrest �. a ifs s ey : A as . �C«ountyKoad BZ - - !t _ _ .�;� � .. � r9 Rosedale Center EAW 29 February 2020 Attachment A Concept Site Plan Rosedale Center EAW January 2020 i ' M ElAll E ■ HOTEL RESIDENTIAL -SERVICE ACCESS -VEHICULAR ACCESS -PEDESTRIAN ACCESS CPenney 00 000000 // VON MAUR MIXED PROGRAM - OVERALL JANUARY 16, 2020 OM N I PLAN CONCEPT ACCESS STUDY ROSEDALE C E N T E R (JLL Kimley»>Horn ...o O, RAL MALL ANALYSIS-=--couv ROAD e��- OVE _ 2M UPS SO HERE FEE OF COMMERCIAL US SO THIS SITE FTEL LLNL%RA NO LED A ME DO EPTIALL AN OF NO 0 ED ENDED M ENT THE CURRENT PROP OSAL "I OF MY FORCES SPECIFIC USERS MAE 11 CASTLE AND a BE SCOVPORETEO WO THEFILM PI AN 72 LEADS DOORMAT Ei, Li 4� �plrrin nTIFfl p F % MUSEED ESIPIAWAS PECED PER CEREALS ..TE..TE� vriiiiuuuus�o �uu ur LARY PUTS USERS MUCH SOMMER{ GN aa® I � .o.�. ,;;; �CPENNE'MAUR = a �oa®� _i I HE AMON HERLEOPERACTME AND HANDS INTERNATTENANT.E�o� �� — II WIIT , y� R \ oa®�..�........ d.o I 1K�i,SPACES 32 dl .tea I ® oar I `••• \ -a a� MARC A m 1 MOVED u...o 0 — t �� l . a TUeps m m. PENA mma� L ✓ice ,. MIXED m o Ni �® o�:Aa:a®SE;NEPAL :��TE j� ��� — — ��sEE WED LOMPLAFFN APPEALE NEPAL 1 MACV's O A �A ......oA NO POSEDA..®...d...a..o.....o...o.000.....MEEN HE .2 DRUM ewo 01 svis I an® ESNPPER j • A NO POSED AMID STARS FUEL U N ACE MAE 21 o.. a.oaa.®oa CIA AS AS �.o.A®�PAN J q_ SPACES Pi IMPOSE IMPOSE _ SOMALI LAC MUTEREPON IS N. MASAI :o®:a MEMEN r �. nq®®:�°""A � TRUNK HIGHWAY N0.36 W 17m owWIP ING00 0 A MAP in s NON AM n..ADMATTALL LOSS ® amNO 5 SO USE AN �ANTENAO: ES, I,% N CACHE LINE SAPPLAX POLL AM win IN TH . ®. �.. .®...PLANKING®b �a� ANE CAP A LINE UEo�A��:oACE . . A...ok.oIN I'M CTORS OLD ��:o. � _, ��_°e �° :L On IiT+awWAS oeo. �v .., v. ean. 9 PAN, ..A � FM M SCALE TVPICALACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGNING FR IRI FERRARO IRI AND PARKING DETAILS NCINITVMAPUND AS AS AS —�1ID1 wz z w ow 0� DATE oz202C i OF IS YCA COUNTY ROAD B2 ERI it ��� • l� - SEViB/IMf J � / 'YYY JII II II II III¢ ARRI `� i �M ? V IIII y I 0,4 YO�%,;� �. �IIIIIIIIII IF 8 j dcmENNEv w V. MAUR� !i _ \a�I i a oaAD4C THEATEF�, w � o g U V MAY V'S p DID, D. A REDI��• �� ���� • kEPMDNGIETI a.o.^•�.^....v<^...^_. a._ 4 ( SREIk- �� \\ X, D \ _ Luj LIJ e E TauNu wcHwnv No.3e W ASzz w 2 WEDATE W 1111711021 Q w W C N� 0 vlci Niiv MAP 2OFS cbuNTv aono as PELSBPUC \ / YYY' rNN • JIIIIIIIII'II II II ILr E3 oN �ce dcvevmEv L zljn x V, t MAUR I II Q 3 1 Y 21 DIP MU \ ^ R Ip I 1 V tisAcvs �I ��.�.o v u�— y / 2 PC / /711 a s / =__ III II++ �� _ __= n ; " i 1 _--_ __ -- __�'--=___ a Lu �- - -- w Lu �. - e F TaumuwcewAv moae W .� i tilr - _ - - z z am SITE V 2 w a w wc N� a 021171202C GHEETNUMBER vlawry MAP 3OF5 r ' 2�E Al. l� spa RIII 3,m. i —m s� i - O LL`�ry JTCPENNEV y.j� & MAUR illIm ��e..,. ..� MACYS ,J j TRUNKHIGHWAV N0.36 Mm m r` O 2 6 ^\ YbTt o� It [L v LLI> �w Q w Z W 2 SITE V j w W C DATE 021171202C VICINITY MAP lm� 4OF5 SITE MICINITV c L ' 2 ® F veg lea Attachment B SHPO Correspondence Rosedale Center EAW January 2020 From: MN MNIT Data Reauest SHPO To: Dammel, Rachel Subject: RE: Database Search Request- Roseville, MN Date: Friday, June 21, 2019 2:48:37 PM Attachments: imaae001.ona RamsevHistoric.xls Hello Rachel, Attached is your requested historic report. Our database has no archaeologic records for the given area. ININ SHPO Data Requests Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office 50 Sherburne Avenue, Suite 203 Saint Paul, MN 55155 (651) 201-3295 datarequestshpo(@state.mn.us Notice: This email message simply reports the results of the cultural resources database search you requested. The database search is only for previously known archaeological sites and historic properties. IN NO CASE DOES THIS DATABASE SEARCH OR EMAIL MESSAGE CONSTITUTE A PROJECT REVIEW UNDER STATE OR FEDERAL PRESERVATION LAWS —please see our website at https://mr.gov/ad mi n/shpo/protection/for further information regarding our Environmental Review Process. Because the majorityof archaeological sites in the state and many historic/architectural properties have not been recorded, important sites or properties may exist within the search area and may be affected by development projects within that area. Additional research, including field surveys, may be necessary to adequately assess the area's potential to contain historic properties or archaeological sites. Properties that are listed in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) or have been determined eligible for listing in the N RHP are indicated on the reports you have received, if any. The following codes may be on those reports: NR— National Register listed. The properties may be individually listed or may be within the boundaries of a National Register District. CEF—Considered Eligible Findings are made when a federal agency has recommended that a property is eligible for listing in the National Register and MN SHPO has accepted the recommendation for the purposes of the Environmental Review Process. These properties need to be further assessed before they are officially listed in the National Register. SEF—Staff eligible Findings are those properties the MN SH PO staff considers eligible for listing in the National Register, in circumstances other than the Environmental Review Process. DOE— Determination of Eligibility is made by the National Park Service and are those properties that are eligible for listing in the National Register, but have not been officially listed. CNEF—Considered Not Eligible Findings are made during the course of the Environmental Review Process. For the purposes of the review a property is considered not eligible for listing in the National Register. These properties may need to be reassessed for eligibility under additional or alternatecontexts. Properties without NR, CEF, SEF, DOE, or CNEF designations in the reports may not have been evaluated and therefore no assumption to their eligibility can be made. Integrity and contexts change overtime, therefore any eligibility determination made ten (10) or more years from the date of the current survey are considered out of date and the property will need to be reassessed. If you require a comprehensive assessment of a project's potential to impact archaeological sites or historic/architectural properties, you may need to hire a qualified archaeologist and/or historian. If you need assistance with a project review, please contact Kelly Gragg-Johnson, Environmental Review Specialist @ 651-201- 3285 or by email at kelly.RraRRiohnson@state.mn.us. The Minnesota SHPO Archaeologyand Historic/Architectural Survey Manuals can be found at https://mr.gov/admir/shpo/idertificatior-evaluatior/. MIN SHPO research hours are 8:30 AM-4:00 PMTuesday-Friday. Please call ahead at 651-201-3295 to ensure staff is available to assist you, if necessary. Thankyou. From: Dammel, Rachel <Rachel.DammeI@kimley-horn.com> Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2019 3:52 PM To: MN_MNIT_Data Request SHPO <DataRequestSHPO@state.mn.us> Subject: Database Search Request- Roseville, MN Hello, I am writing to request a database search for a proposed project at Rosedale Center in Roseville, MN. The project is located in Section 9, Township 29, Range 23W, and a USGS map and a map of the existing site are attached foryour reference. Please let me know if you have any questions or need additional information. Thankyou, Rachel Dammel Rachel Dammel, AICP Kim ley -Horn 1 767 Eustis Street, Suite 100, Saint Paul, MN 55114 Direct: 651 643 0412 1 www.kimlev-horn.com COUNTY CITYTWP PROPNAME ADDRESS TOW RAN SECQUAR USGS REPORTNUINVENTNUM Ramsey Trunk Hwy 51 Trunk Hwy 51 - Larpenteur-Hamline Roseville KSTP Transmitter Rosedale Shopping Center N/A Trunk Hwy 51 2561 Snelling Ave. N 1595 Hwy 36 W 29 23 9 New Brighton RA-ROD-001 29 23 9 New Brighton RA-ROD-002 29 23 9NENE New Brighton RA-81-2H RA-RVC-0019 29 23 9 New Brighton RA-RVC-0048 Attachment C Traffic Impact Analysis Rosedale Center EAW February 2020 ROSEDALE CENTER Traffic Impact Analysis ROSEVILLE, MINNESOTA 101[611=Ikh1-34ZW4111:1 UPDATED JANUARY 2020 Prepared By: Kimley)))Horn Traffic Impact Analysis ROSEDALE CENTER Roseville, Minnesota Prepared by: Kimley-Horn Saint Paul, Minnesota I certify that this Traffic Impact Analysis has been prepared by me or under my immediate supervision and that I have experience and training in the field of traffic and transportation engineering. Rim Date: Rosedale Center I Traffic Impact Analysis January 2020 Update Douglas M. Arnold, P.E. Minnesota Registration #52721 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Chapter 1. INTRODUCTION.....................................................................................................1 Chapter 2. TRAFFIC STUDY ASSUMPTIONS..........................................................................3 STUDYAREA.................................................................................................................................. 3 GROWTH ASSUMPTIONS.............................................................................................................. 3 Chapter 3. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ASSUMPTIONS......................................................5 SITEACCESS.................................................................................................................................. 5 TRIP GENERATION........................................................................................................................ 5 TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND ASSIGNMENT..................................................................................... 6 Chapter4. ROADWAY AND VOLUME ASSUMPTIONS...........................................................9 EXISTING CONDITIONS................................................................................................................. 9 PLANNED ROADWAY/INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS..........................................................9 FUTURE BACKGROUND VOLUME PROJECTIONS................................................................... 10 FUTURE BUILD VOLUME PROJECTIONS.................................................................................. 10 Chapter 5. LEVEL OF SERVICE SUMMARY..........................................................................18 EXISTING (2019) OPERATIONS SUMMARY............................................................................... 19 SHORT-TERM BACKGROUND (2024) OPERATIONS SUMMARY.............................................20 SHORT-TERM BUILD (2024) OPERATIONS SUMMARY...............................................................22 SHORT-TERM BUILD (2024) (W/IMPROVEMENTS) OPERATIONS SUMMARY .......................23 LONG-TERM BACKGROUND (2040) OPERATIONS SUMMARY...............................................24 LONG-TERM BUILD (2040) OPERATIONS SUMMARY . ............................................................. 25 Chapter 6. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS......................................................27 Appendix A. RAW TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS.............................................................A Appendix B. INTERNAL CAPTURE WORKSHEETS.............................................................. B Appendix C. LOS AND DELAY SUMMARY TABLES.............................................................. C Appendix D. QUEUE SUMMARY TABLES............................................................................. D Appendix E. SIMTRAFFIC REPORTS.................................................................................... E Rosedale Center I Traffic Impact Analysis January 2020 Update Kimley>Morn Jones Lang LaSalle (JLL) is proposing an expansion to the existing Rosedale Center in Roseville, Minnesota (see Exhibit 1) as part of their South Campus Master Plan. The site is located between Fairview Avenue and Snelling Avenue (TH 51), north of TH 36 and south of County Road B2 W. The existing Rosedale Center has approximately 1,150,000 square feet of leased retail space. The Herberger's space is an additional 150,000 square feet, however, the store was closed at the time the data was collected. Based on the current master plan, there is anticipated to be 250 market rate residential units, 175 active adult housing units, two 150-room hotels, 100,000 square feet of office, and a net increase of 220,000 square feet of retail space (includes 40,000 square feet of entertainment land use). Additionally, there is approximately 15,000 square feet of development planned on outparcels west of the Macy's building. This traffic impact analysis (TIA) represents a review of the traffic impacts of the project, based on land use and site plan information, and is intended to identify the key traffic issues associated with the project. This TIA documents the existing traffic conditions near the site, estimates the anticipated traffic to be generated by the expansion, distributes and assigns these trips to the adjacent roadway system, and evaluates the traffic operations of key intersections near the site and those providing access to and from the site. To have a basis of comparison, a "no -build" analysis was completed for each future scenario that includes the general background growth on the adjacent roadways. Based on the analysis, the TIA evaluates roadway and/or traffic control mitigation measures to accommodate future traffic levels in the system and whether these mitigation measures are triggered by background growth or the proposed project. Rosedale Center I Traffic Impact Analysis January 2020 Update ' � ita°v�!, ♦ ���yt-...J:4� "n � � � " A � F ?9� $�'S. Y e�s X' y � • ® i � � � 7C..� F. �� <� —. _ db` Count Rd B2 W SICd l / Road �. _ m /+M�w ♦ _ ^ � r � it a�-�: ;i t ��rI N• _ m _ � r � '. � �lil '1 P •� � � Y Ar v t t , .yt x 7m.. NPMN ,.• `` I R M LF. •4; t I�i�i. y.. ,.a ...� +` a�' \� �'.I rT O �vqqw b. _. 1 fx a It • r l �` � �I"�1�lTrr .$ rt �:� l0 Y.r S y ra1•. _ \M .JF"1� 1r— ;J G ♦• 6: ;y1Y �k .jd 'ati v nl .. ,1, •,� ,� y;y �_ I..I� r / /,, t.� r�' .I • _•'�� t=A ' J Ste— _ .� C�'�-. t 1 p p • a RMINNMA `>—�.C•.T. `�!_T"IT�T—" — '�` — N F -i_. LEGEND • ::. > 1' _"^^{, y`• `r_ �,�"., • Study Intersections ! �p� �M,L j • Proposed Site Driveways EXHIBIT 1 Kimlep0lorn EXISTING SITE LOCATION AND STUDY INTERSECTIONS ROSEDALE CENTER Kimley>Morn The project study area that was previously agreed upon by City of Roseville and Ramsey County staff as part of the 2015 traffic study will be used for this traffic study. The study area is bounded by Fairview Avenue to the west, County Road B2 W to the north, Snelling Avenue to the east, and TH 36 to the south. The following intersections are included in the project's study area: • Fairview Avenue & TH 36 (EB) • Fairview Avenue & TH 36 (WB) • Fairview Avenue & Rosedale Center Driveway #1 • Fairview Avenue & County Road B2 W • County Road B2 W & Rosedale Center Driveway #2 • County Road B2 W & Brooks Avenue (Rosedale Commons Driveway) • County Road B2 W & Rosedale Center Driveway #3 • County Road B2 W & Snelling Avenue (SB) / Rosedale Center Driveway #4 • County Road B2 W & Snelling Avenue (NB) • Major internal ring road intersections Exhibit 2 provides the locations of the study intersections, and their associated lane geometries. All study intersections are signalized currently, except for the major internal ring road intersections. GROWTH ASSUMPTIONS The South Campus Master Plan is expected to be completed within five (5) years. The future year analysis will consist of a Short -Term (2024) and Long -Term (2040) time periods. Due to minimal growth in historic traffic volumes in this study area (based on MnDOT counts and comparison of turning movement counts to the 2015 traffic study), an areawide annual growth rate of 0.5% per year was applied to the TMCs at all the study area intersections to obtain Short -Term (2024) and Long - Term (2040) background traffic volumes. Growth was not applied to the turning movements going to or coming from the different retail centers in the area. Rosedale Center I Traffic Impact Analysis January 2020 Update fir �� r C� •, c JJIIJJII I I . T_ - . ! R^+'b'0MYir' P}}of ErEI .Y Y � t_:.� � .Y .Ir 4 `a J9__'��1 LS. -,_ • �i�bt� :_ .a`. - � v MINNESOTI f it _ i N �. _• Y 1F'al • '�: . .' - , tMINNESOU 1'�-'�`.� � -_ l.• f _—�. _ '... -_ LEGENDq Study Intersections ' a ... 4 Proposed Site Driveways I f S 1 as Existing Signal Control P.�i r�T �. � , �1 � r — � r- ' ^ ,� `� � -` •�• Existing Stop Control �. '. .ii .1. _• ... !. 1 ' • • - `l. �. is �'� '. - _._ �.lL EXHIBIT 2 Kimley»> Horn EXISTING GEOMETRY AND INTERSECTION CONTROL - ONE-WAY RING ROAD ROSEDALE CENTER Kimley>Morn The existing Rosedale Center has approximately 1,150,000 square feet of leased retail space. The Herberger's space is an additional 150,000 square feet, however, the store was closed at the time the data was collected. The proposed South Campus Master Plan will include a mix of residential, hotel, office, and retail. The vacant Herberger's building will be demolished and the surface parking on the southeast quadrant will be converted to residential buildings and structed parking. Based on the current master plan, there is anticipated to be 250 market rate residential units, 175 active adult housing units, two 150-room hotels, 100,000 square feet of general office, and a net increase of 205,000 square feet of retail space (includes 40,000 square feet of entertainment land use). There is also an additional 15,000 square feet of retail space planned on outparcels west of the Macy's building. SITE ACCESS The Rosedale Center is currently served by four signalized access points, one on Fairview Avenue and three on County Road B2 W. With the proposed master plan, there are no new site access points being proposed. However, the master plan includes the conversion of the existing one-way internal ring -road to a two-way internal ring road. The trip assignment is based on the assumption that the ring road is converted to two- way. TRIP GENERATION Trip generation for the additional retail space was based on the turning movement counts performed in January and February 2019. Based on the counts, there was approximately 2,205 trips generated during the weekday PM peak hour and 3,480 trips generated during the Saturday peak hour. Based on the existing 1,150,000 square feet of leased space, the weekday PM peak hour trip rate equated to 1.76 trips per 1,000 square feet and the Saturday peak hour trip rate equated to 3.03 trips per 1,000 square feet. These trips rates were used to determine the amount of traffic generated by the proposed retail space. The Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) Trip Generation, Tenth Edition, was used to calculate the anticipated net new external project trips for the remaining land uses assumed for the proposed development (residential, hotel, and office uses). Internal capture was calculated consistent with the ITE Trip Generation Manual, and worksheets are provided in Appendix B. Table 1 provides the trip generation calculation for the proposed and existing square footage. Based or the calculation, the proposed expansion is anticipated to generate 575 new trips during the weekday PM peak hour (280 entering and 295 exiting) and 845 trips during the Saturday peak hour (470 entering and 375 exiting). Rosedale Center I Traffic Impact Analysis January 2020 Update Kimley>Morn TABLE 1: TRIP GENERATION FORECAST I OrLand Use DescriptiOl i E EXISTING DEVELOPMENT Retail (Local Data) 1,150,000 SF 1 1,095 1 930 2,025 1,880 1,600 3,480 PROPOSED DEVELOPEMNT Market Rate Residential (ITE 221) 250 DU 65 45 110 55 55 110 Active Adult Residential (ITE 252) 175 DU 25 20 45 35 25 60 Hotel (ITE 310) 300 Rooms 90 90 180 120 95 215 Office (ITE 710) 100,000 SF 20 95 115 30 25 55 Retail (Local Data) 220,000 SF 210 175 385 360 305 665 Total Trip Generation (South Campus + Outparcels) 410 425 835 600 505 1,105 TRIP REDUCTIONS Internal Capture Reduction (9. 0% PM, 5.7% SAT) -130 -130 -260 -130 -130 -260 Net New Trip Generation (South Campus + • p. :i 295 575 470 TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND ASSIGNMENT The project trip distribution is based on the existing traffic counts at the site access driveways and is assumed to be the same distribution used in the 2015 traffic study. The distribution is anticipated to remain the same as it is today with the expansion. The site trip distribution is provided in Exhibit3. The site traffic was assigned to the surrounding roadway network by applying the trip distribution to the trip generation. Exhibit 4 provides the project trip assignment for the weekday PM peak hour and Saturday peak hour and assumed the two-way ring road. Rosedale Center I Traffic Impact Analysis January 2020 Update k' • - t _L s Maw r 2. = r x • ` w = 7s a1.- . `� • _ ` 7 !A 1 MW 1 Htq fl.\ •III • A.w 11 . . ` K. V� •o _ � •„ r roc ALE .: ta' f =_ � .v°' >"JI � � _ t•_ - _ �« �_ = �1 If ■i. ilk "1P■ County Road B2 W tic,� 15% Y r R. • . .I.fi - _ '\ r .I Fri-MM,�� y� . w.N. • . .,•wp. x � IfIf �r . c �r-- _ � • xf'IOE!1 t ��t•M;I � wf}�f aw 1 u rllf•-�+wiwMM .-.� - v I -.. • ' I Ti S_ -1 Y 1_ � l Kimley»> Horn A 111 to .IrMINNESOTA - —�"T: ��5�".S=T• 10% �111I LEGEND O Entering Site Traffic Distribution OStudy Intersections • Proposed Site Driveways EXHIBIT 3 PROJECT TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION ROSEDALE CENTER k NOT TO SCALE 'k- 15 (m) �1 E— 15 (m) 1 C W y 15 (25) —4 m' 30 (45) o County Road B2 W 0 LEGEND XX (XX) PM (Sat) Peak Hour Volumes EXHIBIT 4 Kimley>>> Horn PROJECT TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT ROSEDALE CENTER Kimley>Morn immmIII 1►[ewsmkiieiiIII Lei kimi Fairview Avenue is a four -lane divided roadway the runs north -south through the City of Roseville. The existing Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) is 24,500 vehicles per day south of County Road B2 and 13,800 vehicles per day north of County Road B2. County Road B2 is a four -lane divided roadway that runs in an east -west direction through the City of Roseville. The existing AADT is 11,000 vehicles per day west of Fairview Avenue and 14,200 vehicles per day east of Fairview Avenue. Peak period turning movement counts were performed at the study intersections in January 2019 and February 2019, and accounts for the opening of Portillo's and the closure of Herberger's. Exhibit 5 summarizes the existing turning movement volumes for the weekday PM peak hour and the Saturday peak hour. Volumes were balanced on Fairview Avenue and County Road B2 W between intersections. Raw turning movement count data is provided in Appendix A. As previously discussed, the South Campus Master Plan includes converting the existing one-way ring road to a two-way ring road. With that assumption, Exhibit 6 provides the anticipated intersection geometrics for the major internal intersections. As part of this conversion, the northbound approach at the intersection of Fairview Avenue & Mall Entrance #1 was assumed to be modified, in particular, the outside northbound through lane would be converted from a shared through -right lane to exclusively a through lane, leaving only one right turn lane into Rosedale Center. This is needed to eliminate potential weaving on the internal roadway between Fairview Avenue and Internal Intersection #1. Existing traffic volumes into and out of Rosedale Center were redistributed based on the assumption of the two-way internal ring road. Rosedale Center was broken into four quadrants, and the total entering and exiting trips were split four ways evenly. From there, the existing trips were distributed by quadrant to each of the site access connections along Fairview Avenue and County Road B2 based on the global trip distribution assumptions provided in Exhibit 3. The total number of trips entering and exiting the Rosedale Center remained constant from what was collected in January and February 2019, however, some volumes may increase or decrease at each access along Fairview Avenue and County Road B2. Exhibit 7 provides the adjusted turning movement volumes for existing conditions. PLANNED ROADWAY/INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS There are no funded and/or committed roadway or intersection improvements assumed as part of this traffic analysis. Rosedale Center I Traffic Impact Analysis January 2020 Update Kimley>Morn FUTURE BACKGROUND VOLUME PROJECTIONS Short -Term Background (2024) traffic volumes were calculated by applying a 0.5% annual growth for five years to the existing traffic volumes and are shown in Exhibit 8 for the weekday PM and Saturday peak hours. Long -Term Background (2040) traffic volumes were calculated by applying a 0.5% annual growth for 21 years to the existing traffic volumes and are shown in Exhibit 9 for the weekday PM and Saturday peak hours. FUTURE BUILD VOLUME PROJECTIONS Future build volumes for Short -Term (2024) and Long -Term (2040) were calculated by adding the project traffic volumes provided in Exhibit 5 to the Short -Term Background (2024) and Long -Term Background (2040) turning movement volumes provided in Exhibit 9 and Exhibit 10, respectively. Exhibit 10 provides the Short -Term Build (2024) turning movement volumes and Exhibit 11 provides the Long -Term Build (2040) turning movement volumes at the study intersections for the weekday PM and Saturday peak hours. Rosedale Center I Traffic Impact Analysis January 2020 Update w k N NOT TO S( / r-)I \ County Road B2 W - 85 Q5) 205 (330) F 80 (165) Lp o m 1 I 1 F 465 (660) 65 (100) ? s •` 145 (180) (� 1 T - e20 (495) —+ o � � 55 (105) o o � -. - _' • � } �. h mil- �. W "f.. a .. ~ �_... _.,, __� ♦ ,a L � �� �\ ( "�• __ _ s • - _ - R eo (no) N • _ it �� S �l M_ 1 �� t, -,h ;'li 0.; - ° • �j�. Ki "L 50 (1 O) 5 5 (5) ----► 6 o s /I�'j.. • t M�. •. F 290 (265) . • c S �e ff 650(450) -+ N 1, o E-185 (140) f .4r-90(4kQ --_ -_ :.-1 MINNESOTA T r' O LEGEND 4s (�' '' �,: ! - _I : •' Q XX (XX) PM (Sat) Peak Hour Volumes ..�•. - - - EXHIBIT 5 Kimley>)) Horn EXISTING (2019) TRAFFIC VOLUMES - ONE-WAY RING ROAD ROSEDALE CENTER N T NorrosCALEty Road B2 W 7140��� .-- - �,�• L r • / .I t W�tf 9 Kimley)))Horn '*�� ; 0., _ I • �. �_ - _ -�J S �:`S'TT_ w� �_ _ _ _ L_ � -mow__ y .f co LEGEND 7 Proposed Site Driveways Signal Control -•- Stop Control Channelized Right Turn EXHIBIT 6 PROPOSED GEOMETRY AND INTERSECTION CONTROL - TWO-WAY RING ROAD ROSEDALE CENTER �GL 165(z sit �" �ma� F 190�� o �190f�) .00m F500(715) �210P10) .7i•/ �/ $/d��/ t i65(110) �31(50) Morro SCALE E. 145(16�� I T ��J 6 �.&/`J� 90�� [1a145 (1e0) --�t fi T 550 P3a0) — 0L � / /'g ♦ T 50 (� � e00 (500) - 185(� ,��•.��� / ,.,5��� 110(190)� o� D County Road B2 W GL 170(230) � 5(5]� 0 0 � •' o fo N F 5(140) 90f 1 •. J(600) •�' ° a LEGEND (XX) PM (Sat) Peak Hour Volumes •) ( N -- EXHIBIT 7 Kimley))) Horn EXISTING (2019) TRAFFIC VOLUMES - TWO-WAY RING ROAD ROSEDALE CENTER L 41 IN NOT TO S, ALE m o 165 (240) APO, 5(3 15) 215(320) 150(165) I T 550(320)---Y 190(275) Kimley))> Horn County Road B2 W CA r LEGEND ._ • ; ` 7 XX (XX) PM (Sat) Peak Hour Volumes = CD EXHIBIT 8 SHORT-TERM (2024) BACKGROUND TRAFFIC VOLUMES - TWO-WAY RING ROAD ROSEDALE CENTER N NOT TO SCALE a- L` ' rK .4 Kimley)>> Horn County Road B2 W y LEGEND r < ._ • ; M.W XX (XX) PM (Sat) Peak Hour Volumes CD EXHIBIT 9 LONG-TERM (2040) BACKGROUND TRAFFIC VOLUMES - TWO-WAY RING ROAD ROSEDALE CENTER a- IN NOT TO S, ALE o �. 1e0)z65) F 21OC335) z15P2T) 150(165) � T r* 565 (345) ---Y o zzo (32o) _ Kimley))> Horn QCounty � \ 190 f� �65(110) u 105(160) m(�� Road B2 W / `m`m ) F565m0) �45(7q 145 (180) 1 685(590) m •� �' 11(1e0)-, o�m� y LEGEND i_ •r -yy� XX (XX) PM (Sat) Peak Hour Volumes N .i EXHIBIT 10 SHORT-TERM (2024) BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES - TWO-WAY RING ROAD ROSEDALE CENTER r_ 'Jig 7195(295) F 230 (365) 1 235 (315) 165(180) �Pa0) o �� (350), o Q� Kimley))> Horn 7fJ 190 (0) lj L 65 (110) 105(160) County Road B2 W �85(7) F 620 (s10) 145 (180) - (�45(7q 1 1.005 (695) -+ 0(190), o o m cp LEGEND ® �. < ,.: •• -yy XX (XX) PM (Sat) Peak Hour Volumes CD EXHIBIT 11 LONG-TERM (2040) BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES - TWO-WAY RING ROAD ROSEDALE CENTER Kimley>))Horn Intersection level of service (LOS) analysis was performed for each of the intersections within the study area using the signalized and unsignalized analysis methodology found in the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) and Trafficware's Synchro/SimTraffic version 10. Each intersection was analyzed for the weekday PM and Saturday peak hour for the following scenarios: • 2019 Existing Conditions (with two-way ring road), • 2024 Short -Term Background Conditions (without project trips), • 2024 Short -Term Build Conditions (with project trips, without improvements), • 2024 Short -Term Build Conditions (with project trips, with improvements), • 2040 Long -Term Background Conditions (without project trips, with Short -Term improvements), • 2040 Long -Term Build Conditions (with project trips, with Short -Term improvements), The weekday AM peak hour was not included in the analysis due to the lower trip generation nature of retail centers during the AM peak hour the adjacent street. One of the primary measures of effectiveness used to evaluate intersection traffic operations, as defined in the HCM, is level of service (LOS)—a qualitative letter grade (A through F) based on seconds of vehicle delay due to the traffic control device at an intersection. By definition, LOS A conditions represent high - quality operations (i.e., motorists experience very little delay or interference) and LOS F conditions represent very poor operations (i.e., extreme delay or severe congestion). This study used the LOS D/E boundary as an indicator of satisfactory traffic operations. The following graph displays the LOS thresholds for signalized and unsignalized intersections. ,00 OS F LOS F LOS E LOS D LOS E LOS C OS D OS C LOS B LOS B LOS A LOS A Si gnalized Unsignalized Rosedale Center I Traffic Impact Analysis January 2020 Update Kimley)))Horn In future scenarios, an intersection with unsatisfactory operations was first addressed through signal timing modifications, or if that was not possible, through implementation of an intersection or roadway improvement. Due to the restrictive nature of the land use surrounding the existing roadway alignments, a limited number of roadway improvements were considered possible. Only those improvements that could be implemented without major reconstruction were implemented as mitigation. In order to determine the impacts of the project on the transportation network, a traffic operations analysis was performed on the roadway network surrounding the site. The analysis process included determining level of service at each of the study intersections for Existing, Short -Term Background (2024), Short -Term Build (2024), Long -Term Background (2040), and Long -Term Build (2040). SimTraffic reports are included in Appendix E. For each scenario, five one -hour simulations were conducted in SimTraffic, and the average of those model runs were reported. In each of the following sections, a description of potentially unsatisfactory operational characteristics is summarized for each scenario modeled. A table summarizing the LOS and delay by intersection is provided for each scenario. For signalized intersections, the overall LOS is reported, and for unsignalized intersections, the overall intersection and worst movement LOS is reported. The SimTraffic reports were reviewed to identify individual movements that experience unsatisfactory level of service and delay. Only in instances where an individual movement experiences an unsatisfactory measure of effectiveness will the movement information be summarized. Supplemental tables are provided in Appendix C that provides individual movement LOS and delay for each intersection. EXISTING (2019) OPERATIONS SUMMARY Table 2 provides Existing (2019) delay and LOS for both the weekday PM and Saturday peak hours. Overall intersection delay and LOS is reported for signalized intersection while overall / worst movement delay and LOS is reported for unsignalized intersections. Table A and Table B (included in Appendix C) provides the delay and LOS for each individual movement for the weekday PM and Saturday peak hours. TABLE 2: EXISTING (2019) LEVEL OF SERVICE SUMMARY Intersection Fairview Avenue at TH 36 EB Control Signal Weekday PM Delay 11.4 Peak LOS B Saturday Peak is Delay 12.9 LOS B Fairview Avenue atTH 36 WB Signal 27.2 C 38.1 D Fairview Avenue at Rosedale Center Driveway #1 Signal 15.9 B 23.6 C Fairview Avenue at County Road B2 W Signal 25.6 C 30.9 C County Road B2 W at Rosedale Center Driveway #2 Signal 10.5 B 15.5 B County Road B2 W at Rosedale Center Driveway #3 Signal 15.6 B 25.5 C County Road B2 W at Snelling Avenue SB Signal 22.0 C 28.1 C County Road B2 W at Snelling Avenue NB Signal 6.1 A 11.6 B Internal Intersection #1A Stop Control 2.0 / 6.3 A / A 3.7 / 7.4 A / A Internal Intersection #113 Stop Control 2.9 / 3.2 A / A 6.3 / 7.8 A / A Internal Intersection #2 Stop Control 6.1 / 9.5 A / A 9.6 / 17.2 A / C Internal Intersection #3 Stop Control 5.9 / 12.2 A / B 8.4 / 17.1 A / C Internal Intersection #4 Stop Control 2.3 / 8.2 A / A 2.9 / 10.3 A / B Rosedale Center I Traffic Impact Analysis January 2020 Update Kimley>Morn The intersections listed below have movements that are not operating at an acceptable level of service during the weekday PM peak hour and/or Saturday peak hour. All other intersections (and their movements) are operating at LOS D or better during the weekday PM peak hour and Saturday peak hour. Fairview Avenue at TH 36 (EB) — During the weekday PM and Saturday peak hours, the westbound left -turn movement is operating at LOS E. This is due to the queue spillback from the westbound right - turn movement. Fairview Avenue at TH 36 (WB) —During the Saturday peak hour, the northbound left -turn and through movements are operating at LOS E. This is due to poor lane utilization for northbound traffic where the majority of the through traffic is utilized the outside lane to position themselves to enter Rosedale Center at the downstream intersection. Fairview Avenue & County Road 132 — During the Saturday peak hour, the eastbound approach is anticipated to operate at LOS E/LOS F. This is due to the lack of a dedicated eastbound right -turn lane. Vehicle Queue Deficiencies Vehicle queues were summarized based on the Synch ro/S i mTraff ic analysis, and are provided in the summary table in Appendix D. The analysis compared the anticipated 951h percentile queue to the existing storage provided at the turn lanes. Following provides a list of turn lane deficiencies, where the 95th percentile queue exceeded the provided storage by at least 25 feet (one vehicle length): Fairview Avenue & TH 36 (WB) —The northbound left -turn and right -turn lanes exceed the provided storage, due to the through lanes spilling back beyond entry into the turn lanes. Fairview Avenue & County Road 132 — The westbound left -turn lane is anticipated to exceed the provided storage. However, the extending the left -turn lane is limited by the eastbound left -turn lane at the intersection of County Road B2 & Mall Entrance #2. County Road 132 & Mall Entrance #2 — The eastbound right -turn lane is anticipated to exceed the provided queue, however, there is no opportunity to provide more storage due to its proximity to Fairview Avenue. County Road 132 & Mall Entrance #3 —The westbound right -turn lane is anticipated to exceed the provided queue, this is due to the westbound through queue spill back beyond the entry into the right - turn lane. SHORT-TERM BACKGROUND (2024) OPERATIONS SUMMARY Table 3 provides Short -Term Background (2024) delay and LOS for both the weekday PM and Saturday peak hours. The analysis represents 5-year growth in the background volumes to 2024. Table C and Table D (included in Appendix C) provides the delay and LOS for each individual movement for the weekday PM and Saturday peak hours. Rosedale Center I Traffic Impact Analysis January 2020 Update Kimley>Morn TABLE 3: SHORT-TERM BACKGROUND (2024) LEVEL OF SERVICE SUMMARY Intersection Fairview Avenue at TH 36 EB Control Signal Weekday PM Delay 11.8 Peak LOS B Saturday Peak Delay 14.1 LOS B Fairview Avenue at TH 36 WB Signal 27.4 C 48.9 D Fairview Avenue at Rosedale Center Driveway #1 Signal 16.0 B 24.4 C Fairview Avenue at County Road B2 W Signal 26.5 C 29.8 C County Road B2 W at Rosedale Center Driveway #2 Signal 10.6 B 15.7 B County Road B2 W at Rosedale Center Driveway #3 Signal 15.9 B 26.8 C County Road B2 W at Snelling Avenue SB Signal 22.2 C 27.9 C County Road B2 W at Snelling Avenue NB Signal 6.6 A 11.8 B Internal Intersection #1A Stop Control 2.1 / 6.2 A / A 3.5 / 6.9 A / B Internal Intersection #113 Stop Control 3.0 / 5.9 A / A 6.2 / 7.1 A / A Internal Intersection #2 Stop Control 6.1 / 9.3 A / A 9.7 / 17.0 A / C Internal Intersection #3 Stop Control 6.0 / 12.2 A / B 8.3 / 17.5 A / C Internal Intersection #4 Stop Control 2.6 / 7.6 A / A 1 2.8 / 10.1 A / B The intersections listed below have movements that are not anticipated to operate at an acceptable level of service during the weekday PM peak hour and/or Saturday peak hour. All other intersections (and their movements) are anticipated to operate at LOS D or better during the weekday PM peak hour and Saturday peak hour. Similar to Existing Conditions, the following intersection are anticipated to have deficiencies: Fairview Avenue at TH 36 (EB) - During the Saturday peak hour, the westbound left -turn movement is anticipated to operate at LOS E. This is due to the queue spillback from the westbound right -turn movement. Fairview Avenue at TH 36 (WB) -During the Saturday peak hour, the northbound left -turn and through movements are anticipated to operate at LOS F. This is due to poor lane utilization for northbound traffic where the majority of the through traffic is utilized the outside lane to position themselves to enter Rosedale Center at the downstream intersection. Fairview Avenue & County Road 132 - During the Saturday peak hour, the eastbound right -turn movement is anticipated to operate at LOS E. Vehicle Queue Deficiencies Vehicle queues were summarized based on the Synch ro/S i mTraff ic analysis, and are provided in the summary table in Appendix D. The analysis compared the anticipated 951h percentile queue to the existing storage provided at the turn lanes. Following provides a list of turn lane deficiencies, where the 95th percentile queue exceeded the provided storage by at least 25 feet (one vehicle length): Fairview Avenue & TH 36 (WB) -The northbound left -turn and right -turn lanes exceed the provided storage, due to the through lanes spilling back beyond entry into the turn lanes. Fairview Avenue & County Road 132 - The westbound left -turn lane is anticipated to exceed the provided storage. However, the extending the left -turn lane is limited by the eastbound left -turn lane at the intersection of County Road 32 & Mall Entrance #2. Rosedale Center I Traffic Impact Analysis January 2020 Update Kimley>Morn County Road 132 & Mall Entrance #2 - The eastbound right -turn lane is anticipated to exceed the provided queue, however, there is no opportunity to provide more storage due to its proximity to Fairview Avenue. County Road 132 & Mall Entrance #3 - The westbound right -turn lane is anticipated to exceed the provided queue, this is due to the westbound through queue spill back beyond the entry into the right - turn lane. SHORT-TERM BUILD (2024) OPERATIONS SUMMARY Table 4 provides Short -Term Build (2024) delay and LOS for both the weekday PM and Saturday peak hours. The analysis represents 5-year growth in the background volumes to 2024 and the addition of South Campus project traffic. Table E and Table F (included in Appendix C) provides the delay and LOS for each individual movement for the weekday PM and Saturday peak hours. TABLE 4: SHORT-TERM BUILD (2024) LEVEL OF SERVICE SUMMARY IntersectionControg Fairview Avenue at TH 36 EB IRM Signal Weekday PM Delay 12.6 Peak LOS B Saturday Delay (seciveh) 20.7 LOS C Fairview Avenue at TH 36 WB Signal 29.7 C 56.8 E Fairview Avenue at Rosedale Center Driveway #1 Signal 19.1 C 29.2 C Fairview Avenue at County Road 132 W Signal 27.6 C 41.2 D County Road 132 W at Rosedale Center Driveway #2 Signal 11.5 B 17.5 B County Road 132 W at Rosedale Center Driveway #3 Signal 19.1 B 28.6 C County Road 132 W at Snelling Avenue SB Signal 22.8 C 30.2 C County Road 132 W at Snelling Avenue NB Signal 7.5 A 15.3 B Internal Intersection #1A Stop Control 2.9 / 6.8 A / A 5.8 / 9.5 A / A Internal Intersection #113 Stop Control 4.8 / 8.0 A / A 12.7 / 21.2 B / C Internal Intersection #2 Stop Control 6.4 / 9.8 A / A 19.8 / 36.9 C / E Internal Intersection #3 Stop Control 5.1 / 9.3 A / A 8.2 / 17.4 A / C Internal Intersection #4 1 Stop Control 1 3.1 / 8.6 A / A 3.2 / 12.3 A / B The intersections listed below have movements that are not anticipated to operate at an acceptable level of service during the weekday PM peak hour and/or Saturday peak hour. All other intersections (and their movements) are anticipated to operate at LOS D or better during the weekday PM peak hour and Saturday peak hour. These are all LOS deficiencies identified inthe Existing and Short -Term Background conditions. Similar to Existing and Short -Term Background Conditions, the following intersection are anticipated to have deficiencies: Fairview Avenue at TH 36 (EB) - During the Saturday peak hour, the westbound left -turn movement is anticipated to operate at LOS F. This is due to the queue spillback from the westbound right -turn movement. Fairview Avenue at TH 36 (WB) -During the Saturday peak hour, the northbound left -turn and through movements are anticipated to operate at LOS F. This is due to poor lane utilization for northbound traffic where the majority of the through traffic is utilized the outside lane to position themselves to enter Rosedale Center at the downstream intersection. Rosedale Center I Traffic Impact Analysis January 2020 Update Kimley>))Horn Fairview Avenue & County Road 132 — During the Saturday peak hour, the eastbound right -turn movement is anticipated to operate at LOS F. Vehicle Queue Deficiencies Vehicle queues were summarized based on the Synch ro/S i mTraff ic analysis, and are provided in the summary table in Appendix D. The analysis compared the anticipated 951h percentile queue to the existing storage provided at the turn lanes. Following provides a list of turn lane deficiencies, where the 95th percentile queue exceeded the provided storage by at least 25 feet (one vehicle length): Fairview Avenue & TH 36 (WB) —The northbound left -turn and right -turn lanes exceed the provided storage, due to the through lanes spilling back beyond entry into the turn lanes. Fairview Avenue & Mall Entrance #1 — The southbound left -turn lane is anticipated to exceed the provided to storage: however, extending the turn lane is limited by the northbound left -turn lane at the intersection of Fairview Avenue & County Road 32. Fairview Avenue & County Road 132 — The westbound left -turn lane is anticipated to exceed the provided storage: however, the extending the left -turn lane is limited by the eastbound left -turn lane at the intersection of County Road 32 & Mall Entrance #2. County Road 132 & Mall Entrance #2 — The eastbound left -turn and right -turn lanes are anticipated to exceed the provided queue, however, there is no opportunity to provide more storage due to its proximity to Fairview Avenue. The westbound left -turn lane is anticipated to exceed the provided storage by 30 feet, however, there is no opportunity to provide more storage due to the proximity of the signalized intersection to the east. County Road 132 & Mall Entrance #3 —The westbound right -turn lane is anticipated to exceed the provided queue, this is due to the westbound through queue spill back beyond the entry into the right - turn lane. County Road 132 & Snelling Avenue NB — The southbound queues are anticipated to spill back to where the left and right turn lanes start, however, it is not anticipated to spill back into the Snelling Avenue travel lanes. SHORT-TERM BUILD (2024) (W/IMPROVEMENTS) OPERATIONS SUMMARY Due to the failing traffic operations in the 2019 and 2024 conditions, improvements to the traffic network in the study area will be required to help mitigate excessive queuing and delays. Only those improvements that could be implemented without major reconstruction of the roadway and surrounding area were considered as mitigation. The following improvements were assumed for the 2024 build -out year and will need to be explored further with the City of Roseville, Ramsey County, and MnDOT: Fairview Avenue at TH 36 (EB) • Convert the WB right -turn from yield control to a free movement. • Optimize splits and offset for the traffic signal. Fairview Avenue at TH 36 (WB) • Convert the northbound right -turn lane into a third NB through lane. This will require modifying the existing channelized islands on the east side of Fairview Avenue, in addition to the relocation or replacement of the northbound and eastbound approach signal poles and mast arms. • Construct new northbound right -turn lane that serves the on -ramp to TH 36 (WB). • Traffic signal modification. Optimize splits and offset for the traffic signal. Rosedale Center I Traffic Impact Analysis January 2020 Update Kimley>Morn Fairview Avenue at County Road 132 W • Construct an eastbound right -turn lane (if ROW is available). • Optimize splits and offset for the traffic signal. Table 5 provides the results of the Short -Term Build (2024) (With Improvements) delay and LOS for both the weekday PM and Saturday peak hours. The analysis represents the Short -Term Build (2024) scenario with the addition of the recommended improvements listed above. With the recommended improvements, all intersections are anticipated to operate at an acceptable level of service for Short -Term Build (2024) conditions during the weekday PM and Saturday peak hours. Table G and Table H (included in Appendix C) provides the delay and LOS for each individual movement for the weekday PM and Saturday peak hours. TABLE 5: SHORT-TERM BUILD WITH IMPROVEMENTS (2024) LEVEL OF SERVICE SUMMARY It is suggested that the City of Roseville, Ramsey County, and MnDOT, in addition to representatives from Rosedale Center, meet to discuss the mitigation measures listed above and any other potential alternative improvements along Fairview Avenue. A second mitigation option was considering and analyzed, which included adding dual westbound right -turn lanes at the intersection of Fairview Avenue & TH 36 EB. Based on the Synchro/SimTraffic analysis, the westbound right -turn movement is anticipated to operate at LOS E during the Saturday peak hour. Furthermore, the northbound through movement at Fairview Avenue & TH 36 WB is still anticipated to operate at LOS F with delay over 100 seconds with this improvement. LONG-TERM BACKGROUND (2040) OPERATIONS SUMMARY Table 6 provides Long -Term Background (2040) delay and LOS for both the weekday PM and Saturday peak hours. The analysis represents 20-year growth in the background volumes to 2040 and includes the recommended improvements from the Short -Term (2024) analysis. Table I and Table J (included in Appendix C) provides the delay and LOS for each individual movement for the weekday PM and Saturday peak hours. All intersections are anticipated to operate at LOS D or better during the weekday PM peak hour and Saturday peak hour. Rosedale Center I Traffic Impact Analysis January 2020 Update Kimley)))Horn TABLE 6: LONG-TERM BACKGROUND (2040) LEVEL OF SERVICE SUMMARY Intersection Fairview Avenue at TH 36 EB Control Signal Weekday P Me& DelayDelay 13.4 B Saturday Peak 14.5 LOS B Fairview Avenue at TH 36 WB Signal 27.2 C 29.4 C Fairview Avenue at Rosedale Center Driveway #1 Signal 17.4 B 28.2 C Fairview Avenue at County Road B2 W Signal 25.8 C 28.3 C County Road B2 W at Rosedale Center Driveway #2 Signal 11.2 B 18.9 B County Road B2 W at Rosedale Center Driveway #3 Signal 17.5 B 27.7 C County Road B2 W at Snelling Avenue SB Signal 22.3 C 29.5 C County Road B2 W at Snelling Avenue NB Signal 6.7 A 14.4 B Internal Intersection#1A Stop Control 1.9/6.3 A/A 4.1/6.9 A/A Internal Intersection#1B Stop Control 2.9/5.8 A/A 6.7/9.1 A/A Internal Intersection #2 Stop Control 5.4 / 9.2 A / A 9.1 / 16.6 A / C Internal Intersection #3 Stop Control 5.9 / 12.4 A / B 8.0 / 17.3 A / C Internal Intersection #4 Stop Control 2.7 / 7.7 A / A 3.0 / 10.4 A / B Vehicle Queue Deficiencies Vehicle queues were summarized based on the Synch ro/S i mTraff ic analysis, and are provided in the summary table in Appendix D. The analysis compared the anticipated 951h percentile queue to the existing storage provided at the turn lanes. Following provides a list of turn lane deficiencies, where the 95th percentile queue exceeded the provided storage by at least 25 feet (one vehicle length): Fairview Avenue & TH 36 (WB) — The westbound right -turn movement is anticipated to exceed the provided storage, however, it is not anticipated to impact the overall queue of the approach to the point that it impacts operations along TH 36. Fairview Avenue & County Road 132 — The westbound left -turn lane is anticipated to exceed the provided storage: however, the extending the left -turn lane is limited by the eastbound left -turn lane at the intersection of County Road B2 & Mall Entrance #2. County Road 132 & Mall Entrance #2 — The eastbound left -turn and right -turn lanes are anticipated to exceed the provided queue, however, there is no opportunity to provide more storage due to its proximity to Fairview Avenue. County Road 132 & Mall Entrance #3 —The westbound right -turn lane is anticipated to exceed the provided queue, this is due to the westbound through queue spill back beyond the entry into the right - turn lane. County Road 132 & Snelling Avenue NB — The southbound queues are anticipated to spill back to where the left and right turn lanes start, however, it is not anticipated to spill back into the Snelling Avenue travel lanes. LONG-TERM BUILD (2040) OPERATIONS SUMMARY Table 7 provides Long -Term Build (2040) delay and LOS for both the weekday PM and Saturday peak hours. The analysis represents 20-year growth in the background volumes to 2040 and South Campus project traffic and includes the recommended improvements from the Short -Term (2024) analysis. Table K and Table L (included in Appendix C) provides the delay and LOS for each individual movement for the Rosedale Center I Traffic Impact Analysis January 2020 Update Kimley>Morn weekday PM and Saturday peak hours. All intersections are anticipated to operate at LOS D or better during the weekday PM peak hour and Saturday peak hour. TABLE 7. LONG-TERM BUILD (2040) LEVEL OF SERVICE SUMMARY Intersection Fairview Avenue at TH 36 EB Control Signal Weekday PM Dela 14.8 Peak LOS B Saturday�� (sDelayMM 16.6 B Fairview Avenue at TH 36 WB Signal 27.1 C 35.0 C Fairview Avenue at Rosedale Center Driveway #1 Signal 20.1 C 36.3 D Fairview Avenue at County Road 132 W Signal 27.7 C 35.3 D County Road 132 W at Rosedale Center Driveway #2 Signal 12.6 B 22.5 C County Road 132 W at Rosedale Center Driveway #3 Signal 20.3 C 32.4 C County Road 132 W at Snelling Avenue SB Signal 23.5 C 35.2 D County Road 132 W at Snelling Avenue NB Signal 8.2 A 19.8 B Internal Intersection #1A Stop Control 3.0 / 6.8 A / A 5.9 / 13.2 A / B Internal Intersection #113 Stop Control 5.0 / 8.6 A / A 12.4 / 17.4 B / C Internal Intersection #2 Stop Control 6.3 / 9.7 A / A 18.8 / 34.7 C / D Internal Intersection #3 Stop Control 5.1 / 9.6 A / A 8.4 / 17.0 A / C Internal Intersection #4 Stop Control 3.1 / 8.5 A / A 3.4 / 13.4 A / B Vehicle Queue Deficiencies Vehicle queues were summarized based on the Synch ro/S i mTraff ic analysis, and are provided in the summary table in Appendix D. The analysis compared the anticipated 951h percentile queue to the existing storage provided at the turn lanes. Following provides a list of turn lane deficiencies, where the 95th percentile queue exceeded the provided storage by at least 25 feet (one vehicle length): Fairview Avenue & TH 36 (W13) - The westbound right -turn movement is anticipated to exceed the provided storage, however, it is not anticipated to impact the overall queue of the approach to the point that it impacts operations along TH 36. Fairview Avenue & County Road 132 - The westbound left -turn lane is anticipated to exceed the provided storage: however, the extending the left -turn lane is limited by the eastbound left -turn lane at the intersection of County Road 32 & Mall Entrance #2. County Road 132 & Mall Entrance #2 - The eastbound left -turn and right -turn lanes are anticipated to exceed the provided queue, however, there is no opportunity to provide more storage due to its proximity to Fairview Avenue. County Road 132 & Mall Entrance #3 - The westbound right -turn lane is anticipated to exceed the provided queue, this is due to the westbound through queue spill back beyond the entry into the right - turn lane. County Road 132 & Snelling Avenue SB -The eastbound left -turn lane is anticipated to exceed the provided storage, however, extending the turn lane is limited due to the proximity of the intersection to the west. County Road 132 & Snelling Avenue NB - The southbound queues are anticipated to spill back to where the left and right turn lanes start, however, it is not anticipated to spill back into the Snelling Avenue travel lanes. Rosedale Center I Traffic Impact Analysis January 2020 Update Kimley>Morn Jones Lang LaSalle (JLL) is working on the South Campus Master Plan for the Rosedale Center in Roseville, Minnesota (see Exhibit 1). The site is located between Fairview Avenue and Snelling Avenue (TH 51), north of TH 36 and south of County Road B2 W. The South Campus Master Plan includes 250 market rate residential units, 175 active adult housing units, two 150-room hotels, 100,000 square feet of office, and a net increase of 220,000 square feet of retail space (includes 40,000 square feet of entertainment land use). Based on the ITE trip generation calculation, the proposed development is anticipated to add 575 trips during the weekday PM peak hour and 845 trips during the Saturday peak hour onto the surrounding roadway network. These numbers in the proposed retail on the outparcels west of Macy's. As part of the South Campus Master Plan, the existing one-way ring road is proposed to be converted to a two-way ring road. The proposed master plan with two-way circulation provides better circulation for the entire center. The addition of structured parking and multiple access drives for the south side eliminates the long rows of parking that circulate on the ring road. This configuration provides more controlled intersections for vehicles and pedestrian crossings. The structured parking for residential and retail are separated within the structures. Therefore, people will take a more direct route to their parking areas vs circulating long rows to find an open space. It is typical for malls to operate with two-way traffic circulation. Many of the regional malls in the area operate with two-way circulation or are in the process of converting to two-way. The Rosedale Management Team have noted many vehicles going the wrong way on the one-way ring road because people ignore the designed circulation to take the shortest path to open parking spaces or to the nearest mall exit. The traffic study consisted of an analysis of Existing (2019), Short -Term (2024) Background and Build conditions, and Long -Term (2040) Background and Build conditions during the weekday PM and Saturday peak hours at the following intersections: • Fairview Avenue & TH 36 (Eastbound) • Fairview Avenue & TH 36 (Westbound) • Fairview Avenue & Rosedale Center Driveway #1 • Fairview Avenue & County Road 32 W • County Road B2 W & Rosedale Center Driveway #2 • County Road B2 W & Rosedale Center Driveway #3 • County Road B2 W & Snelling Avenue (Southbound) / Rosedale Center Driveway #4 • County Road B2 W & Snelling Avenue (Northbound) • Major Internal Ring Road Intersections Rosedale Center I Traffic Impact Analysis January 2020 Update Kimley>Morn Based on the analysis using Synchro/SimTraffic 10, the following improvements are recommended for the 2024 analysis year to ensure that all intersections and approaches operate at an acceptable level of service during the weekday PM and Saturday peak hours: Fairview Avenue at TH 36 (EB) • Convert the WB right -turn from yield control to a free movement. • Optimize splits and offset for the traffic signal. Fairview Avenue at TH 36 (WB) • Convert the NB right -turn lane into a third NB through lane. This will require modifying the existing channelized islands on the east side of Fairview Avenue, in addition to the relocation or replacement of the NB and EB approach signal poles and mast arms. • Construct new NB right -turn lane that serves the on -ramp to TH 36 (WB). • Traffic signal modification. Optimize splits and offset for the traffic signal. Fairview Avenue at County Road 132 W • Construct an EB right -turn lane (if ROW is available). • Optimize splits and offset for the traffic signal. These improvements will require additional discussion with the City of Roseville, Ramsey County, and MnDOT. Many of the improvements are necessary due to the significant retail growth adjacent to the Rosedale Center and not directly associated with the proposed South Campus Master Plan. All the intersections are anticipated to operate at an acceptable level of service for the 2040 analysis year with the recommendations from above in place. It is recommended that the Fairview Avenue and County Road B2 W corridors be retimed sometime before the horizon year to improve the operations of the twocorridors. Rosedale Center I Traffic Impact Analysis January 2020 Update A Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL) 1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350 Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532 331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.com Turning Movement Data Count Name: 1 Fairview Avenue N & Highway 36 EB Ramps (South) (FULL) Site Code: Start Date: 02/02/2019 Page No: 1 Start Time Lett Highway 36 EB Ramps Westbound Right Asp Total Lett Fairview Avenue N Southbound Thor Asp. Total Thor Fairview Avenue N Northbound Right Asp Total ILL Total 10.00AM 17 117 134 70 65 135 104 30 134 403 10.15 AM 17 126 143 68 91 159 113 18 131 433 1030AM 17 141 158 78 92 170 101 21 122 450 10:45 AM 15 162 177 79 113 192 105 24 129 498 Hourly Total 66 546 612 295 361 656 423 03 516 1784 11.00 AM 17 152 169 89 111 200 120 23 152 521 11.15 AM 15 176 191 102 112 214 136 25 161 566 1130AM 20 153 173 112 113 225 135 30 165 563 11:45 AM 20 164 184 131 123 254 133 20 162 600 Hourly Total 72 645 717 434 450 893 533 107 640 2250 12.00 PM 15 157 172 119 118 237 126 26 152 561 12.15 PM 16 152 168 127 131 258 128 28 156 582 1230 PM 13 170 183 126 130 256 142 21 163 602 12 45 PM 17 156 173 120 116 236 143 12 155 564 Hourly Total 61 635 696 492 405 987 530 87 626 2309 1 00 PM 9 160 169 107 122 229 138 10 157 555 115 PM 12 140 152 138 131 269 147 22 169 590 130 PM 17 137 154 126 130 256 127 24 151 561 1 45 PM 20 161 181 135 127 262 130 18 148 591 Hourly Total 58 598 656 506 510 1016 542 83 625 2297 ===BREAK === 7 00 AM 16 29 45 26 36 62 52 9 61 168 7 15 AM 13 22 35 41 51 92 64 30 94 221 730 AM 15 32 47 32 56 88 64 31 95 230 7:45 AM 24 30 54 37 65 102 72 31 103 259 Hourly Total 68 113 181 136 208 344 252 101 353 878 8 00 AM 27 25 52 25 86 111 60 26 86 249 8 15 AM 18 32 50 31 85 116 75 22 97 263 830AM 23 32 55 39 85 124 63 10 82 261 8:45 AM 20 45 65 25 73 98 00 20 119 282 Hourly Total 88 134 222 120 320 449 288 00 384 1055 ===BREAK 4 00 PM 18 73 91 87 140 227 157 33 190 508 415 PM 23 77 100 56 134 190 160 23 183 473 430 PM 14 102 116 85 130 224 170 20 208 548 4:45 PM 19 76 95 77 146 223 167 28 195 513 Hourly Total 74 328 402 305 550 864 663 113 776 2042 5 00 PM 23 79 102 85 156 241 162 10 181 524 5 15 PM 11 79 90 66 143 209 217 38 255 554 530 PM 18 93 111 62 150 212 206 23 229 552 5:45 PM r 23 105 128 98 141 239 147 23 170 537 Henry Total 75 356 431 311 590 901 732 103 835 2181 Grand Total 562 3355 3917 2599 3511 6110 3972 783 4755 14782 Approach% 143 857 - 425 575 - 835 165 - - Total% 38 227 265 176 238 413 269 53 322 - Lights 558 3336 3894 2555 3457 6012 3917 778 4695 14601 %Lights 993 994 994 983 985 984 98.6 994 987 98.8 Mediums 4 14 18 24 53 11 53 5 58 153 %Mediums 07 04 05 09 15 13 13 0.6 12 18 Articulated Trucks 0 5 5 20 1 21 2 0 2 28 % Articulated Trucks OD 0.1 01 T 08 00 03 01 OD OD 02 Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL) 1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350 Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532 331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.com !fin 02/02/201910. 00 AM E0tl10 A[ 02/13/2019 600 PM Lights Mediums Aft du shed Trucks j R 778 5 0 ]8395 87108 1152 355 8828 TObIvenue N �S� Turning Movement Data Plot Count Name: 1 Fairview Avenue N & Highway 36 EB Ramps (South) (FULL) Site Code: Start Date: 02/022019 Page No: 3 Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL) 1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350 Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532 331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.com Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (11:00 AM) Count Name: 1 Fairview Avenue N & Highway 36 EB Ramps (South) (FULL) Site Code: Start Date: 02/022019 Page No: 4 Start Time Left Highway 36 EB Ramps Westbound Right Asp Total Left Fairview Avenue N Southbound Thor Asp. Total Thor Fairview Avenue N Northbound Right Asp Total Int. Total 11 00 AM 17 152 169 89 111 200 129 23 152 521 11 15 AM 15 176 191 102 112 214 136 25 161 566 1130AM 20 153 173 112 113 225 135 30 165 563 11:45 AM 20 164 184 131 123 254 133 29 162 600 Total 72 645 717 434 459 893 533 107 640 2250 Approach% 100 90.0 - 486 514 - 833 167 - - TotalM, 32 287 319 193 204 397 237 4.8 284 - PHF 0900 0916 0938 0828 0.933 0879 0980 0892 0970 0938 Lights 72 642 714 427 453 880 531 107 638 2232 %Lights 100.0 995 996 984 987 985 99.6 100.0 997 992 Mediums 0 3 3 3 5 8 2 0 2 13 %Mediums 0.0 05 04 07 11 09 04 0.0 03 0.6 Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 4 1 5 0 0 0 5 Articulated Trucks 0.0 0.0 00 09 02 06 00 0.0 0.0 02 Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL) 1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350 Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532 331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.com Falmlew Avenue N iNi out m Taal 11 ]3 888 2853 5 8 13 8 5 5 178 893 2071 453 42] 5 3 1 4 459 434 T Peak Hour Data c 022822/201911 88AM �- — Ending At Q 02/02/201912. 88 PM Lights m O Mediums Aft cula[ed Trucks IN 525 638 1163 5 2 ] 1 8 1 531 640 1171 Out In Totd11 Fairview Avenue N [S] Turning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (11:00 AM) Count Name: 1 Fairview Avenue N & Highway 36 EB Ramps (South) (FULL) Site Code: Start Date: 02/022019 Page No: 5 Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL) 1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350 Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532 331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.com Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (12:30 PM) Count Name: 1 Fairview Avenue N & Highway 36 EB Ramps (South) (FULL) Site Code: Start Date: 02/022019 Page No: 6 Start Time Left Highway 36 EB Ramps Westbound Right Asp Total Left Fairview Avenue N Southbound Thor Asp. Total Thor Fairview Avenue N Northbound Right Asp Total Ink. Total 1230 PM 13 170 183 126 130 256 142 21 163 602 12:45 PM 17 156 173 120 116 236 143 12 155 564 1 00 PM 9 160 169 107 122 229 138 19 157 555 115 PM 12 140 152 138 131 269 147 22 169 590 Total 51 626 677 491 499 990 570 74 644 2311 Approach% 75 925 - 496 504 - 885 115 - - TotalM, 22 27.1 293 212 21.6 42.8 247 32 279 - PHF 0750 0921 0925 0889 0.952 0920 0969 0841 0953 0960 Lights 51 624 675 491 496 987 565 74 639 2301 %Lights 100.0 997 997 100.0 994 997 99.1 100.0 992 996 Mediums 0 1 1 0 3 3 5 0 5 9 %Mediums 0.0 02 01 0.0 06 03 09 0.0 0.8 04 Articulated Trucks 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Articulated Trucks 0.0 02 01 0.0 00 00 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL) 1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350 Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532 331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.com EeimieM APenue m imi out m Taal 1139 93] 21 ]6 6 3 9 1 0 1 1196 990 2186 496 491 3 0 0 0 499 491 T Peak Hour Data c 02/02/2019 12 30 PM �- — Ending At Q 02/02/2019 1.30 PM Lights m O Mediums Aft du shed Trucks 54] 639 1136 3 5 3 0 0 0 550 640 'I'190 Out In Tobl Falrvlew Avenue N �S� Turning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (12:30 PM) Count Name: 1 Fairview Avenue N & Highway 36 EB Ramps (South) (FULL) Site Code: Start Date: 02/022019 Page No: 7 Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL) 1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350 Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532 331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.com Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (8:00 AM) Count Name: 1 Fairview Avenue N & Highway 36 EB Ramps (South) (FULL) Site Code: Start Date: 02/022019 Page No: 8 Start Time Left Highway 36 EB Ramps Westbound Right Asp Total Left Fairview Avenue N Southbound Thor Asp. Total Thor Fairview Avenue N Northbound Right Asp Total Int. Total 8:00 AM 27 25 52 25 86 111 60 26 86 249 8:15 AM 18 32 50 31 85 116 75 22 97 263 830AM 23 32 55 39 85 124 63 19 82 261 8 45 AM 20 45 65 25 73 98 90 29 119 282 Total 88 134 222 120 329 449 288 96 384 1055 Approach % 39 6 604 - 267 73.3 - 75.0 25 0 - - TotalM, 83 127 210 114 31.2 42.6 273 9.1 364 - PHF 0 815 0 744 0 854 0 769 0.956 0905 0 800 0 828 0.807 0935 Lights 86 132 218 110 319 429 278 95 373 1020 %Lights 977 985 982 917 970 955 965 990 97.1 967 Mediums 2 0 2 7 10 17 10 1 11 30 %Mediums 23 0.0 09 5.8 30 38 35 1.0 29 2.8 Articulated Trucks 0 2 2 3 0 3 0 0 0 5 Articulated Trucks 0.0 15 09 25 00 07 00 0.0 0.0 05 Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL) 1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350 Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532 331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.com EeimieM Anenue m imi our m Taal 8 429 839 10 1] 2] 2 3 5 422 449 871 319 110 10 ] 0 3 329 120 T Peak Hour Data c 02/13/2019 8 00 AM �- — Ending A[ Q 02/13/20199.00 AM IJ9M15 m O Mediums Aft du shed Trucks 405 3]3 ]]8 12 11 23 0 0 0 4'I] 384 80'I Out In Tobl Falrvlew Avenue N �S� Turning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (8:00 AM) Count Name: 1 Fairview Avenue N & Highway 36 EB Ramps (South) (FULL) Site Code: Start Date: 02/022019 Page No: 9 Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL) 1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350 Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532 331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.com Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (5:00 PM) Count Name: 1 Fairview Avenue N & Highway 36 EB Ramps (South) (FULL) Site Code: Start Date: 02/022019 Page No: 10 Start Time Left Highway 36 EB Ramps Westbound Right Asp Total Left Fairview Avenue N Southbound Thor Asp. Total Thor Fairview Avenue N Northbound Right Asp Total Int. Total 5:00 PM 23 79 102 85 156 241 162 19 181 524 5:15 PM 11 79 90 66 143 209 217 38 255 554 530 PM 18 93 111 62 150 212 206 23 229 552 545 PM 23 105 128 98 141 239 147 23 170 537 Total 75 356 431 311 590 901 732 103 835 2167 Approach% 174 82.6 - 345 65.5 - 877 123 - - TotalM, 35 164 199 144 27.2 41.6 33.8 4.8 385 - PHF 0815 0.848 0842 0793 0.946 0935 0843 0678 0.819 0978 Lights 74 355 429 308 586 894 722 102 824 2147 %Lights 987 997 995 990 99.3 992 98.6 990 987 991 Mediums 1 1 2 0 4 4 9 1 10 16 %Mediums 13 03 05 0.0 07 04 12 1.0 12 07 Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 3 0 3 1 0 1 4 Articulated Trucks 0.0 0.0 00 1.0 00 03 01 0.0 0.1 02 Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL) 1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350 Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532 331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.com Falmlew Avenue N iNi out m Taal 16]] 894 16]1 10 4 14 1 3 4 1088 901 1989 586 308 4 0 0 3 590 31 T Peak Hour Data c 02/13/2019 5 00 PM �- — Ending A[ a 02/13/2019 E00 PM Lights m O Mediums Aft cula[ed Trucks IN 666 824 1484 5 18 15 8 1 1 665 835 1500 Out In Totd11 Fairview Avenue N [S] Turning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (5:00 PM) Count Name: 1 Fairview Avenue N & Highway 36 EB Ramps (South) (FULL) Site Code: Start Date: 02/022019 Page No: 11 Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL 1001 Warrenville Road, Sui a 350 Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532 331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.com Turninq Movement Data Count Name: 2 Fairview Avenue N & Highway 36 WB Ramps/Service Road (North) (FULL) Site Code: Start Date: 02/02/2019 Page No: 1 Start Time Left Highway 36 WB Ramps Westbound Thor Right Asp Total Left Service Road Eastbound Thor Right Asp Total Left Fairview Avenue N Southbound Thor Right Asp Total Left Fairview Avenue N Northbound Thm Right Asp Total ILL Total 10.00AM 18 32 83 133 23 13 62 98 28 75 23 126 33 180 11 224 581 10.15 AM 16 27 100 152 16 19 39 74 45 85 22 152 47 176 18 241 619 1030AM 15 34 01 140 18 18 57 93 55 113 18 186 39 177 23 239 658 10 45 AM 20 47 110 186 22 20 52 94 59 117 41 217 51 185 30 266 763 Hourly Total 69 140 402 611 79 70 210 359 187 300 104 681 170 718 82 970 2621 11.00 AM 9 36 104 149 17 18 58 93 71 136 37 244 53 185 26 264 750 11.15 AM 20 48 113 181 17 22 72 111 56 123 22 201 53 209 42 304 797 1130 AM 17 54 112 183 28 30 69 127 61 128 40 229 51 204 28 283 822 11 45 AM 15 35 127 177 20 18 90 128 89 152 33 274 65 220 20 305 884 Hourly Total 61 173 456 690 82 88 289 459 277 530 132 948 222 818 116 1156 3253 12.00 PM 11 41 117 169 20 23 89 132 69 137 41 247 35 198 31 264 812 12.15 PM 10 52 135 197 22 13 87 122 90 168 43 301 46 208 18 272 892 1230 PM 14 46 121 181 35 15 71 121 84 175 46 305 56 214 24 294 901 12 45 PM 13 28 144 185 26 29 64 119 88 154 40 282 47 219 27 293 879 Hourly Total 48 167 517 732 103 80 311 494 331 634 170 1135 184 839 100 1123 3484 1 00 PM 6 30 121 166 25 26 72 123 100 164 48 312 50 215 26 291 892 1 15 PM 11 38 120 178 27 23 89 139 98 161 33 292 38 214 22 274 883 130 PM 11 35 120 175 16 20 73 109 106 177 27 310 38 210 22 270 864 1 45 PM 16 26 151 193 20 24 76 120 80 181 42 303 42 218 19 279 895 Hourly Total 44 138 530 712 88 93 310 491 384 683 150 1217 168 857 89 1114 3534 ===BREAK === 7:00 AM 8 32 32 72 5 13 21 39 12 33 6 51 28 35 11 74 236 7:15 AM 10 18 25 53 3 9 22 34 17 50 1 77 16 46 25 87 251 730 AM 11 14 22 47 3 8 25 36 18 47 11 76 27 45 24 96 255 7 45 AM 13 30 35 78 7 6 35 48 15 48 10 73 20 65 14 99 298 Hourly Total 42 04 114 250 18 36 103 157 62 187 28 277 91 191 74 356 1040 8:00 AM 17 20 38 84 5 13 34 52 15 53 11 79 20 50 17 87 302 8:15 AM 15 27 34 76 4 4 45 53 14 60 14 88 33 47 23 103 320 830 AM 25 33 50 108 13 17 35 65 12 61 17 90 27 54 18 99 362 8 45 AM 31 28 50 109 10 12 32 54 20 36 8 64 32 71 29 132 359 Hourly Total 88 117 172 377 32 46 146 224 61 210 50 321 112 222 87 421 1343 ===BREAK === 4:00 PM 29 37 86 152 26 13 79 118 34 117 20 171 43 147 25 215 656 4:15 PM 24 46 88 158 24 13 73 110 47 106 25 178 35 172 16 223 669 430 PM 18 47 02 157 24 18 81 123 57 120 21 207 43 198 27 268 755 445 PM 19 46 08 163 17 18 70 105 56 132 25 213 41 177 24 242 723 Hourly Total 90 176 364 630 91 62 303 456 194 484 01 769 162 694 92 948 2803 5:00 PM 17 44 04 155 15 21 86 122 48 132 23 203 26 184 27 237 717 5:15 PM 33 44 104 181 22 11 70 103 52 105 10 176 44 201 32 277 737 530 PM 30 30 05 164 19 17 63 99 45 125 28 198 52 190 34 276 737 545 PM 27 45 89 161 12 16 80 108 59 124 19 202 40 176 22 238 709 Hourly Total 107 172 382 661 68 65 299 432 204 486 89 119 162 751 115 1028 2900 Grand Total 549 1111 2937 4663 561 540 1971 3072 1700 3613 814 6127 1271 5090 755 7116 20978 Approach% 118 252 630 - 183 176 642 - 271 590 133 - 179 715 10.6 - - Total% 26 56 140 222 27 2.6 94 14.6 81 172 39 292 6.1 243 36 339 - Lights 543 1157 2903 4603 558 535 1945 3038 1687 3555 807 6049 1269 5029 740 7038 20728 %Lights 989 983 988 987 995 991 987 989 992 984 99.1 987 998 98.8 980 989 988 Mediums 5 13 19 31 2 3 15 20 11 49 1 61 2 51 15 14 198 %Mediums 09 11 0.6 08 04 0.6 08 07 06 14 09 11 02 1.1 20 10 09 Articulated Trucks 1 1 15 23 1 2 11 14 2 9 0 11 0 4 0 4 52 Articulated Trucks 02 06 05 05 02 04 06 05 01 02 00 02 00 0.1 00 0.1 02 Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL) 1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350 Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532 331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.com _- JS — r � O p Fairview Avenue N IN] Out In Total 8490 6049 14539 ]8 57 145 20 11 31 8588 6127 14715 807 3555 1687 ] 49 11 0 9 2 814 3613 1700 R T L N 1 4 02/02/201910. 00 AM Ending A[ 02/13/2019 600 PM Lights Mediums Aft mldied Trucks h 1 r► IT T R 1269 5029 740 2 5] 15 0 4 0 1271 5090 755 6043 ]038 13081 69 ]4 143 21 4 25 6'133 ]'I'I6 '13249 Out In Total Fairview Avenue N �S� O p r 3 Turning Movement Data Plot Count Name: 2 Fairview Avenue N & Highway 36 WB Ramps/Service Road (North) (FULL) Site Code: Start Date: 02/022019 Page No: 3 Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL) 1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350 Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532 331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.com Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (11:00 AM) Count Name: 2 Fairview Avenue N & Highway 36 WB Ramps/Service Road (North) (FULL) Site Code: Start Date: 02/022019 Page No: 4 Start Time Left Highway 36V Ramps Westbound Thor Right Asp Total Left Service Road Eastbound Thor Right Asp Total Left Fairview Avenue Southbound Thor Right Asp Total Left Fairview Avenue Northbound Thor Right Asp Total ILL Total 11 00 AM 9 36 104 149 17 18 58 93 71 136 37 244 53 185 26 264 750 11 15 AM 20 48 113 181 17 22 72 111 56 123 22 201 53 209 42 304 797 11 30 AM 17 54 112 183 28 30 69 127 61 128 40 229 51 204 28 283 822 11 45 AM 15 35 127 177 20 18 90 128 89 152 33 274 65 220 20 305 884 Total 61 173 456 690 82 88 289 459 277 539 132 948 222 818 116 1156 3253 Approach% 88 25.1 66.1 - 17.0 102 63.0 - 292 569 139 - 102 708 10.0 - - TotalM, 19 53 14.0 212 25 27 89 141 85 16.6 41 29.1 6.8 251 3.6 355 - PHF 0763 0.801 0.898 0943 0732 0733 0.803 0896 0778 0.887 0825 0.865 0854 0930 0.690 0948 0920 Lights 61 172 454 687 82 88 284 454 277 534 132 943 222 813 116 1151 3235 %Lights 100.0 994 99.6 99.6 100.0 100.0 983 989 100.0 99.1 100.0 995 1000 994 1000 996 994 Mediums 0 1 2 3 0 0 2 2 0 4 0 4 0 5 0 5 14 %Mediums 00 06 04 04 00 0.0 07 04 00 07 00 04 0.0 06 0.0 04 04 Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 4 Articulated Trucks 00 00 0.0 00 00 0.0 10 07 00 02 00 01 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 01 Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL) 1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350 Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532 331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.com Fairview Avenue N IN] Out In Total 1349 943 2292 7 4 11 0 1 1 1356 948 2304 132 534 277 0 4 0 0 1 0 132 539 277 R T L Peak Hour Data 02/02/2019 11.00AM Ending At 02/02/201912. 00 PM Lights Mediums Acidulated Trucks 3]9 1151 2030 6 5 11 4 0 4 889 'I'156 2045 Out In Total Fairview Avenue N �S� Z m O n F F" m 3 r Turning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (11:00 AM) Count Name: 2 Fairview Avenue N & Highway 36 WB Ramps/Service Road (North) (FULL) Site Code: Start Date: 02/022019 Page No: 5 Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL) 1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350 Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532 331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.com Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (12:15 PM) Count Name: 2 Fairview Avenue N & Highway 36 WB Ramps/Service Road (North) (FULL) Site Code: Start Date: 02/022019 Page No: 6 Start Time Left Highway 36V Ramps Westbound Thor Right Asp Total Left Service Road Eastbound Thor Right Asp Total Left Fairview Avenue Southbound Thor Right Asp Total Left Fairview Avenue Northbound Thor Right Asp Total Ink Total 12:15 PM 10 52 135 197 22 13 87 122 90 168 43 301 46 208 18 272 892 1230 PM 14 46 121 181 35 15 71 121 84 175 46 305 56 214 24 294 901 1245 PM 13 28 144 185 26 29 64 119 88 154 40 282 47 219 27 293 879 1 00 PM 6 39 121 166 25 26 72 123 100 164 48 312 50 215 26 291 892 Total 43 165 521 729 108 83 294 485 362 661 177 1200 199 856 95 1150 3564 Approach% 59 22.6 715 - 22.3 17.1 60.6 - 302 55.1 148 - 173 744 83 - - TotalM, 12 46 14.6 205 30 23 82 136 102 185 50 337 5.6 240 27 323 - PHF 0768 0793 0905 0925 0771 0716 0.845 0986 0905 0944 0922 0962 0888 0977 0.880 0978 0989 Lights 43 163 520 726 108 81 294 483 360 657 176 1193 198 852 94 1144 3546 %Lights 100.0 98.8 99.8 99.6 100.0 976 100.0 996 994 994 994 994 995 995 989 995 995 Mediums 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 1 4 1 6 1 4 1 6 16 %Mediums 00 12 0.0 03 00 24 00 04 03 0.6 06 05 05 05 1.1 05 04 Articulated Trucks 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 Articulated Trucks 00 00 02 01 00 0.0 00 0.0 03 0.0 00 01 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 01 Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL) 1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350 Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532 331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.com Fairview Avenue N IN] Out In Total 1480 1193 2673 4 6 16 1 1 2 1485 1200 2685 176 657 366 1 4 1 0 0 1 177 661 362 R T L Peak Hour Data 02/02/2019 12.15 PM Ending At 02/02/2019 1.15 PM ugdns Mediums Ammlated Trucks 994 1144 2133 4 6 10 0 0 0 998 'I'150 2'148 Out In Total Fal rvlew Avenue N �S� p O F F" m r 3 Turning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (12:15 PM) Count Name: 2 Fairview Avenue N & Highway 36 WB Ramps/Service Road (North) (FULL) Site Code: Start Date: 02/022019 Page No: 7 Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL) 1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350 Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532 331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.com Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (8:00 AM) Count Name: 2 Fairview Avenue N & Highway 36 WB Ramps/Service Road (North) (FULL) Site Code: Start Date: 02/022019 Page No: 8 Start Time Left Highway 36V Ramps Westbound Thor Right Asp Total Left Service Road Eastbound Thor Right Asp Total Left Fairview Avenue Southbound Thor Right Asp Total Left Fairview Avenue Northbound Thor Right Asp Total Ink Total 8:00 AM 17 29 38 84 5 13 34 52 15 53 11 79 20 50 17 87 302 8:15AM 15 27 34 76 4 4 45 53 14 60 14 88 33 47 23 103 320 830AM 25 33 50 108 13 17 35 65 12 61 17 90 27 54 18 99 362 845AM 31 28 50 109 10 12 32 54 20 36 8 64 32 71 29 132 359 Total 88 117 172 377 32 46 146 224 61 210 50 321 112 222 87 421 1343 Approach% 233 31.0 45.6 - 14.3 205 652 - 19.0 654 156 - 266 527 207 - - TotalM, 66 87 12.8 28.1 24 34 109 167 45 15.6 37 239 83 10.5 65 313 - PHF 0 710 0.886 0.860 0.865 0.615 0 676 0.811 0 862 0 763 0.861 0 735 0.892 0 848 0 782 0 750 0 797 0927 Lights 87 115 165 367 31 45 140 216 58 199 48 305 112 214 83 409 1297 %Lights 989 983 959 973 00.9 978 959 964 95.1 94.8 960 95.0 1000 964 954 971 966 Mediums 1 1 4 6 1 0 4 5 3 11 2 16 0 6 4 10 37 %Mediums 11 09 23 16 3.1 0.0 27 22 49 52 40 50 0.0 27 4.6 24 28 Articulated Trucks 0 1 3 4 0 1 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 9 Articulated Trucks 00 09 17 11 0.0 22 14 13 00 0.0 00 00 0.0 09 0.0 05 07 Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL) 1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350 Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532 331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.com Fairview Avenue N IN] Out In Total 410 385 715 11 16 27 5 8 5 426 321 747 48 199 58 2 11 3 8 8 8 50 210 61 R T L Peak Hour Data 022/13/2019 8.00 AM Ending A[ 02/13/20199.00 AM Lure 'is Mediums Amculated Trucks 426 409 835 16 ID 26 2 2 4 444 42'I 665 Out In Total Fairview Avenue N �S� p O F F" m r sl Turning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (8:00 AM) Count Name: 2 Fairview Avenue N & Highway 36 WB Ramps/Service Road (North) (FULL) Site Code: Start Date: 02/022019 Page No: 9 Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL) 1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350 Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532 331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.com Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (4:30 PM) Count Name: 2 Fairview Avenue N & Highway 36 WB Ramps/Service Road (North) (FULL) Site Code: Start Date: 02/022019 Page No: 10 Start Time Left Highway 36V Ramps Westbound Thor Right Asp Total Left Service Road Eastbound Thor Right Asp Total Left Fairview Avenue Southbound Thor Right Asp Total Left Fairview Avenue Northbound Thor Right Asp Total Ink Total 430 PM 18 47 92 157 24 18 81 123 57 129 21 207 43 198 27 268 755 445 PM 19 46 98 163 17 18 70 105 56 132 25 213 41 177 24 242 723 5:00 PM 17 44 94 155 15 21 86 122 48 132 23 203 26 184 27 237 717 5:15 PM 33 44 104 181 22 11 70 103 52 105 19 176 44 201 32 277 737 Total 87 181 388 656 78 68 307 453 213 498 88 799 154 760 110 1024 2932 Approach% 133 27.6 59.1 - 17.2 150 67.8 - 267 623 110 - 150 74.2 107 - - TotalM, 30 62 132 224 27 23 105 155 73 17.0 30 273 53 25.9 3.8 349 - PHF 0659 0963 0933 0906 0.813 0810 0.892 0921 0934 0943 0880 0938 0875 0045 0.859 0924 0971 Lights 87 176 381 644 78 67 306 451 209 492 88 789 154 749 106 1009 2893 %Lights 100.0 972 982 982 100.0 985 997 996 98.1 98.8 100.0 987 1000 98.6 964 985 987 Mediums 0 4 2 6 0 1 0 1 3 4 0 7 0 10 4 14 28 %Mediums 00 22 05 09 00 15 00 02 14 0.8 00 09 0.0 13 3.6 14 10 Articulated Trucks 0 1 5 6 0 0 1 1 1 2 0 3 0 1 0 1 11 Articulated Trucks 00 06 13 09 00 0.0 03 02 05 04 00 04 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 04 Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL) 1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350 Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532 331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.com Fairview Avenue N IN] Out In Total 1208 789 1997 12 7 19 6 3 9 1226 799 2025 88 492 289 8 4 3 8 2 1 88 498 213 R T L Peak Hour Data 022/13/2019 4.30 PM Ending At 02/13/2019 5.30 PM ugdns Mediums Ammlated Trucks 885 1669 1894 4 14 18 3 1 4 892 '1020 '19'I6 Out In Total Fairview Avenue N �S� O p F 3 r Turning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (4:30 PM) Count Name: 2 Fairview Avenue N & Highway 36 WB Ramps/Service Road (North) (FULL) Site Code: Start Date: 02/022019 Page No: 11 Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL) 1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350 Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532 331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.com Turninq Movement Data Count Name: 3 Fairview Avenue N & Rosedale Center Mall West Driveway (FULL) Site Code: Start Date: 02/022019 Page No: 1 Start Time Left Rosedale Center Mall West Bnveway Westbound Thor Right Asp Total Left Commercial Bnveway Eastbound Thm Right Asp Total Left Fairview Avenue N Southbound Thor Right Asp Total Left Fairview Avenue N Northbound Thor Right Asp Total Int.Total 10.00AM 11 0 11 22 0 0 0 0 19 112 1 132 40 150 101 291 445 10.15 AM 14 0 11 25 0 0 0 0 14 138 2 154 35 165 99 299 478 1030AM 22 3 9 34 0 0 0 0 16 172 2 190 23 163 98 284 508 10 45 AM 30 1 17 48 0 0 0 0 20 180 3 203 42 173 106 321 572 Hourly Total 77 4 48 120 0 0 0 0 69 602 8 679 140 651 404 1195 2003 11.00 AM 38 4 10 61 0 0 0 0 14 204 1 219 37 185 94 316 596 11.15 AM 24 5 22 51 0 0 0 0 10 185 1 196 50 180 109 339 586 1130 AM 30 2 28 60 0 0 0 0 24 100 3 226 32 186 109 327 613 11 45 AM 53 4 25 82 0 0 0 0 12 211 1 224 48 191 129 368 674 Hourly Total 145 15 04 254 0 0 0 0 60 700 6 865 167 742 441 1350 2469 12.00 PM 36 1 41 78 0 0 0 0 11 212 4 227 46 197 136 379 684 12.15 PM 58 2 36 00 0 0 0 0 18 245 1 264 46 196 132 374 734 1230 PM 58 1 30 08 0 0 0 0 15 246 2 263 50 193 138 381 742 12 45 PM 58 5 47 110 0 0 0 0 13 220 3 236 45 207 131 383 729 Hourly Total 210 9 163 382 0 0 0 0 57 023 10 990 187 793 537 1517 2889 1 00 PM 57 3 37 07 1 0 2 3 18 250 3 271 52 204 116 372 743 1 15 PM 64 2 51 117 0 0 0 0 21 226 3 250 46 192 132 370 737 130 PM 62 3 34 00 0 0 0 0 11 240 4 264 43 179 120 342 705 1 45 PM 50 3 45 08 1 0 0 1 17 244 2 263 62 189 141 392 754 Hourly Total 233 11 167 411 2 0 2 4 67 000 12 1048 203 764 509 1476 2939 ===BREAK === 7:00 AM 1 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 3 51 1 55 2 63 8 73 130 7 15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 70 0 79 0 66 7 73 152 730AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 76 1 77 3 58 7 68 145 7 45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 76 0 79 1 94 12 107 186 Hourly Total 1 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 6 282 2 290 6 281 34 321 613 8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 88 0 92 3 80 9 92 184 8:15 AM 2 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 2 00 0 92 1 77 10 88 183 830AM 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 3 80 0 83 4 100 9 113 198 845 AM 2 1 2 5 0 0 0 0 2 63 2 67 12 101 18 131 203 Hourly Total 6 1 3 10 0 0 0 0 11 321 2 334 20 358 46 424 768 ===BREAK === 4:00 PM 34 2 26 62 0 0 2 2 8 142 1 151 26 164 45 235 450 4:15 PM 28 3 20 60 0 0 0 0 10 145 3 158 39 163 71 273 491 430 PM 20 2 15 46 0 0 0 0 11 175 1 187 27 180 84 291 524 445 PM 35 0 10 54 0 0 1 1 7 174 3 184 30 183 68 281 520 Hourly Total 126 7 80 222 0 0 3 3 36 636 8 680 122 690 268 1080 1985 5:00 PM 31 1 20 61 1 0 0 1 9 181 3 193 26 184 81 291 546 5:15 PM 23 0 15 38 0 0 0 0 7 148 1 156 34 192 97 323 517 530 PM 33 2 23 58 0 0 1 1 10 170 2 182 38 163 109 310 551 545 PM 42 2 29 73 0 0 0 0 13 166 0 179 25 152 102 279 531 Hourly Total 129 5 96 230 1 0 1 2 39 665 6 710 123 691 389 1203 2145 Grand Total 927 52 661 1640 3 0 6 9 345 5197 54 5596 968 4970 2628 8566 15811 Approach% 565 32 403 - 333 00 667 - 62 929 10 - 113 58.0 307 - - Total% 50 03 42 104 00 00 00 0.1 22 329 03 354 6.1 314 16.6 542 - Lights 925 52 658 1635 2 0 6 8 343 5125 54 5522 005 4897 2619 8481 15646 %Lights 998 1000 995 997 667 - 100.0 889 994 98.6 1000 987 997 985 997 990 990 Mediums 1 0 3 4 0 0 0 0 2 62 0 64 2 56 8 66 134 %Mediums 0.1 00 05 02 00 - 00 00 06 12 00 11 02 1.1 03 08 08 Articulated Trucks 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 10 0 10 1 17 1 19 31 Articulated Trucks 0.1 00 00 01 333 - 00 11.1 00 02 00 02 0.1 03 00 02 02 Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL) 1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350 Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532 331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.com �- JS 3 r E 0 p Fairview Avenue N IN] Out In Total 5557 5522 11079 59 64 123 18 10 28 5634 5596 11230 54 5125 343 0 62 2 0 10 0 54 5197 345 R T L N 1 4 02/02/201910. 00 AM Ending A[ 02/13/2019 600 PM Lights Mediums Aft culated Trucks h 1 r► IT T R 965 4897 2619 2 56 8 1 17 1 968 4970 2628 6056 8481 1453] 63 66 1 L9 11 19 30 6'130 8566 '14696 Out In Total Fairview Avenue N �S� Turning Movement Data Plot Count Name: 3 Fairview Avenue N & Rosedale Center Mall West Driveway (FULL) Site Code: Start Date: 02/022019 Page No: 3 Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL) 1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350 Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532 331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.com Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (11:00 AM) Count Name: 3 Fairview Avenue N & Rosedale Center Mall West Driveway (FULL) Site Code: Start Date: 02/022019 Page No: 4 Start Time Left Rosedale Center Mall West Enveway Westbound Thor Right Asp Total Left Commercial Enveway Eastbound Thor Right Asp Total Left Fairview Avenue Southbound Thor Right Asp. Total Left Fairview Avenue Northbound Thor Right Asp Total Ink. Total 11 00 AM 38 4 19 61 0 0 0 0 14 204 1 219 37 185 94 316 596 11 15 AM 24 5 22 51 0 0 0 0 10 185 1 196 50 180 109 339 586 11 30 AM 30 2 28 60 0 0 0 0 24 199 3 226 32 186 109 327 613 11 45 AM 53 4 25 82 0 0 0 0 12 211 1 224 48 191 129 368 674 Total 145 15 94 254 0 0 0 0 60 799 6 865 167 742 441 1350 2469 Approach% 571 59 37.0 - 0.0 0.0 00 - 69 924 07 - 124 550 327 - - TotalM, 59 06 3.8 103 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 24 324 02 35.0 6.8 301 179 547 - PHF 0 684 0 750 0.839 0 774 0.000 0 000 0.000 0 000 0 625 0947 0500 0957 0 835 0971 0.855 0917 0916 Lights 145 15 93 253 0 0 0 0 60 795 6 861 167 736 438 1341 2455 %Lights 100.0 100.0 989 996 100.0 995 100.0 995 1000 992 993 993 994 Mediums 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 6 3 9 13 %Mediums 00 00 1.1 04 - - - - 00 04 00 03 0.0 0.8 07 07 05 Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 Articulated Trucks 00 00 0.0 00 - - - - 00 01 00 01 0.0 0.0 00 00 00 Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL) 1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350 Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532 331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.com �- JS 3 E 0 p Fairview Avenue N IN] Out In Total 829 861 1690 7 3 10 0 1 1 836 865 1701 6 795 60 0 3 0 0 1 0 6 799 60 R T L Peak Hour Data 02/02/201911. 00AM Ending At 02/02/2019 12.00 PM Lig ins Mediums Ammlated Trucks 940 1341 2281 3 9 12 1 0 1 900 '1350 2290 Out In Total Fairview Avenue N �S� Turning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (11:00 AM) Count Name: 3 Fairview Avenue N & Rosedale Center Mall West Driveway (FULL) Site Code: Start Date: 02/022019 Page No: 5 Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL) 1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350 Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532 331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.com Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (12:30 PM) Count Name: 3 Fairview Avenue N & Rosedale Center Mall West Driveway (FULL) Site Code: Start Date: 02/022019 Page No: 6 Start Time Left Rosedale Center Mall West Enveway Westbound Thor Right Asp Total Left Commercial Enveway Eastbound Thor Right Asp Total Left Fairview Avenue Southbound Thor Right Asp. Total Left Fairview Avenue Northbound Thor Right Asp Total Ink. Total 1230 PM 58 1 39 98 0 0 0 0 15 246 2 263 50 193 138 381 742 1245 PM 58 5 47 110 0 0 0 0 13 220 3 236 45 207 131 383 729 1 00 PM 57 3 37 97 1 0 2 3 18 250 3 271 52 204 116 372 743 115 PM 64 2 51 117 0 0 0 0 21 226 3 250 46 192 132 370 737 Total 237 11 174 422 1 0 2 3 67 942 11 1020 193 796 517 1506 2951 Approach% 562 26 412 - 33.3 0.0 667 - 66 924 11 - 12.8 529 343 - - TotalM, 80 04 59 143 0.0 0.0 01 0.1 23 319 04 34.6 65 270 175 510 - PHF 0926 0550 0.853 0902 0.250 0000 0.250 0250 0798 0942 0917 0941 0928 0961 0937 0983 0993 Lights 236 11 173 420 1 0 2 3 67 936 11 1014 193 790 517 1500 2937 %Lights 996 100.0 994 995 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 994 100.0 994 1000 992 100.0 996 995 Mediums 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 6 0 5 0 5 12 %Mediums 00 00 0.6 02 0.0 - 00 0.0 00 06 00 06 0.0 0.6 00 03 04 Articulated Trucks 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 Articulated Trucks 04 00 0.0 02 0.0 - 00 0.0 00 00 00 00 0.0 0.1 00 01 01 Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL) 1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350 Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532 331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.com �- JS 3 E 0 p Fairview Avenue N IN] Out In Total 964 1014 1973 6 6 12 1 0 1 971 1020 1991 11 936 57 0 6 0 0 0 0 II 942 6] R T L Peak Hour Data 02/02/201912. 30 PM Ending At 02/02/2019 1.30 PM Lig ins Mediums Ammlated Trucks 11 ]4 1500 2W4 6 5 11 1 1 2 'I'I6'I '1506 266] Out In Total Fal rvlew Avenue N �S� Turning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (12:30 PM) Count Name: 3 Fairview Avenue N & Rosedale Center Mall West Driveway (FULL) Site Code: Start Date: 02/022019 Page No: 7 Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL) 1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350 Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532 331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.com Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (8:00 AM) Count Name: 3 Fairview Avenue N & Rosedale Center Mall West Driveway (FULL) Site Code: Start Date: 02/022019 Page No: 8 Start Time Left Rosedale Center Mall West Enveway Westbound Thor Right Asp Total Left Commercial Enveway Eastbound Thor Right Asp Total Left Fairview Avenue Southbound Thor Right Asp. Total Left Fairview Avenue Northbound Thor Right Asp Total Ink. Total 8:00AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 88 0 92 3 8o 9 92 184 8:15 AM 2 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 2 90 0 92 1 11 10 88 183 8 30 AM 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 3 80 0 83 4 100 9 113 198 8 45 AM 2 1 2 5 0 0 0 0 2 63 2 67 12 101 18 131 203 Total 6 1 3 10 0 0 0 0 11 321 2 334 20 358 46 424 768 Approach% 600 10.0 30.0 - 0.0 0.0 00 - 33 96.1 06 - 47 844 10.8 - - TotalM, 08 01 04 13 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 14 41.8 03 435 2.6 40.0 60 552 - PHF 0750 0250 0375 0500 0.000 0000 0.000 0000 0688 0.892 0250 0908 0417 0.886 0.639 0809 0946 Lights 5 1 3 9 0 0 0 0 11 305 2 318 19 343 45 407 734 %Lights 833 100.0 1000 900 100.0 95.0 100.0 952 95.0 95.8 97.8 960 956 Mediums 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 16 1 11 1 13 30 %Mediums 167 00 0.0 100 - - - - 00 50 00 48 5.0 3.1 22 31 39 Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 4 Articulated Trucks 00 00 0.0 00 - - - - 00 00 00 00 0.0 1.1 00 09 05 Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL) 1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350 Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532 331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.com �- JS 3 E 0 p Fairview Avenue N IN] Out In Total 346 318 664 11 16 2] 4 8 4 361 334 695 2 385 11 6 16 6 8 8 8 2 321 11 R T L Peak Hour Data 022/13/2019 8.00 AM Ending A[ 02/13/20199.00 AM Lights Mediums Acidulated Trucks 310 40] ]1] 1] 13 30 0 4 4 32] 424 ]5'I Out In Total Fairview Avenue N �S� Turning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (8:00 AM) Count Name: 3 Fairview Avenue N & Rosedale Center Mall West Driveway (FULL) Site Code: Start Date: 02/022019 Page No: 9 Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL) 1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350 Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532 331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.com Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (5:00 PM) Count Name: 3 Fairview Avenue N & Rosedale Center Mall West Driveway (FULL) Site Code: Start Date: 02/022019 Page No: 10 Start Time Left Rosedale Center Mall West Enveway Westbound Thor Right Asp Total Left Commercial Enveway Eastbound Thor Right Asp Total Left Fairview Avenue Southbound Thor Right Asp. Total Left Fairview Avenue Northbound Thor Right Asp Total Ink. Total 5:00 PM 31 1 29 61 1 0 0 1 9 181 3 193 26 184 81 291 546 5:15 PM 23 0 15 38 0 0 0 0 7 148 1 156 34 192 97 323 517 530 PM 33 2 23 58 0 0 1 1 10 170 2 182 38 163 109 310 551 545 PM 42 2 29 73 0 0 0 0 13 166 0 179 25 152 102 279 531 Total 129 5 96 230 1 0 1 2 39 665 6 710 123 691 389 1203 2145 Approach% 561 22 417 - 50.0 0.0 50.0 - 55 937 08 - 102 574 323 - - TotalM, 60 02 45 107 0.0 0.0 00 0.1 18 31.0 03 33.1 57 32.2 18.1 561 - PHF 0768 0.625 0.828 0788 0250 0000 0250 0500 0750 0919 0500 0920 0809 0.900 0.892 0931 0973 Lights 129 5 96 230 0 0 1 1 38 654 6 698 122 675 389 1186 2115 %Lights 100.0 100.0 1000 100.0 0.0 100.0 500 974 983 100.0 983 992 977 100.0 986 986 Mediums 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 8 0 9 0 10 0 10 19 %Mediums 00 00 0.0 00 0.0 - 00 0.0 26 12 00 13 0.0 14 00 08 09 Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 3 0 3 1 6 0 7 11 Articulated Trucks 00 00 0.0 00 100.0 - 00 500 00 05 00 04 0.8 09 00 06 05 Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL) 1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350 Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532 331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.com �- JS 3 E 0 p Fairview Avenue N IN] Out In Total ]]1 698 1469 16 9 19 ] 3 18 788 710 1498 6 654 38 8 8 1 8 3 8 6 665 39 R T L Peak Hour Data 022/13/2019 5.00 PM Ending A[ 02/13/2819 688 PM I gins Med urns Ammlated Trucks ]84 1186 16]6 8 18 18 3 ] 18 ]95 '1203 '1998 Out In Total Fairview Avenue N �S� Turning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (5:00 PM) Count Name: 3 Fairview Avenue N & Rosedale Center Mall West Driveway (FULL) Site Code: Start Date: 02/022019 Page No: 11 Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL) 1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350 Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532 331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.com Turning Movement Data Count Name: 4 County Road B2 W & Fairview Avenue N (FULL) Site Code: Start Date: 02/02/2019 Page No: 1 Start Time Left County Road B2 W Westbound Thor Right App.Total Left County Road B2 W Eastbound Thor Right App.Total Left Fairview Avenue N Southbound Thor Right App.Total Left Fairview Avenue N Northbound Thor Right App.Total ILL Total 10.00 AM 28 38 29 95 23 46 40 109 31 52 16 99 16 77 67 160 463 10.15 AM 43 44 17 104 26 65 32 123 29 79 24 132 25 79 77 181 540 1030 AM 56 41 43 140 34 47 49 130 45 78 23 146 32 59 79 170 586 10 45 AM 58 54 39 151 26 60 51 137 51 86 21 158 33 81 85 199 645 Hourly Total 185 177 128 490 109 218 172 499 156 285 84 535 106 296 308 710 2234 11.00 AM 60 63 32 155 17 75 36 128 46 106 32 184 45 85 82 212 679 11.15 AM 52 53 44 149 29 61 52 142 51 87 19 157 29 85 87 201 649 1130 AM 65 50 46 161 38 76 50 164 43 102 35 180 48 79 102 229 734 11:45 AM 73 60 51 184 37 109 70 216 53 75 24 152 43 88 96 227 779 Hourly Total 250 226 173 649 121 321 208 650 193 370 110 673 165 337 367 869 2841 12.00 PM 81 55 58 194 46 105 42 193 54 8o 25 159 44 90 107 241 787 12.15 PM 67 65 46 178 61 92 73 226 43 105 26 174 45 97 93 235 813 1230 PM 78 72 63 213 42 80 61 183 67 103 26 196 43 112 88 243 835 12:45 PM 87 75 40 202 54 66 41 161 63 91 25 179 54 97 108 259 801 Hourly Total 313 267 287 787 203 343 217 763 227 378 102 708 186 396 396 978 3236 1 00 PM 84 84 45 213 55 95 62 212 52 98 23 173 51 97 108 256 854 1 15 PM 75 57 48 180 30 87 56 173 61 96 32 189 39 101 119 259 801 130 PM 89 74 67 230 39 68 63 170 75 92 33 200 35 91 104 230 830 1 45 PM 82 73 47 202 34 91 67 192 49 87 30 166 47 93 122 262 822 Hourly Total 330 288 287 825 158 341 248 747 237 373 118 728 172 382 453 1007 3307 ===BREAK === 7:00AM 17 31 8 56 2 6 9 17 4 28 6 38 22 38 5 65 176 7:15 AM 17 47 14 78 2 10 4 16 7 58 6 71 20 39 10 69 234 730AM 21 48 17 86 5 3 8 16 5 49 3 57 18 32 13 63 222 7 45 AM 22 59 23 104 7 7 6 20 6 52 9 67 29 39 20 88 279 Hourly Total 77 185 62 324 16 26 27 69 22 187 24 233 89 148 48 285 911 8:00 AM 27 52 16 95 5 5 9 19 5 53 5 63 30 43 14 87 264 8:15 AM 26 47 12 85 5 9 11 25 9 58 5 72 32 30 10 72 254 830AM 24 47 16 87 6 13 14 33 6 45 10 61 38 45 22 105 286 845 AM 17 37 9 63 5 20 9 34 10 40 10 60 31 54 22 107 264 Hourly Total 94 183 53 330 21 47 43 111 30 196 30 256 131 172 68 371 1068 ===BREAK === 4:00 PM 37 56 43 136 32 98 36 166 48 69 20 137 54 110 74 238 677 4:15 PM 45 57 37 139 40 106 43 189 37 63 21 121 45 92 70 207 656 430 PM 46 39 32 117 37 143 41 221 53 79 27 159 43 97 92 232 729 4 45 PM 47 54 46 147 40 146 48 234 61 72 20 153 50 89 88 227 761 Hourly Total 175 288 158 539 149 493 168 810 199 283 88 570 192 388 324 904 2823 5:00 PM 41 46 46 133 38 143 48 229 44 83 20 147 28 92 94 214 723 5:15 PM 44 44 29 117 27 131 30 188 54 68 18 140 34 105 83 222 667 530 PM 53 39 26 118 34 117 39 190 37 83 15 135 34 81 74 189 632 545 PM 49 59 38 146 33 77 40 150 50 69 15 134 26 90 86 202 632 Hourly Total 187 188 139 514 132 468 157 757 185 303 68 556 122 368 337 827 2654 Grand Total 1611 1720 1127 4458 909 2257 1240 4406 1249 2386 624 4259 1163 2487 2301 5951 19074 Approach% 36.1 38.6 253 - 20.6 512 28.1 - 293 560 147 - 195 41.8 387 - - Total% 84 90 59 234 48 118 65 23.1 65 125 33 223 6.1 13.0 121 312 - Lights 1580 1675 1110 4365 901 2227 1209 4337 1225 2357 617 4199 1140 2450 2269 5859 18180 %Lights 98.1 974 985 979 99.1 987 975 984 98.1 988 989 98.6 98.0 985 986 985 984 Mediums 31 43 16 90 6 21 23 56 24 26 5 55 11 33 29 13 274 %Mediums 19 25 14 20 07 12 19 13 19 11 08 13 09 13 13 12 14 Articulated Trucks 0 2 1 3 2 3 8 13 0 3 2 5 12 4 3 19 40 Articulated Trucks 00 01 0.1 01 02 0.1 06 03 00 01 03 01 10 02 01 03 02 Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL) 1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350 Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532 331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.com �- JS �o pZ Fairview Avenue N IN] Out In Total 4461 4199 3666 55 55 110 ] 5 12 4523 4259 8782 617 2357 1225 5 26 24 2 3 0 624 2386 1249 R T L N 1 4 02/02/201910. 00 AM Ending A[ 02/13/2019 600 PM Lights Mediums Aft culated Trucks h 1 r► IT T R 1140 2456 2269 11 33 29 12 4 3 1163 2487 23.1 5146 5359 11005 30 ]3 153 11 19 30 523] 595'I 'I'I'I88 Out In Total Fal rvlew Avenue N �S� Turning Movement Data Plot Count Name: 4 County Road B2 W & Fairview Avenue N (FULL) Site Code: Start Date: 02/022019 Page No: 3 Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL) 1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350 Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532 331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.com Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (11:00 AM) Count Name: 4 County Road B2 W & Fairview Avenue N (FULL) Site Code: Start Date: 02/022019 Page No: 4 Start Time Left County Road 32 W Westbound Thor Right Asp Total Left County Road B2 W Eastbound Thor Right Asp Total Left Fairview Avenue N Southbound Thor Right Asp Total Left Fairview Avenue N Northbound Thor Right Asp Total Int.Total 11 00AM 60 63 32 155 17 75 36 128 46 106 32 184 45 85 82 212 679 11 15 AM 52 53 44 149 29 61 52 142 51 87 19 157 29 85 87 201 649 11 30AM 65 50 46 161 38 76 50 164 43 102 35 180 48 79 102 229 734 11 45 AM 73 60 51 184 37 109 70 216 53 75 24 152 43 88 96 227 779 Total 250 226 173 649 121 321 208 650 193 370 110 673 165 337 367 869 2841 Approach% 385 34.8 267 - 18.8 494 32.0 - 287 55.0 163 - 19.0 38.8 422 - - TotalM, 8.8 80 6.1 22.8 43 11.3 73 229 68 13.0 39 237 5.8 11.9 129 306 - PHF 0 856 0.897 0.848 0.882 0 796 0 736 0 743 0752 0910 0.873 0786 0914 0 859 0.957 0900 0949 0912 Lights 248 220 172 640 121 319 208 648 190 367 110 667 164 335 364 863 2818 %Lights 992 973 994 98.6 100.0 994 1000 997 984 992 100.0 99.1 BBA BBA 992 993 992 Mediums 2 6 1 9 0 2 0 2 3 2 0 5 1 2 3 6 22 %Mediums 0.8 27 0.6 14 00 0.6 0.0 03 16 05 0.0 07 0.6 0.6 0.8 07 08 Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 Articulated Trucks 0.0 00 0.0 00 00 0.0 0.0 00 00 03 0.0 01 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 00 Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL) 1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350 Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532 331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.com �- JS pox pZ Fairview Avenue N IN] Out In Total 628 667 1295 3 5 8 8 1 1 631 673 1304 110 367 190 8 2 3 8 1 8 110 370 193 R T L Peak Hour Data 02/02/2019 11.88AM Ensure At 02/02/2019 12.00 PM I gins Med urns Ammlated Trucks 823 863 1686 4 6 16 1 8 1 626 669 '169] Out In Total Fairview Avenue N �S� Turning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (11:00 AM) Count Name: 4 County Road B2 W & Fairview Avenue N (FULL) Site Code: Start Date: 02/022019 Page No: 5 Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL) 1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350 Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532 331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.com Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (1:00 PM) Count Name: 4 County Road B2 W & Fairview Avenue N (FULL) Site Code: Start Date: 02/022019 Page No: 6 Start Time Left County Road 32 W Westbound Thor Right Asp Total Left County Road B2 W Eastbound Thor Right Asp Total Left Fairview Avenue N Southbound Thor Right Asp Total Left Fairview Avenue N Northbound Thor Right Asp Total Int.Total 1 00 PM 84 84 45 213 55 95 62 212 52 98 23 173 51 97 108 256 854 1 15 PM 75 57 48 180 30 87 56 173 61 96 32 189 39 101 119 259 801 1 30 PM 89 74 67 230 39 68 63 170 75 92 33 200 35 91 104 230 830 1 45 PM 82 73 47 202 34 91 67 192 49 87 30 166 47 93 122 262 822 Total 330 288 207 825 158 341 248 747 237 373 118 728 172 382 453 1007 3307 Approach% 400 349 251 - 212 45.6 332 - 32.6 512 162 - 17.1 379 45.0 - - TotalM, 100 87 63 249 48 10.3 75 226 72 113 3.6 22.0 52 11.6 137 305 - PHF 0927 0.857 0772 0.897 0718 0.897 0925 0881 0790 0952 0894 0910 0843 0.946 0928 0961 0968 Lights 328 283 206 817 158 336 246 740 235 371 117 723 170 381 450 1001 3281 %Lights 994 983 995 99.0 100.0 98.5 992 991 992 995 992 993 98.8 997 993 994 992 Mediums 2 5 1 8 0 5 2 7 2 2 1 5 1 1 2 4 24 %Mediums 0.6 17 05 10 00 15 0.8 09 08 05 0.8 07 0.6 03 04 04 07 Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 2 Articulated Trucks 0.0 00 0.0 00 00 0.0 0.0 00 00 00 0.0 00 0.6 0.0 02 02 01 Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL) 1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350 Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532 331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.com Fairview Avenue N IN] Out In Total 745 723 1468 2 5 7 8 8 8 ]4] 728 1475 117 371 235 1 2 2 8 8 8 118 373 237 R T L Peak Hour Data 02/02/2019 1 oo PM Ending At 02/02/2019 2.00 PM LgM15 Metllums Ammlated Trucks 945 1661 1946 6 4 16 8 2 2 95'I '100] '1958 Out In Total Fal rvlew Avenue N �S� Turning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (1:00 PM) Count Name: 4 County Road B2 W & Fairview Avenue N (FULL) Site Code: Start Date: 02/022019 Page No: 7 Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL) 1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350 Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532 331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.com Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (7:45 AM) Count Name: 4 County Road B2 W & Fairview Avenue N (FULL) Site Code: Start Date: 02/022019 Page No: 8 Start Time Left County Road 32 W Westbound Thor Right Asp Total Left County Road B2 W Eastbound Thor Right Asp Total Left Fairview Avenue N Southbound Thor Right Asp Total Left Fairview Avenue N Northbound Thor Right Asp Total Int.Total 7 45 AM 22 59 23 104 7 7 6 20 6 52 9 67 20 30 20 88 279 8:OOAM 27 52 16 95 5 5 9 19 5 53 5 63 30 43 14 87 264 8:15 AM 26 47 12 85 5 9 11 25 9 58 5 72 32 30 10 72 254 830AM 24 47 16 87 6 13 14 33 6 45 10 61 38 45 22 105 286 Total 99 205 67 371 23 34 40 97 26 208 29 263 120 157 66 352 1083 Approach% 267 553 181 - 237 35.1 412 - 99 79.1 110 - 30.0 44.6 18.8 - - TotalM, 9.1 189 62 343 2.1 3.1 37 90 24 192 27 243 110 14.5 6.1 325 - PHF 0917 0.869 0 728 0.892 0.821 0.654 0 714 0 735 0 722 0.897 0 725 0913 0 840 0.872 0 750 0 838 0947 Lights 92 198 60 350 21 20 35 85 24 201 27 252 123 152 62 337 1024 %Lights 929 96.6 896 943 013 85.3 875 876 923 96.6 931 95.8 05.3 00.8 939 957 94.6 Mediums 7 5 7 19 2 4 3 9 2 7 2 11 4 4 3 11 50 %Mediums 7.1 24 104 51 87 11.8 75 93 77 34 69 42 3.1 25 45 31 46 Articulated Trucks 0 2 0 2 0 1 2 3 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 4 9 Articulated Trucks 0.0 1 0 0.0 05 0.0 29 5.0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 1.6 0.6 15 1 1 0 8 Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL) 1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350 Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532 331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.com �- JS Ino pZ Fairview Avenue N IN] Out In Total 233 252 485 13 11 24 1 8 1 247 263 510 2] 201 24 2 ] 2 8 8 8 29 208 26 R T L Peak Hour Data 022/13/2019 7:45 AM Ending A[ 02/13/2819 8:45 AM Lure 'is Mediums Amculated Trucks 328 33] 665 1] 11 28 2 4 6 34] 352 699 Out In Total Fal rvlew Avenue N �S� Turning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (7:45 AM) Count Name: 4 County Road B2 W & Fairview Avenue N (FULL) Site Code: Start Date: 02/022019 Page No: 9 Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL) 1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350 Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532 331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.com Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (4:30 PM) Count Name: 4 County Road B2 W & Fairview Avenue N (FULL) Site Code: Start Date: 02/022019 Page No: 10 Start Time Left County Road 32 W Westbound Thor Right Asp Total Left County Road B2 W Eastbound Thor Right Asp Total Left Fairview Avenue N Southbound Thor Right Asp Total Left Fairview Avenue N Northbound Thor Right Asp Total Int.Total 430PM 46 39 32 117 37 143 41 221 53 79 27 159 43 97 92 232 729 445 PM 47 54 46 147 40 146 48 234 61 72 20 153 50 89 88 227 761 5:00 PM 41 46 46 133 38 143 48 229 44 83 20 147 28 92 94 214 723 5:15 PM 44 44 29 117 27 131 30 188 54 68 18 140 34 105 83 222 667 Total 178 183 153 514 142 563 167 872 212 302 85 599 155 383 357 895 2880 Approach% 346 35.6 298 - 10.3 646 192 - 354 504 142 - 17.3 42.8 399 - - TotalM, 62 64 53 17.8 49 195 5.8 303 74 105 3.0 20.8 54 13.3 124 311 - PHF 0947 0.847 0.832 0.874 0.888 0964 0.870 0932 0869 0910 0787 0942 0775 0.912 0949 0964 0946 Lights 175 175 153 503 141 561 164 866 205 299 84 588 149 374 355 878 2835 %Lights 983 95.6 1000 979 99.3 996 982 993 967 99.0 988 982 90.1 977 994 981 984 Mediums 3 8 0 11 1 2 1 4 7 2 0 9 2 8 2 12 36 %Mediums 17 44 0.0 21 07 04 0.6 05 33 07 0.0 15 13 2.1 0.6 13 13 Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 1 1 2 4 1 0 5 9 Articulated Trucks 0.0 00 0.0 00 00 00 12 02 00 03 12 03 2.6 03 0.0 06 03 Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL) 1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350 Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532 331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.com Fairview Avenue N IN] Out In Total 668 588 1256 9 9 18 1 2 3 678 599 12]] 84 299 285 8 2 7 1 1 8 85 302 212 R T Peak Hour Data 022/13/2019 4.30 PM Ending A[ 02/13/2819 530PM T'hts Mediums Acidulated Trucks 638 8]8 1516 6 12 18 3 5 8 60] 895 '1502 Out In Total Fal rvlew Avenue N �S� tp o o rro w o N Tit Turning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (4:30 PM) Count Name: 4 County Road B2 W & Fairview Avenue N (FULL) Site Code: Start Date: 02/022019 Page No: 11 Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL 1001 Warrenville Road, Sui a 350 Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532 331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.com Turninq Movement Data Count Name: 5 County Road B2 W & Rosedale Center Mall Norfhwest Driveway (FULL) Site Code: Start Date: 02/02/2019 Page No: 1 Start Time Left County Road B2 W Westbound Thor Right Asp Total Left County Road BE W Eastbound Thor Right Asp Total Left Commercial Driveway Southbound Thor Right Asp Total Rosedale Left CenterMall Northwest Driveway Northbound Thor Right Asp Total ILL Total 10.00AM 28 77 7 112 15 96 37 148 4 1 8 13 9 0 3 12 285 10.15 AM 15 84 9 108 19 110 31 160 6 2 8 16 7 0 8 15 299 1030AM 14 108 11 133 27 116 38 181 8 2 13 23 17 0 15 32 369 10 45 AM 28 116 14 158 19 124 52 195 5 1 12 18 16 1 24 41 412 Hourly Total 85 385 41 511 80 446 158 684 23 6 41 70 49 1 50 100 1365 11.00AM 25 127 18 170 28 112 53 193 4 1 12 17 25 3 15 43 423 11.15 AM 26 109 16 151 29 115 44 188 7 6 12 25 23 5 17 45 409 1130 AM 32 122 11 165 27 138 67 232 7 2 14 23 31 3 26 60 480 11 45 AM 20 123 9 152 20 166 75 261 5 0 15 20 27 3 22 52 485 Hourly Total 103 481 54 638 104 531 239 874 23 9 53 85 106 14 80 200 1797 12.00 PM 33 122 18 173 23 145 79 247 4 5 22 31 28 4 27 59 510 12.15 PM 31 127 10 168 26 135 67 228 12 2 15 29 37 0 20 57 482 1230 PM 19 153 7 179 22 144 76 242 7 5 12 24 34 4 29 67 512 12 45 PM 32 136 7 175 18 132 84 234 9 1 23 33 35 4 28 67 509 Hourly Total 115 538 42 695 89 556 306 951 32 13 72 117 134 12 104 250 2013 1 00 PM 41 148 14 203 30 133 81 244 8 2 11 21 40 2 40 82 550 1 15 PM 23 129 16 168 30 157 88 275 2 6 10 18 23 4 27 54 515 130 PM 28 164 9 201 23 129 81 233 6 4 21 31 29 5 55 89 554 1 45 PM 27 125 9 161 23 142 77 242 2 3 25 30 39 12 25 76 509 Hourly Total 119 566 48 733 106 561 327 994 18 15 67 100 131 23 147 301 2128 ===BREAK === 7:00 AM 4 54 1 59 0 14 1 15 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 76 7:15 AM 1 77 1 79 0 22 4 26 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 105 730AM 1 85 2 88 3 18 0 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 109 745AM 2 103 3 108 2 28 3 33 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 143 Hourly Total 8 319 7 334 5 82 8 95 1 0 0 1 2 0 1 3 433 8:00 AM 0 95 1 96 1 20 2 23 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 2 122 8 15 AM 3 82 4 89 2 26 3 31 1 0 2 3 0 0 1 1 124 830AM 3 Bo 0 83 5 31 3 39 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 124 8 45 AM 8 64 1 73 2 46 4 52 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 127 Hourly Total 14 321 6 341 10 123 12 145 1 0 6 7 2 0 2 4 497 ===BREAK === 4:00 PM 17 121 7 145 11 169 27 207 3 2 4 9 18 2 25 45 406 4:15 PM 9 100 8 117 17 158 35 210 5 0 11 16 18 2 20 40 383 430 PM 11 95 4 110 19 215 34 268 9 1 12 22 18 0 23 41 441 445 PM 14 104 4 122 18 213 49 280 7 0 10 17 16 0 18 34 453 Hourly Total 51 420 23 494 65 755 145 965 24 3 37 64 70 4 86 160 1683 5:00 PM 7 106 10 123 12 202 45 259 8 4 8 20 1 18 0 16 34 436 515 PM 7 94 10 111 18 188 50 256 8 0 8 16 15 4 21 40 423 530 PM 16 93 10 119 12 165 47 224 6 4 11 21 18 0 18 36 400 545 PM 16 113 9 138 11 145 49 205 8 2 8 18 16 3 28 47 408 Hourly Total 46 406 39 491 53 700 191 944 30 10 35 15 01 1 83 157 1001 Grand Total 541 3436 260 4237 512 3754 1386 5652 152 56 311 519 561 61 553 1175 11583 Approach% 128 81.1 6.1 - 91 664 245 - 293 108 599 - 477 52 4.1 - - Total% 47 297 22 366 44 324 12.0 488 13 05 27 45 48 05 48 10.1 - Lights 535 3354 259 4148 511 3681 1382 5574 152 55 310 517 559 61 552 1172 11411 %Lights 989 976 99.6 979 99.8 98.1 997 98.6 1000 982 997 99.6 996 100.0 998 997 985 Mediums 6 80 1 81 1 69 4 14 0 1 1 2 2 0 1 3 166 %Mediums 11 23 04 21 02 18 03 13 00 18 03 04 04 00 02 03 14 Articulated Trucks 0 2 0 2 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 Articulated Trucks 00 01 00 00 00 0.1 00 0.1 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 01 Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL) 1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350 Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532 331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.com �- JS �o pZ Commercial Ddvewayhut Out In Total 831 517 1348 2 2 4 8 8 8 833 519 1352 318 55 152 1 1 8 8 8 8 311 56 152 R T N 1 4 02/02/201910. 88 AM Entllna A[ 02/13/2819 688 PM Lights Mediums Aft culated Trucks h 1 r► T R 559 61 552 2 8 1 8 8 8 561 61 553 Turning Movement Data Plot Count Name: 5_County Road B2 W & Rosedale Center Mall Northwest Driveway (FULL) Site Code: Start Date: 02/022019 Page No: 3 Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL) 1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350 Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532 331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.com Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (11:00 AM) Count Name: 5_County Road B2 W & Rosedale Center Mall Northwest Driveway (FULL) Site Code: Start Date: 02/022019 Page No: 4 Start Time Left County Road 32 W Westbound Thor Right Asp Total Left County Road B2 W Eastbound Thor Right Asp Total Left Commercial Driveway Southbound Thor Right Asp Total Rosedale Left CenterMall Northwest Driveway Northbound Thor Right Asp Total Int.Total 11 00AM 25 127 18 170 28 112 53 193 4 1 12 17 25 3 15 43 423 11 15 AM 26 109 16 151 29 115 44 188 7 6 12 25 23 5 17 45 409 11 30AM 32 122 11 165 27 138 67 232 7 2 14 23 31 3 26 60 480 11 45 AM 20 123 9 152 20 166 75 261 5 0 15 20 27 3 22 52 485 Total 103 481 54 638 104 531 239 874 23 9 53 85 106 14 80 200 1797 Approach% 161 754 85 - 11 9 608 273 - 27.1 10.6 624 - 53.0 7.0 40.0 - - TotalM, 57 26.8 3.0 355 58 295 133 486 13 05 29 47 59 0.8 45 11.1 - PHF 0 805 0947 0 750 0938 0.897 0 800 0 797 0 837 0 821 0 375 0 883 0.850 0 855 0 700 0 769 0.833 0926 Lights 102 476 54 632 104 523 239 866 23 9 53 85 105 14 80 199 1782 %Lights 99 0 99.0 100 0 99.1 100.0 985 100 0 991 100.0 100 0 100.0 100 0 99.1 100.0 100.0 995 99 2 Mediums 1 5 0 6 0 8 0 8 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 15 %Mediums 1.0 10 0.0 09 00 15 0.0 09 00 00 0.0 0.0 09 0.0 0.0 05 08 Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Articulated Trucks 0.0 00 0.0 00 00 00 0.0 00 00 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL) 1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350 Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532 331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.com Commercial Drveway[N] Out In Total 172 85 257 8 8 8 8 8 8 72 85 257 53 9 23 8 8 8 8 8 8 53 9 23 R T L Peak Hour Data 02/02/2019 11.88AM EndingAt 02/02/2019 12.88 PM Lars Mecuums Ammlated Trucks Turning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (11:00 AM) Count Name: 5_County Road B2 W & Rosedale Center Mall Northwest Driveway (FULL) Site Code: Start Date: 02/022019 Page No: 5 Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL) 1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350 Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532 331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.com Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (12:45 PM) Count Name: 5_County Road B2 W & Rosedale Center Mall Northwest Driveway (FULL) Site Code: Start Date: 02/022019 Page No: 6 Start Time Left County Road 32 W Westbound Thor Right Asp Total Left County Road B2 W Eastbound Thor Right Asp Total Left Commercial Driveway Southbound Thor Right Asp Total Rosedale Left CenterMall Northwest Driveway Northbound Thor Right Asp Total Int.Total 1245 PM 32 136 7 175 18 132 84 234 9 1 23 33 35 4 28 67 509 1 00 PM 41 148 14 203 30 133 81 244 8 2 11 21 40 2 40 82 550 1 15 PM 23 129 16 168 30 157 88 275 2 6 10 18 23 4 27 54 515 1 30 PM 28 164 9 201 23 129 81 233 6 4 21 31 29 5 55 89 554 Total 124 577 46 747 101 551 334 986 25 13 65 103 127 15 150 292 2128 Approach% 166 772 62 - 10.2 559 339 - 243 12.6 631 - 43.5 5.1 514 - - TotalM, 5.8 27.1 22 35.1 47 259 157 463 12 06 3.1 4.8 6.0 07 7.0 137 - PHF 0 756 0.880 0 719 0920 0.842 0 877 0949 0 896 0694 0 542 0 707 0 780 0 794 0 750 0.682 0.820 0960 Lights 123 572 46 741 100 544 331 975 25 13 65 103 127 15 150 292 2111 %Lights 992 99.1 100 0 992 99.0 987 99.1 989 100.0 100 0 100.0 100 0 100 0 100.0 100.0 100 0 992 Mediums 1 5 0 6 1 7 3 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 %Mediums 0.8 09 0.0 08 10 13 09 11 00 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 08 Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Articulated Trucks 0.0 00 0.0 00 00 00 0.0 00 00 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL) 1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350 Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532 331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.com �- JS cos pZ Commercial Drveway[N] Out In Total 161 103 264 1 0 1 0 0 0 162 103 265 65 13 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 65 13 25 R T L Peak Hour Data 02/02/201912:45 PM Ending At 02/02/2019 1:45 PM LgM15 Metllums Ammlated Trucks Turning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (12:45 PM) Count Name: 5_County Road B2 W & Rosedale Center Mall Northwest Driveway (FULL) Site Code: Start Date: 02/02/2019 Page No: 7 Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL) 1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350 Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532 331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.com Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (7:45 AM) Count Name: 5_County Road B2 W & Rosedale Center Mall Northwest Driveway (FULL) Site Code: Start Date: 02/022019 Page No: 8 Start Time Left County Road 32 W Westbound Thor Right Asp Total Left County Road B2 W Eastbound Thor Right Asp Total Left Commercial Driveway Southbound Thor Right Asp Total Rosedale CenterMall Northwest Driveway Northbound Left Thor Right Asp Total Int.Total 7 45 AM 2 103 3 108 2 28 3 33 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 143 8:00 AM 0 95 1 96 1 20 2 23 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 2 122 8 15 AM 3 82 4 89 2 26 3 31 1 0 2 3 0 0 1 1 124 830AM 3 80 0 83 5 31 3 39 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 124 Total 8 360 8 376 10 105 11 126 1 0 5 6 2 0 3 5 513 Approach% 2.1 957 2.1 - 79 83.3 87 - 167 00 833 - 400 0.0 60.0 - - TotalM, 1.6 702 1.6 733 19 20.5 2.1 246 02 00 1.0 12 04 0.0 0.6 1.0 - PHF 0667 0.874 0500 0.870 0.500 0.847 0917 0808 0250 0.000 0625 0500 0500 0000 0750 0.625 0.897 Lights 7 340 7 354 10 05 11 116 1 0 5 6 2 0 3 5 481 %Lights 875 944 875 94.1 100.0 00.5 1000 921 100.0 100.0 1000 100.0 100.0 1000 93.8 Mediums 1 19 1 21 0 8 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 %Mediums 125 53 125 56 0.0 7.6 0.0 63 00 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 57 Articulated Trucks 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 Articulated Trucks 0.0 03 0.0 03 0.0 19 0.0 16 00 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 06 Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL) 1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350 Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532 331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.com �- JS �o pZ Commercial Drveway[N] Out In Total 17 6 23 1 0 1 0 0 0 16 6 24 5 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 1 R T Peak Hour Data 022/13/2019 7:45 AM Entllna A[ 02/13/2019 3:45 AM To ids Mediums Acidulated Trucks tp O rr0 W - Turning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (7:45 AM) Count Name: 5_County Road B2 W & Rosedale Center Mall Northwest Driveway (FULL) Site Code: Start Date: 02/022019 Page No: 9 Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL) 1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350 Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532 331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.com Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (4:30 PM) Count Name: 5_County Road B2 W & Rosedale Center Mall Northwest Driveway (FULL) Site Code: Start Date: 02/022019 Page No: 10 Start Time Left County Road 32 W Westbound Thor Right Asp Total Left County Road B2 W Eastbound Thor Right Asp Total Left Commercial Driveway Southbound Thor Right Asp Total Rosedale CenterMall Northwest Driveway Northbound Left Thor Right Asp Total Int.Total 430 PM 11 95 4 110 19 215 34 268 9 1 12 22 18 0 23 41 441 445 PM 14 104 4 122 18 213 49 280 7 0 10 17 16 0 18 34 453 5:00 PM 7 106 10 123 12 202 45 259 8 4 8 20 18 0 16 34 436 515 PM 7 94 10 111 18 188 50 256 8 0 8 16 15 4 21 40 423 Total 39 399 28 466 67 818 178 1063 32 5 38 75 67 4 78 149 1753 Approach% 84 85.6 6.0 - 63 770 167 - 427 67 507 - 45.0 27 523 - - TotalM, 22 22.8 1.6 26.6 3.8 467 102 606 18 03 22 43 3.8 02 44 85 - PHF 0696 0941 0700 0947 0.882 0951 0.890 0949 0889 0313 0792 0.852 0931 0250 0.848 0909 0967 Lights 39 390 28 457 67 809 178 1054 32 4 38 74 00 4 77 147 1732 % Lights 100.0 97 7 100 0 98.1 100.0 989 100 0 99 2 100.0 80.0 100.0 987 98.5 100.0 987 98 7 98.8 Mediums 0 9 0 9 0 9 0 9 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 2 21 %Mediums 0.0 23 0.0 19 0.0 11 0.0 08 00 20.0 0.0 13 15 0.0 13 13 12 Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Articulated Trucks 0.0 00 0.0 00 0.0 00 0.0 00 00 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL) 1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350 Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532 331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.com �- JS pox pZ Commercial Drveway[N] Out In Total 99 74 173 8 1 1 8 8 8 99 ]5 174 38 4 32 8 1 8 8 8 8 38 5 32 R T L Peak Hour Data 02/13/2019 4.30 PM Entllna A[ 02/13/2819 530 PM Liglus Mediums Ammlated Trucks Turning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (4:30 PM) Count Name: 5_County Road B2 W & Rosedale Center Mall Northwest Driveway (FULL) Site Code: Start Date: 02/022019 Page No: 11 Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL) 1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350 Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532 331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.com Turning Movement Data Count Name: 6_County Road B2 W & Rosedale Center Mall North Driveway Parking Ramp (FULL) Site Code: Start Date: 02/02/2019 Page No: 1 Start Time Left County Road B2 W Westbound Thm Right App. Total Left County Road BE W Eastbound Thm Right App. Total Left Commercial Driveway Southbound Thm Right App. Total Left Rosedale CenterMall North Driveway Northbound Thm Right App. Total Int. Total 10 HAM 18 106 26 150 33 56 16 105 45 3 21 69 3 0 20 23 347 10:15AM 24 04 46 164 43 67 22 132 38 3 24 65 5 1 20 26 387 1030AM 22 107 25 154 42 85 13 140 42 3 18 63 8 7 32 47 404 1045AM 24 132 25 181 56 96 12 164 50 6 24 80 12 1 42 55 480 HoudyTotal 88 430 122 649 174 304 63 541 175 15 87 277 28 9 114 151 1618 11 On AM 16 127 36 179 33 97 14 144 70 2 25 97 13 2 25 40 460 11 15AM 14 114 32 160 40 106 21 167 50 4 21 75 18 3 33 54 456 1130AM 22 124 30 176 50 109 15 174 72 3 24 99 14 2 33 49 498 1145AM 27 141 30 207 54 124 20 198 68 3 14 85 13 3 47 63 553 HoudyTotal 79 506 137 722 177 436 70 683 260 12 84 356 58 10 138 206 1967 12 00 PM 27 150 31 217 56 119 26 201 60 4 15 79 15 7 35 57 554 12 15 PM 26 135 22 183 43 105 30 178 59 3 32 94 23 3 38 64 519 1230 PM 28 155 23 206 41 127 23 191 57 2 20 79 15 5 48 68 544 1245PM 23 170 21 214 48 115 25 188 58 7 23 88 20 4 47 71 561 Homy Total 104 610 97 820 188 466 104 758 234 16 90 340 73 10 168 260 2178 1 00 PM 32 171 25 228 36 128 33 197 65 4 14 83 23 5 42 70 578 1 15 PM 19 143 17 179 50 111 28 189 59 2 22 83 22 2 55 79 530 130 PM 27 183 11 221 49 126 21 196 52 4 20 76 28 5 55 88 581 1 45 PM 21 130 20 180 44 117 22 183 77 4 19 100 23 3 62 88 551 Homy Total 99 636 73 808 179 482 104 765 253 14 75 342 96 15 214 325 2240 ===BREAK === 7 00 AM 0 55 5 60 1 19 0 20 3 0 4 7 1 0 1 2 89 7 15 AM 1 80 13 94 1 18 4 23 7 0 2 9 3 0 3 6 132 730AM 2 100 5 107 2 11 3 16 1 0 0 1 2 0 7 9 133 7:45AM 3 100 13 125 2 24 3 29 7 0 3 10 1 0 10 11 175 Homy Total 6 344 36 386 6 72 10 88 18 0 9 27 7 0 21 28 529 800AM 0 88 9 97 3 21 1 25 2 0 5 7 1 1 6 8 137 8 15 AM 2 84 5 91 2 24 5 31 6 0 3 9 5 0 7 12 143 830AM 2 78 10 90 4 26 0 30 9 0 2 11 3 0 6 9 140 8:45AM 6 77 25 108 10 31 1 42 9 0 4 13 1 2 3 6 169 Homy Total 10 327 40 386 19 102 7 128 26 0 14 40 10 3 22 35 589 *** BREAK'" 4 00 PM 10 123 28 161 31 155 7 193 39 2 16 57 13 2 43 58 469 4 15PM 13 113 20 155 30 145 5 180 48 3 9 60 12 1 38 51 446 430 PM 19 02 22 133 42 191 3 236 50 5 9 64 8 1 31 40 473 4:45 PM 21 101 16 138 33 179 8 220 40 0 14 54 9 2 39 50 462 HoudyTotal 63 420 05 587 136 670 23 829 177 10 48 235 42 6 151 199 1850 5 00 PM 9 130 22 161 37 202 17 256 41 1 16 58 12 1 42 55 530 5 15 PM 14 04 23 131 33 185 24 242 51 1 16 68 8 4 43 55 496 530 PM 15 96 25 136 32 165 11 208 46 0 20 66 12 4 34 50 460 5 45 PM 11 122 23 156 30 131 19 180 55 3 15 13 14 5 49 68 41 Hourly Total 49 442 93 584 132 683 11 886 193 5 61 265 46 14 168 228 1963 Grand Total 498 3742 702 4942 1011 3215 452 4678 1336 12 44 1882 360 16 996 1432 12934 Approach% 101 757 142 - 216 687 97 - 710 38 252 - 25.1 53 69.6 - - Total% 39 289 54 382 18 24.9 35 362 103 06 37 14.6 28 0.6 71 111 - Lights 497 3651 699 4847 1008 3143 451 4602 1332 12 41 1875 360 15 995 1430 12754 % Lights 99 8 97 6 99.6 98 1 99 7 97 8 998 984 99 7 100 0 994 99.6 100 0 98 7 999 999 986 Mediums 1 89 3 93 2 11 0 13 3 0 3 6 0 1 1 2 174 %Mediums 02 24 04 19 02 22 00 1.6 02 00 06 03 00 13 0.1 0.1 13 Articulated Trucks 0 2 0 2 1 1 1 3 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 6 Articulated Trucks 00 01 00 00 01 00 02 0.1 01 00 00 01 0 00 00 0 00 Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL) 1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350 Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532 331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.com Commercial DrvewayIN] Out In Total 1782 1875 3657 6 6 12 1 1 2 1789 1882 3671 471 72 1332 3 8 3 8 8 1 474 72 1336 R T L N 1 4 02/02/201910. 88 AM Ending A[ 02/13/2019 688 PM Lights Mediums Aft mlated Trucks h t 0 IT T R 366 75 995 8 1 1 8 8 8 360 ]6 996 1020 1430 2458 1 2 3 1 8 1 1022 1432 2454 Out In Total Rosedale Center Mall Turning Movement Data Plot Count Name: 6_County Road B2 W & Rosedale Center Mall North Driveway Parking Ramp (FULL) Site Code: Start Date: 02/022019 Page No: 3 Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL) 1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350 Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532 331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.com Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (11:00 AM) Count Name: 6_County Road B2 W & Rosedale Center Mall North Driveway Parking Ramp (FULL) Site Code: Start Date: 02/022019 Page No: 4 Start Time Left County Road 32 W Westbound Thm Right App. Total Left County Road B2 W Eastbound Thm Right App. Total Left Commercial Driveway Southbound Thm Right App. Total Left Rosedale CenterMall North Driveway Northbound Thm Right App. Total Int. Total 11 00AM 16 127 36 179 33 97 14 144 70 2 25 97 13 2 25 40 460 11 15 AM 14 114 32 160 40 106 21 167 50 4 21 75 18 3 33 54 456 11 30AM 22 124 30 176 50 109 15 174 72 3 24 99 14 2 33 49 498 11 45 AM 27 141 39 207 54 124 20 198 68 3 14 85 13 3 47 63 553 Total 79 506 137 722 177 436 70 683 260 12 84 356 58 10 138 206 1967 Approach% 109 70.1 190 25.9 63.8 102 73.0 34 236 28.2 49 67.0 Total% 4.0 257 7.0 367 90 22.2 3.6 347 132 06 43 18.1 29 05 7.0 105 - PHF 0731 0.897 0.878 0.872 0.819 0.879 0.833 0862 0903 0750 0840 0.899 0806 0.833 0734 0.817 0.889 Lights 79 498 135 712 177 429 70 676 260 12 84 356 58 10 138 206 1950 %Lights 100.0 984 985 98.6 100.0 984 100 0 99 0 100.0 100 0 100.0 100 0 100 0 100 0 100.0 100 0 99.1 Mediums 0 8 2 10 0 7 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 %Mediums 0.0 16 15 14 00 1.6 0.0 10 00 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 09 Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Articulated Trucks 0.0 00 0.0 00 00 0.0 0.0 00 00 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL) 1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350 Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532 331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.com Commercial Drveway[N] Out In Total 322 356 678 2 6 2 6 6 6 324 356 680 84 12 266 6 6 6 6 6 6 84 12 260 R T N 1 4 Peak Hour Data 02/02/2019 11.66AM EndingAt 02/02/2019 12.00 PM voids Mediums Acidulated Trucks moo® Turning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (11:00 AM) Count Name: 6_County Road B2 W & Rosedale Center Mall North Driveway Parking Ramp (FULL) Site Code: Start Date: 02/022019 Page No: 5 Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL) 1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350 Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532 331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.com Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (12:45 PM) Count Name: 6_County Road B2 W & Rosedale Center Mall North Driveway Parking Ramp (FULL) Site Code: Start Date: 02/022019 Page No: 6 Start Time Left County Road 32 W Westbound Thm Right App. Total Left County Road B2 W Eastbound Thm Right App. Total Left Commercial Driveway Southbound Thm Right App. Total Left Rosedale CenterMall North Driveway Northbound Thm Right App. Total Int. Total 1245 PM 23 170 21 214 48 115 25 188 58 7 23 88 20 4 47 71 561 1 00 PM 32 171 25 228 36 128 33 197 65 4 14 83 23 5 42 70 578 1 15 PM 19 143 17 179 50 111 28 189 59 2 22 83 22 2 55 79 530 1 30 PM 27 183 11 221 49 126 21 196 52 4 20 76 28 5 55 88 581 Total 101 667 74 842 183 480 107 770 234 17 79 330 93 16 199 308 2250 Approach% 120 792 8.8 23.8 623 139 709 52 239 30.2 52 64.6 Total% 45 29.6 33 374 81 213 4.8 342 104 08 35 147 4.1 07 8.8 137 - PHF 0789 0911 0740 0923 0.915 0938 0.811 0977 0900 0.607 0859 0938 0830 0.Boo 0905 0.875 0968 Lights 101 661 74 836 183 473 107 763 233 17 79 329 93 16 199 308 2236 % Lights 100.0 99.1 100 0 99 3 100.0 985 100 0 99 1 99.6 100 0 100.0 99 7 100 0 100 0 100.0 100 0 994 Mediums 0 6 0 6 0 7 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 %Mediums 0.0 09 0.0 07 00 15 0.0 09 00 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 06 Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 Articulated Trucks 0.0 00 0.0 00 00 00 0.0 00 04 00 0.0 03 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL) 1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350 Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532 331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.com Commercial Drveway[N] Out In Total 273 329 602 0 0 0 0 1 1 273 330 603 79 17 233 0 0 0 0 0 1 ]9 17 234 R T N 1 4 Peak Hour Data 02/02/201912:45 PM Ending At 02/02/2019 1:45 PM coins Mediums Acidulated Trucks Turning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (12:45 PM) Count Name: 6_County Road B2 W & Rosedale Center Mall North Driveway Parking Ramp (FULL) Site Code: Start Date: 02/022019 Page No: 7 Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL) 1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350 Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532 331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.com Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (7:45 AM) Count Name: 6_County Road B2 W & Rosedale Center Mall North Driveway Parking Ramp (FULL) Site Code: Start Date: 02/022019 Page No: 8 Start Time Left County Road 32 W Westbound Thm Right App. Total Left County Road B2 W Eastbound Thm Right App. Total Left Commercial Driveway Southbound Thm Right App. Total Left Rosedale CenterMall North Driveway Northbound Thm Right App. Total Int. Total 7 45 AM 3 109 13 125 2 24 3 29 7 0 3 10 1 0 10 11 175 8:00 AM 0 88 9 97 3 21 1 25 2 0 5 7 1 1 6 8 137 8 15 AM 2 84 5 91 2 24 5 31 6 0 3 9 5 0 7 12 143 830AM 2 78 10 90 4 26 0 30 9 0 2 11 3 0 6 9 140 Total 7 359 37 403 11 05 9 115 24 0 13 37 10 1 29 40 595 Approach% 17 89.1 92 9.6 82.6 7.8 649 00 351 25.0 25 725 Total% 12 603 62 677 1.8 10.0 15 193 40 00 22 62 17 02 49 67 - PHF 0583 0.823 0712 0.806 0.688 0.013 0450 0927 0667 0.000 0650 0.841 0500 0250 0725 0.833 0.850 Lights 7 339 36 382 10 86 9 105 24 0 12 36 10 0 29 39 562 %Lights 100.0 944 973 94.8 00.0 00.5 1000 913 100.0 923 973 1000 00 100.0 975 945 Mediums 0 19 1 20 0 9 0 9 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 31 %Mediums 0.0 53 27 50 0.0 95 0.0 78 00 - 77 27 0.0 100.0 0.0 25 52 Articulated Trucks 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Articulated Trucks 0.0 03 0.0 02 9.1 0.0 0.0 09 00 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 03 Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL) 1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350 Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532 331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.com Commercial Drveway[N] Out In Total 46 36 82 2 1 3 1 8 1 49 3] 86 12 8 24 1 8 8 8 8 8 13 0 24 R T N 1 4 Peak Hour Data 022/13/2019 7:45 AM Entllna A[ 02/13/2819 8:45 AM To ids Mediums Acidulated Trucks moo® ®o® Turning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (7:45 AM) Count Name: 6_County Road B2 W & Rosedale Center Mall North Driveway Parking Ramp (FULL) Site Code: Start Date: 02/022019 Page No: 9 Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL) 1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350 Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532 331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.com Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (5:00 PM) Count Name: 6_County Road B2 W & Rosedale Center Mall North Driveway Parking Ramp (FULL) Site Code: Start Date: 02/022019 Page No: 10 Start Time Left County Road 32 W Westbound Thm Right App. Total Left County Road B2 W Eastbound Thm Right App. Total Left Commercial Driveway Southbound Thm Right App. Total Left Rosedale CenterMall North Driveway Northbound Thm Right App. Total Int. Total 5:00 PM 9 130 22 161 37 202 17 256 41 1 16 58 12 1 42 55 530 515 PM 14 94 23 131 33 185 24 242 51 1 16 68 8 4 43 55 496 530 PM 15 96 25 136 32 165 11 208 46 0 20 66 12 4 34 50 460 545 PM 11 122 23 156 30 131 19 180 55 3 15 73 14 5 49 68 477 Total 49 442 93 584 132 683 71 886 193 5 67 265 46 14 168 228 1963 Approach% 84 757 159 14.9 77.1 8.0 72.8 19 253 20.2 6.1 737 Total% 25 225 47 29.8 67 34.8 3.6 451 98 03 34 135 23 07 8.6 11.6 - PHF 0 817 0.850 0930 0907 0.892 0.845 0 740 0 865 0 877 0417 0 838 0908 0 821 0 700 0.857 0.838 0926 Lights 49 429 93 571 132 670 71 873 192 5 67 264 46 14 168 228 1936 %Lights 100.0 97.1 100 0 97.8 100.0 98.1 100 0 985 995 100 0 100.0 99.6 100 0 100 0 100.0 100 0 98.6 Mediums 0 13 0 13 0 12 0 12 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 26 %Mediums 0.0 29 0.0 22 00 1.8 0.0 14 05 00 0.0 04 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 13 Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Articulated Trucks 0.0 00 0.0 00 00 0.1 0.0 01 00 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 01 Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL) 1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350 Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532 331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.com Commercial Drveway[N] Out In Total 239 264 503 0 1 1 0 0 0 239 265 504 57 5 192 0 0 1 0 0 0 6] 5 193 R T N 1 4 Peak Hour Data 022/13/2019 5.00 PM Entllna A[ 02/13/2019 600 PM To ids Mediums Acidulated Trucks tp rr0 0 0 or o- Turning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (5:00 PM) Count Name: 6_County Road B2 W & Rosedale Center Mall North Driveway Parking Ramp (FULL) Site Code: Start Date: 02/022019 Page No: 11 Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL) 1001 Warrenville Road. Suite 350 Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532 331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.com Turning Movement Data Count Name: 7 County Road B2 W & Rosedale Center Mall Norfheast Driveway/Snelling Avenue SB (West) (FULL) Site Code: Start Date: 02/02/2019 Page No: 1 Start Time Left County Road B2W Westbound Thor Right Asp Total Left County Road BE Eastbound Thor Right Asp Total Left Snelling Avenue SB Southbound Thor Right Asp Total Rosedale Left Center Mall Northeast Driveway Northbound Thor Right Asp Total Int.Total 10 HAS 43 115 9 167 44 61 16 121 2 25 58 85 6 5 7 18 391 10:15AM 48 110 5 172 52 62 17 131 1 18 55 74 5 14 9 28 405 1030AM 43 112 8 163 68 73 18 159 6 26 48 80 8 15 14 37 439 1045AM 56 143 15 214 80 97 23 200 1 25 68 94 7 20 18 45 553 HoudyTotal 190 480 37 716 244 293 74 611 10 04 220 333 26 54 48 128 1788 11 On AM 71 126 10 207 81 90 22 193 1 30 63 94 18 27 15 60 554 11 15AM 74 122 11 207 82 86 33 201 2 38 58 98 14 27 16 57 563 1130AM 87 118 9 214 95 99 33 227 3 38 45 86 19 26 32 77 604 1145AM 87 162 12 261 98 112 37 247 2 47 73 122 25 43 24 92 722 HoudyTotal 319 528 42 889 356 387 125 868 8 153 239 400 76 123 87 286 2443 12:00PM 72 137 13 222 88 114 24 226 1 37 67 105 22 42 26 90 643 1215 PM 70 124 10 204 82 104 34 220 1 32 52 85 25 45 29 99 608 1230 PM 91 136 9 236 101 104 38 243 1 30 64 95 20 46 36 102 676 1245PM 86 145 5 236 92 106 30 228 5 45 00 116 33 40 35 108 688 Homy Total 319 542 37 898 363 428 126 917 8 144 240 401 100 173 126 399 2615 100PM 81 145 21 247 91 117 39 247 6 32 60 98 30 51 45 126 718 1 15 PM 100 150 6 256 91 117 31 239 0 34 50 84 30 52 39 121 700 130 PM 71 132 14 217 86 133 20 239 2 42 00 110 33 59 45 137 703 1 45PM 75 127 16 218 107 129 33 269 6 43 48 97 26 63 62 151 735 Homy Total 327 554 57 938 375 496 123 994 14 151 224 389 119 225 191 535 2856 ===BREAK === 700AM 14 67 19 100 0 11 0 11 11 0 0 11 0 3 1 4 126 7 15 AM 14 00 17 121 0 15 0 15 9 0 0 9 0 5 4 9 154 730AM 12 104 38 154 0 13 0 13 11 0 0 11 0 3 2 5 183 7:45AM 19 137 20 176 0 26 0 26 12 0 0 12 0 1 3 4 218 Homy Total 59 308 94 551 0 65 0 65 43 0 0 43 0 12 10 22 681 8 00 AM 8 80 26 114 0 20 0 20 8 0 0 8 0 3 0 3 145 8 15 AM 18 81 23 122 0 20 0 20 7 0 0 7 0 5 5 10 159 830AM 22 70 15 116 0 13 0 13 10 0 0 10 0 4 2 6 145 8:45AM 17 70 14 101 0 27 0 27 3 0 0 3 0 7 4 11 142 Homy Total 65 310 78 453 0 80 0 80 28 0 0 28 0 19 11 30 591 ===BREAK === 4 00 PM 50 107 13 170 0 180 0 180 1 0 0 1 0 34 25 59 410 4 15PM 34 03 17 144 0 141 0 141 7 0 0 7 0 27 38 65 357 430 PM 30 65 19 114 0 203 0 203 6 0 0 6 0 28 34 62 385 4:45 PM 52 00 16 158 0 201 0 201 5 0 0 5 0 38 28 66 430 HoudyTotal 166 355 65 586 0 725 0 725 19 0 0 19 0 127 125 252 1582 5 00 PM 31 112 19 162 0 174 0 174 3 0 0 3 0 31 33 64 403 5 15 PM 53 t02 9 164 0 180 0 180 4 0 0 4 0 39 30 69 417 530PM 62 91 14 167 0 140 0 140 5 0 0 5 0 33 44 77 389 545 PM 60 102 12 174 0 137 0 137 10 0 0 10 0 35 28 63 384 Hourly Total 206 407 54 667 0 631 0 631 22 0 0 22 0 138 135 273 1593 Grand Total 1651 3583 464 5698 1338 3105 448 4891 152 542 941 1635 321 871 733 1925 14149 Approach% 290 629 8.1 - 274 635 92 - 93 33.1 576 - 167 452 38.1 - - Total% 117 253 33 403 95 219 32 34.6 1.1 38 67 11.6 23 62 52 13.6 - Lights 1558 3548 461 5567 1334 3094 422 4850 148 537 939 1624 300 780 711 1791 13832 %Lights 944 990 994 971 997 996 942 992 974 99.1 998 993 935 896 970 930 978 Mediums 92 33 2 127 3 10 26 39 4 5 2 11 20 81 22 129 306 %Mediums 5.6 09 04 22 02 03 58 08 2.6 09 02 07 62 100 30 67 22 Articulated Trucks 1 2 1 4 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 5 11 Articulated Trucks 0.1 01 02 01 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 OD 03 05 00 03 01 Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL) 1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350 Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532 331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.com �- JS o p-Z Snelling Avenue sa but Out In Tonal 2575 1624 4199 92 11 103 6 8 6 2673 1635 4308 939 537 148 2 5 4 8 8 8 941 542 152 R T N 1 4 02/02/201910. 88 AM Ending A[ 02/13/2019 688 PM Lights Mediums Aft cula[ed Trucks h t 0 T R 300 780 711 20 87 22 1 4 0 321 871 733 Turning Movement Data Plot Count Name: 7_County Road B2 W & Rosedale Center Mall Northeast Driveway/Snelling Avenue SB (West) (FULL) Site Code: Start Date: 02/022019 Page No: 3 Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL) 1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350 Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532 331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.com Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (11:00 AM) Count Name: 7_County Road B2 W & Rosedale Center Mall Northeast Driveway/Snelling Avenue SB (West) (FULL) Site Code: Start Date: 02/022019 Page No: 4 Start Time Left County Road 32W Westbound Thm Right App. Total Left County Road B2W Eastbound Thm Right App. Total Left Snelling Avenue SB Southbound Thm Right App. Total Rosedale Left Center Mall Northeast Driveway Northbound Thm Right App. Total Int. Total 11 00 AM 71 126 10 207 81 90 22 193 1 30 63 94 18 27 15 60 554 11 15 AM 74 122 11 207 82 86 33 201 2 38 58 98 14 27 16 57 563 11 30 AM 87 118 9 214 95 99 33 227 3 38 45 86 19 26 32 77 604 1145AM 87 162 12 261 98 112 37 247 2 47 73 122 25 43 24 92 722 Total 319 528 42 889 356 387 125 868 8 153 239 400 76 123 87 286 2443 Approach% 359 594 47 410 44.6 144 20 383 598 20.0 43.0 304 Total% 131 21.6 17 364 14.6 15.8 5.1 355 03 63 9.8 164 3.1 5.0 3.6 117 - PHF 0917 0.815 0.875 0.852 0.908 0.864 0.845 0 879 0 667 0.814 0 818 0.820 0 760 0 715 0.680 0 777 0 846 Lights 307 528 41 876 356 387 117 860 8 151 238 397 70 111 84 265 2398 %Lights 962 100.0 976 985 100.0 1000 93.6 991 100.0 987 996 993 92.1 902 96.6 927 982 Mediums 12 0 0 12 0 0 8 8 0 2 1 3 6 12 3 21 44 %Mediums 3.8 00 0.0 13 00 0.0 64 09 00 13 04 08 79 9.8 34 73 18 Articulated Trucks 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Articulated Trucks 0.0 00 24 01 00 0.0 0.0 00 00 00 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL) 1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350 Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532 331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.com Snelling Avenue sa [N] Out In Total 508 397 905 12 3 15 1 0 1 521 400 921 238 151 8 1 2 0 0 0 0 239 153 8 R T N 1 4 Peak Hour Data 02/02/2019 11.00AM Ending At 02/02/201912. 00 PM Lig ins Mediums Articulated Trucks Turning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (11:00 AM) Count Name: 7_County Road B2 W & Rosedale Center Mall Northeast Driveway/Snelling Avenue SB (West) (FULL) Site Code: Start Date: 02/022019 Page No: 5 Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL) 1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350 Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532 331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.com Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (1:00 PM) Count Name: 7_County Road B2 W & Rosedale Center Mall Northeast Driveway/Snelling Avenue SB (West) (FULL) Site Code: Start Date: 02/022019 Page No: 6 Start Time Left County Road 32W Westbound Thm Right App. Total Left County Road B2W Eastbound Thm Right App. Total Left Snelling Avenue SB Southbound Thm Right App. Total Rosedale Center Mall Northeast Driveway Northbound Left Thm Right App. Total Int. Total 1 00 PM 81 145 21 247 91 117 39 247 6 32 60 98 30 51 45 126 718 1 15 PM 100 150 6 256 91 117 31 239 0 34 50 84 30 52 39 121 700 1 30 PM 71 132 14 217 86 133 20 239 2 42 66 110 33 59 45 137 703 1 45 PM 75 127 16 218 107 129 33 269 6 43 48 97 26 63 62 151 735 Total 327 554 57 938 375 496 123 994 14 151 224 389 119 225 191 535 2856 Approach% 349 59.1 6.1 377 499 124 36 38.8 576 22.2 42.1 357 Total% 114 194 2.0 32.8 13.1 174 43 348 05 53 7.8 13.6 42 79 67 187 - PHF 0818 0923 0.679 0916 0.876 0932 0788 0924 0583 0.878 0848 0.884 0902 0.893 0770 0.886 0971 Lights 315 554 57 926 373 496 116 985 14 149 224 387 113 213 188 514 2812 %Lights 963 100.0 1000 987 99.5 100.0 943 991 100.0 987 100.0 995 95.0 947 984 96.1 985 Mediums 12 0 0 12 1 0 7 8 0 2 0 2 6 12 3 21 43 %Mediums 37 00 0.0 13 03 00 57 08 00 13 0.0 05 5.0 53 1.6 39 15 Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Articulated Trucks 0.0 00 0.0 00 03 00 0.0 01 00 00 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL) 1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350 Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532 331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.com Snelling Avenue sa [N] Out In Total 643 387 1030 13 2 15 1 0 1 657 389 1046 224 149 14 0 2 0 0 0 0 224 151 14 R T N 1 4 Peak Hour Data 022/022/2019 1 00 PM Ending At 02/02/2019 2.00 PM Lig ins Mediums Articulated Trucks Turning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (1:00 PM) Count Name: 7_County Road B2 W & Rosedale Center Mall Northeast Driveway/Snelling Avenue SB (West) (FULL) Site Code: Start Date: 02/022019 Page No: 7 Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL) 1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350 Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532 331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.com Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (7:30 AM) Count Name: 7_County Road B2 W & Rosedale Center Mall Northeast Driveway/Snelling Avenue SB (West) (FULL) Site Code: Start Date: 02/022019 Page No: 8 Start Time Left County Road 32W Westbound Thm Right App. Total Left County Road B2W Eastbound Thm Right App. Total Left Snelling Avenue SB Southbound Thm Right App. Total Rosedale Center Mall Northeast Driveway Northbound Left Thm Right App. Total Int. Total 730AM 12 104 38 154 0 13 0 13 11 0 0 11 0 3 2 5 183 745AM 19 137 20 176 0 26 0 26 12 0 0 12 0 1 3 4 218 8:00 AM 8 80 26 114 0 20 0 20 8 0 0 8 0 3 0 3 145 8 15 AM 18 81 23 122 0 20 0 20 7 0 0 7 0 5 5 10 159 Total 57 402 107 566 0 70 0 79 38 0 0 38 0 12 10 22 705 Approach % 101 71.0 189 0.0 1000 0.0 100.0 00 0.0 0.0 54.5 455 Total% 8.1 57.0 152 803 0.0 11.2 0.0 112 54 00 0.0 54 0.0 17 14 3.1 - PHF 0 750 0 734 0 704 0.804 0.000 0 760 0.000 0 760 0 792 0.000 0 000 0 792 0 000 0.600 0.500 0.550 0 808 Lights 45 388 106 539 0 77 0 77 37 0 0 37 0 3 10 13 666 %Lights 789 965 991 952 97.5 975 974 974 25.0 100.0 59.1 945 Mediums 11 14 1 26 0 2 0 2 1 0 0 1 0 8 0 8 37 %Mediums 193 35 09 46 - 25 - 25 26 - - 26 - 667 0.0 364 52 Articulated Trucks 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 Articulated Trucks 1.8 00 0.0 02 - 0.0 - 00 00 - - 00 - 83 0.0 45 03 Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL) 1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350 Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532 331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.com Snelling Avenue sB [N] Out In Total 109 37 146 9 1 16 1 B 1 119 38 157 B B 37 B B 1 B B B 0 0 38 R T N 1 4 Peak Hour Data 022/13/2019 7 30 AM Ending A[ 02/13/2619 8.36 AM Lig ins Mediums Articulated Trucks moo® ®o® Turning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (7:30 AM) Count Name: 7_County Road B2 W & Rosedale Center Mall Northeast Driveway/Snelling Avenue SB (West) (FULL) Site Code: Start Date: 02/022019 Page No: 9 Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL) 1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350 Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532 331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.com Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (4:45 PM) Count Name: 7_County Road B2 W & Rosedale Center Mall Northeast Driveway/Snelling Avenue SB (West) (FULL) Site Code: Start Date: 02/022019 Page No: 10 Start Time Left County Road 32W Westbound Thm Right App. Total Left County Road B2W Eastbound Thm Right App. Total Left Snelling Avenue SB Southbound Thm Right App. Total Rosedale Center Mall Northeast Driveway Northbound Left Thm Right App. Total Int. Total 445 PM 52 90 16 158 0 201 0 201 5 0 0 5 0 38 28 66 430 5:00 PM 31 112 19 162 0 174 0 174 3 0 0 3 0 31 33 64 403 5:15 PM 53 102 9 164 0 180 0 180 4 0 0 4 0 39 30 69 417 530 PM 62 91 14 167 0 140 0 140 5 0 0 5 0 33 44 77 389 Total 198 395 58 651 0 695 0 695 17 0 0 17 0 141 135 276 1639 Approach% 304 607 89 0.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 00 0.0 0.0 51.1 489 Total% 121 24.1 35 397 0.0 424 0.0 424 10 00 0.0 10 0.0 8.6 82 16.8 - PHF 0 798 0.882 0 763 0975 0.000 0 864 0.000 0 864 0 850 0.000 0 000 0.850 0 000 0.904 0 767 0.896 0953 Lights 188 390 58 636 0 694 0 694 16 0 0 16 0 130 131 261 1607 %Lights 949 987 1000 977 999 999 94.1 94.1 922 97.0 94.6 980 Mediums 10 5 0 15 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 10 4 14 31 %Mediums 5.1 13 0.0 23 - 01 - 01 59 - - 59 - 7.1 3.0 5.1 19 Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 Articulated Trucks 0.0 00 0.0 00 - 00 - 00 00 - - 00 - 07 0.0 04 01 Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL) 1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350 Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532 331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.com Snelling Avenue sB [N] Out In Total 133 16 264 10 1 11 1 0 1 199 17 216 0 0 16 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 17 R T N 1 4 Peak Hour Data 022/13/20194:45 PM Ending At 02/13/2019 5:45 PM Lig ins Mediums Articulated Trucks Turning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (4:45 PM) Count Name: 7_County Road B2 W & Rosedale Center Mall Northeast Driveway/Snelling Avenue SB (West) (FULL) Site Code: Start Date: 02/022019 Page No: 11 Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL) 1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350 Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532 331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.com Turning Movement Data Count Name: 8_County Road B2 W & Snelling Avenue NB (East) (FULL) Site Code: Start Date: 02/02/2019 Page No: 1 Start Time Turn County Road B2 W Westbound Right Age Total Left County Road B2 W Eastbound Thor Ape. Total Left Snelling Avenue NB Southbound Right Ape. Total Int. Total 10.00 AM 75 4 79 20 52 72 7 88 95 246 10.15AM 69 1 70 22 48 70 2 100 102 242 1030AM 62 1 63 29 56 85 2 105 107 255 10:45 AM 90 2 92 39 85 124 6 137 143 359 Homy Total 296 8 304 110 241 351 17 430 447 1102 11 00 AM 89 9 98 43 68 111 3 117 120 329 11.15 AM 62 3 65 35 65 100 6 139 145 310 1130AM 84 4 88 50 86 136 3 139 142 366 11:45 AM 89 6 95 64 76 140 5 178 183 418 Homy Total 324 22 346 192 295 487 17 573 590 1423 12.00 PM 72 0 72 57 76 133 11 150 161 366 12.15 PM 72 3 75 59 79 138 7 140 147 360 1230 PM 91 4 95 48 97 145 7 155 162 402 12:45 PM 90 3 93 57 89 146 5 157 162 401 Homy Total 325 10 335 221 341 562 30 602 632 1529 1 00 PM 89 1 90 69 87 156 5 152 157 403 1 15 PM 96 1 97 59 112 171 3 159 162 430 130 PM 74 4 78 58 114 172 0 142 142 392 1 45 PM 80 0 80 79 117 196 5 127 132 408 Homy Total 339 6 345 265 438 695 13 580 593 1633 ===BREAK === 7 00 AM 71 8 79 3 21 24 17 18 35 138 7 15 AM 87 0 87 1 24 25 20 28 48 160 730 AM 116 15 131 6 20 26 14 22 36 193 7:45 AM 126 6 132 2 37 39 19 34 53 224 Homy Total 400 29 429 12 102 114 70 102 172 715 8 00 AM 92 10 102 8 23 31 11 26 37 170 8 15 AM 98 4 102 8 27 35 9 29 38 175 830 AM 87 3 90 5 21 26 9 27 36 152 8:45 AM 81 7 88 10 23 33 8 34 42 163 Homy Total 358 24 382 31 94 125 37 116 153 660 ===BREAK 4 00 PM 88 24 112 76 126 202 8 97 105 419 4 15 PM 70 16 86 70 124 194 4 103 107 387 430 PM 67 19 86 75 171 246 3 72 75 407 4:45 PM 75 15 90 62 172 234 5 90 95 419 HoudyTotal 300 74 374 283 593 876 20 362 382 1632 5 00 PM 103 8 111 74 149 223 8 67 75 409 5 15 PM 81 8 89 77 159 236 7 79 86 411 530 PM 87 9 96 53 143 196 7 93 100 392 5:45 PM 81 10 91 56 126 182 11 96 107 380 Henry Total 352 35 387 260 511 837 33 335 368 1592 Grand Total 2694 208 2902 1374 2673 4047 237 3100 3337 10286 Approach% 92.8 12 - 340 660 - 11 929 - - Total% 262 20 282 134 260 393 23 30.1 324 - Lights 2669 205 2874 1362 2650 4012 233 3010 3243 10129 %Lights 99.1 98.6 990 991 99.1 99.1 983 971 972 985 Mediums 24 3 21 11 22 33 4 84 88 148 %Mediums 09 14 09 08 08 08 17 27 26 14 Articulated Trucks 1 0 1 1 1 2 0 6 6 9 % Articulated Trucks 00 00 00 0.1 00 00 00 02 02 0.1 Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL) 1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350 Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532 331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.com snemng Avenue NE NI out n Taal 1567 3243 4810 14 88 102 1 6 7 1582 3337 4919 3010 233 84 4 6 8 3100 237 R N 4 02/02/201910. 88 AM Ending A[ 02/13/2819 688 PM IJ9M15 Mediums Aft du shed Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Out 11n Torzl Fake Appruarn [S] Turning Movement Data Plot Count Name: 8_County Road B2 W & Snelling Avenue NB (East) (FULL) Site Code: Start Date: 02/022019 Page No: 3 Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL) 1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350 Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532 331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.com Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (11:00 AM) Count Name: 8_County Road B2 W & Snelling Avenue NB (East) (FULL) Site Code: Start Date: 02/022019 Page No: 4 Start Time Thor County Road 32 W Westbound Right Asp Total Left County Road 32 W Eastbound Thor Asp. Total Left Snelling Avenue NB Southbound Right Asp. Total Int. Total 11.00 AM 89 9 98 43 68 111 3 117 120 329 11.15 AM 62 3 65 35 65 100 6 139 145 310 1130AM 84 4 88 50 86 136 3 139 142 366 11:45 AM 89 6 95 64 76 140 5 178 183 418 Total 324 22 346 192 295 487 17 573 590 1423 Approach% 936 64 - 394 60.6 - 29 971 - - TotalM, 228 15 243 135 207 342 12 403 415 - PHF 0 910 0.611 0.883 0 750 0.858 0 870 0708 0 805 0.806 0 851 Lights 323 21 344 191 293 484 16 560 576 1404 %Lights 997 95.5 994 995 99.3 994 94.1 977 97.6 987 Mediums 1 1 2 1 2 3 1 12 13 18 %Mediums 03 45 0.6 05 07 06 59 2.1 22 13 Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 Articulated Trucks 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 00 00 02 02 0.1 Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL) 1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350 Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532 331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.com snelung Avenue NE NI out n Taal 212 576 788 2 13 15 8 1 1 214 590 804 566 16 12 1 1 8 573 17 R N 4 Peak Hour Data 02/02/2019 11.66AM Ending At 02/02/201912. 00 PM IJ9M15 Mediums Aft du shed Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Out 11n Teal Fake Approach [S] Turning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (11:00 AM) Count Name: 8_County Road B2 W & Snelling Avenue NB (East) (FULL) Site Code: Start Date: 02/022019 Page No: 5 Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL) 1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350 Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532 331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.com Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (12:30 PM) Count Name: 8_County Road B2 W & Snelling Avenue NB (East) (FULL) Site Code: Start Date: 02/022019 Page No: 6 StartTime Thor County Road 32 W Westbound Right Asp Total Left County Road 32 W Eastbound Thor Asp. Total Left Snelling Avenue NB Southbound Right Asp. Total Ink. Total 1230 PM 91 4 95 48 97 145 7 155 162 402 12:45 PM 90 3 93 57 89 146 5 157 162 401 1 00 PM 89 1 90 69 87 156 5 152 157 403 1 15 PM 00 1 97 59 112 171 3 159 162 430 Total 366 9 375 233 385 618 20 623 643 1636 Approach% 976 24 - 377 62.3 - 31 009 - - TotalM, 224 0.6 229 142 23.5 37.8 12 38.1 393 - PHF 0953 0.563 0966 0.844 0.859 0904 0714 0980 0992 0951 Lights 365 8 373 230 384 614 20 611 631 1618 %Lights 997 88.9 995 987 997 994 100.0 98.1 98.1 989 Mediums 1 1 2 3 1 4 0 12 12 18 %Mediums 03 11.1 05 13 03 06 00 19 19 1.1 Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Articulated Trucks 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 00 00 0.0 00 0.0 Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL) 1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350 Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532 331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.com snelling Avenue Na [NI out n Taal 233 631 369 4 12 16 0 0 0 242 643 885 611 20 12 0 0 0 623 20 R N 4 Peak Hour Data 02/02/201912. 30 PM Ending At 02/02/2019 1.30 PM Lights Mediums Aft du shed Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Out In Total Fake Appruarn [S] Turning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (12:30 PM) Count Name: 8_County Road B2 W & Snelling Avenue NB (East) (FULL) Site Code: Start Date: 02/022019 Page No: 7 Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL) 1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350 Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532 331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.com Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (7:30 AM) Count Name: 8_County Road B2 W & Snelling Avenue NB (East) (FULL) Site Code: Start Date: 02/022019 Page No: 8 StartTime Thor County Road 32 W Westbound Right Asp Total Left County Road 32 W Eastbound Thor Asp. Total Left Snelling Avenue NB Southbound Right Asp. Total Int. Total 7 30 AM 116 15 131 6 20 26 14 22 36 193 7 45 AM 126 6 132 2 37 39 19 34 53 224 8:00AM 92 10 102 8 23 31 11 26 37 170 8:15 AM 98 4 102 8 27 35 9 29 38 175 Total 432 35 467 24 107 131 53 111 164 762 Approach% 925 75 - 183 817 - 323 677 - - TotalM, 567 4.6 613 3.1 14.0 172 70 146 215 - PHF 0 857 0.583 0.884 0 750 0 723 0 840 0 697 0 816 0 774 0 850 Lights 424 35 459 24 104 128 53 99 152 739 %Lights 98.1 100.0 983 1000 972 977 100.0 892 927 970 Mediums 7 0 7 0 3 3 0 10 10 20 %Mediums 1.6 0.0 15 0.0 28 23 00 9.0 61 2.6 Articulated Trucks 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 2 3 Articulated Trucks 02 0.0 02 0.0 00 00 00 1.8 12 04 Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL) 1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350 Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532 331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.com snelling Avenue Na [NI out n Taal 59 152 211 8 10 10 0 2 2 59 164 223 99 53 10 0 2 0 III 53 R n=n Peak Hour Data 022/13/2019 7 30 AM Ending A[ 02/13/2019 8.30 AM Lights Mediums Aft du shed Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Out 11n Total Fake Appruarn [S] Turning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (7:30 AM) Count Name: 8_County Road B2 W & Snelling Avenue NB (East) (FULL) Site Code: Start Date: 02/022019 Page No: 9 Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL) 1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350 Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532 331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.com Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (4:30 PM) Count Name: 8_County Road B2 W & Snelling Avenue NB (East) (FULL) Site Code: Start Date: 02/022019 Page No: 10 Start Time Thor County Road 32 W Westbound Right Asp Total Left County Road 32 W Eastbound Thor Asp. Total Left Snelling Avenue NB Southbound Right Asp. Total Int. Total 430 PM 67 19 86 75 171 246 3 72 75 407 445 PM 75 15 90 62 172 234 5 90 95 419 5:00 PM 103 8 111 74 149 223 8 67 75 409 5:15 PM 81 8 89 77 159 236 7 79 86 411 Total 326 50 376 288 651 939 23 308 331 1646 Approach% 867 13.3 - 307 69.3 - 69 93.1 - - TotalM, 198 3.0 22.8 175 39.6 57.0 14 187 20.1 - PHF 0791 0.658 0.847 0935 0.946 0954 0719 0856 0.871 0982 Lights 324 50 374 285 650 935 23 298 321 1630 %Lights 994 100.0 995 99.0 99.8 99.6 100.0 968 97.0 990 Mediums 2 0 2 3 1 4 0 10 10 16 %Mediums 0.6 0.0 05 1.0 02 04 00 32 30 1.0 Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Articulated Trucks 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 00 00 0.0 00 0.0 Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL) 1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350 Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532 331.481.7332 Keelee.Roggenbuck@kimley-horn.com snelling Avenue Na [NI out n Taal 335 321 656 3 10 13 0 0 0 338 331 669 298 23 10 0 0 0 308 23 R N 4 Peak Hour Data 022/13/2019 4.30 PM Ending A[ 02/13/2019 530 PM Lights Mediums Aft du shed Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Out In Total Fake Appruarn [S] Turning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (4:30 PM) Count Name: 8_County Road B2 W & Snelling Avenue NB (East) (FULL) Site Code: Start Date: 02/022019 Page No: 11 Internal Capture Reduction Calculations Methodology for A.M. Peak Hour and P.M. Peak Hour based on the Trip Generation Handbook, 3rd Edition, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers Methodology for Daily based on the average of the Unconstrained Rates for the A.M. Peak Hour and P.M. Peak Hour SUMMARY - WEEKDAY GROSS TRIP GENERATION Land Use Daily A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour Enter Exit Enter Exit Enter Exit Office 20 95 Retail 1,305 1,105 zRestaurant Cinema/Entertainment Residential 90 65 Hotel 1 90 90 0 0 0 0 1,505 1,355 INTERNALTRIPS � Land Use Daily A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour Enter Exit Enter Exit Enter Exit Office 0 0 0 0 9 21 d Retail 0 0 0 0 60 62 Restaurant 0 0 0 0 0 0 O Cinema/Entertainment 0 0 0 0 0 0 Residential 0 0 0 0 43 32 Hotel 0 0 1 0 0 17 14 0 0 0 0 129 129 Reduction 0.0% 0.0% 9.0% EXTERNAL TRIPS � Land Use Daily A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour Enter Exit Enter Exit Enter Exit Office 0 0 0 0 11 74 d Retail 0 0 0 0 1,245 1,043 Restaurant 0 0 0 0 0 0 O Cinema/Entertainment 0 0 0 0 0 0 Residential 0 0 0 0 47 33 Hotel 0 0 0 0 1 73 76 0 0 0 0 1,376 1,226 Internal Capture Reduction Calculations Methodology for A.M. Peak Hour and P.M. Peak Hour based on the Trip Generation Handbook, 3rd Edition, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers Methodology for Daily based on the average of the Unconstrained Rates for the A.M. Peak Hour and P.M. Peak Hour SUMMARY - SATURDAY GROSS TRIP GENERATION Land Use SAT Peak Hour Enter Exit Office 30 25 Retail 2,240 1,905 zRestaurant Cinema/Entertainment Residential 90 SO Hotel 120 95 2,450 2,105 INTERNALTRIPS Land Use SAT Peak Hour Enter Exit Office 12 6 d Retail 54 70 Restaurant 0 0 O Cinema/Entertainment 0 0 Residential 42 39 Hotel 1 22 15 0 0 0 0 130 130 Reduction 0.0% 0.0% 5.7% EXTERNAL TRIPS � Land Use Daily A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour Enter Exit Enter Exit Enter Exit Office 0 0 0 0 18 19 d Retail 0 0 0 0 2,156 1,535 Restaurant 0 0 0 0 0 0 O Cinema/Entertainment 0 0 0 0 0 0 Residential 0 0 0 0 48 41 Hotel 0 0 0 0 1 98 SO 0 0 0 0 2,350 1,975 C TABLE A -EXISTING (2019) CONDITIONS SIMTRAFFIC SUMMARY: WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR - DELAY AND LOS Intersection Control Approach Operations by Movement Overall Intersection Delay LOS (sec/veh) Left Delay LOS (sec/veh) Through Delay LOS (sec/veh) Right Delay LOS (sec/veh) Farivew Avenue & TH 36 EB Ramps Signal EB 11.4 B WB 54.6 D - - 3.6 A NB - - 13.2 B 4.0 A SB 18.6 B 5.9 A - - Fairview Avenue& TH 36 WB Ramps Signal EB 42.8 D 40.6 D 1.4 A 27.2 C WB 41.5 D 39.5 D 3.9 A NB 48.3 D 39.1 D 6.9 A SB 39.6 D 25.3 C 5.8 A Fairview Avenue& Mall Access## Signal EB 45.5 D 51.0 D 15.7 B 15.9 B WB 40.9 D 10.5 B 4.0 A NB 15.7 B 16.1 B 6.5 A SB 13.6 B 12.2 B 10.6 B Fairview Avenue& County Road 62 Signal EB 20.1 C 30.5 C 26.4 C 25.6 C WB 25.1 C 18.7 B 11.5 6 NB 38.8 D 38.6 D 7.1 A SB 27.1 C 31.6 C 26.0 C County Road B2 & Mall Access 7i2 Signal EB 10.4 B 7.7 A 6.0 A 10.5 6 WB 11.3 B 4.1 A 2.7 A NB 45.0 D 45.7 D 11.6 6 SB 40.0 D 42.2 D 18.2 B County Road B2 & Mall Access 7i3 Signal EB 12.2 B 7.6 A 2.5 A 15.6 6 WB 21.8 C 22.1 C 8.0 A NB 43.8 D 43.7 D 14.1 6 SB 41.0 D 40.1 D 5.5 A County Road B2 & Snelling Avenue NB Ramps Signal EB 37.5 D 17.0 B 8.4 A 22.0 C WB 41.2 D 20.5 C 3.3 A NB 34.9 C 36.2 D 6.3 A SB 47.3 D 40.6 D 2.7 A County Road 62 & Snelling Avenue NB Ramps Signal EB 9.6 A 3.6 A - - 6.1 A WB - - 3.6 A 2.2 A NB - - - - - - SB 49.0 D - - 7.9 A Internal Intersection 81A (West) Stop Controlled EB 0.4 A - - 1.3 A 2.0 A NB - - 6.3 A - _ SB - - 5.8 A 0.8 A Internal Intersection 81B (West) Stop Controlled EB 2.9 A WB 6.1 A - - 2.2 A 3.2 A - - SB - - 1.2 A - - Internal Intersection 7i2 (Northwest) Stop Controlled EB 6.9 A 7.1 A - - 6.1 A WB - - 9.5 A 2.5 A NB _ _ _ _ _ _ SB 6.1 A - - 5.8 A Internal Intersection 83 (North) Stop Controlled EB 6.1 A 3.8 A - 5.9 A WB - - 12.2 B 3.5 A NB SB 0.5 A - - 0.8 A Internal Intersection 84 (Northeast) Stop Controlled EB - - 3.7 A - WB 8.2 A 2.5 A NB - _ _ _ _ SB 1.4 A - - 2.7 A TABLE B - EXISTING (2019) CONDITIONS SIMTRAFFIC SUMMARY: SATURDAY PEAK HOUR - DELAY AND LOS Intersection Control Approach Operations by Movement Overall Intersection Delay LOS (sec/veh) Left Delay LOS (sec/veh) Through Delay LOS (sec/veh) Right Delay LOS (sec/veh) Farivew Avenue & TH 36 EB Ramps Signal EB 12.9 B WB 66.6 E - - 6.6 A NB - - 13.8 B 3.9 A SB 21.4 C 5.5 A - - Fairview Avenue& TH 36 WB Ramps Signal EB 48.5 D 49.3 D 2.0 A 38.1 D WB 40.9 D 41.9 D 3.9 A NB 72.6 E 80.5 F 19.6 6 SB 40.4 D 19.9 B 5.4 A Fairview Avenue& Mall Access 81 Signal EB 36.6 D 56.5 E 8.4 A 23.6 C WB 37.0 D 15.4 B 7.9 A NB 25.3 C 25.0 C 8.8 A SB 23.6 C 24.5 C 22.4 C Fairview Avenue& County Road 62 Signal EB 25.9 C 59.2 E 82.9 F 30.9 C WB 26.7 C 20.8 C 16.3 6 NB 32.7 C 29.2 C 9.4 A SB 25.0 C 33.8 C 28.7 C County Road B2 & Mall Access 7i2 Signal EB 16.0 B 13.3 B 6.2 A 15.5 6 WB 18.0 B 11.1 B 8.7 A NB 42.3 D 47.1 D 13.4 6 SB 31.4 C 40.2 D 14.9 B County Road B2 & Mall Access 7i3 Signal EB 22.7 C 16.6 B 5.6 A 25.5 C WB 24.7 C 35.8 D 13.2 6 NB 44.1 D 45.5 D 15.1 6 SB 41.1 D 36.8 D 6.9 A County Road B2 & Snelling Avenue NB Ramps Signal EB 1.6 A 21.2 C 9.3 A 28.1 C WB 41.8 D 25.4 C 3.6 A NB 39.6 D 39.8 D 16.4 B SB 47.8 D 48.3 D 3.6 A County Road 62 & Snelling Avenue NB Ramps Signal EB 13.0 B 6.2 A - - 11.6 B WB - - 10.1 B 2.2 A NB - - - - - - SB 27.0 C - - 15.6 B Internal Intersection 81A (West) Stop Controlled EB 0.4 A - - 1.4 A 3.7 A NB - - 6.9 A - _ SB - - 7.4 A 3.5 A Internal Intersection 81B (West) Stop Controlled EB 6.3 A WB 7.8 A 2.5 A NB 6.6 A SB - - 5.6 A - - Internal Intersection 82 (Northwest) Stop Controlled EB 15.1 C 11.1 B - - 9.6 A WB - - 17.2 C 4.8 A NB _ _ - _ - _ SB 6.4 A - - 6.4 A Internal Intersection 83 (North) Stop Controlled EB 12.2 B 2.9 A - 8.4 A WB - - 17.1 C 3.1 A NB SB 0.6 A - - - - Internal Intersection 7i4 (Northeast) Stop ControlledFSNB EB - - 2.4 A - - - - 10.3 B 3.7 A - SB 1.4 A - - 2.9 A TABLE C -SHORT TERM BACKGROUND (2024) CONDITIONS SIMTRAFFIC SUMMARY: WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR - DELAY AND LOS Intersection Control Approach Operations by Movement Overall Intersection Delay LOS (sec/veh) Left Delay LOS (sec/veh) Through Delay LOS (sec/veh) Right Delay LOS (sec/veh) Farivew Avenue & TH 36 EB Ramps Signal EB 11.8 B WB 53.2 D - - 3.6 A NB - - 13.6 B 4.0 A SB 19.9 B 6.3 A - - Fairview Avenue& TH 36 WB Ramps Signal EB 43.3 D 39.8 D 1.8 A 27.4 C WB 40.2 D 41.3 D 4.1 A NB 49.0 D 38.9 D 7.1 A SB 41.4 D 26.1 C 5.7 A Fairview Avenue& Mall Access## Signal EB 59.7 E 68.5 E 13.7 B 16.0 B WB 41.0 D 9.7 A 4.0 A NB 17.3 B 15.7 B 6.5 A SB 13.9 B 12.9 B 8.9 A Fairview Avenue& County Road B2 Signal EB 21.2 C 32.7 C 27.5 C 26.5 C WB 29.1 C 19.5 B 13.4 B NB 37.1 D 39.3 D 6.8 A SB 25.9 C 32.6 C 25.7 C County Road B2 & Mall Access 7i2 Signal EB 10.4 B 8.0 A 5.8 A 10.6 6 WB 10.8 B 4.2 A 3.1 A NB 44.9 D 41.5 D 12.6 6 SB 40.9 D 40.5 D 14.9 B County Road B2 & Mall Access 7i3 Signal EB 12.5 B 7.6 A 2.4 A 15.9 6 WB 22.9 C 22.3 C 8.1 A NB 46.2 D 35.2 D 13.3 6 SB 42.2 D 36.3 D 4.9 A County Road B2 & Snelling Avenue NB Ramps Signal EB 37.4 D 17.9 B 8.0 A 22.2 C WB 42.3 D 19.9 B 3.2 A NB 36.4 D 37.5 D 7.2 A SB 41.1 D 38.8 D 2.7 A County Road B2 & Snelling Avenue NB Ramps Signal EB 10.3 B 3.8 A - - 6.6 A WB 4.5 A 2.9 A NB - - - - - - SB 43.2 D - - 8.2 A Internal Intersection 81A (West) Stop Controlled EB 0.4 A - - 1.2 A 2.1 A NB - - 6.2 A - _ SB - - 5.9 A 0.8 A Internallntersection 81B (West) Stop Controlled EB - - - 3.0 A WB 5.9 A 2.2 A 3.5 A - _ SB - - 1.3 A - - Internal Intersection 7i2 (Northwest) Stop Controlled EB 7.1 A 6.8 A - - 6.1 A WB - - 9.3 A 2.5 A NB SB 5.8 A - - 5.6 A Internal Intersection 83 (North) Stop Controlled EB 6.4 A 3.9 A - 6.0 A WB - - 12.2 B 3.4 A NB SB 0.5 A - - 0.8 A Internal Intersection 84 (Northeast) Stop Controlled EB - - 3.0 A - 2.6 A WB - - 7.6 A 2.6 A SB 1.3 A - - 2.6 A TABLE D- SHORT TERM BACKGROUND (2024) CONDITIONS SIMTRAFFIC SUMMARY: SATURDAY PEAK HOUR -DELAY AND LOS Intersection Control Approach Operations by Movement Overall Intersection Delay LOS (sec/veh) Left Delay LOS (sec/veh) Through Delay LOS (sec/veh) Right Delay LOS (sec/veh) Farivew Avenue & TH 36 EB Ramps Signal EB 14.1 B WB 79.5 - - 10.9 B NB - - 12.2 B 3.9 A SB 22.8 C 5.3 A - - Fairview Avenue& TH 36 WB Ramps Signal EB 47.3 D 50.4 D 2.1 A 48.9 D WB 40.2 D 38.7 D 4.1 A NB 98.6 F 100+ F 31.4 C SB 41.3 D 21.0 C 5.5 A Fairview Avenue& Mall Access 81 Signal EB 49.9 D 53.6 D 9.4 A 24.4 C WB 35.1 D 15.7 B 7.6 A NB 27.1 C 26.1 C 8.8 A SB 26.4 C 25.2 C 24.3 C Fairview Avenue& County Road B2 Signal EB 22.1 C 52.0 D 68.0 ' 29.8 C WB 28.4 C 21.7 C 17.8 B NB 36.8 D 29.5 C 9.6 A SB 25.0 C 34.9 C 30.9 C County Road B2 & Mall Access 7i2 Signal EB 18.1 B 14.0 B 6.3 A 15.7 6 WB 19.4 B 12.0 B 8.4 A NB 42.2 D 43.8 D 13.3 6 SB 36.6 D 34.1 C 13.0 B County Road B2 & Mall Access 7i3 Signal EB 23.9 C 18.0 B 5.8 A 26.8 C WB 26.8 C 38.2 D 14.1 6 NB 43.7 D 40.6 D 15.2 6 SB 39.9 D 35.9 D 7.4 A County Road B2 & Snelling Avenue NB Ramps Signal EB 44.3 D 21.8 C 9.5 A 27.9 C WB 40.1 D 25.5 C 3.7 A NB 37.9 D 35.8 D 12.5 B SB 44.0 D 47.2 D 3.5 A County Road B2 & Snelling Avenue NB Ramps Signal EB 13.6 B 6.0 A - - 11.8 B WB - - 10.7 B 1.6 A NB - - - - - - SB 29.2 C - - 15.8 B Internal Intersection 81A (West) Stop Controlled EB 0.5 A - - 1.4 A 3.5 A NB - - 6.9 A - _ SB - - 7.4 A 3.2 A Internal Intersection 81B (West) Stop Controlled EB 6.2 A 7.1 A 2.9 A NB 6.8 A SB - - 5.6 A - - Internal Intersection 7i2 (Northwest) Stop Controlled EB 15.5 C 11.5 B - - 9.7 A WB - - 17.0 C 5.1 A NB SB 6.1 A - - 6.3 A Internal Intersection 83 (North) Stop Controlled EB 10.2 B 3.0 A - 8.3 A WB - - 17.5 C 3.1 A NB SB 0.7 A - - - - Internal Intersection 84 (Northeast) Stop Controlled EB - - 2.6 A - 2.8 A WB - - 10.1 B 3.1 A NB _ _ - _ - _ SB 1.4 A 0.0 A 2.9 A TABLE E -SHORT TERM BUILD (2024) CONDITIONS SIMTRAFFIC SUMMARY: WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR - DELAY AND LOS Intersection Control Approach Operations by Movement Overall Intersection Delay LOS (sec/veh) Left Delay LOS (sec/veh) Through Delay LOS (sec/veh) Right Delay LOS (sec/veh) Farivew Avenue & TH 36 EB Ramps Signal EB 12.6 B WB 58.9 E - - 3.6 A NB - - 15.1 B 4.2 A SB 21.2 C 6.3 A - - Fairview Avenue& TH 36 WB Ramps Signal EB 45.2 D 41.6 D 2.0 A 29.7 C WB 44.4 D 40.2 D 4.5 A NB 51.0 D 44.9 D 7.6 A SB 42.0 D 26.8 C 6.0 A Fairview Avenue& Mall Access 81 Signal EB 62.7 E 44.8 D 11.4 B 19.1 B WB 37.9 D 9.4 A 5.0 A NB 19.1 B 21.9 C 7.6 A SB 17.9 B 15.8 B 13.6 B Fairview Avenue& County Road B2 Signal EB 22.1 C 34.8 C 31.1 C 27.6 C WB 27.1 C 17.0 B 11.9 B NB 39.6 D 40.3 D 7.5 A SB 27.6 C 32.8 C 24.7 C County Road B2 & Mall Access 7i2 Signal EB 10.2 B 8.7 A 6.2 A 11.5 6 WB 16.9 B 5.8 A 3.6 A NB 45.4 D 23.3 C 13.6 6 SB 38.7 D 32.1 C 16.1 B County Road B2 & Mall Access 7i3 Signal EB 16.3 B 12.7 B 4.5 A 19.1 6 WB 24.2 C 25.5 C 8.3 A NB 40.4 D 36.5 D 16.8 6 SB 40.8 D 43.1 D 5.0 A County Road B2 & Snelling Avenue NB Ramps Signal EB 38.7 D 19.1 B 7.6 A 22.8 C WB 40.6 D 21.7 C 3.3 A NB 33.1 C 35.8 D 7.8 A SB 40.5 D 38.8 D 2.6 A County Road B2 & Snelling Avenue NB Ramps Signal EB 11.6 B 4.7 A - - 7.5 A WB - - 5.7 A 3.0 A NB - - - - - - SB 42.6 D - - 8.7 A Internal Intersection 81A (West) Stop Controlled EB 0.4 A - - 1.5 A 2.9 A NB - - 6.8 A - _ SB - - 6.2 A 1.4 A Internallntersection 81B (West) Stop Controlled EB - - - 4.8 A WB 8.0 A - - 2.6 A 7.0 A - _ SB - - 1.1 A - - Internal Intersection 7i2 (Northwest) Stop Controlled EB 8.9 A 9.1 A - - 6.4 A WB - - 9.8 A 2.0 A NB SB 49 A - - 49 A Internal Intersection 83 (North) Stop Controlled EB 6.6 A 4.3 A - 5.1 A WB 9.3 A 4.4 A NB SB 0.6 A 0.0 A 0.9 A Internal Intersection 84 (Northeast) Stop Controlled EB - - 3.3 A - 3.1 A WB 8.6 A 2.9 A SB 1.4 A - - 2.6 A TABLE F -SHORT TERM BUILD (2024) CONDITIONS SIMTRAFFIC SUMMARY: SATURDAY PEAK HOUR -DELAY AND LOS Intersection Control Approach Operations by Movement Overall Intersection Delay LOS (sec/veh) Left Delay LOS (sec/veh) Through Delay LOS (sec/veh) Right Delay LOS (sec/veh) Farivew Avenue & TH 36 EB Ramps Signal EB 20.7 C WB 100+ F - - 26.1 C NB - - 18.9 B 4.4 A SB 24.1 C 5.7 A - - Fairview Avenue& TH 36 WB Ramps Signal EB 49.0 D 52.1 D 2.4 A 56.8 WB 41.4 D 41.3 D 4.5 A NB 100+ F 100+ F 52.9 D SB 40.7 D 17.7 B 4.7 A Fairview Avenue& Mall Access 81 Signal EB 60.8 E 54.8 D 12.2 B 29.2 C WB 33.5 C 13.3 B 10.2 B NB 32.3 C 32.4 C 9.7 A SB 42.0 D 33.0 C 39.6 D Fairview Avenue& County Road B2 Signal EB 30.8 C 93.6 F 100+ F 41.2 D WB 30.8 C 20.3 C 16.2 B NB 42.5 D 23.6 C 9.9 A SB 25.8 C 38.9 D 36.9 D County Road B2 & Mall Access 7i2 Signal EB 19.0 B 17.8 B 6.4 A 17.5 6 WB 24.0 C 13.7 B 9.2 A NB 40.9 D 38.7 D 13.2 6 SB 31.2 C 32.5 C 11.6 B County Road B2 & Mall Access 7i3 Signal EB 24.6 C 21.8 C 6.8 A 28.6 C WB 26.1 C 40.1 D 16.0 6 NB 41.4 D 40.3 D 15.6 6 SB 39.6 D 38.6 D 8.2 A County Road B2 & Snelling Avenue NB Ramps Signal EB 48.5 D 24.4 C 11.3 B 30.2 C WB 41.4 D 27.8 C 3.9 A NB 40.3 D 36.5 D 16.5 B SB 48.9 D 48.7 D 4.9 A County Road 62 & Snelling Avenue NB Ramps Signal EB 16.9 B 7.0 A - - 15.3 B WB - - 15.5 B 2.2 A NB - - - - - - SB 29.4 C - - 20.1 C Internal Intersection 81A (West) Stop Controlled EB 0.9 A - - 1.7 A 5.8 A NB - - 9.5 A - _ SB - - 7.8 A 7.0 A Internal Intersection 81B (West) Stop Controlled EB 127 B WB 21.2 C - - 5.0 A NB - - 12.7 B - - SB - - 6.7 A - - Internal Intersection 7i2 (Northwest) Stop Controlled EB 28.4 D 20.5 C - - 19.8 C WB - - 36.9 E 24.7 C NB SB 6.6 A - - 7.4 A Internal Intersection 83 (North) Stop Controlled EB 10.9 B 3.1 A - 8.2 A WB - - 17.4 C 3.3 A NB SB 0.6 A - - - - Internal Intersection 84 (Northeast) Stop Controlled EB - - 3.3 A - - 3.2 A WB - - 12.3 B 4.0 A NB _ _ - _ - _ SB 1.5 A 3.0 A 3.0 A TABLE G -SHORT TERM BUILD (2024) W/ IMPROVEMENTS CONDITIONS SIMTRAFFIC SUMMARY: WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR - DELAY AND LOS Intersection Control Approach Operations by Movement Overall Intersection Delay LOS (sec/veh) Left Delay LOS (sec/veh) Through Delay LOS (sec/veh) Right Delay LOS (sec/veh) Farivew Avenue & TH 36 EB Ramps Signal EB 13.2 B WB 55.3 - - 3.6 A NB - - 17.0 B 4.2 A SB 21.8 C 6.3 A - Fairview Avenue& TH 36 WB Ramps Signal EB 43.0 D 42.6 D 2.1 A 26.7 C WB 44.0 D 42.8 D 4.9 A NB 44.2 D 34.2 C 12.5 6 SB 39.6 D 25.6 C 6.3 A FairviewAvenue& Mall Access 81 Signal EB WB - - - - - - NB - - - - - - SB Fairview Avenue& County Road B2 Signal EB 21.2 C 29.4 C 9.8 A 24.1 C WB 23.4 C 19.0 B 13.4 B NB 36.0 D 36.3 D 7.3 A SB 25.8 C 32.3 C 24.8 C County Road B2 & Mall Access 7i2 Signal EB WB - - - - - - NB - - - - - - SB County Road B2 & Mall Access 7i3 Signal EB WB - - - - - - NB - - - - - - SB County Road B2 & Snelling Avenue NB Ramps Signal EB - - WB NB SB County Road B2 & Snelling Avenue NB Ramps Signal EB - - WB NB - - - - - - SB Internal Intersection 81A (West) Stop Controlled EB - - WB NB SB Internal Intersection 81B (West) Stop Controlled EB - WB SB - - - - - - Internal Intersection 82 (Northwest) Stop Controlled EB - - WB NB SB - - - - - - Internal Intersection 83 (North) Stop Controlled EB - WB SB - - - - - - Internal Intersection 7i4 (Northeast) Stop Controlled EB WB SB - - - - - - TABLE H -SHORT TERM BUILD (2024) W/ IMPROVEMENTS CONDITIONS SIMTRAFFIC SUMMARY: SATURDAY PEAK HOUR -DELAY AND LOS Intersection Control Approach Operations by Movement Overall Intersection Delay LOS (sec/veh) Left Delay LOS (sec/veh) Through Delay LOS (sec/veh) Right Delay LOS (sec/veh) Farivew Avenue & TH 36 EB Ramps Signal EB 13.5 B WB 58.9 - - 4.2 A NB - - 15.8 B 3.9 A SB 25.1 C 6.1 A - - Fairview Avenue& TH 36 WB Ramps Signal EB 49.2 D 52.2 D 2.5 A 28.9 C WB 41.7 D 41.6 D 9.7 A NB 52.6 D 42.7 D 21.6 C SB 41.3 D 20.5 C 5.2 A FairviewAvenue& Mall Access 81 Signal EB WB - - - - - - NB - - - - - - SB Fairview Avenue& County Road B2 Signal EB 23.8 C 33.7 C 25.3 C 27.1 C WB 33.8 C 23.1 C 17.7 B NB 48.1 D 22.2 C 10.0 A SB 28.4 C 40.8 D 40.4 D County Road B2 & Mall Access 7i2 Signal EB WB - - - - - - NB - - - - - - SB County Road B2 & Mall Access 7i3 Signal EB WB - - - - - - NB - - - - - - SB County Road B2 & Snelling Avenue NB Ramps Signal EB - - WB NB SB County Road B2 & Snelling Avenue NB Ramps Signal EB - - WB NB - - - - - - SB Internal Intersection 81A (West) Stop Controlled EB - - WB NB SB Internal Intersection 81B (West) Stop Controlled EB - - WB NB SB Internal Intersection 82 (Northwest) Stop Controlled EB - WB SB - - - - - - Internal Intersection 83 (North) Stop Controlled EB - - WB NB SB - - - - - - Internal Intersection 84 (Northeast) Stop Controlled EB - WB SB - - - - - - TABLE I - LONG TERM BACKGROUND (2040) CONDITIONS SIMTRAFFIC SUMMARY: WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR - DELAY AND LOS Intersection Control Approach Operations by Movement Overall Intersection Delay LOS (sec/veh) Left Delay LOS (sec/veh) Through Delay LOS (sec/veh) Right Delay LOS (sec/veh) Farivew Avenue & TH 36 EB Ramps Signal EB 13.4 B WB 57.7 E - - 3.6 A NB - - 16.8 B 4.1 A SB 22.3 C 6.8 A - - Fairview Avenue& TH 36 WB Ramps Signal EB 41.3 D 44.5 D 2.3 A 27.2 C WB 42.3 D 41.1 D 4.4 A NB 44.3 D 34.0 C 11.9 6 SB 41.8 D 29.1 C 6.5 A Fairview Avenue& Mall Access## Signal EB 50.4 D 46.8 D 11.1 B 17.4 B WB 40.1 D 8.9 A 3.4 A NB 19.6 B 17.8 B 8.0 A SB 16.4 B 14.8 B 11.1 B Fairview Avenue& County Road B2 Signal EB 23.0 C 32.1 C 10.6 B 25.8 C WB 24.9 C 20.2 C 14.1 B NB 42.4 D 37.2 D 7.2 A SB 26.6 C 34.3 C 29.9 C County Road B2 & Mall Access 7i2 Signal EB 11.0 B 9.1 A 6.2 A 11.2 6 WB 15.1 B 5.4 A 3.8 A NB 45.2 D 40.9 D 15.2 6 SB 36.5 D 52.0 D 15.8 B County Road B2 & Mall Access 7i3 Signal EB 16.9 B 10.7 B 4.5 A 17.5 6 WB 22.3 C 23.8 C 8.7 A NB 44.1 D 39.7 D 14.2 6 SB 42.9 D 35.9 D 5.5 A County Road B2 & Snelling Avenue NB Ramps Signal EB 39.2 D 18.4 B 8.7 A 22.3 C WB 42.3 D 19.7 B 3.3 A NB 33.1 C 36.9 D 6.7 A SB 45.2 D 41.9 D 2.6 A County Road B2 & Snelling Avenue NB Ramps Signal EB 11.2 B 4.1 A - - 6.7 A WB - - 41 A 2.6 A NB - - - - - - SB 41.8 D - - 8.5 A Internal Intersection 81A (West) Stop Controlled EB 0.4 A - - 1.3 A 1.9 A NB - - 6.3 A - _ SB - - 5.9 A 0.7 A Internallntersection 81B (West) Stop Controlled EB - - - 2.9 A WB 5.8 A 2.2 A NB - - 3.3 A - - SB - - 1.2 A - - Internal Intersection 7i2 (Northwest) Stop Controlled EB 6.4 A 6.7 A - - 5.4 A WB - - 9.2 A 2.4 A NB SB 47 A - - 44 A Internal Intersection 83 (North) Stop Controlled EB 6.1 A 3.7 A - 5.9 A WB - - 12.4 B 3.3 A NB SB 0.5 A 0.0 A 0.8 A Internal Intersection 84 (Northeast) Stop Controlled EB - - 3.3 A - 2.7 A WB 7.7 A 2.7 A NB SB 1.3 A - - 2.6 A TABLE J - LONG TERM BACKGROUND (2040) CONDITIONS SIMTRAFFIC SUMMARY: SATURDAY PEAK HOUR - DELAY AND LOS Intersection Control Approach Operations by Movement Overall Intersection Delay LOS (sec/veh) Left Delay LOS (sec/veh) Through Delay LOS (sec/veh) Right Delay LOS (sec/veh) Farivew Avenue & TH 36 EB Ramps Signal EB 14.5 B WB 56.9 E - - 4.0 A NB - - 18.1 B 3.9 A SB 27.4 C 6.3 A - - Fairview Avenue& TH 36 WB Ramps Signal EB 48.3 D 55.4 E 2.7 A 29.4 C WB 38.7 D 40.0 D 9.9 A NB 49.2 D 41.9 D 8.7 A SB 44.9 D 24.2 C 6.6 A Fairview Avenue& Mall Access 81 Signal EB 46.7 D 53.5 D 13.5 B 28.2 C WB 36.5 D 15.2 B 8.2 A NB 33.7 C 28.6 C 12.8 B SB 31.5 C 30.8 C 29.0 C Fairview Avenue& County Road B2 Signal EB 25.2 C 35.6 D 26.3 C 28.3 C WB 41.2 D 24.9 C 20.6 C NB 40.6 D 26.7 C 10.0 A SB 27.7 C 40.8 D 40.2 D County Road B2 & Mall Access 7i2 Signal EB 20.3 C 15.1 B 6.8 A 18.9 6 WB 28.4 C 19.2 B 11.0 6 NB 43.6 D 43.6 D 14.8 6 SB 28.9 C 37.1 D 15.3 B County Road B2 & Mall Access 7i3 Signal EB 25.9 C 19.1 B 6.2 A 27.7 C WB 26.4 C 39.4 D 15.2 6 NB 43.4 D 41.6 D 15.5 6 SB 41.2 D 37.9 D 9.0 A County Road B2 & Snelling Avenue NB Ramps Signal EB 48.4 D 23.4 C 10.6 B 29.5 C WB 41.2 D 26.3 C 3.8 A NB 43.3 D 41.0 D 17.8 B SB 43.2 D 46.4 D 3.9 A County Road B2 & Snelling Avenue NB Ramps Signal EB 14.7 B 6.4 A - - 14.4 B WB - - 14.1 B 1.8 A NB - - - - - - SB 27.3 C - - 19.7 B Internal Intersection 81A (West) Stop Controlled EB 0.4 A - - 1.4 A 4.1 A NB - - 6.9 A - _ SB - - 7.1 A 4.6 A Internal Intersection 81B (West) Stop Controlled EB 6.7 A 9.1 A 2.4 A NB 6.5 A SB - - 5.7 A - - Internal Intersection 7i2 (Northwest) Stop Controlled EB 13.2 B 10.2 B - - 9.1 A WB - - 16.6 C 5.1 A NB SB 6.2 A - - 6.0 A Internal Intersection 83 (North) Stop Controlled EB 9.4 A 2.6 A - 8.0 A WB - - 17.3 C 3.0 A NB SB 0.6 A - - - - Internal Intersection 84 (Northeast) Stop Controlled EB - - 2.9 A - 3.0 A WB - - 10.4 B 3.7 A NB _ _ - _ - _ SB 1.5 A - - 2.9 A TABLE K - LONG TERM BUILD (2040) CONDITIONS SIMTRAFFIC SUMMARY: WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR - DELAY AND LOS Intersection Control Approach Operations by Movement Overall Intersection Delay LOS (sec/veh) Left Delay LOS (sec/veh) Through Delay LOS (sec/veh) Right Delay LOS (sec/veh) Farivew Avenue & TH 36 EB Ramps Signal EB 14.8 B WB 58.4 E - - 3.7 A NB - - 20.2 C 4.4 A SB 23.8 C 6.6 A - Fairview Avenue& TH 36 WB Ramps Signal EB 43.4 D 43.7 D 2.2 A 27.1 C WB 42.4 D 41.4 D 5.2 A NB 43.2 D 34.4 C 13.3 6 SB 43.1 D 27.5 C 6.6 A Fairview Avenue& Mall Access 81 Signal EB 60.7 E 47.9 D 8.0 A 20.1 C WB 37.7 D 10.3 B 5.9 A NB 21.5 C 22.6 C 8.8 A SB 19.7 B 17.0 B 16.6 B Fairview Avenue& County Road B2 Signal EB 28.1 C 37.1 D 12.1 B 27.7 C WB 25.4 C 18.9 B 14.1 B NB 42.8 D 39.5 D 7.9 A SB 28.2 C 34.4 C 26.7 C County Road B2 & Mall Access 7i2 Signal EB 13.2 B 10.6 B 6.5 A 12.6 6 WB 16.8 B 6.2 A 4.2 A NB 46.2 D 21.1 C 16.6 6 SB 37.5 D 36.7 D 14.8 B County Road B2 & Mall Access 7i3 Signal EB 19.4 B 13.8 B 5.0 A 20.3 C WB 26.3 C 27.8 C 9.7 A NB 41.5 D 42.7 D 16.8 6 SB 41.4 D 38.1 D 6.0 A County Road B2 & Snelling Avenue NB Ramps Signal EB 39.3 D 20.4 C 9.6 A 23.5 C WB 42.0 D 22.2 C 3.5 A NB 32.3 C 33.4 C 6.6 A SB 46.9 D 40.2 D 2.8 A County Road B2 & Snelling Avenue NB Ramps Signal EB 12.8 B 4.9 A - - 8.2 A WB - - 6.3 A 2.6 A NB - - - - - - SB 41.2 D - - 9.9 A Internal Intersection 81A (West) Stop Controlled EB 0.4 A - - 1.4 A 3.0 A NB - - 6.8 A - _ SB - - 6.1 A 1.6 A Internallntersection 81B (West) Stop Controlled EB - - - 5.0 A WB 8.6 A - - 2.5 A NB - - 70 A - _ SB - - 1.1 A - - Internal Intersection 7i2 (Northwest) Stop Controlled EB 8.6 A 9.1 A - - 6.3 A WB - - 9.7 A 2.2 A NB SB 47 A - - 49 A Internal Intersection 83 (North) Stop Controlled EB 6.5 A 4.0 A - 5.1 A WB - - 9.6 A 4.3 A NB SB 0.6 A 0.6 A 0.9 A Internal Intersection 84 (Northeast) Stop Controlled EB - - 3.3 A - 3.1 A WB 8.5 A 2.8 A NB SB 1.5 A - - 2.6 A TABLE L - LONG TERM BUILD (2040) CONDITIONS SIMTRAFFIC SUMMARY: SATURDAY PEAK HOUR - DELAY AND LOS Intersection Control Approach Operations by Movement Overall Intersection Delay LOS (sec/veh) Left Delay LOS (sec/veh) Through Delay LOS (sec/veh) Right Delay LOS (sec/veh) Farivew Avenue & TH 36 EB Ramps Signal EB 16.6 B WB 60.8 E - - 5.5 A NB - - 20.3 C 4.1 A SB 31.2 C 6.6 A - - Fairview Avenue& TH 36 WB Ramps Signal EB 54.5 D 53.2 D 2.6 A 35.0 C WB 39.2 D 42.1 D 18.9 6 NB 52.7 D 56.6 E 43.8 D SB 43.9 D 100+ F 5.7 A Fairview Avenue& Mall Access## Signal EB 52.7 D 55.8 E 9.4 A 36.3 D WB 33.0 C 16.0 B 10.1 B NB 40.6 D 43.5 D 16.0 B SB 54.3 D 39.1 D 42.2 D Fairview Avenue& County Road B2 Signal EB 27.0 C 38.6 D 42.0 D 35.3 D WB 49.6 D 27.2 C 22.6 C NB 100+ F 25.4 C 11.2 B SB 28.8 C 44.7 D 40.8 D County Road B2 & Mall Access 7i2 Signal EB 27.1 C 21.1 C 7.3 A 22.5 C WB 39.5 D 22.8 C 15.4 6 NB 40.5 D 31.0 C 14.9 6 SB 33.8 C 32.9 C 14.6 B County Road B2 & Mall Access 7i3 Signal EB 30.4 C 24.9 C 8.5 A 32.4 C WB 32.4 C 44.4 D 18.5 6 NB 41.4 D 51.3 D 17.9 6 SB 47.6 D 28.7 C 9.1 A County Road B2 & Snelling Avenue NB Ramps Signal EB 59.8 E 30.9 C 14.3 B 35.2 D WB 40.6 D 28.1 C 4.0 A NB 45.9 D 41.2 D 18.3 B SB 48.5 D 54.4 D 5.3 A County Road B2 & Snelling Avenue NB Ramps Signal EB 20.7 C 7.4 A - - 19.8 B WB - - 17.9 B 2.0 A NB - - - - - - SB 35.2 D - - 29.1 C Internal Intersection 81A (West) Stop Controlled EB 2.7 A - - 1.7 A 5.9 A NB - - 13.2 6 - _ SB - - 8.2 A 5.4 A Internal Intersection 81B (West) Stop Controlled EB 124 B WB 17.4 C - - 5.4 A NB - - 17.1 C - - SB - - 6.5 A - - Internal Intersection 7i2 (Northwest) Stop Controlled EB 34.7 D 24.3 C - - 18.8 C WB - - 29.5 D 15.1 C NB SB 74 A - - 77 A Internal Intersection 83 (North) Stop Controlled EB 12.4 B 3.3 A - 8.4 A WB - - 17.0 C 3.1 A NB SB 0.7 A - - - - Internal Intersection 84 (Northeast) Stop Controlled EB - - 3.0 A - 3.4 A WB - - 13.4 B 4.9 A NB _ _ - _ - _ SB 1.6 A 1.6 A 2.8 A VEHIQ.E QUEUE SUMMARY (WEEKDAY PM PEAK) ®�L®0®ems®A®L ml�0®s0M mE�0®s0W MMMM0®0sL J�®�� ®mmmammmmmammmmmasmammasmsmesaaaeesaea m.mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmism®m®0s0®m®miss®®m mmmammmmaammmmmammmmmammmmmseeeeeseee a.sass®m�s�semamamemmmaaeemsae®s�ssees s.aaamaaeaamaeeaaeaassaeaasasesassseaa mmmammmmmammmmmammmmaammmasaeeeeaseee a.mmamaemmamaemmamaammamssaea®assesses mmmamaammamaammamaammamemamaeeeeeseee a.meaeaemsamaemmamaammsmsseeaeaaeesess mmmammmmmammammammmmmsmmmseaemeesseas m.mmemaammems-®mom �s®m�m�smmaeaaeeseas m �0e0e00000em �00s0m� �00s� �00s���ss� � a00®00e00®0ee00® �es0s®00s0s®s���s®�� � �00®00e�e®0ee00® �0s0s®00s0s®s����®ems �0se®ee0�0®s00ss®s0 000®�s���®sue �0se®e�0e0�s00ss®s0 000®�s������ �0s0®e�0e0®000s0®s0 0s0®���s�®�� �ss0�0�0e0�000s0�0s 0s0����s���� �s00�00s00�00s00®0s������0s0�s����®�� ■�®®®®�®®�� ��N�N� a®®ice®ice SimTraffic Performance Report Existing Conditions Two Way Ring Road PM Peak Hour 1: Fairview Ave & TH 36 EB Ramp Performance by movement Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Al Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.4 0.4 0.3 2.6 0.0 0.0 0.3 - Total Delay (hr) 1.1 0.3 2.4 0.1 1.7 1.0 6.7 Total DelNeh (s) 54.6 3.6 13.2 4.0 18.6 5.9 11.4 Vehicles Entered 73 335 648 109 335 607 2107 Vehicles Exited 72 336 648 110 335 607 2108 Houdy Exit Rate 72 336 648 110 335 607 2108 Input Volume 70 340 645 115 335 585 2091 %of Volume 102 99 100 96 100 104 101 2: Fairview Ave & TH 36 WB Ramps Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.2 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (hr) 1.0 0.8 0.1 1.1 2.0 0.4 2.1 8.1 0.2 2.8 3.9 0.2 Total DelNeh (s) 42.8 40.6 1.4 41.5 39.5 3.9 48.3 39.1 6.9 39.6 25.3 5.8 Vehicles Entered 81 68 303 95 180 342 150 723 110 253 541 94 Vehicles Exited 82 68 303 95 181 341 149 725 109 251 543 95 Houdy Exit Rate 82 68 303 95 181 341 149 725 109 251 543 95 Input Volume 80 70 310 90 185 340 155 721 110 245 520 90 %of Volume 103 97 98 106 98 100 96 101 99 103 104 106 2: Fairview Ave & TH 36 WB Ramps Performance by movement uemea ueay tnr/ U. i Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 Total Delay (hr) 22.5 Total DelNeh (s) 27.2 Vehicles Entered 2940 Vehicles Exited 2942 Houdy Exit Rate 2942 Input Volume 2916 %of Volume 101 SimTraffic Report SimTraffic Performance Report Existing Conditions Two Way Ring Road PM Peak Hour 3: Fairview Ave & Mall Entrance 1 Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBit SBL�S!! Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (hr) 0.1 0.1 0.0 2.2 0.1 0.1 0.5 4.0 0.2 0.3 2.4 0.0 Total DelNeh (s) 45.5 51.0 15.7 40.9 10.5 4.0 15.7 16.1 6.5 13.6 12.2 10.6 Vehicles Entered 5 5 4 192 29 101 114 897 138 80 689 11 Vehicles Exited 5 4 5 193 29 101 113 899 137 80 691 11 Houdy Exit Rate 5 4 5 193 29 101 113 899 137 80 691 11 Input Volume 5 5 5 170 25 95 120 881 140 ' 80 680 10 %of Volume 100 80 100 114 115 107 94 102 98 100 102 110 3: Fairview Ave & Mall Entrance 1 Performance by movement Movement Al Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 Total Delay (hr) 10.0 Total DelNeh (s) 15.9 Vehicles Entered 2265 Vehicles Exited 2268 Houdy Exit Rate 2268 Input Volume 2215 %of Volume 102 4: Fairview Ave & CR B2 W Performance by movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Delay (hr) 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 2.5 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.4 0.3 Total Delay (hr) 0.8 4.7 1.4 1.4 1.0 0.5 1.8 4.3 0.9 1.5 3.4 0.7 Total DelNeh (s) 20.1 30.5 26.4 25.1 18.7 11.5 38.8 38.6 7.1 27.1 31.6 26.0 Vehicles Entered 140 552 192 200 193 165 162 390 452 198 388 96 Vehicles Exited 141 553 190 200 193 165 165 389 453 197 385 96 Houdy Exit Rate 141 553 190 200 193 165 165 389 453 197 385 96 Input Volume 145 550 185 210 190 160 160 385 435 185 370 85 %of Volume 97 101 103 95 101 103 103 101 104 106 104 113 4: Fairview Ave & CR B2 W Performance by movement Movement Al Denied Delay (hr) 0.4 Denied Del/Veh (s) - 0.4 Total Delay (hr) 22.5 Total DelNeh (s) 25.6 Vehicles Entered 3128 Vehicles Exited 3127 Houdy Exit Rate 3127 Input Volume 3060 %of Volume 102 SimTraffic Report SimTraffic Performance Report Existing Conditions Two Way Ring Road PM Peak Hour 5: Mall Entrance 2 & CR B2 W Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBit SBL�S!! Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.2 0.3 Total Delay (hr) 0.2 2.0 0.4 0.3 0.5 0.0 1.6 0.1 0.4 0.4 0.1 0.2 Total DelNeh (s) 10.4 7.7 6.0 11.3 4.1 2.7 45.0 45.7 11.6 40.0 42.2 18.2 Vehicles Entered 74 909 219 102 419 29 126 8 124 35 5 41 Vehicles Exited 74 908 219 103 418 29 125 7 124 35 5 41 Houdy Exit Rate 74 908 219 103 418 29 125 7 124 35 5 41 Input Volume 70 894 205 110 455 30 95 5 95 35 5 40 %of Volume 105 102 107 94 92 96 132 140 131 99 100 102 5: Mall Entrance 2 & CR B2 W Performance by movement Movement Al Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 Total Delay (hr) 6.1 Total DelNeh (s) 10.5 Vehicles Entered 2091 Vehicles Exited 2088 Houdy Exit Rate 2088 Input Volume 2040 %of Volume 102 6: Mall Entrance 3 & CR B2 W Performance by movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 _ Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 Total Delay (hr) 0.5 1.8 0.1 0.1 3.1 0.2 0.7 0.1 0.4 2.1 0.1 0.1 Total DelNeh (s) 12.2 7.6 2.5 21.8 22.1 8.0 43.8 43.7 14.1 41.0 40.1 5.5 Vehicles Entered 141 832 118 23 500 74 54 7 96 183 9 55 Vehicles Exited 140 833 118 23 501 74 53 7 96 184 9 55 Houdy Exit Rate 140 833 118 23 501 74 53 7 96 184 9 55 Input Volume 145 800 110 30 501 85 105 11 165 185 10 55 %of Volume 97 104 108 76 100 87 51 64 58 99 90 100 6: Mall Entrance 3 & CR B2 W Performance by movement Movement Al Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) - 0.0 Total Delay (hr) 9.1 Total DelNeh (s) 15.6 Vehicles Entered 2092 Vehicles Exited 2093 Houdy Exit Rate 2093 Input Volume 2202 %of Volume 95 SimTraffic Report SimTraffic Performance Report Existing Conditions Two Way Ring Road PM Peak Hour 7: Mall Entrance 4/Snelling Ave SB Ramps & CR B2 W Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBLNS!! Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.8 0.7 3.6 Total Delay (hr) 2.5 3.9 0.2 2.3 2.0 0.1 0.3 0.7 0.1 0.3 1.6 0.2 Total DelNeh (s) 37.5 17.0 8.4 41.2 20.5 3.3 34.9 36.2 6.3 47.3 40.6 2.7 Vehicles Entered 236 814 71 200 356 61 35 66 78 20 137 207 Vehicles Exited 235 816 71 201 354 62 34 67 79 20 137 208 Houdy Exit Rate 235 816 71 201 354 62 34 67 79 20 137 208 Input Volume 250 840 70 205 370 65 35 70 80 20 125 210 %of Volume 94 97 101 98 96 95 96 95 99 100 110 99 7: Mall Entrance 4/Snellina Ave SB Movement Al Denied Delay (hr) 0.3 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.4 Total Delay (hr) 14.1 Total DelNeh (s) 22.0 Vehicles Entered 2281 Vehicles Exited 2284 Houdy Exit Rate 2284 Input Volume i 2341 %of Volume 98 & CR B2 W Performance by movement 8: CR B2 W & Snelling Ave NB Ramps Performance by movement BT WBT WBR SBL SBR Al uemea ueay tnr/ u.0 u.0 u.0 u.0 u.0 u.s u.4 _ Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.2 3.2 1.0 3.7 0.8 Total Delay (hr) 0.7 0.6 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.7 2.7 Total DelNeh (s) 9.6 3.6 3.6 2.2 49.0 7.9 6.1 Vehicles Entered 273 642 322 53 25 296 1611 Vehicles Exited 273 642 322 53 25 295 1610 Houdy Exit Rate 273 642 322 53 25 295 1610 Input Volume 290 650 330 50 25 310 1656 %of Volume 94 99 98 105 99 95 97 SimTraffic Report SimTraffic Performance Report Existing Conditions Two Way Ring Road PM Peak Hour 9: Mall Entrance 1 Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR NBT SBT Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.4 Total DelNeh (s) 0.4 0.4 1.3 6.3 5.8 0.8 2.0 - Vehicles Entered 73 1 150 63 97 322 706 Vehicles Exited 73 1 150 63 97 322 706 Hourly Exit Rate 73 1 150 63 97 322 706 Input Volume 75 1 150 60 85 290 660 - %ofVolume 98 133 100 105 114 111 107 10: Performance by movement Movement WBL WBR NBT SBT Al Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 ' Total Delay (hr) 0.3 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.5 Total DelNeh (s) 6.1 2.2 3.2 1.2 2.9 Vehicles Entered 179 23 136 331 669 Vehicles Exited 179 24 136 331 670 Hourly Exit Rate 179 24 136 331 670 Input Volume 180 20 135 270 605 %of Volume 99 120 101 123 111 11: Mall Entrance 2 Performance by movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBT SBR Al Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (hr) 0.2 0.1 0.4 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.3 1.3 Total DelNeh (s) 6.9 7.1 9.5 2.5 6.1 8.9 5.8 6.1 Vehicles Entered 117 51 134 142 127 1 199 771 Vehicles Exited 117 51 133 140 127 1 198 767 Hourly Exit Rate 117 51 133 140 127 1 198 767 Input Volume 115 50 80 80 130 1 190 646 %of Volume 102 101 167 176 98 133 104 119 SimTraffic Report SimTraffic Performance Report Existing Conditions Two Way Ring Road PM Peak Hour 12: Rosedale Shopping Ctr & Mall Entrance 3 Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Al - Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 - Total Delay (hr) 0.1 0.1 0.6 0.1 0.0 0.0 1.0 Total DelNeh (s) 6.1 3.8 12.2 3.5 0.5 0.8 5.9 - Vehicles Entered 82 96 182 75 102 48 585 Vehicles Exited 81 96 182 75 102 48 584 Houdy Exit Rate 81 96 182 75 102 48 584 Input Volume 90 90 65 190 100 50 586 %ofVolume 90 106 279 39 102 96 100 13: Mall Entrance 4 Performance by movement Movement EBT WBT WBR SBL SBT SBR Al Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.2 3.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 Total Delay (hr) 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.6 Total DelNeh (s) 3.7 8.2 2.5 1.4 1.1 2.7 2.8 Vehicles Entered 157 51 179 228 1 182 798 Vehicles Exited 157 51 179 228 1 182 798 Houdy Exit Rate 157 51 179 228 1 182 798 Input Volume = 150 50 185 220 1 180 787 %of Volume 105 101 97 104 133 101 101 Total Zone Performance Denied Delay (hr) 1.5 Denied Del/Veh (s) 1.0 Total Delay (hr) 97.7 Total DelNeh (s) 623.4 Vehicles Entered 5427 Vehicles Exited 402 Houdy Exit Rate 402 Input Volume 21805 %of Volume 2 SimTraffic Report Queuing and Blocking Report Existing Conditions Two Way Ring Road PM Peak Hour Intersection: 1: Fairview Ave & TH 36 EB Ramp Movement WB NB NB SB SB Directions Served LR T T L T T Maximum Queue (ft) 130 221 263 255 114 137 Average Queue (ft) 59 83 90 122 28 49 95th Queue (ft) 105 191 204 223 85 107 Link Distance (ft) 395 1169 1169 734 734 Upstream BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 380 Storage BIk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 2: Fairview Ave & TH 36 WB Ramps - EB EB EB WB WB NB NB SB SB SB Directions Served L T R LT TR L T T R L T T Maximum Queue (ft) 106 100 75 263 217 228 424 438 73 283 237 226 Average Queue (ft) 43 29 12 143 59 110 176 239 3 140 135 114 95th Queue (ft) 91 71 47 221 167 194 307 365 54 234 217 197 Link Distance (ft) 373 316 316 734 734 734 462 462 462 Upstream BIk Time (%) 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 170 170 210 Storage BIk Time (%) 0 3 Queuing Penalty (veh) n 4 Intersection: 2: Fairview Ave & TH 36 WB Ra Move - Directions Served R Maximum Queue (ft) 86 Average Queue (ft) 33 95th Queue (ft) 67 Link Distance (ft) Upstream BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 300 Storage BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) SimTraffic Report Queuing and Blocking Report Existing Conditions Two Way Ring Road PM Peak Hour Intersection: 3: Fairview Ave & Mall Entrance 1 Movement EB WB WB WB i Directions Served LTR L LT R L T T T R L T TR Maximum Queue (ft) 51 123 187 100 104 189 375 383 96 79 245 27C Average Queue (ft) 13 47 97 37 40 79 96 142 8 35 76 137 95th Queue (ft) 41 100 178 114 81 155 248 284 65 69 161 24C Link Distance (ft) 241 135 135 462 462 462 405 405 Upstream BIk Time (%) 0 5 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 7 0 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 50 260 250 160 Storage BIk Time (%) 27 0 0 0 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 26 0 1 0 0 Intersection: 4: Fairview Ave & CR B2 W - EB EB EB WB WB WB NB ' NB SB SB SB Directions Served L T TR L T TR L T T L T TR Maximum Queue (ft) 185 333 381 147 99 190 196 212 224 197 194 243 Average Queue (ft) 80 160 191 83 38 84 100 104 116 91 93 145 95th Queue (ft) 162 272 314 143 84 145 182 189 197 161 164 223 Link Distance (ft) 1154 1154 260 260 405 405 1122 1122 Upstream BIk Time (%) - Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 160 180 200 Storage BIk Time (%) 0 8 0 0 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 11 0 1 1 Intersection: 5: Mall Entrance 2 & CR B2 W Move EB EB EB WB WB WB NB NB SB Directions Served L T T R L T TR LT R LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 74 250 278 294 100 99 89 168 105 116 Average Queue (ft) 21 67 72 24 40 26 33 96 49 43 95th Queue (ft) 57 183 210 162 78 74 78 158 85 91 Link Distance (ft) 260 260 260 419 419 299 299 114 Upstream BIk Time (%) 0 0 0 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 2 2 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 50 120 Storage BIk Time (%) 0 7 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 2 5 0 0 SimTraffic Report Queuing and Blocking Report Existing Conditions Two Way Ring Road PM Peak Hour Intersection: 6: Mall Entrance 3 & CR B2 W Movement -LU.- EB EB E6 WB I WB WB Directions Served L T T R L T T R LT R L LT Maximum Queue (ft) 142 177 156 89 60 211 211 164 122 100 196 135 Average Queue (ft) 47 78 65 20 16 107 105 33 60 47 101 37 95th Queue (ft) 99 150 125 57 45 181 191 98 120 83 162 101 Link Distance (ft) 644 644 687 687 106 106 427 427 Upstream BIk Time (%) 3 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 4 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 160 120 240 140 Storage BIk Time (%) 0 1 1 0 0 4 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 1 1 0 0 4 0 Directions Served R Maximum Queue (ft) 47 Average Queue (ft) 20 95th Queue (ft) 41 Link Distance (ft) 427 Upstream BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) SimTraffic Report Queuing and Blocking Report Existing Conditions Two Way Ring Road PM Peak Hour Intersection: 7: Mall Entrance 4/Snelling Ave SB Ramps & CR B2 W Movement -.66- EB EB EB WB WB WB Directions Served L T T R L L T T L T R L Maximum Queue (ft) 262 307 292 185 156 161 159 160 73 155 49 81 Average Queue (ft) 132 157 151 47 78 71 82 82 26 55 39 21 95th Queue (ft) 215 250 241 145 134 130 140 143 60 127 61 57 Link Distance (ft) 687 687 667 667 147 147 147 Upstream BIk Time (%) 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 300 160 270 270 150 Storage BIk Time (%) 0 0 5 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 3 0 Intersection: 7: Mall Entrance 4/Snelling Ave SB Ramps & CR B2 W — SB Directions Served T R Maximum Queue (ft) 179 86 Average Queue (ft) 92 10 95th Queue (ft) 161 51 Link Distance (ft) 519 Upstream BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage BIk Time (%) 2 Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 8: CR B2 W & Snellina Ave NB Ram Mov MEINEWMIRIEr EB EB WB WB WB SB S Directions Served L T T T T R L R Maximum Queue (ft) 166 40 73 86 67 42 77 151 Average Queue (ft) 63 7 12 30 13 5 25 68 95th Queue (ft) 123 27 45 74 46 27 64 121 - Link Distance (ft) 667 667 1171 1171 380 Upstream BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 270 200 240 — Storage BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) SimTraffic Report Queuing and Blocking Report Existing Conditions Two Way Ring Road PM Peak Hour Intersection: 9: Mall Entrance 1 Movement NB SB SB Directions Served T T R Maximum Queue (ft) 59 47 54 Average Queue (ft) 29 24 4 95th Queue (ft) 49 39 30 Link Distance (ft) 476 155 155 Upstream BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 10: Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) _jL L R T 87 28 49 35 15 27 63 37 46 331 331 155 Intersection: 11: Mall Entrance 2 Mov EB EB WB WB SB S Directions Served LT T T TR L R Maximum Queue (ft) 88 28 56 119 22 39 Average Queue (ft) 47 2 29 39 1 4 95th Queue (ft) 76 15 51 80 11 20 Link Distance (ft) 182 182 357 357 299 299 Upstream BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) SimTraffic Report Queuing and Blocking Report Existing Conditions Two Way Ring Road PM Peak Hour Intersection: 12: Rosedale Shopping Ctr & Mall Entrance 3 Movement EB WB Directions Served LT T Maximum Queue (ft) 69 115 Average Queue (ft) 38 54 95th Queue (ft) 60 90 Link Distance (ft) 493 589 Upstream BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 13: Mall Entrance 4 EB WB Directions Served T T Maximum Queue (ft) 57 61 Average Queue (ft) 30 28 95th Queue (ft) 51 53 - Link Distance (ft) 589 627 Upstream BIk Time (%) - Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) - Storage BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) - Zone Summa Zone wide Queuing Penalty: 82 SimTraffic Report SimTraffic Performance Report Existing Conditions Two Way Ring Road SAT Peak Hour 1: Fairview Ave & TH 36 EB Ramp Performance by movement Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Al Denied Delay (hr) 0.1 1.2 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 1.4 Denied Del/Veh (s) 7.2 7.5 0.3 2.8 0.0 0.0 2.2 - Total Delay (hr) 1.1 1.0 2.1 0.1 3.1 0.8 8.3 Total DelNeh (s) 66.6 6.6 13.8 3.9 21.4 5.5 12.9 Vehicles Entered 59 565 551 88 523 525 2311 Vehicles Exited 58 563 551 89 525 525 2311 Houdy Exit Rate 58 563 551 89 525 525 2311 Input Volume 60 600 545 85 510 520 2320 %of Volume 96 94 101 105 103 101 100 2: Fairview Ave & TH 36 WB Ramps Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (hr) 1.3 1.2 0.2 0.6 1.5 0.5 3.3 20.0 0.5 4.1 3.9 0.2 Total DelNeh (s) 48.5 49.3 2.0 40.9 41.9 3.9 72.6 80.5 19.6 40.4 19.9 5.4 Vehicles Entered 93 90 308 50 133 471 156 872 86 359 698 157 Vehicles Exited 92 90 308 50 133 470 155 858 86 356 696 158 Houdy Exit Rate 92 90 308 50 133 470 155 858 86 356 696 158 Input Volume 90 95 310 45 140 470 170 885 90 355 680 150 %of Volume 103 95 99 110 95 100 91 97 96 100 102 105 2: Fairview Ave & TH 36 WB Ramps Performance by movement uemea ueay tnr/ U. i Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 Total Delay (hr) 37.2 Total DelNeh (s) 38.1 Vehicles Entered 3473 Vehicles Exited 3452 Houdy Exit Rate 3452 Input Volume 3480 %of Volume 99 SimTraffic Report SimTraffic Performance Report Existing Conditions Two Way Ring Road SAT Peak Hour 3: Fairview Ave & Mall Entrance 1 Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL�S!! Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (hr) 0.0 0.1 0.0 3.3 0.2 0.4 1.5 6.8 0.6 0.9 6.2 0.1 Total DelNeh (s) 36.6 56.5 18.4 37.0 15.4 7.9 25.3 25.0 8.8 23.6 24.5 22.4 Vehicles Entered 4 5 6 312 55 182 208 970 243 140 889 15 Vehicles Exited 4 5 ' 6 313 54 182 209 971 243 140 896 15 Houdy Exit Rate 4 5 6 313 54 182 209 971 243 140 896 15 Input Volume 5 5 5 290 45 160 205 1005 235 145 890 15 %of Volume 80 100 120 108 119 114 102 97 104 97 101 100 3: Fairview Ave & Mall Entrance 1 Performance by movement Movement Al Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 - Total Delay (hr) 20.1 Total DelNeh (s) 23.6 - Vehicles Entered 3029 Vehicles Exited 3038 Houdy Exit Rate 3038 Input Volume 3005 %of Volume 101 4: Fairview Ave & CR B2 W Performance by movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Delay (hr) 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 2.6 0.4 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.9 0.3 0.3 Total Delay (hr) 1.1 5.2 6.1 2.4 1.8 1.1 1.6 3.0 1.7 1.1 4.5 1.0 Total DelNeh (s) 25.9 59.2 82.9 26.7 20.8 16.3 32.7 29.2 9.4 25.0 33.8 28.7 Vehicles Entered 154 315 259 315 305 241 171 363 629 158 465 119 Vehicles Exited 155 313 257 314 304 240 172 362 629 157 468 119 Houdy Exit Rate 155 313 257 314 304 240 172 362 629 157 468 119 Input Volume 160 320 265 310 306 235 175 365 635 150 470 120 %of Volume 97 98 97 101 99 102 98 99 99 105 100 99 4: Fairview Ave & CR B2 W Performance by movement Movement Al Denied Delay (hr) 0.4 Denied Del/Veh (s) - 0.4 Total Delay (hr) 30.4 Total DelNeh (s) 30.9 Vehicles Entered 3494 Vehicles Exited 3490 Houdy Exit Rate 3490 Input Volume 3512 %of Volume 99 SimTraffic Report SimTraffic Performance Report Existing Conditions Two Way Ring Road SAT Peak Hour 5: Mall Entrance 2 & CR B2 W Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WB% NBL NBTM--"R SBL�S!! Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.2 Total Delay (hr) 0.5 2.4 0.6 0.9 2.1 0.1 2.6 0.5 0.8 0.2 0.2 0.3 Total DelNeh (s) 16.0 13.3 6.2 18.0 11.1 8.7 42.3 47.1 13.4 31.4 40.2 14.9 Vehicles Entered 114 640 346 175 672 41 222 37 215 19 14 64 Vehicles Exited 113 641 345 175 675 42 221 37 217 19 14 63 Houdy Exit Rate 113 641 345 175 675 42 221 37 217 19 14 63 Input Volume 110 646 350 190 730 50 160 25 160 20 15 70 %of Volume 103 99 99 92 93 84 138 147 136 95 93 90 5: Mall Entrance 2 & CR B2 W Performance by movement Movement Al Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 Total Delay (hr) 11.1 Total DelNeh (s) 15.5 Vehicles Entered 2559 Vehicles Exited 2562 Houdy Exit Rate 2562 Input Volume 2526 %of Volume 101 6: Mall Entrance 3 & CR B2 W Performance by movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 _ Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.1 Total Delay (hr) 1.2 2.5 0.3 0.3 7.3 0.3 1.2 0.1 0.6 2.8 0.1 0.1 Total DelNeh (s) 22.7 16.6 5.6 24.7 35.8 13.2 44.1 45.5 15.1 41.1 36.8 6.9 Vehicles Entered 183 531 206 43 724 81 92 8 149 245 14 77 Vehicles Exited 183 530 205 43 719 81 92 8 149 247 14 77 Houdy Exit Rate 183 530 205 43 719 81 92 8 149 247 14 77 Input Volume 180 500 190 50 715 75 180 16 275 255 15 75 %of Volume 102 106 108 86 101 108 51 51 54 97 93 103 6: Mall Entrance 3 & CR B2 W Performance by movement Movement Al Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) - 0.1 Total Delay (hr) 16.9 Total DelNeh (s) 25.5 Vehicles Entered 2353 Vehicles Exited 2348 i Houdy Exit Rate 2348 Input Volume 2526 %of Volume 93 SimTraffic Report SimTraffic Performance Report Existing Conditions Two Way Ring Road SAT Peak Hour 7: Mall Entrance 4/Snelling Ave SB Ramps & CR B2 W Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL'=NNJR"=1F1R Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.8 1.0 3.5 Total Delay (hr) 3.8 2.9 0.3 4.2 4.0 0.1 0.6 1.5 0.7 0.2 2.9 0.2 Total DelNeh (s) 41.6 21.2 9.3 41.8 25.4 3.6 39.6 39.8 16.4 47.8 48.3 3.6 Vehicles Entered 325 492 130 358 553 59 56 130 142 14 213 238 Vehicles Exited 324 491 130 357 556 59 57 129 141 15 214 238 Houdy Exit Rate 324 491 130 357 556 59 57 129 141 15 214 238 Input Volume 375 560 120 350 556 60 60 120 140 15 215 225 %of Volume 86 88 109 102 100 98 95 108 101 100 99 106 7: Mall Entrance 4/Snellina Ave SB Movement Al Denied Delay (hr) 0.3 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.4 Total Delay (hr) 21.5 Total DelNeh (s) 28.1 Vehicles Entered 2710 Vehicles Exited 2711 Houdy Exit Rate 2711 Input Volume i 2796 %of Volume 97 & CR B2 W Performance by movement 8: CR B2 W & Snelling Ave NB Ramps Performance by movement BL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Al Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.6 _ Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.2 2.8 1.4 3.5 1.3 Total Delay (hr) 0.8 0.7 1.1 0.0 0.1 2.6 5.3 Total DelNeh (s) 13.0 6.2 10.1 2.2 27.0 15.6 11.6 Vehicles Entered 234 412 379 9 15 585 1634 Vehicles Exited 235 413 379 9 16 585 1637 Houdy Exit Rate 235 413 379 9 16 585 1637 Input Volume 265 450 380 10 15 580 1700 %of Volume 89 92 100 90 107 101 96 SimTraffic Report SimTraffic Performance Report Existing Conditions Two Way Ring Road SAT Peak Hour 9: Mall Entrance 1 Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR NBT SBT Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 - Total Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.5 1.3 Total DelNeh (s) 0.4 0.5 1.4 6.9 7.4 3.5 3.7 - Vehicles Entered 126 5 258 120 191 549 1249 Vehicles Exited 126 5 257 120 190 548 1246 Hourly Exit Rate 126 5 257 120 190 548 1246 Input Volume 130 5 250 110 170 495 1160 - %ofVolume 97 100 103 109 112 111 107 10: Performance by movement Movement WBL WBR NBT SBT Al Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 - Total Delay (hr) 0.7 0.0 0.5 0.8 2.0 Total DelNeh (s) 7.8 2.5 6.6 5.6 6.3 ' Vehicles Entered 327 31 246 540 1144 Vehicles Exited 327 31 246 539 1143 Hourly Exit Rate 327 31 246 539 1143 Input Volume 320 30 240 450 1040 %of Volume 102 102 103 120 110 11: Mall Entrance 2 Performance by movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBT SBR Pill Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (hr) 0.9 0.2 1.1 0.4 0.4 0.0 0.6 3.5 Total DelNeh (s) 15.1 11.1 17.2 4.8 6.4 7.7 6.4 9.6 Vehicles Entered 209 68 232 267 225 1 309 1311 Vehicles Exited 209 67 231 266 225 1 309 1308 Hourly Exit Rate 209 67 231 266 225 1 309 1308 Input Volume 200 70 130 145 235 1 320 1101 %of Volume 104 96 178 183 96 133 96 119 SimTraffic Report SimTraffic Performance Report Existing Conditions Two Way Ring Road SAT Peak Hour 12: Rosedale Shopping Ctr & Mall Entrance 3 Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBT SBR Al - Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 Total Delay (hr) 0.5 0.1 1.6 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.3 Total DelNeh (s) 12.2 2.9 17.1 3.1 0.6 0.4 0.9 8.4 - Vehicles Entered 136 147 334 112 183 2 77 991 Vehicles Exited 135 146 334 112 183 2 77 989 - Houdy Exit Rate 135 146 334 112 183 2 77 989 Input Volume 140 155 110' 330 175 1 80 991 - %ofVolume 96 94 304 34 104 267 97 100 13: Mall Entrance 4 Performance by movement Movement EBT WBT WBR SBL SBT SBR Al Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.9 3.6 0.0 0.0 0.9 Total Delay (hr) 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.3 1.1 Total DelNeh (s) 2.4 10.3 3.7 1.4 2.9 2.9 Vehicles Entered 226 50 328 367 0 334 1305 Vehicles Exited 225 49 328 366 0 334 1302 Houdy Exit Rate 225 49 328 366 0 334 1302 Input Volume = 226 50 320 360 0 325 1282 %of Volume 100 98 102 102 103 102 Total Zone Performance Denied Delay (hr) 3.2 Denied Del/Veh (s) 1.8 Total Delay (hr) 160.9 Total DelNeh (s) 679.1 Vehicles Entered 6381 Vehicles Exited 577 Houdy Exit Rate 577 Input Volume 27438 %of Volume 2 SimTraffic Report Queuing and Blocking Report Existing Conditions Two Way Ring Road SAT Peak Hour Intersection: 1: Fairview Ave & TH 36 EB Ramp Movement WB NB NB SB SB S Directions Served LR T T L T T Maximum Queue (ft) 357 194 226 391 243 105 Average Queue (ft) 98 71 88 186 26 36 95th Queue (ft) 300 166 196 329 117 87 - Link Distance (ft) 395 1169 1169 734 734 Upstream BIk Time (%) 7 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) ' 380 Storage BIk Time (%) 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) • 0 1 Intersection: 2: Fairview Ave & TH 36 WB Ramps - EB EB EB WB WB NB NB I NB NB SB SB SB Directions Served L T R LT TR L T T R L T T Maximum Queue (ft) 118 120 104 202 224 235 589 679 896 349 294 221 Average Queue (ft) 51 43 21 107 31 143 381 454 310 206 168 118 95th Queue (ft) 102 97 64 177 122 254 626 703 942 314 265 191 Link Distance (ft) 373 316 316 734 734 734 462 462 462 Upstream BIk Time (%) 0 1 14 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 3 53 Storage Bay Dist (ft) �170 170 210 Storage BIk Time (%) 0 0 1 11 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 4 19 0 Intersection: 2: Fairview Ave & TH 36 WB Ra Move Directions Served R Maximum Queue (ft) 98 Average Queue (ft) 38 95th Queue (ft) 75 Link Distance (ft) Upstream BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 300 Storage BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) SimTraffic Report Queuing and Blocking Report Existing Conditions Two Way Ring Road SAT Peak Hour Intersection: 3: Fairview Ave & Mall Entrance 1 Movement EB WB WB WB NB I NB NB MB NB 5"=NR"==JR Directions Served LTR L LT R L T T T R L T TR Maximum Queue (ft) 42 186 195 100 179 281 460 433 275 184 368 385 Average Queue (ft) 13 77 150 60 84 91 132 206 44 79 168 241 95th Queue (ft) 38 155 224 135 148 190 333 335 196 161 327 371 Link Distance (ft) 241 135 135 462 462 462 405 405 Upstream BIk Time (%) 3 18 0 0 0 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 7 45 1 0 0 3 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 50 260 250 160 Storage BIk Time (%) 43 2 0 3 0 0 6 Queuing Penalty (veh) 68 3 0 8 0 2 9 Intersection: 4: Fairview Ave & CR B2 W - EB EB EB WB WB WB NB NB NB NB SB SB Directions Served L T TR L T TR L T T R L T Maximum Queue (ft) 176 539 651 204 274 278 192 153 174 30 160 237 Average Queue (ft) 82 195 339 133 93 137 92 86 99 1 74 124 95th Queue (ft) 154 590 764 213 220 234 167 140 159 22 136 214 Link Distance (ft) 1154 1154 260 260 405 405 405 1122 Upstream BIk Time (%) 0 1 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 4 2 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 160 180 200 300 Storage BIk Time (%) 1 2 4 0 1 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 7 1 1 0 Intersection: 4: Fairview Ave & CR B2 W Directions Served TR Maximum Queue (ft) 281 Average Queue (ft) 175 95th Queue (ft) 271 Link Distance (ft) 1122 Upstream BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) SimTraffic Report Queuing and Blocking Report Existing Conditions Two Way Ring Road SAT Peak Hour Intersection: 5: Mall Entrance 2 & CR B2 W Movement EB EB EB EB WB WB WB N NB NB Directions Served L T T R L T TR LT R LTR Maximum Queue (it) 75 219 256 342 138 186 154 246 284 125 Average Queue (it) 39 97 88 24 48 37 39 148 89 53 95th Queue (it) 80 199 197 165 106 111 120 230 202 101 Link Distance (it) 260 260 260 1061 1061 264 264 128 Upstream BIk Time (%) 0 0 0 0 1 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 2 1 1 0 Storage Bay Dist (it) 50 120 Storage BIk Time (%) 4 18 1 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 14 20 3 1 Intersection: 6: Mall Entrance 3 & CR B2 W - EB EB EB EB WB WB WB SB SB Directions Served L T T R L T T R LT R L LT Maximum Queue (it) 164 208 176 141 149 310 292 165 142 106 222 172 Average Queue (it) 71 93 69 50 32 202 185 75 87 58 117 55 95th Queue (it) 138 174 139 108 93 296 279 187 144 101 189 134 Link Distance (it) 1061 1061 687 687 99 99 427 427 Upstream BIk Time (%) 14 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 32 1 Storage Bay Dist (it) 160 20 240 140 Storage BIk Time (%) 0 2 2 0 5 22 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 3 3 16 0 � Intersection: 6: Mall Entrance 3 & CR B2 W Directions Served R Maximum Queue (it) 67 Average Queue (it) 24 95th Queue (it) 51 Link Distance (it) 427 Upstream BIk Time (%) i Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (it) Storage BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) SimTraffic Report Queuing and Blocking Report Existing Conditions Two Way Ring Road SAT Peak Hour Intersection: 7: Mall Entrance 4/Snelling Ave SB Ramps & CR B2 W Movement —&W.— EB EB EB WB WB WB Directions Served L T T R L L T T L T R L Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) 315 343 212 182 242 265 250 203 244 175 122 100 52 126 118 138 124 139 277 234 173 121 204 205 209 185 249 687 687 667 667 147 13 14 f[Y�>f�7L�>f�lL�l Intersection: 7: Mall Entrance 4/Snelling Ave SB Ramps & CR B2 W Directions Served T R Maximum Queue (ft) 312 211 Average Queue (ft) 150 35 95th Queue (ft) 260 144 Link Distance (ft) 519 Upstream BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 250 Storage BIk Time (%) 11 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) i 27 0 Intersection: 8: CR B2 W & Snellina Ave NB Ram 62 52 145 58 47 20 65 55 76 147 147 150 Move WB WB WB SB S Directions Served L T T T T R L R Maximum Queue (ft) 172 70 100 193 122 8 281 260 - Average Queue (ft) 72 14 35 77 27 0 43 156 95th Queue (ft) 135 46 80 150 81 4 201 260 Link Distance (ft) 667 667 1171 1171 380 Upstream BIk Time (%) 0 — Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 270 200 240 Storage BIk Time (%) 0 3 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 SimTraffic Report Queuing and Blocking Report Existing Conditions Two Way Ring Road SAT Peak Hour Intersection: 9: Mall Entrance 1 Movement NB SB SB SB Directions Served T T R R Maximum Queue (ft) 67 72 92 178 Average Queue (ft) 35 30 6 40 95th Queue (ft) 55 52 53 136 Link Distance (ft) 476 155 155 155 Upstream BIk Time (%) 0 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 3 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 10 IIII&B SB SB Directions Served L R T T T Maximum Queue (ft) 120 46 95 60 80 - Average Queue (ft) 54 19 46 35 45 95th Queue (ft) 96 43 74 52 68 Link Distance (ft) 331 331 155 182 182 Upstream BIk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 11: Mall Entrance 2 Movement EB EB WB WB SB S Directions Served LT T T TR L R Maximum Queue (ft) — 143 54 104 238 35 48 Average Queue (ft) 74 6 40 83 4 9 95th Queue (ft) 125 31 71 174 22 32 Link Distance (ft) 182 182 357 357 264 264 Upstream BIk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) SimTraffic Report Queuing and Blocking Report Existing Conditions Two Way Ring Road SAT Peak Hour Intersection: 12: Rosedale Shopping Ctr & Mall Entrance 3 Movement EB WB SB Directions Served LT T L Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) 130 187 26 55 96 2 100 158 13 493 589 99 Intersection: 13: Mall Entrance 4 EB WB WB Directions Served T T R Maximum Queue (ft) 45 92 168 Average Queue (ft) 27 30 14 95th Queue (ft) 48 69 96 - Link Distance (ft) 589 627 Upstream BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 Storage BIk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Zone Summa Zone wide Queuing Penalty: 399 SimTraffic Report SimTraffic Performance Report 5-Year Background Two Way Ring Road PM Peak Hour 1: Fairview Ave & TH 36 EB Ramp Performance by movement Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Al Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.5 0.5 0.3 2.7 0.0 0.0 0.4 Total Delay (hr) 1.1 0.3 2.4 0.1 2.0 1.1 7.1 Total DelNeh (s) 53.2 3.6 13.6 4.0 19.9 6.3 11.8 Vehicles Entered 73 344 633 129 357 623 2159 Vehicles Exited 73 342 631 128 356 624 2154 Houdy Exit Rate 73 342 631 128 356 624 2154 Input Volume 75 350 665 120 345 600 2155 %of Volume 98 98 95 107 103 104 100 2: Fairview Ave & TH 36 WB Ramps Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (hr) 1.1 0.8 0.2 1.1 2.2 0.4 2.2 7.9 0.2 2.9 4.1 0.2 Total DelNeh (s) 43.3 39.8 1.8 40.2 41.3 4.1 49.0 38.9 7.1 41.4 26.1 5.7 Vehicles Entered 87 75 326 99 190 346 157 704 112 250 554 103 Vehicles Exited 87 74 325 99 190 346 156 704 113 250 557 103 Houdy Exit Rate 87 74 325 _ 99 190 346 156 704 113 250 557 103 Input Volume 85 75 320= 95 190 350 160 740 115 250 531 95 %of Volume 103 99 101 104 100 99 98 95 98 100 105 109 2: Fairview Ave & TH 36 WB Ramps Performance by movement uemea ueay tnr/ U. i Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 Total Delay (hr) 23.2 Total DelNeh (s) 27.4 Vehicles Entered 3003 Vehicles Exited 3004 Houdy Exit Rate 3004 Input Volume 3006 %of Volume 100 SimTraffic Report SimTraffic Performance Report 5-Year Background Two Way Ring Road PM Peak Hour 3: Fairview Ave & Mall Entrance 1 Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBit SBL�S!! Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (hr) 0.1 0.1 0.0 2.2 0.1 0.1 0.6 3.9 0.2 0.3 2.6 0.0 Total DelNeh (s) 59.7 68.5 13.7 41.0 9.7 4.0 17.3 15.7 6.5 13.9 12.9 8.9 Vehicles Entered 6 3 4 186 29 105 116 885 137 69 717 10 Vehicles Exited 6 3 4 186 29 105 115 885 137 70 718 10 Hourly Exit Rate 6 3 4 186 29 105 115 885 137 70 718 10 Input Volume 5 5 5 170 25 95 120 916 140 80 700 10 %of Volume 120 60 80 109 115 111 96 97 98 88 102 100 3: Fairview Ave & Mall Entrance 1 Performance by movement Movement Al Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 - Total Delay (hr) 10.1 Total DelNeh (s) 16.0 - Vehicles Entered 2267 Vehicles Exited 2268 Hourly Exit Rate 2268 Input Volume 2271 %of Volume 100 4: Fairview Ave & CR B2 W Performance by movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Delay (hr) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 2.5 0.4 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.1 0.3 0.3 Total Delay (hr) 0.9 5.1 1.5 1.8 1.1 0.7 1.7 4.4 0.8 1.3 3.5 0.6 Total DelNeh (s) 21.2 32.7 27.5 29.1 19.5 13.4 37.1 39.3 6.8 25.9 32.6 25.7 Vehicles Entered 148 553 194 221 203 181 161 396 439 181 384 90 Vehicles Exited 148 553 194 222 202 182 162 400 438 182 380 89 Hourly Exit Rate 148 553 194 222 202 182 162 400 438 182 380 89 Input Volume 150 550 190 215 196 165 165 405 445 180 385 90 %of Volume 99 101 102 103 103 110 98 99 98 101 99 99 4: Fairview Ave & CR B2 W Performance by movement Movement Al Denied Delay (hr) 0.4 Denied Del/Veh (s) - 0.4 Total Delay (hr) 23.5 Total DelNeh (s) 26.5 Vehicles Entered 3151 Vehicles Exited 3152 Hourly Exit Rate 3152 Input Volume 3136 %of Volume 101 SimTraffic Report SimTraffic Performance Report 5-Year Background Two Way Ring Road PM Peak Hour 5: Mall Entrance 2 & CR B2 W Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WB% NBL NBi t SBL�S!! Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 Total Delay (hr) 0.2 2.0 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.0 1.6 0.1 0.5 0.4 0.1 0.2 Total DelNeh (s) 10.4 8.0 5.8 10.8 4.2 3.1 44.9 41.5 12.6 40.9 40.5 14.9 Vehicles Entered 68 913 194 98 439 30 129 6 129 37 6 42 Vehicles Exited 68 914 195 100 441 30 130 7 128 37 6 42 Houdy Exit Rate 68 914 195 100 441 30 130 7 128 37 6 42 Input Volume 70 901 205 110 455 30 95 5 95 35 5 40 %of Volume 97 101 95 91 97 99 137 140 135 105 120 104 5: Mall Entrance 2 & CR B2 W Performance by movement Movement Al Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 Total Delay (hr) 6.2 Total DelNeh (s) 10.6 Vehicles Entered 2091 Vehicles Exited 2098 Houdy Exit Rate 2098 Input Volume 2046 %of Volume 103 6: Mall Entrance 3 & CR B2 W Performance by movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 _ Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.1 Total Delay (hr) 0.5 1.9 0.1 0.2 3.2 0.2 0.8 0.1 0.3 2.1 0.1 0.1 Total DelNeh (s) 12.5 7.6 2.4 22.9 22.3 8.1 46.2 35.2 13.3 42.2 36.3 4.9 Vehicles Entered 142 874 109 28 521 82 63 8 90 179 11 50 Vehicles Exited 143 873 109 28 518 82 64 7 90 178 11 51 Houdy Exit Rate 143 873 109 28 518 82 64 7 90 178 11 51 Input Volume 145 825 110 30 506 85 105 11 165 185 10 55 %of Volume 99 106 99 93 102 97 61 64 55 96 110 92 6: Mall Entrance 3 & CR B2 W Performance by movement Movement Al Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) - 0.0 Total Delay (hr) 9.6 Total DelNeh (s) 15.9 Vehicles Entered 2157 Vehicles Exited 2154 Houdy Exit Rate 2154 Input Volume 2232 %of Volume 97 SimTraffic Report SimTraffic Performance Report 5-Year Background Two Way Ring Road PM Peak Hour 7: Mall Entrance 4/Snelling Ave SB Ramps & CR B2 W Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBLNS!! Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.7 0.8 3.6 Total Delay (hr) 2.5 4.2 0.2 2.5 2.4 0.1 0.3 0.8 0.2 0.3 1.5 0.2 Total DelNeh (s) 37.4 17.9 8.0 ■ 42.3 19.9 3.2 36.4 37.5 7.2 41.1 38.8 2.7 Vehicles Entered 239 838 75 205 421 63 32 74 79 26 133 215 Vehicles Exited 239 841 74 205 423 63 32 74 79 27 133 214 Houdy Exit Rate 239 841 74 205 423 63 32 74 79 27 133 214 Input Volume 260 855 70 205 405 65 35 70 80 25 125 215 %of Volume 92 98 105 100 104 97 91 105 99 107 106 99 7: Mall Entrance 4/Snellina Ave SB Movement Al Denied Delay (hr) 0.3 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.4 Total Delay (hr) 15.0 Total DelNeh (s) 22.2 Vehicles Entered 2400 Vehicles Exited 2404 Houdy Exit Rate 2404 Input Volume i 241Ah %of Volume 100 & CR B2 W Performance by movement 8: CR B2 W & Snelling Ave NB Ramps Performance by movement BT WBT WBR SBL SBR AI Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.4 _ Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.2 3.0 0.8 3.6 0.8 Total Delay (hr) 0.8 0.7 0.5 0.0 0.4 0.7 3.2 Total DelNeh (s) 10.3 3.8 4.5 2.9 43.2 8.2 6.6 Vehicles Entered 290 659 372 57 34 314 1726 Vehicles Exited 288 658 373 57 34 315 1725 Houdy Exit Rate 288 658 373 57 34 315 1725 Input Volume 300 661 355 55 30 320 1722 %of Volume 96 100 105 103 112 98 100 SimTraffic Report SimTraffic Performance Report 5-Year Background Two Way Ring Road PM Peak Hour 9: Mall Entrance 1 Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR NBT SBT Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.4 Total DelNeh (s) 0.4 1.0 1.2 6.2 5.9 0.8 2.1 - Vehicles Entered 69 1 141 68 93 321 693 Vehicles Exited 69 1 141 69 93 321 694 Hourly Exit Rate 69 1 141 69 93 321 694 Input Volume 75 1 150 60 85 290 660 - %ofVolume 92 133 94 115 110 111 105 10: Performance by movement Movement WBL WBR NB T Al Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 - Total Delay (hr) 0.3 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.6 Total DelNeh (s) 5.9 2.2 3.5 1.3 3.0 Vehicles Entered 180 20 138 323 661 Vehicles Exited 179 20 138 323 660 Hourly Exit Rate 179 20 138 323 660 Input Volume 180 20 135 270 605 %of Volume 99 100 102 120 109 11: Mall Entrance 2 Performance by movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBT SBR Al Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (hr) 0.2 0.1 0.4 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.3 1.3 Total DelNeh (s) 7.1 6.8 9.3 2.5 5.8 4.0 5.6 6.1 Vehicles Entered 123 53 140 141 119 1 182 759 Vehicles Exited 123 53 142 141 119 1 181 760 Hourly Exit Rate 123 53 142 141 119 1 181 760 Input Volume 115 50 80 80 130 1 190 646 %of Volume 107 105 178 177 92 133 95 118 SimTraffic Report SimTraffic Performance Report 5-Year Background Two Way Ring Road PM Peak Hour 12: Rosedale Shopping Ctr & Mall Entrance 3 Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Al Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.1 Total Delay (hr) 0.2 0.1 0.6 0.1 0.0 0.0 1.0 Total DelNeh (s) 6.4 3.9 12.2 3.4 0.5 0.8 6.0 - Vehicles Entered 88 85 185 72 97 50 577 Vehicles Exited 88 84 185 72 98 50 577 Houdy Exit Rate 88 84 185 72 98 50 577 Input Volume 90 90 65 190 100 50 586 - %ofVolume 98 93 284 38 98 100 99 13: Mall Entrance 4 Performance by movement Movement EBT WBT WBR SBL SBT SBR Al Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.2 3.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 Total Delay (hr) 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.6 Total DelNeh (s) 3.0 7.6 2.6 1.3 1.8 2.6 2.6 Vehicles Entered 144 50 185 227 2 185 793 Vehicles Exited 144 50 186 227 2 185 794 Houdy Exit Rate 144 50 186 227 2 185 794 Input Volume = 150 50 185 220 1 180 787 %of Volume 96 100 100 103 267 103 101 Total Zone Performance Denied Delay (hr) 1.5 Denied Del/Veh (s) 1.0 Total Delay (hr) 101.6 Total DelNeh (s) 649.6 Vehicles Entered 5569 Vehicles Exited 390 Houdy Exit Rate 390 Input Volume 22264 %of Volume 2 SimTraffic Report Queuing and Blocking Report 5-Year Background Two Way Ring Road PM Peak Hour Intersection: 1: Fairview Ave & TH 36 EB Ramp Movement WB NB NB SB SB Directions Served LR T T L T T Maximum Queue (it) 116 220 245 290 110 116 Average Queue (it) 60 83 89 128 31 54 95th Queue (it) 104 191 211 229 85 113 Link Distance (it) 395 1169 1169 734 734 Upstream BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (it) 380 Storage BIk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 2: Fairview Ave & TH 36 WB Ramps - EB EB WB WB NB NB SB SB SB Directions Served L T R LT TR L T T R L T T Maximum Queue (it) 111 95 87 285 253 232 357 580 323 272 243 233 Average Queue (it) 44 29 17 156 69 118 178 250 19 144 142 119 95th Queue (it) 91 76 57 242 197 214 310 436 180 233 224 202 Link Distance (it) 373 316 316 734 734 734 462 462 462 Upstream BIk Time (%) 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 Storage Bay Dist (it) 170 170 210 Storage BIk Time (%) 0 3 Queuing Penalty (veh) 4 Intersection: 2: Fairview Ave & TH 36 WB Ra Directions Served R Maximum Queue (it) Average Queue (it) 33 95th Queue (it) Link Distance (it) Upstream BIk Time (%) _ Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (it) 300 Storage BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) SimTraffic Report Queuing and Blocking Report 5-Year Background Two Way Ring Road PM Peak Hour Intersection: 3: Fairview Ave & Mall Entrance 1 Movement EB WB WB WB NB I NB NB I NB NB Directions Served LTR L LT R L T T T R L T TR Maximum Queue (ft) 55 143 197 100 157 217 402 315 89 122 273 295 Average Queue (ft) 14 45 96 31 47 85 100 122 4 35 73 142 95th Queue (ft) 41 107 173 105 108 171 255 254 47 77 177 267 Link Distance (ft) 241 135 135 462 462 462 405 405 Upstream BIk Time (%) 0 4 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 6 0 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 50 260 250 160 Storage BIk Time (%) 29 0 0 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 28 0 0 1 0 Intersection: 4: Fairview Ave & CR B2 W - EB EB EB WB WB WB NB SB SB -NB Directions Served L T TR L T TR L T T R L T Maximum Queue (ft) 185 328 342 176 156 205 186 201 209 32 194 231 Average Queue (ft) 89 172 191 100 45 96 94 105 120 1 86 96 95th Queue (ft) 178 287 309 164 99 163 169 174 187 23 160 186 Link Distance (ft) 1154 1154 260 260 405 405 405 1122 Upstream BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 160 18�_ 200 300 Storage BIk Time (%) 0 12 0 0 1 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 18 n 1 0 Intersection: 4: Fairview Ave & CR B2 W Directions Served TR Maximum Queue (ft) 261 Average Queue (ft) 147 95th Queue (ft) 233 Link Distance (ft) 1122 Upstream BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) SimTraffic Report Queuing and Blocking Report 5-Year Background Two Way Ring Road PM Peak Hour Intersection: 5: Mall Entrance 2 & CR B2 W Movement -&6.- EB EB E6 WB I WB WB Directions Served L T T R L T TR LT R LTR Maximum Queue (it) 71 248 277 332 93 91 122 178 112 104 - Average Queue (it) 24 69 78 31 42 22 33 98 51 44 95th Queue (it) 56 190 219 176 79 65 91 165 87 88 Link Distance (it) 260 260 260 419 419 299 299 114 Upstream BIk Time (%) 0 1 0 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 2 2 0 Storage Bay Dist (it) 50 120 Storage BIk Time (%) 1 7 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 4 5 0 0 — EB EB EB El WB WB WB SB SB Directions Served L T T R L T T R LT R L LT Maximum Queue (it) 136 184 173 76 59 220 224 165 133 101 175 153 Average Queue (it) 48 79 65 18 19 109 111 39 68 45 96 34 95th Queue (it) 96 153 134 52 47 195 196 114 127 81 156 98 Link Distance (it) 644 644 687 687 106 106 427 427 Upstream BIk Time (%) 4 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 6 0 Storage Bay Dist (it) 20 240 140 Storage BIk Time (%) 1 1 0 0 4 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 4 0 Intersection: 6: Mall Entrance 3 & CR B2 W Directions Served R Maximum Queue (it) 53 Average Queue (it) 21 95th Queue (it) 44 Link Distance (it) 427 Upstream BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (it) Storage BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) SimTraffic Report Queuing and Blocking Report 5-Year Background Two Way Ring Road PM Peak Hour Intersection: 7: Mall Entrance 4/Snelling Ave SB Ramps & CR B2 W Movement DEB EB EB WB WB WB Directions Served L T T R L L T T L T R L Maximum Queue (ft) 266 311 322 185 160 144 176 171 82 173 49 77 Average Queue (ft) 135 165 159 49 80 72 90 89 24 59 41 24 95th Queue (ft) 222 269 271 152 137 131 150 145 61 134 59 63 Link Distance (ft) 687 687 667 667 147 147 147 Upstream BIk Time (%) 2 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 300 160 270 270 150 Storage BIk Time (%) 0 7 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 5 0 Intersection: 7: Mall Entrance 4/Snelling Ave SB Ramps & CR B2 W � sB � � ■ Directions Served T R Maximum Queue (ft) 190 76 Average Queue (ft) 86 12 95th Queue (ft) 144 53 Link Distance (ft) 519 Upstream BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 250 Storage BIk Time (%) 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 8: CR B2 W & Snellina Ave NB Ram Mov MEINEWMIRIEr EB EB WB WB WB SB S Directions Served L T T T T R L R Maximum Queue (ft) 151 61 81 116 74 68 94 152 Average Queue (ft) 71 9 18 39 20 6 29 68 95th Queue (ft) 125 35 53 86 58 34 68 112 Link Distance (ft) 667 667 1171 1171 380 Upstream BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 270 200 240 Storage BIk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 SimTraffic Report Queuing and Blocking Report 5-Year Background Two Way Ring Road PM Peak Hour Intersection: 9: Mall Entrance 1 Movement NB SB Directions Served T T R Maximum Queue (ft) 56 50 39 Average Queue (ft) 29 23 2 95th Queue (ft) 48 37 21 Link Distance (ft) 476 155 155 Upstream BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 10: Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) _jL L R T 84 32 50 36 12 28 64 33 45 331 331 155 Intersection: 11: Mall Entrance 2 Mov EB EB WB WB SB S Directions Served LT T T TR L R Maximum Queue (ft) 89 24 57 114 15 39 Average Queue (ft) 49 1 30 41 1 5 95th Queue (ft) 77 9 52 82 6 22 Link Distance (ft) 182 182 357 357 299 299 Upstream BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) SimTraffic Report Queuing and Blocking Report 5-Year Background Two Way Ring Road PM Peak Hour Intersection: 12: Rosedale Shopping Ctr & Mall Entrance 3 Movement EB WB Directions Served LT T Maximum Queue (ft) 84 103 Average Queue (ft) 40 53 95th Queue (ft) 64 85 Link Distance (ft) 493 589 Upstream BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 13: Mall Entrance 4 Directions Served T T Maximum Queue (ft) 52 51 Average Queue (ft) 26 27 95th Queue (ft) 48 50 Link Distance (ft) 589 627 Upstream BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Zone Summa Zone wide Queuing Penalty: 96 SimTraffic Report SimTraffic Performance Report 5-Year Background Two Way Ring Road SAT Peak Hour 1: Fairview Ave & TH 36 EB Ramp Performance by movement Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Al Denied Delay (hr) 0.3 3.3 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 3.8 Denied Del/Veh (s) 19.2 19.4 0.3 2.8 0.0 0.0 5.7 Total Delay (hr) 1.4 1.8 2.0 0.1 3.3 0.8 9.4 Total DelNeh (s) 79.5 10.9 12.2 3.9 22.8 5.3 14.1 Vehicles Entered 64 600 571 99 514 536 2384 Vehicles Exited 64 599 573 99 513 537 2385 Houdy Exit Rate 64 599 573 99 513 537 2385 Input Volume 65 615 560 90 525 540 2395 %of Volume 98 97 102 110 98 99 100 2: Fairview Ave & TH 36 WB Ramps Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.2 0.5 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (hr) 1.3 1.5 0.2 0.5 1.6 0.6 5.0 29.4 0.9 4.2 4.1 0.2 Total DelNeh (s) 47.3 50.4 2.1 40.2 38.7 4.1 98.6 113.2 31.4 41.3 21.0 5.5 Vehicles Entered 99 104 309 47 153 486 175 901 101 362 696 161 Vehicles Exited 99 105 309 46 153 486 174 894 101 364 695 160 Houdy Exit Rate 99 105 309 46 153 486 174 894 101 364 695 160 Input Volume 95 100 320 50 145 485 175 910 95 365 695 155 %of Volume 104 105 96 92 106 100 99 98 107 100 100 103 2: Fairview Ave & TH 36 WB Ramps Performance by movement uemea ueay tnr/ U. i Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 Total Delay (hr) 49.6 Total DelNeh (s) 48.9 Vehicles Entered 3594 Vehicles Exited 3586 Houdy Exit Rate 3586 Input Volume 3591 %of Volume 100 SimTraffic Report SimTraffic Performance Report 5-Year Background Two Way Ring Road SAT Peak Hour 3: Fairview Ave & Mall Entrance 1 Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL�S!! Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (hr) 0.1 0.1 0.0 3.1 0.2 0.4 1.5 7.6 0.6 1.1 6.3 0.1 Total DelNeh (s) 49.9 53.6 9.4 35.1 15.7 7.6 27.1 26.1 8.8 26.4 25.2 24.3 Vehicles Entered 6 7 5 311 49 180 204 1048 228 145 899 15 Vehicles Exited 6 7 5 312 49 180 203 1048 228 145 898 15 Houdy Exit Rate 6 7 5 312 49 180 203 1048 228 145 898 15 Input Volume 5 ' 5 290 45 160 205 1050 235 145 916 15 %of Volume 120 140 100 108 108 112 99 100 97 100 98 100 3: Fairview Ave & Mall Entrance 1 Performance by movement Movement Al Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 Total Delay (hr) 21.1 Total DelNeh (s) 24.4 Vehicles Entered 3097 Vehicles Exited 3096 Houdy Exit Rate 3096 Input Volume 3076 %of Volume 101 4: Fairview Ave & CR B2 W Performance by movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Delay (hr) 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 2.6 0.4 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.9 0.4 0.3 Total Delay (hr) 1.0 4.6 5.3 2.5 1.9 1.2 1.9 3.3 1.8 1.2 4.6 1.1 Total DelNeh (s) 22.1 52.0 68.0 28.4 21.7 17.8 36.8 29.5 9.6 25.0 34.9 30.9 Vehicles Entered 165 314 275 319 321 238 177 392 657 162 466 126 Vehicles Exited 166 316 273 320 322 238 176 395 657 161 466 126 Houdy Exit Rate 166 316 273 320 322 238 176 395 657 161 466 126 Input Volume 165 320 275 320 316 240 180 380 650 150 480 125 %of Volume 101 99 99 100 102 99 98 104 101 107 97 101 4: Fairview Ave & CR B2 W Performance by movement Movement Al Denied Delay (hr) 0.4 Denied Del/Veh (s) - 0.4 Total Delay (hr) 30.3 Total DelNeh (s) 29.8 Vehicles Entered 3612 Vehicles Exited 3616 Houdy Exit Rate 3616 Input Volume 3602 %of Volume 100 SimTraffic Report SimTraffic Performance Report 5-Year Background Two Way Ring Road SAT Peak Hour 5: Mall Entrance 2 & CR B2 W Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WB% NBL NBT NBR SBL�S!! Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.1 Total Delay (hr) 0.6 2.6 0.6 0.9 2.3 0.1 2.5 0.4 0.8 0.2 0.1 0.3 Total DelNeh (s) 18.1 14.0 6.3 19.4 12.0 8.4 42.2 43.8 13.3 36.6 34.1 13.0 Vehicles Entered 118 670 346 162 691 44 213 29 224 21 12 74 Vehicles Exited 118 668 348 161 687 44 213 29 223 22 12 74 Houdy Exit Rate 118 668 348 161 687 44 213 29 223 22 12 74 Input Volume 110 660 350 190 750 50 160 25 160 20 15 70 %of Volume 108 101 99 85 92 88 133 115 139 110 80 105 5: Mall Entrance 2 & CR B2 W Performance by movement Movement Al Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 Total Delay (hr) 11.4 Total DelNeh (s) 15.7 Vehicles Entered 2604 Vehicles Exited 2599 Houdy Exit Rate 2599 Input Volume 2561 %of Volume 101 6: Mall Entrance 3 & CR B2 W Performance by movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 _ Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.3 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.2 Total Delay (hr) 1.3 2.8 0.3 0.4 7.9 0.3 1.1 0.1 0.6 2.9 0.1 0.2 Total DelNeh (s) 23.9 18.0 5.8 26.8 38.2 14.1 43.7 40.6 15.2 39.9 35.9 7.4 Vehicles Entered 192 563 204 51 732 66 92 10 138 260 15 78 Vehicles Exited 191 562 204 51 731 66 92 9 139 260 15 78 Houdy Exit Rate 191 562 204 51 731 66 92 9 139 260 15 78 Input Volume 180 515 190 50 740 75 180 16 275 255 15 75 %of Volume 106 109 107 101 99 88 51 57 51 102 100 104 6: Mall Entrance 3 & CR B2 W Performance by movement Movement Al Denied Delay (hr) 0.1 Denied Del/Veh (s) - 0.1 Total Delay (hr) 18.0 Total DelNeh (s) 26.8 Vehicles Entered 2401 Vehicles Exited 2398 i Houdy Exit Rate 2398 Input Volume 2566 %of Volume 93 SimTraffic Report SimTraffic Performance Report 5-Year Background Two Way Ring Road SAT Peak Hour 7: Mall Entrance 4/Snelling Ave SB Ramps & CR B2 W Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL'=NNJR"=1F1R Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.3 0.9 3.5 Total Delay (hr) 4.4 3.1 0.3 4.0 4.0 0.1 0.6 1.2 0.5 0.2 3.0 0.2 Total DelNeh (s) 44.3 21.8 9.5 40.1 25.5 3.7 37.9 35.8 12.5 44.0 47.2 3.5 Vehicles Entered 353 509 125 353 561 62 57 115 148 15 217 231 Vehicles Exited 351 508 126 356 562 62 56 116 148 15 221 232 Houdy Exit Rate 351 508 126 356 562 62 56 116 148 15 221 232 Input Volume 385 565 120 350 571 65 60 120 140 15 215 235 %of Volume 91 90 105 102 98 95 93 97 106 100 103 99 7: Mall Entrance 4/Snellina Ave SB Movement Al Denied Delay (hr) 0.3 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.4 Total Delay (hr) 21.6 Total DelNeh (s) 27.9 Vehicles Entered 2746 Vehicles Exited 2753 Houdy Exit Rate 2753 Input Volume i 2841 %of Volume 97 & CR B2 W Performance by movement 8: CR B2 W & Snelling Ave NB Ramps Performance by movement BL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Al Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.6 _ Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.2 3.3 1.1 3.5 1.3 Total Delay (hr) 0.9 0.7 1.2 0.0 0.1 2.6 5.5 Total DelNeh (s) 13.6 6.0 10.7 1.6 29.2 15.8 11.8 Vehicles Entered 249 425 391 10 14 585 1674 Vehicles Exited 248 426 390 10 14 585 1673 Houdy Exit Rate 248 426 390 10 14 585 1673 Input Volume 275 450 390 10 15 595 1735 %of Volume 90 95 100 100 93 98 96 SimTraffic Report SimTraffic Performance Report 5-Year Background Two Way Ring Road SAT Peak Hour 9: Mall Entrance 1 Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR NBT Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.5 1.2 Total DelNeh (s) 0.5 0.6 1.4 6.9 7.4 3.2 3.5 Vehicles Entered 128 6 245 104 188 540 1211 Vehicles Exited 129 6 245 104 188 540 1212 Houdy Exit Rate 129 6 245 104 188 540 1212 Input Volume 130 5 250 110 170 495 1160 %of Volume 99 120 98 95 110 109 104 10: Performance by movement Movement WBL WBR NBT&SBT Al Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 ' Total Delay (hr) 0.6 0.0 0.4 0.8 1.9 Total DelNeh (s) 7.1 2.9 6.8 5.6 6.2 Vehicles Entered 315 29 232 540 1116 Vehicles Exited 314 29 232 540 1115 Houdy Exit Rate 314 29 232 540 1115 Input Volume 320 30 240 450 1040 %of Volume 98 96 97 120 107 11: Mall Entrance 2 Performance by movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBT SBR Pill Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (hr) 0.8 0.2 1.1 0.4 0.4 0.0 0.5 3.5 Total DelNeh (s) 15.5 11.5 17.0 5.1 6.1 9.3 6.3 9.7 Vehicles Entered 197 65 234 268 215 1 305 1285 Vehicles Exited 196 64 235 269 215 1 305 1285 Houdy Exit Rate 196 64 235 269 215 1 305 1285 Input Volume 200 70 130 145 235 1 320 1101 %of Volume 98 92 181 186 92 133 95 117 SimTraffic Report SimTraffic Performance Report 5-Year Background Two Way Ring Road SAT Peak Hour 12: Rosedale Shopping Ctr & Mall Entrance 3 Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBT SBR Al Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 Total Delay (hr) 0.4 0.1 1.6 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.3 Total DelNeh (s) 10.2 3.0 17.5 3.1 0.7 0.3 0.9 8.3 - Vehicles Entered 137 133 331 102 181 2 87 973 Vehicles Exited 137 134 332 102 181 2 87 975 - Houdy Exit Rate 137 134 332 102 181 2 87 975 Input Volume 140 155 110 330 175 1 80 991 - %ofVolume 98 86 303 31 103 267 109 98 13: Mall Entrance 4 Performance by movement Movement EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Al Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.3 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.9 3.6 0.0 0.0 0.9 Total Delay (hr) 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.3 1.0 Total DelNeh (s) 2.6 10.1 3.1 1.4 2.9 2.8 Vehicles Entered 222 47 321 373 330 1293 Vehicles Exited 221 47 320 373 330 1291 Houdy Exit Rate 221 47 320 373 330 1291 Input Volume = 226 50 320 360 325 1282 %of Volume 98 94 100 104 101 101 Total Zone Performance Denied Delay (hr) 5.6 Denied Del/Veh (s) 3.1 Total Delay (hr) 176.8 Total DelNeh (s) 755.2 Vehicles Entered 6517 Vehicles Exited 573 Houdy Exit Rate 573 Input Volume 27940 %of Volume 2 SimTraffic Report Queuing and Blocking Report 5-Year Background Two Way Ring Road SAT Peak Hour Intersection: 1: Fairview Ave & TH 36 EB Ramp Movement WB NB NB SB SB Directions Served LR T T L T T Maximum Queue (it) 431 152 211 356 252 114 Average Queue (it) 190 65 85 192 22 34 95th Queue (it) 467 134 180 327 120 89 Link Distance (it) 395 1169 1169 734 734 Upstream BIk Time (%) 18 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (it) 380 Storage BIk Time (%) 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 2 Intersection: 2: Fairview Ave & TH 36 WB Ramps - EB EB EB WB WB NB NB SB Directions Served L T R LT TR L T T R L T T Maximum Queue (it) 132 147 96 215 250 235 666 738 916 374 281 209 Average Queue (it) 56 55 17 109 32 157 482 566 606 212 171 118 95th Queue (it) 111 117 62 183 128 267 693 789 1207 324 260 195 Link Distance (it) 373 316 316 734 734 734 462 462 462 Upstream BIk Time (%) 0 2 36 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 8 143 Storage Bay Dist (it) 170 170 210 Storage BIk Time (%) 0 0 2 19 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 = 8 34 Intersection: 2: Fairview Ave & TH 36 WB Ra Move Directions Served R Maximum Queue (it) Average Queue (it) 41 95th Queue (it) Link Distance (it) Upstream BIk Time (%) i Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (it) 300 Storage BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) SimTraffic Report Queuing and Blocking Report 5-Year Background Two Way Ring Road SAT Peak Hour Intersection: 3: Fairview Ave & Mall Entrance 1 Movement EB WB WB WB NB NB NB 1. Directions Served LTR L LT R L T T T R L T TR Maximum Queue (ft) 58 156 199 100 205 247 478 421 275 185 378 399 Average Queue (ft) 15 70 148 69 85 95 161 223 43 85 165 244 95th Queue (ft) 46 129 228 141 159 175 391 352 194 173 324 384 Link Distance (ft) 241 135 135 462 462 462 405 405 Upstream BIk Time (%) 1 18 0 0 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 2 43 2 0 1 2 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 50 260 250 160 Storage BIk Time (%) 41 2 0 0 5 0 1 7 Queuing Penalty (veh) 65 3 0 0 12 0 4 10 Intersection: 4: Fairview Ave & CR B2 W - EB EB EB WB WB WB NB NB NB NB SB SB Directions Served L T TR L T TR L T T R L T Maximum Queue (ft) 175 540 638 202 253 274 196 180 211 217 138 248 Average Queue (ft) 77 153 316 133 100 140 100 94 110 10 71 129 95th Queue (ft) 138 413 603 213 208 235 173 156 175 93 123 224 Link Distance (ft) 1154 1154 260 260 405 405 405 1122 Upstream BIk Time (%) 1 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 3 3 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 160 180 200 300 Storage BIk Time (%) 0 2 5 0 0 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 3= 1 1 0 0 Intersection: 4: Fairview Ave & CR B2 W Directions Served TR Maximum Queue (ft) 297 Average Queue (ft) 182 95th Queue (ft) 274 - Link Distance (ft) 1122 Upstream BIk Time (%) - Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) - Storage BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) SimTraffic Report Queuing and Blocking Report 5-Year Background Two Way Ring Road SAT Peak Hour Intersection: 5: Mall Entrance 2 & CR B2 W Movement -LU.- EB EB E6 WB I WB WB Directions Served L T T R L T TR LT R LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 75 261 283 371 144 200 171 230 219 127 Average Queue (ft) 40 105 98 38 45 47 41 141 76 53 95th Queue (ft) 82 225 219 216 102 130 119 227 153 96 Link Distance (ft) 260 260 260 1061 1061 264 264 128 Upstream BIk Time (%) 0 1 1 0 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 2 4 1 0 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 50 120 Storage BIk Time (%) 5 19 1 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 17 21 3 2 Intersection: 6: Mall Entrance 3 & CR B2 W - EB EB EB EB WB WB WB SB SB Directions Served L T T R L T T R LT R L LT Maximum Queue (ft) 182 240 174 141 195 336 331 165 150 107 249 196 Average Queue (ft) 83 104 80 46 42 213 195 70 89 55 125 49 95th Queue (ft) 156 189 145 98 132 307 290 184 145 98 197 122 Link Distance (ft) 1061 1061 687 687 99 99 427 427 Upstream BIk Time (%) 13 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 31 1 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 20 240 140 Storage BIk Time (%) 0 2 2 0 7 25 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 4 19 0 Intersection: 6: Mall Entrance 3 & CR B2 W Move Directions Served R Maximum Queue (ft) 66 Average Queue (ft) 23 95th Queue (ft) 51 Link Distance (ft) 427 Upstream BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) SimTraffic Report Queuing and Blocking Report 5-Year Background Two Way Ring Road SAT Peak Hour Intersection: 7: Mall Entrance 4/Snelling Ave SB Ramps & CR B2 W Movement -&W.- EB EB EB WB WB WB Directions Served L T T R L L T T L T R L Maximum Queue (ft) 318 340 285 163 215 204 230 225 236 62 52 100 Average Queue (ft) 197 129 102 51 121 110 137 123 123 57 47 17 95th Queue (ft) 306 240 186 109 192 180 205 189 229 65 52 68 Link Distance (ft) 687 687 667 667 147 147 147 Upstream BIk Time (%) 8 Queuing Penalty (veh) 9 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 300 160 270 270 150 Storage BIk Time (%) 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 6 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Intersection: 7: Mall Entrance 4/Snelling Ave SB Ramps & CR B2 W Directions Served T R Maximum Queue (ft) 287 165 Average Queue (ft) 148 28 95th Queue (ft) 253 118 Link Distance (ft) 519 Upstream BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage BIk Time (%) 10 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 8: CR B2 W & Snellina Ave NB Ram Move EB EB WB WB WB SB S Directions Served L T T T T R L R Maximum Queue (ft) 143 72 90 191 138 15 311 263 - Average Queue (ft) 72 14 34 75 34 1 34 152 95th Queue (ft) 127 48 74 145 90 8 180 256 Link Distance (ft) 667 667 1171 1171 380 Upstream BIk Time (%) 1 — Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 270 200 240 Storage BIk Time (%) 0 0 4 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 1 SimTraffic Report Queuing and Blocking Report 5-Year Background Two Way Ring Road SAT Peak Hour Intersection: 9: Mall Entrance 1 Movement NB SB SB SB Directions Served T T R R Maximum Queue (ft) 66 69 31 180 Average Queue (ft) 35 30 1 36 95th Queue (ft) 56 53 23 122 Link Distance (ft) 476 155 155 155 Upstream BIk Time (%) 0 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 2 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 10: SB SB Directions Served L R T T T Maximum Queue (ft) 93 47 88 63 77 Average Queue (ft) 52 16 46 37 45 95th Queue (ft) 84 41 73 55 68 Link Distance (ft) 331 331 155 182 182 Upstream BIk Time (%) — Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) — Storage BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 11: Mall Entrance 2 Movement EB EB WB WB SB SB Directions Served LT T T TR L R Maximum Queue (ft) — 152 45 132 238 34 47 - Average Queue (ft) 73 3 42 86 3 9 95th Queue (ft) 136 21 91 185 18 31 - Link Distance (ft) 182 182 357 357 264 264 Upstream BIk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) SimTraffic Report Queuing and Blocking Report 5-Year Background Two Way Ring Road SAT Peak Hour Intersection: 12: Rosedale Shopping Ctr & Mall Entrance 3 Movement EB WB SB Directions Served LT T L Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) 116 219 24 55 98 1 94 172 12 493 589 99 Intersection: 13: Mall Entrance 4 EB WB WB Directions Served T T R Maximum Queue (ft) 65 60 139 Average Queue (ft) 27 26 5 95th Queue (ft) 52 53 53 Link Distance (ft) 589 627 Upstream BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 Storage BIk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Zone Summa Zone wide Queuing Penalty: 518 SimTraffic Report SimTraffic Performance Report 5-Year Build Two Way Ring Road PM Peak Hour 1: Fairview Ave & TH 36 EB Ramp Performance by movement Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Al Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.5 0.5 0.4 2.6 0.0 0.0 0.3 - Total Delay (hr) 1.3 0.4 2.9 0.1 2.2 1.2 8.1 Total DelNeh (s) 58.9 3.6 15.1 ' 4.2 21.2 6.3 12.6 Vehicles Entered 76 367 698 115 363 665 2284 Vehicles Exited 77 367 695 114 362 664 2279 Houdy Exit Rate 77 367 695 114 362 664 2279 Input Volume 75 365 695 120 375 630 2260 %of Volume 103 100 100 95 97 105 101 2: Fairview Ave & TH 36 WB Ramps Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.3 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (hr) 1.1 0.8 0.2 1.1 2.2 0.5 2.4 10.2 0.2 3.1 4.6 0.2 Total DelNeh (s) 45.2 41.6 2.0 44.4 40.2 4.5 51.0 44.9 7.6 42.0 26.8 6.0 Vehicles Entered 86 71 329 89 196 369 163 791 109 264 613 94 Vehicles Exited 86 71 329 89 196 369 164 798 108 265 611 94 Houdy Exit Rate 86 71 329 89 196 369 164 798 108 265 611 94 Input Volume 85 75 320 95 190 375 160 785 115 265 590 95 %of Volume 101 95 103 94 103 98 102 102 94 100 104 99 2: Fairview Ave & TH 36 WB Ramps Performance by movement uemea ueay tnr/ U. i Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 Total Delay (hr) 26.6 Total DelNeh (s) 29.7 Vehicles Entered 3174 Vehicles Exited 3180 Houdy Exit Rate 3180 Input Volume 3149 %of Volume 101 SimTraffic Report SimTraffic Performance Report 5-Year Build Two Way Ring Road PM Peak Hour 3: Fairview Ave & Mall Entrance 1 Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBit SBL�S!! Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (hr) 0.1 0.1 0.0 2.6 0.1 0.2 0.6 5.6 0.5 0.7 3.2 0.0 Total DelNeh (s) 62.7 44.8 11.4 37.9 9.4 5.0 19.1 21.9 7.6 17.9 15.8 13.6 Vehicles Entered 4 8 7 246 25 155 122 914 218 134 722 9 Vehicles Exited 4 7 7 244 25 155 122 912 217 134 721 9 Houdy Exit Rate 4 7 7 244 25 155 122 912 217 134 721 9 Input Volume 5 5 5 245 25 155 120 916 210 140 701 10 %of Volume 80 140 140 100 99 100 102 100 103 96 103 90 3: Fairview Ave & Mall Entrance 1 Performance by movement Movement Al Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 , Total Delay (hr) 13.7 Total DelNeh (s) 19.1 Vehicles Entered 2564 Vehicles Exited 2557 Houdy Exit Rate 2557 Input Volume 2538 %of Volume 101 4: Fairview Ave & CR B2 W Performance by movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Delay (hr) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 2.4 0.3 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.4 0.3 Total Delay (hr) 1.0 5.5 1.9 1.7 0.9 0.6 2.2 5.0 0.9 1.6 3.9 0.6 Total DelNeh (s) 22.1 34.8 31.1 27.1 17.0 11.9 39.6 40.3 7.5 27.6 32.8 24.7 Vehicles Entered 154 567 219 221 197 180 191 435 443 204 424 90 Vehicles Exited 154 568 220 221 197 180 190 435 444 204 421 90 Houdy Exit Rate 154 568 220 221 197 180 190 435 444 204 421 90 Input Volume 150 565 220 215 210 180 195 436 445 195 415 90 %of Volume 103 101 100 103 94 100 97 100 100 104 102 100 4: Fairview Ave & CR B2 W Performance by movement Movement Al Denied Delay (hr) 0.4 Denied Del/Veh (s) - 0.4 Total Delay (hr) 25.8 Total DelNeh (s) 27.6 Vehicles Entered 3325 Vehicles Exited 3324 Houdy Exit Rate 3324 Input Volume 3317 %of Volume 100 SimTraffic Report SimTraffic Performance Report 5-Year Build Two Way Ring Road PM Peak Hour 5: Mall Entrance 2 & CR B2 W Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WB% NBL NBi t SBL�S!! Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.2 0.2 Total Delay (hr) 0.2 2.2 0.4 0.7 0.8 0.0 1.7 0.1 0.7 0.4 0.0 0.2 Total DelNeh (s) 10.2 8.7 6.2 16.9 5.8 3.6 45.4 23.3 13.6 38.7 32.1 16.1 Vehicles Entered 68 919 229 155 505 32 131 10 176 33 5 40 Vehicles Exited 69 918 229 156 506 32 131 10 177 33 5 40 Hourly Exit Rate 69 918 229 156 506 32 131 10 177 33 5 40 Input Volume 70 900 235 170 525 30 125 10 155 35 5 40 %of Volume 98 102 98 92 96 106 105 100 114 94 100 99 5: Mall Entrance 2 & CR B2 W Performance by movement Movement Al - Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 Total Delay (hr) 7.4 Total DelNeh (s) 11.5 Vehicles Entered 2303 Vehicles Exited 2306 Hourly Exit Rate 2306 Input Volume 2301 %of Volume 100 6: Mall Entrance 3 & CR B2 W Performance by movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 _ Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.1 Total Delay (hr) 0.7 3.2 0.1 0.3 4.0 0.2 0.8 0.1 0.6 2.1 0.1 0.1 Total DelNeh (s) 16.3 12.7 4.5 24.2 25.5 8.3 40.4 36.5 16.8 40.8 43.1 5.0 Vehicles Entered 151 914 111 47 566 84 73 7 128 185 12 57 Vehicles Exited 151 910 111 47 563 85 72 7 128 184 12 57 Hourly Exit Rate 151 910 111 47 563 85 72 7 128 184 12 57 Input Volume 145 885 110 45 566 85 105 10 180 185 10 55 %of Volume 104 103 101 104 100 100 69 70 71 99 120 103 6: Mall Entrance 3 & CR B2 W Performance by movement Movement Al Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) - 0.0 Total Delay (hr) 12.5 Total DelNeh (s) 19.1 Vehicles Entered 2335 Vehicles Exited 2327 i Hourly Exit Rate 2327 Input Volume 2381 %of Volume 98 SimTraffic Report SimTraffic Performance Report 5-Year Build Two Way Ring Road PM Peak Hour 7: Mall Entrance 4/Snelling Ave SB Ramps & CR B2 W Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBLNS!! Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.7 0.9 3.6 Total Delay (hr) 3.0 4.7 0.2 2.5 2.7 0.1 0.3 1.0 0.3 0.3 1.6 0.2 Total DelNeh (s) 38.7 19.1 7.6 40.6 21.7 3.3 33.1 35.8 7.8 40.5 38.8 2.6 Vehicles Entered 280 877 75 220 444 71 29 94 120 26 141 224 Vehicles Exited 280 878 75 220 443 71 30 94 119 27 143 224 Houdy Exit Rate 280 878 75 220 443 71 30 94 119 27 143 224 Input Volume 290 901 70 225 430 70 35 95 110 25 150 230 %of Volume 97 97 107 98 103 101 85 99 108 107 95 97 7: Mall Entrance 4/Snellina Ave SB Movement Al Denied Delay (hr) 0.3 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.4 Total Delay (hr) 16.7 Total DelNeh (s) 22.8 Vehicles Entered 2601 Vehicles Exited 2604 Houdy Exit Rate 2604 Input Volume i 2631 %of Volume 99 & CR B2 W Performance by movement 8: CR B2 W & Snelling Ave NB Ramps Performance by movement BT WBT WBR SBL SBR AI Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.5 Denied Del/Veh (s) _ 0.0 0.0 0.2 3.1 1.1 3.6 0.9 Total Delay (hr) 1.1 0.9 0.6 0.0 0.3 0.9 3.8 Total DelNeh (s) 11.6 4.7 5.7 3.0 42.6 8.7 7.5 Vehicles Entered 332 690 355 56 28 380 1841 Vehicles Exited 333 688 355 56 28 380 1840 - Houdy Exit Rate 333 688 355 56 28 380 1840 Input Volume 345 690 350 55 30 375 1846 %of Volume 96 100 101 101 93 101 100 SimTraffic Report SimTraffic Performance Report 5-Year Build Two Way Ring Road PM Peak Hour 9: Mall Entrance 1 Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR NBT Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.9 Total DelNeh (s) 0.4 0.5 1.5 6.8 6.2 1.4 2.9 Vehicles Entered 72 2 285 164 176 426 1125 Vehicles Exited 71 2 285 165 177 426 1126 Houdy Exit Rate 71 2 285 165 177 426 1126 Input Volume 75 1 280 165 185 425 1131 %of Volume 95 267 102 100 96 100 100 10: Performance by movement Movement WBL WBR NBT SBT Al Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 - Total Delay (hr) 0.7 0.0 0.5 0.1 1.3 Total DelNeh (s) 8.0 2.6 7.0 1.1 4.8 Vehicles Entered 307 24 237 384 952 Vehicles Exited 307 24 237 383 951 Houdy Exit Rate 307 24 237 383 951 Input Volume 315 20 240 370 945 %of Volume 97 120 99 104 101 11: Mall Entrance 2 Performance by movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBT SBR Al Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (hr) 0.5 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.4 1.6 Total DelNeh (s) 8.9 9.1 9.8 2.0 4.9 2.9 4.9 6.4 Vehicles Entered 205 64 124 112 126 4 260 895 Vehicles Exited 205 64 124 113 125 4 259 894 Houdy Exit Rate 205 64 124 113 125 4 259 894 Input Volume 205 65 95 85 130 5 275 860 %of Volume 100 98 131 133 96 80 94 104 SimTraffic Report SimTraffic Performance Report 5-Year Build Two Way Ring Road PM Peak Hour 12: Rosedale Shopping Ctr & Mall Entrance 3 Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Al - Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 - Total Delay (hr) 0.2 0.1 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.9 Total DelNeh (s) 6.6 4.3 9.3 4.4 0.6 0.9 5.1 - Vehicles Entered 101 89 175 108 107 63 643 Vehicles Exited 101 88 175 108 107 63 642 Houdy Exit Rate 101 88 175 108 107 63 642 Input Volume 105 90 90 190 100 65 640 - %ofVolume 96 97 195 57 107 97 100 13: Mall Entrance 4 Performance by movement Movement EBT WBT WBR SBL SBT SBR Al Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.3 3.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 Total Delay (hr) 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.8 Total DelNeh (s) 3.3 8.6 2.9 1.4 1.6 2.6 3.1 Vehicles Entered 158 107 243 262 2 175 947 Vehicles Exited 157 108 244 261 2 175 947 Houdy Exit Rate 157 108 244 261 2 175 947 Input Volume = 150 100 240 265 1 180 935 %of Volume 105 108 102 99 267 97 101 Total Zone Performance 1.7 Denied Delay (hr) Denied Del/Veh (s) 1.0 Total Delay (hr) 120.1 Total DelNeh (s) 700.8 Vehicles Entered 6098 Vehicles Exited 405 Houdy Exit Rate 405 Input Volume 24933 %of Volume 2 SimTraffic Report Queuing and Blocking Report 5-Year Build Two Way Ring Road PM Peak Hour Intersection: 1: Fairview Ave & TH 36 EB Ramp Movement WB NB NB SB SB Directions Served LR T T L T T Maximum Queue (ft) 150 221 267 279 124 118 Average Queue (ft) 64 100 112 138 32 47 95th Queue (ft) 123 210 236 242 93 106 Link Distance (ft) 395 1169 1169 734 734 Upstream BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 380 Storage BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 2: Fairview Ave & TH 36 WB Ramps - EB EB WB WB NB NB SB SB Directions Served L T R LT TR L T T R L T T Maximum Queue (ft) 113 92 122 269 274 234 453 531 366 279 277 239 Average Queue (ft) 48 29 20 147 73 131 230 296 22 152 153 135 95th Queue (ft) 99 73 72 235 214 233 404 468 183 247 244 219 Link Distance (ft) 373 316 316 734 734 734 462 462 462 Upstream BIk Time (%) 0 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 170 170 210 Storage BIk Time (%) 1 5 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 9 0 Intersection: 2: Fairview Ave & TH 36 WB Ra Directions Served R Maximum Queue (ft) 91 Average Queue (ft) 33 95th Queue (ft) 68 Link Distance (ft) Upstream BIk Time (%) + Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 300 Storage BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) SimTraffic Report Queuing and Blocking Report 5-Year Build Two Way Ring Road PM Peak Hour Intersection: 3: Fairview Ave & Mall Entrance 1 Movement EB WB WB WB NB I NB NB 5"==N-"=NMJR Directions Served LTR L LT R L T T T R L T TR Maximum Queue (it) 55 129 192 100 109 302 379 378 270 178 274 305 Average Queue (it) 15 54 119 51 48 115 121 146 23 63 92 167 95th Queue (it) 43 111 201 129 97 226 262 286 124 129 203 289 Link Distance (it) 241 135 135 462 462 462 405 405 Upstream BIk Time (%) 0 9 0 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 19 0 0 0 Storage Bay Dist (it) 50 260 250 160 Storage BIk Time (%) 36 1 0 1 0 0 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 56 1 0 2 0 0 2 Intersection: 4: Fairview Ave & CR B2 W - EB EB EB WB WB WB NB NB NB NB SB SB Directions Served L T TR L T TR L T T R L T Maximum Queue (it) 185 381 400 197 140 180 214 239 242 26 197 213 Average Queue (it) 88 180 224 99 44 89 117 126 143 1 95 107 95th Queue (it) 177 302 359 171 106 154 197 198 213 19 172 192 Link Distance (it) 1154 1154 260 260 405 405 405 1122 Upstream BIk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (it) 180 200 300 Storage BIk Time (%) 0 11 1 1 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 3 2 Intersection: 4: Fairview Ave & CR B2 W Move Directions Served TR Maximum Queue (it) 247 Average Queue (it) 151 95th Queue (it) 242 - Link Distance (it) 1122 Upstream BIk Time (%) _ Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (it) - Storage BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) - SimTraffic Report Queuing and Blocking Report 5-Year Build Two Way Ring Road PM Peak Hour Intersection: 5: Mall Entrance 2 & CR B2 W Movement EB EB EB E6 WB I WB WB NB NB S6' Directions Served L T T R L T TR LT R LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 74 250 282 350 117 71 64 163 142 126 - Average Queue (ft) 20 88 87 33 47 10 9 85 60 49 95th Queue (ft) 53 211 234 185 102 44 37 147 110 94 Link Distance (ft) 260 260 260 1061 1061 264 264 128 Upstream BIk Time (%) 0 1 1 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 2 2 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 50 120 Storage BIk Time (%) 1 10 1 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 3 7 1 0 Intersection: 6: Mall Entrance 3 & CR B2 W — EB EB WB WB WB ) WB NB W SB SB Directions Served L T T R L T T R LT R L LT Maximum Queue (ft) 170 273 209 135 84 238 229 165 121 113 192 144 Average Queue (ft) 49 115 92 25 29 134 123 41 71 53 99 35 95th Queue (ft) 102 226 172 74 65 216 207 119 130 99 161 95 Link Distance (ft) 1061 1061 687 687 99 99 427 427 Upstream BIk Time (%) 6 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 9 1 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 120 240 140 Storage BIk Time (%) 0 3 3 0 0 6 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 4 0 JAL 0 5 0 Intersection: 6: Mall Entrance 3 & CR B2 W Move Directions Served R Maximum Queue (ft) 44 Average Queue (ft) 18 95th Queue (ft) 38 Link Distance (ft) 427 Upstream BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) SimTraffic Report Queuing and Blocking Report 5-Year Build Two Way Ring Road PM Peak Hour Intersection: 7: Mall Entrance 4/Snelling Ave SB Ramps & CR B2 W Movement -LU.- EB EB EB WB WB WB WB i Directions Served L T T R L L T T L T R L Maximum Queue (ft) 266 291 298 184 156 139 193 165 79 192 50 69 Average Queue (ft) 158 175 164 51 89 66 107 94 23 84 45 25 95th Queue (ft) 246 268 265 156 146 120 168 144 57 172 49 59 Link Distance (ft) 687 687 667 667 147 147 147 Upstream BIk Time (%) 3 Queuing Penalty (veh) 3 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 300 160 270 270 150 Storage BIk Time (%) 0 0 7 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 5 0 Intersection: 7: Mall Entrance 4/Snelling Ave SB Ramps & CR B2 W - SB SB Directions Served T R Maximum Queue (ft) 177 61 Average Queue (ft) 91 9 95th Queue (ft) 157 43 Link Distance (ft) 519 Upstream BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 250 Storage BIk Time (%) 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 8: CR B2 W & Snellina Ave NB Ram Move EB EB WB WB WB SB S Directions Served L T T T T R L R Maximum Queue (ft) 184 47 78 147 102 64 73 196 Average Queue (ft) 78 11 21 44 19 7 25 86 95th Queue (ft) 147 38 57 107 64 36 64 147 Link Distance (ft) 667 667 1171 1171 380 Upstream BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 270 200 240 Storage BIk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 SimTraffic Report Queuing and Blocking Report 5-Year Build Two Way Ring Road PM Peak Hour Intersection: 9: Mall Entrance 1 Movement EB NB SB Directions Served L T T R Maximum Queue (ft) 4 71 52 129 Average Queue (ft) 0 38 28 14 95th Queue (ft) 3 59 48 67 Link Distance (ft) 135 476 155 155 Upstream BIk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 10: Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) 120 32 82 56 14 44 95 37 70 331 331 155 Intersection: 11: Mall Entrance 2 Movement EB EB WB WB SB SB Directions Served LT T T TR L R Maximum Queue (ft) — 121 43 58 82 16 43 - Average Queue (ft) 55 5 29 39 1 5 95th Queue (ft) 93 25 52 67 7 23 - Link Distance (ft) 182 182 357 357 264 264 Upstream BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) SimTraffic Report Queuing and Blocking Report 5-Year Build Two Way Ring Road PM Peak Hour Intersection: 12: Rosedale Shopping Ctr & Mall Entrance 3 Movement EB WB SB Directions Served LT T L Maximum Queue (ft) 89 87 4 Average Queue (ft) 41 41 0 95th Queue (ft) 69 68 3 Link Distance (ft) 493 589 99 Upstream BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 13: Mall Entrance 4 Directions Served T T Maximum Queue (ft) 58 71 Average Queue (ft) 28 38 95th Queue (ft) 52 63 Link Distance (ft) 589 627 Upstream BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Zone Summa Zone wide Queuing Penalty: 168 SimTraffic Report SimTraffic Performance Report 5-Year Build Two Way Ring Road SAT Peak Hour 1: Fairview Ave & TH 36 EB Ramp Performance by movement Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Al Denied Delay (hr) 5.4 43.7 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 49.2 Denied Del/Veh (s) 272.7 251.0 0.3 2.7 0.0 0.0 69.9 - Total Delay (hr) 2.1 3.9 3.2 0.1 3.8 0.9 14.1 Total DelNeh (s) 124.5 26.1 18.9 4.4 24.1 5.7 20.7 Vehicles Entered 59 532 606 91 564 576 2428 Vehicles Exited 60 530 603 93 564 575 2425 Houdy Exit Rate 60 530 603 93 564 575 2425 Input Volume 65 640 610 90 565 576 2546 %of Volume 92 83 99 104 100 100 95 2: Fairview Ave & TH 36 WB Ramps Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.2 0.5 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (hr) 1.3 1.5 0.2 0.6 1.7 0.7 5.5 38.0 1.5 4.5 3.8 0.2 Total DelNeh (s) 49.0 52.1 2.4 41.4 41.3 4.5 118.7 147.5 52.9 40.7 17.7 4.7 Vehicles Entered 92 105 316 50 143 531 160 883 96 392 776 152 Vehicles Exited 93 103 315 50 142 531 160 874 98 389 774 151 Houdy Exit Rate 93 103 315 50 142 531 160 874 98 389 774 151 Input Volume 95 100 320 50 145 530 175 985 95 385 770 155 %of Volume 98 103 98 100 98 100 91 89 103 101 100 97 2: Fairview Ave & TH 36 WB Ramps Performance by movement uemea ueay tnr/ U. i Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 Total Delay (hr) 59.4 Total DelNeh (s) 56.8 Vehicles Entered 3696 Vehicles Exited 3680 Houdy Exit Rate 3680 Input Volume 3804 %of Volume 97 SimTraffic Report SimTraffic Performance Report 5-Year Build Two Way Ring Road SAT Peak Hour 3: Fairview Ave & Mall Entrance 1 Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL�S!! Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (hr) 0.1 0.1 0.0 3.9 0.2 0.7 1.7 8.9 0.9 2.6 8.3 0.2 Total DelNeh (s) 60.8 54.8 12.2 33.5 13.3 10.2 32.3 32.4 9.7 42.0 33.0 39.6 Vehicles Entered 3 6 7 420 55 260 193 981 323 225 886 15 Vehicles Exited 3 6 7 417 54 260 193 985 323 224 890 15 Hourly Exit Rate 3 6 7 417 54 260 193 985 323 224 890 15 Input Volume 5 5 5 385 45 235 205 1049 355 240 916 15 %of Volume 60 120 140 108 119 111 94 94 91 93 97 100 3: Fairview Ave & Mall Entrance 1 Performance by movement Movement Al Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 Total Delay (hr) 27.6 Total DelNeh (s) 29.2 Vehicles Entered 3374 Vehicles Exited 3377 Hourly Exit Rate 3377 Input Volume 3459 %of Volume 98 4: Fairview Ave & CR B2 W Performance by movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Delay (hr) 0.4 0.7 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 9.4 7.6 6.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.9 0.4 0.4 Total Delay (hr) 1.4 9.0 12.2 2.6 1.8 1.2 2.6 2.7 1.7 1.2 5.8 1.3 Total DelNeh (s) 30.8 93.6 138.1 30.8 20.3 16.2 42.5 23.6 9.9 25.8 38.9 36.9 Vehicles Entered 165 343 306 299 318 260 216 408 620 162 525 12C Vehicles Exited 166 337 305 300 318 259 212 406 620 164 520 118 Hourly Exit Rate 166 337 305 300 318 259 212 406 620 164 520 118 Input Volume 165 345 320 320 336 260 215 419 650 175 530 125 %of Volume 101 98 95 94 95 100 98 97 95 94 98 94 4: Fairview Ave & CR B2 W Performance by movement Movement Al Denied Delay (hr) 2.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) - 1.9 Total Delay (hr) 43.5 Total DelNeh (s) 41.2 Vehicles Entered 3742 Vehicles Exited 3725 Hourly Exit Rate 3725 Input Volume 3861 %of Volume 96 SimTraffic Report SimTraffic Performance Report 5-Year Build Two Way Ring Road SAT Peak Hour 5: Mall Entrance 2 & CR B2 W Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WB% NBL NBT NBR SBL�S!! Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.2 0.2 Total Delay (hr) 0.6 3.2 0.7 1.8 2.5 0.1 2.6 0.3 1.0 0.2 0.1 0.3 Total DelNeh (s) 19.0 17.8 6.4 24.0 13.7 9.2 40.9 38.7 13.2 31.2 32.5 11.6 Vehicles Entered 112 642 366 271 663 41 228 30 278 19 13 77 Vehicles Exited 113 647 368 270 662 41 228 30 278 19 13 78 Hourly Exit Rate 113 647 368 270 662 41 228 30 278 19 13 78 Input Volume 110 661 400 285 750 50 200 31 235 20 15 70 %of Volume 103 98 92 95 88 82 114 97 118 95 87 111 5: Mall Entrance 2 & CR B2 W Performance by movement Movement Al Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 Total Delay (hr) 13.5 Total DelNeh (s) 17.5 Vehicles Entered 2740 Vehicles Exited 2747 Hourly Exit Rate 2747 Input Volume 2827 %of Volume 97 6: Mall Entrance 3 & CR B2 W Performance by movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 _ Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.1 Total Delay (hr) 1.3 3.7 0.4 0.5 9.3 0.3 1.0 0.1 0.7 2.8 0.1 0.2 Total DelNeh (s) 24.6 21.8 6.8 26.1 40.1 16.0 41.4 40.3 15.6 39.6 38.6 8.2 Vehicles Entered 183 604 199 75 818 78 90 10 150 254 12 70 Vehicles Exited 183 610 200 76 821 78 90 10 150 254 13 70 Hourly Exit Rate 183 610 200 76 821 78 90 10 150 254 13 70 Input Volume 180 590 190 75 836 75 180 15 295 255 15 75 %of Volume 102 103 105 102 98 104 50 67 51 100 87 94 6: Mall Entrance 3 & CR B2 W Performance by movement Movement Al Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) - 0.1 Total Delay (hr) 20.5 Total DelNeh (s) 28.6 Vehicles Entered 2543 Vehicles Exited 2555 i Hourly Exit Rate 2555 Input Volume 2780 %of Volume 92 SimTraffic Report SimTraffic Performance Report 5-Year Build Two Way Ring Road SAT Peak Hour 7: Mall Entrance 4/Snelling Ave SB Ramps & CR B2 W Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL'=NNJR"=1F1R Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.4 1.0 3.4 Total Delay (hr) 5.0 3.8 0.4 4.5 5.1 0.1 0.6 1.6 0.8 0.2 3.7 0.4 Total DelNeh (s) 48.5 24.4 11.3 41.4 27.8 3.9 40.3 36.5 16.5 48.9 48.7 4.9 Vehicles Entered 371 554 116 381 656 69 53 153 169 12 270 260 Vehicles Exited 370 552 116 381 657 69 54 152 170 12 265 260 Houdy Exit Rate 370 552 116 381 657 69 54 152 170 12 265 260 Input Volume 420 626 120 390 666 65 60 159 175 15 260 260 %of Volume 88 88 97 98 99 106 90 95 97 80 102 100 7: Mall Entrance 4/Snellina Ave SB Movement Al Denied Delay (hr) 0.4 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.4 Total Delay (hr) 26.1 Total DelNeh (s) 30.2 Vehicles Entered 3064 Vehicles Exited 3058 Houdy Exit Rate 3058 Input Volume i 3216 %of Volume 95 & CR B2 W Performance by movement 8: CR B2 W & Snelling Ave NB Ramps Performance by movement BT WBT WBR SBL SBR Al Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.7 _ Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.2 3.0 1.8 3.6 1.3 Total Delay (hr) 1.4 0.9 1.9 0.0 0.1 3.7 8.0 Total DelNeh (s) 16.9 7.0 15.5 2.2 29.4 20.1 15.3 Vehicles Entered 290 448 446 11 18 653 1866 Vehicles Exited 291 448 446 12 18 659 1874 Houdy Exit Rate 291 448 446 12 18 659 1874 Input Volume 330 490 440 10 15 680 1965 %of Volume 88 91 101 120 120 97 95 SimTraffic Report SimTraffic Performance Report 5-Year Build Two Way Ring Road SAT Peak Hour 9: Mall Entrance 1 Performance by movement Movement EBL EBR NBT SBT SBR I Al Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (hr) 0.0 0.2 0.6 0.8 1.4 3.0 Total DelNeh (s) 0.9 1.7 9.5 7.8 7.0 5.8 Vehicles Entered 110 443 232 349 735 1869 Vehicles Exited 110 442 232 350 735 1869 Hourly Exit Rate 110 442 232 350 735 1869 Input Volume 130 470 245 340 665 1850 %of Volume 85 94 95 103 111 101 10: Performance by movement Movement WBL WBR NBT SBT Al Denied Delay (hr) 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.9 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.3 ' Total Delay (hr) 3.0 0.0 1.2 1.3 5.6 Total DelNeh (s) 21.2 5.0 12.7 6.7 12.7 Vehicles Entered 505 31 343 691 1570 Vehicles Exited 508 31 341 692 1572 Hourly Exit Rate 508 31 341 692 1572 Input Volume 490 30 376 620 1516 %of Volume 104 102 91 112 104 11: Mall Entrance 2 Performance by movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Al Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.9 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 6.1 6.7 0.0 0.0 2.2 Total Delay (hr) 2.3 0.5 2.7 1.8 0.4 0.9 8.5 Total DelNeh (s) 28.4 20.5 36.9 24.7 6.6 7.4 19.8 Vehicles Entered 285 86 261 258 219 432 1541 Vehicles Exited 283 85 258 252 218 433 1529 Hourly Exit Rate 283 85 258 252 218 433 1529 Input Volume 315 90 155 150 235 465 1410 %of Volume 90 94 166 168 93 93 108 SimTraffic Report SimTraffic Performance Report 5-Year Build Two Way Ring Road SAT Peak Hour 12: Rosedale Shopping Ctr & Mall Entrance 3 Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Al uemea ueay tnr/ u.0 u.0 u.0 u.0 u.0 u.0 u.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.4 0.0 0.0 0.1 Total Delay (hr) 0.4 0.1 1.6 0.1 0.0 0.0 2.3 Total DelNeh (s) 10.9 3.1 17.4 3.3 0.6 1.0 8.2 Vehicles Entered 138 154 333 110 182 106 1023 Vehicles Exited 138 153 332 111 183 106 1023 Hourly Exit Rate 138 153 332 111 183 106 1023 Input Volume 160 154 110 330 175 105 1034 %of Volume 86 99 303 34 104 101 99 13: Mall Entrance 4 Performance by movement Movement EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Al Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.4 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 1.0 3.5 0.0 0.0 1.0 - Total Delay (hr) 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.3 1.3 Total DelNeh (s) 3.3 12.3 4.0 1.5 3.0 3.2 - Vehicles Entered 230 53 375 430 332 1420 Vehicles Exited 230 53 375 430 332 1420 Hourly Exit Rate 230 53 375 430 332 1420 Input Volume 226 50 395 445 325 1441 %ofVolume 102 105 95 97 102 99 Total Network Performance Denied Delay (hr) 54.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 24.8 - Total Delay (hr) 238.6 Total DelNeh (s) 106.2 - Vehicles Entered 7708 Vehicles Exited 7688 - Hourly Exit Rate 7688 Input Volume 40570 %of Volume 19 SimTraffic Report Queuing and Blocking Report 5-Year Build Two Way Ring Road SAT Peak Hour Intersection: 1: Fairview Ave & TH 36 EB Ramp Movement WB NB NB NB SB SB Directions Served LR T T R L T T Maximum Queue (ft) 453 271 317 91 346 182 120 — Average Queue (ft) 347 93 122 10 203 25 36 95th Queue (ft) 581 209 272 107 333 108 97 Link Distance (ft) 395 1169 1169 734 734 Upstream BIk Time (%) 59 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 340 380 Storage BIk Time (%) 2 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 2 0 1 Intersection: 2: Fairview Ave & TH 36 WB Ramps — EB EB EB WB WB NB NB I NB NB SB S§" Directions Served L T R LT TR L T T R L T T Maximum Queue (ft) 136 170 151 248 284 235 719 746 924 374 322 217 Average Queue (ft) 53 57 30 113 49 159 536 658 818 220 169 113 95th Queue (ft) 112 125 96 191 171 270 711 817 1187 349 286 198 Link Distance (ft) 373 316 316 734 734 734 462 462 462 Upstream BIk Time (%) 0 0 0 9 72 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 1 37 299 2 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 170 _ 170 210 Storage BIk Time (%) 0 1 16 Queuing Penalty (veh) 3 27 Intersection: 2: Fairview Ave & TH 36 WB Ra Directions Served R Maximum Queue (ft) 75 Average Queue (ft) 34 95th Queue (ft) 67 Link Distance (ft) Upstream BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 300 Storage BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) SimTraffic Report Queuing and Blocking Report 5-Year Build Two Way Ring Road SAT Peak Hour Intersection: 3: Fairview Ave & Mall Entrance 1 Movement EB WB WB WB NB + NB NB' NB 5"==N-"=NMJR Directions Served LTR L LT R L T T T R L T TR Maximum Queue (it) 50 192 215 100 195 299 495 470 273 185 414 411 Average Queue (it) 15 93 178 83 87 108 159 213 41 132 230 293 95th Queue (it) 41 173 226 137 159 196 363 335 162 207 408 418 Link Distance (it) 241 135 135 462 462 462 405 405 Upstream BIk Time (%) 3 33 0 0 1 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 11 109 2 1 5 8 Storage Bay Dist (it) 50 260 250 160 Storage BIk Time (%) 48 5 3 0 8 9 Queuing Penalty (veh) 113 9 11 0 34 22 Intersection: 4: Fairview Ave & CR B2 W - EB EB EB WB WB WB NB NB NB NB SB SB Directions Served L T TR L T TR L T T R L T Maximum Queue (it) 171 907 956 204 272 255 210 250 234 117 169 314 Average Queue (it) 79 372 571 129 103 138 116 100 111 4 74 162 95th Queue (it) 137 958 1079 213 216 224 202 186 179 55 142 263 Link Distance (it) 1154 1154 260 260 405 405 405 1122 Upstream BIk Time (%) 6 8 1 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 5 1 Storage Bay Dist (it) 160 180 200 300 Storage BIk Time (%) 0 2 5 0 3 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 4 0 6 0 Intersection: 4: Fairview Ave & CR B2 W Directions Served TR Maximum Queue (it) 366 Average Queue (it) 200 95th Queue (it) 317 Link Distance (it) 1122 Upstream BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (it) Storage BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) SimTraffic Report Queuing and Blocking Report 5-Year Build Two Way Ring Road SAT Peak Hour Intersection: 5: Mall Entrance 2 & CR B2 W Movement —QR-- EB EB EB WB WB WB NB NB �— Directions Served L T T R L T TR LT R LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 75 258 279 336 144 195 132 256 272 124 Average Queue (ft) 41 129 120 43 86 60 40 150 94 54 95th Queue (ft) 83 236 238 224 150 165 106 240 196 102 Link Distance (ft) 260 260 260 1061 1061 264 264 128 Upstream BIk Time (%) 0 0 1 0 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 1 3 0 1 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 50 120 Storage BIk Time (%) 5 27 5 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 15 29 17 2 Intersection: 6: Mall Entrance 3 & CR B2 W — EB EB EB EB WB WB WB NB SB SB Directions Served L T T R L T T R LT R L LT Maximum Queue (ft) 184 276 204 145 265 351 318 165 136 114 234 179 Average Queue (ft) 90 144 96 58 77 249 220 87 81 60 126 51 95th Queue (ft) 169 249 169 125 217 334 305 201 141 100 194 125 Link Distance (ft) 1061 1061 687 687 99 99 427 427 Upstream BIk Time (%) 10 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 24 1 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 140 Storage BIk Time (%) 1 6 4 0 0 13 30 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 10 23 0 Intersection: 6: Mall Entrance 3 & CR B2 W Directions Served R Maximum Queue (ft) 66 Average Queue (ft) 22 95th Queue (ft) 47 Link Distance (ft) 427 Upstream BIk Time (%) + Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) SimTraffic Report Queuing and Blocking Report 5-Year Build Two Way Ring Road SAT Peak Hour Intersection: 7: Mall Entrance 4/Snelling Ave SB Ramps & CR B2 W Movement EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB NB Directions Served L T T R L L T T L T R L Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) 322 430 276 160 247 226 245 231 243 214 167 113 51 134 108 168 145 156 315 334 205 107 207 180 227 210 266 687 687 667 667 147 15 20 300 5 14 f[Y�>f�7L�>f�lL�l Intersection: 7: Mall Entrance 4/Snelling Ave SB Ramps & CR B2 W Directions Served T R Maximum Queue (ft) 324 237 Average Queue (ft) 182 53 95th Queue (ft) 333 199 Link Distance (ft) 519 Upstream BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage BIk Time (%) 19 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 8: CR B2 W & Snellina Ave NB Ram 62 52 149 58 47 16 65 52 72 147 147 150 Mov MEINEWMIRIEr EB EB WB WB WB SB S Directions Served L T T T T R L R Maximum Queue (ft) 237 76 99 241 184 8 395 265 Average Queue (ft) 97 17 40 112 53 0 81 196 95th Queue (ft) 187 53 83 198 128 0 308 293 Link Distance (ft) 667 667 1171 1171 380 Upstream BIk Time (%) 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 270 200 240 Storage BIk Time (%) 0 0 0 7 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 0 1 SimTraffic Report Queuing and Blocking Report 5-Year Build Two Way Ring Road SAT Peak Hour Intersection: 9: Mall Entrance 1 Movement EB EB NB SB SB Directions Served L R T T R R Maximum Queue (ft) 40 14 142 94 154 234 Average Queue (ft) 4 0 53 42 15 115 95th Queue (ft) 26 9 96 73 88 244 — Link Distance (ft) 135 135 476 155 155 155 Upstream BIk Time (%) 0 0 8 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 25 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 10: SB SB Directions Served L R T T T Maximum Queue (ft) 339 198 158 78 139 Average Queue (ft) 145 37 69 44 62 95th Queue (ft) 297 158 136 68 104 Link Distance (ft) 331 331 155 182 182 Upstream BIk Time (%) 4 2 4 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 15 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 11: Mall Entrance 2 Movement EB EB WB WB B30 B30 SB S Directions Served LT T T TR T T L R Maximum Queue (ft) — 190 182 300 424 67 103 31 65 Average Queue (ft) 121 27 81 166 9 14 5 12 95th Queue (ft) 199 112 230 369 77 109 21 40 Link Distance (ft) 182 182 357 357 493 493 264 264 Upstream BIk Time (%) 6 0 2 9 Queuing Penalty (veh) 12 0 2 9 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) SimTraffic Report Queuing and Blocking Report 5-Year Build Two Way Ring Road SAT Peak Hour Intersection: 12: Rosedale Shopping Ctr & Mall Entrance 3 Movement EB WB SB Directions Served LT T L Maximum Queue (ft) 134 203 22 Average Queue (ft) 53 97 1 95th Queue (ft) 103 166 7 Link Distance (ft) 493 589 99 Upstream BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 13: Mall Entrance 4 EB WB WB Directions Served T T R Maximum Queue (ft) 70 131 184 Average Queue (ft) 30 32 12 95th Queue (ft) 58 85 87 Link Distance (ft) 589 627 Upstream BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 - Storage BIk Time (%) 0 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 0 - Network Summ Network Wide Queuing Penalty: 1029 SimTraffic Report SimTraffic Performance Report 5-Year Build IMP Two Way Ring Road PM Peak Hour 1: Fairview Ave & TH 36 EB Ramp Performance by movement Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Al Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.5 0.5 0.4 2.6 0.0 0.0 0.4 - Total Delay (hr) 1.2 0.4 3.3 0.1 2.2 1.1 8.4 Total DelNeh (s) 55.3 3.6 17.0 ■ 4.2 21.8 6.3 13.2 Vehicles Entered 76 374 696 121 366 629 2262 Vehicles Exited 75 374 694 120 366 630 2259 Houdy Exit Rate 75 374 694 120 366 630 2259 Input Volume 75 365 695 120 375 630 2260 %of Volume 100 102 100 100 98 100 100 2: Fairview Ave & TH 36 WB Ramps Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.2 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (hr) 1.1 0.9 0.2 1.1 2.4 0.5 2.2 7.5 0.4 2.9 4.4 0.2 Total DelNeh (s) 43.0 42.6 2.1 44.0 42.8 4.9 44.2 34.2 12.5 39.6 25.6 6.3 Vehicles Entered 88 75 306 92 204 368 175 773 120 261 612 95 Vehicles Exited 89 76 307 92 204 369 174 770 120 260 611 95 Houdy Exit Rate 89 76 307 92 204 369 174 770 120 260 611 95 Input Volume 85 75 320 95 190 380 160 785 115 250 605 95 %of Volume 105 102 96 97 107 97 109 98 105 104 101 100 2: Fairview Ave & TH 36 WB Ramps Performance by movement uemea ueay tnr/ U. i Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 Total Delay (hr) 23.8 Total DelNeh (s) 26.7 Vehicles Entered 3169 Vehicles Exited 3167 Houdy Exit Rate 3167 Input Volume 3154 %of Volume 100 SimTraffic Report SimTraffic Performance Report 5-Year Build IMP Two Way Ring Road PM Peak Hour 3: Fairview Ave & Mall Entrance 1 Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBit SBL�S!! Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (hr) 0.1 0.1 0.0 2.8 0.1 0.3 0.6 5.7 0.5 0.7 3.0 0.0 Total DelNeh (s) 47.5 54.5 12.0 38.5 8.1 7.2 20.0 22.7 8.7 17.5 15.1 11.8 Vehicles Entered 5 4 5 254 27 156 113 900 215 138 708 10 Vehicles Exited 5 3 5 257 28 156 113 903 216 138 708 10 Hourly Exit Rate 5 3 5 257 28 156 113 903 216 138 708 10 Input Volume 5 5 5 245 25 155 120 920 210 140 701 10 %of Volume 100 60 100 105 111 101 94 98 103 99 101 100 3: Fairview Ave & Mall Entrance 1 Performance by movement Movement Al Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 - Total Delay (hr) 13.8 Total DelNeh (s) 19.5 - Vehicles Entered 2535 Vehicles Exited 2542 Hourly Exit Rate 2542 Input Volume 2541 %of Volume 100 4: Fairview Ave & CR B2 W Performance by movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Delay (hr) 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 2.5 0.5 2.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.9 0.4 0.3 Total Delay (hr) 0.9 4.5 0.6 1.4 1.1 0.7 1.8 4.4 0.9 1.5 3.9 0.6 Total DelNeh (s) 21.2 29.4 9.8 23.4 19.0 13.4 36.0 36.3 7.3 25.8 32.3 24.8 Vehicles Entered 147 545 220 210 207 183 178 429 453 201 424 87 Vehicles Exited 146 546 219 211 207 183 179 428 453 199 425 88 Hourly Exit Rate 146 546 219 211 207 183 179 428 453 199 425 88 Input Volume 150 550 220 215 210 180 195 436 445 195 415 90 %of Volume 97 99 99 98 98 102 92 98 102 102 102 98 4: Fairview Ave & CR B2 W Performance by movement Movement Al Denied Delay (hr) 0.6 Denied Del/Veh (s) - 0.6 Total Delay (hr) 22.3 Total DelNeh (s) 24.1 Vehicles Entered 3284 Vehicles Exited 3284 Hourly Exit Rate 3284 Input Volume 3302 _ %of Volume 99 SimTraffic Report SimTraffic Performance Report 5-Year Build IMP Two Way Ring Road PM Peak Hour 5: Mall Entrance 2 & CR B2 W Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBit SBL�S!! Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 Total Delay (hr) 0.2 2.3 0.4 0.6 0.8 0.0 1.7 0.1 0.6 0.3 0.0 0.2 Total DelNeh (s) 11.0 9.1 5.9 14.4 5.8 4.1 43.9 20.7 12.7 37.8 44.5 13.9 Vehicles Entered 66 911 235 149 505 29 138 9 170 32 4 39 Vehicles Exited 66 913 234 150 500 29 138 9 170 31 4 39 Houdy Exit Rate 66 913 234 150 500 29 138 9 170 31 4 39 Input Volume 70 900 235 170 525 30 125 10 155 35 5 40 %of Volume 94 101 100 88 95 96 110 90 110 88 80 97 5: Mall Entrance 2 & CR B2 W Performance by movement Movement Al Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 Total Delay (hr) 7.3 Total DelNeh (s) 11.3 Vehicles Entered 2287 Vehicles Exited 2283 Houdy Exit Rate 2283 Input Volume 2300 %of Volume 99 6: Mall Entrance 3 & CR B2 W Performance by movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 _ Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.1 Total Delay (hr) 0.7 3.0 0.2 0.3 4.2 0.2 0.9 0.1 0.5 2.3 0.1 0.1 Total DelNeh (s) 16.6 12.0 4.5 22.9 26.8 9.1 46.5 40.0 15.4 42.7 37.6 5.3 Vehicles Entered 149 901 119 42 564 87 67 4 120 190 10 54 Vehicles Exited 149 901 118 43 562 87 68 4 120 191 10 54 Houdy Exit Rate 149 901 118 43 562 87 68 4 120 191 10 54 Input Volume 145 885 110 45 566 85 105 10 180 185 10 55 %of Volume 103 102 108 95 99 103 65 40 67 103 100 98 6: Mall Entrance 3 & CR B2 W Performance by movement Movement Al Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) - 0.0 Total Delay (hr) 12.5 Total DelNeh (s) 19.4 Vehicles Entered 2307 Vehicles Exited 2307 i Houdy Exit Rate 2307 Input Volume 2381 %of Volume 97 SimTraffic Report SimTraffic Performance Report 5-Year Build IMP Two Way Ring Road PM Peak Hour 7: Mall Entrance 4/Snelling Ave SB Ramps & CR B2 W Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBLNS!! Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.6 0.9 3.5 Total Delay (hr) 3.3 4.9 0.2 2.8 2.7 0.1 0.3 1.1 0.3 0.3 2.0 0.2 Total DelNeh (s) 40.5 20.2 8.5 41.8 22.5 3.5 34.1 36.5 8.0 44.0 41.1 2.9 Vehicles Entered 288 863 70 238 422 72 32 103 112 25 168 237 Vehicles Exited 289 860 69 239 422 72 33 102 112 24 168 237 Houdy Exit Rate 289 860 69 239 422 72 33 102 112 24 168 237 Input Volume 290 901 70 235 430 70 35 100 110 25 155 230 %of Volume 100 95 98 102 98 102 94 102 102 95 108 103 7: Mall Entrance 4/Snellina Ave SB Movement Al Denied Delay (hr) 0.3 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.4 Total Delay (hr) 17.9 Total DelNeh (s) 24.3 Vehicles Entered 2630 Vehicles Exited 2627 Houdy Exit Rate 2627 Input Volume i 2651 %of Volume 99 & CR B2 W Performance by movement 8: CR B2 W & Snelling Ave NB Ramps Performance by movement BT WBT WBR SBL SBR AI Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.5 _ Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.2 3.1 1.1 3.6 0.9 Total Delay (hr) 1.1 0.8 0.5 0.0 0.3 0.9 3.7 Total DelNeh (s) 12.3 4.3 5.4 2.4 39.4 8.8 7.4 Vehicles Entered 322 672 354 54 29 378 1809 Vehicles Exited 325 671 354 53 28 378 1809 Mod Houdy Exit Rate 325 671 354 53 28 378 1809 Input Volume 345 690 355 55 30 380 1856 %of Volume 94 97 100 96 93 100 97 SimTraffic Report SimTraffic Performance Report 5-Year Build IMP Two Way Ring Road PM Peak Hour 9: Mall Entrance 1 Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR NBT Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.2 1.0 Total DelNeh (s) 0.4 0.4 1.5 7.0 6.2 1.6 3.0 Vehicles Entered 76 1 281 160 196 438 1152 Vehicles Exited 76 1 281 161 196 438 1153 Houdy Exit Rate 76 1 281 161 196 438 1153 Input Volume 75 1 280 165 185 425 1131 %of Volume 102 133 100 98 106 103 102 10: Performance by movement Movement WBL WBR NBT SBT Al Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 ' Total Delay (hr) 0.8 0.0 0.5 0.1 1.4 Total DelNeh (s) 8.7 2.5 7.1 1.1 5.2 Vehicles Entered 326 18 237 386 967 Vehicles Exited 327 18 237 387 969 Houdy Exit Rate 327 18 237 387 969 Input Volume 315 20 240 370 945 %of Volume 104 90 99 105 103 11: Mall Entrance 2 Performance by movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBT SBR Al Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (hr) 0.5 0.1 0.4 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.4 1.6 Total DelNeh (s) 8.5 9.3 9.6 2.0 5.0 5.9 5.2 6.5 Vehicles Entered 205 57 131 112 127 5 256 893 Vehicles Exited 206 57 131 112 127 5 255 893 Houdy Exit Rate 206 57 131 112 127 5 255 893 Input Volume 205 65 95 85 130 5 275 860 %of Volume 100 87 138 132 98 100 93 104 SimTraffic Report SimTraffic Performance Report 5-Year Build IMP Two Way Ring Road PM Peak Hour 12: Rosedale Shopping Ctr & Mall Entrance 3 Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Al - Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 - Total Delay (hr) 0.2 0.1 0.5 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.9 Total DelNeh (s) 7.4 4.7 9.1 4.3 0.5 0.8 5.2 - Vehicles Entered 96 89 181 95 104 67 632 Vehicles Exited 96 90 181 95 104 67 633 Houdy Exit Rate 96 90 181 95 104 67 633 Input Volume 105 90 90 190 100 65 640 - %ofVolume 92 99 202 50 104 103 99 13: Mall Entrance 4 Performance by movement Movement EBT WBT WBR SBL SBT SBR Al Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.2 3.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 Total Delay (hr) 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.9 Total DelNeh (s) 3.9 8.9 2.9 1.5 1.1 2.7 3.2 Vehicles Entered 154 95 246 294 1 181 971 Vehicles Exited 154 95 247 294 1 181 972 Houdy Exit Rate 154 95 247 294 1 181 972 Input Volume = 150 100 245 280 1 180 956 %of Volume 103 95 101 105 133 100 102 Total Zone Performance 1.9 Denied Delay (hr) Denied Del/Veh (s) 1.1 Total Delay (hr) 115.5 Total DelNeh (s) 659.1 Vehicles Entered 6130 Vehicles Exited 420 Houdy Exit Rate 420 Input Volume 24976 %of Volume 2 SimTraffic Report Queuing and Blocking Report 5-Year Build IMP Two Way Ring Road PM Peak Hour Intersection: 1: Fairview Ave & TH 36 EB Ramp Movement WB NB NB SB SB SB Directions Served LR T T L T T Maximum Queue (ft) 131 246 274 264 245 143 - Average Queue (ft) 65 106 124 142 40 55 95th Queue (ft) 118 219 248 250 157 117 - Link Distance (ft) 395 1169 1169 736 736 Upstream BIk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 380 Storage BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 2: Fairview Ave & TH 36 WB Ramps - EB EB EB WB WB NB NB NB NB NB SB SB Directions Served L T R LT TR L T T T R L T Maximum Queue (ft) 120 90 110 286 271 225 249 348 391 150 281 231 Average Queue (ft) 47 32 21 155 87 118 124 131 190 87 148 143 95th Queue (ft) 103 75 70 240 221 200 206 244 328 207 245 220 Link Distance (ft) 373 304 304 736 736 736 463 463 Upstream BIk Time (%) _ 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 170 210 100 Storage BIk Time (%) 0 0 0 0 24 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 1 28 Intersection: 2: Fairview Ave & TH 36 WB Ra Mov ISB Directions Served T R Maximum Queue (ft) 223 88 Average Queue (ft) 126 30 95th Queue (ft) 204 65 - Link Distance (ft) 463 Upstream BIk Time (%) i Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 300 i Storage BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) SimTraffic Report Queuing and Blocking Report 5-Year Build IMP Two Way Ring Road PM Peak Hour Intersection: 3: Fairview Ave & Mall Entrance 1 Movement EB WB WB WB NB NB NB NB NB 5"==N-"=NMJR Directions Served LTR L LT R L T T T R L T TR Maximum Queue (ft) 50 158 191 100 105 233 336 354 240 179 249 314 Average Queue (ft) 13 57 133 57 44 101 116 146 23 68 87 158 95th Queue (ft) 38 121 214 134 91 199 248 279 128 139 189 292 Link Distance (ft) 241 135 135 463 463 463 392 392 Upstream BIk Time (%) 1 13 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 2 27 0 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 50 260 250 160 Storage BIk Time (%) 38 1 0 2 0 0 2 Queuing Penalty (veh) 60 1 0 3 0 0 2 Intersection: 4: Fairview Ave & CR B2 W — EB EB EB EB WB WB WB �B SB Mj§W Directions Served L T T R L T TR L T T L T Maximum Queue (ft) 185 266 246 134 184 178 181 203 194 214 183 1239 Average Queue (ft) 76 142 125 60 86 48 97 98 106 124 89 112 95th Queue (ft) 158 231 203 108 150 113 157 176 182 202 153 1197 Link Distance (ft) 1154 1154 260 260 392 392 1122 Upstream BIk Time (%) _ Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 160 �00 180 200 3_ Storage BIk Time (%) 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 9 0 0 1 0 ' 0 Intersection: 4: Fairview Ave & CR B2 W Directions Served TR Maximum Queue (ft) 269 - Average Queue (ft) 144 95th Queue (ft) 236 - Link Distance (ft) 1122 Upstream BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) SimTraffic Report Queuing and Blocking Report 5-Year Build IMP Two Way Ring Road PM Peak Hour Intersection: 5: Mall Entrance 2 & CR B2 W Movement EB EB EB E6 WB I WB WB Directions Served L T T R L T TR LT R LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 74 277 298 352 104 62 62 200 134 117 Average Queue (ft) 21 92 95 37 36 7 10 87 56 48 95th Queue (ft) 55 227 253 195 82 31 37 161 101 92 Link Distance (ft) 260 260 260 1061 1061 264 264 128 Upstream BIk Time (%) 0 1 1 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 2 4 2 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 50 120 Storage BIk Time (%) 1 10 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 3 7 0 Intersection: 6: Mall Entrance 3 & CR B2 W - EB EB WB WB SB SB Directions Served L T T R L T T R LT R L LT Maximum Queue (ft) 151 238 187 127 151 258 252 165 126 102 180 162 Average Queue (ft) 50 101 81 29 30 141 126 45 69 51 105 37 95th Queue (ft) 104 187 150 85 90 228 211 128 127 93 167 108 Link Distance (ft) 1061 1061 687 687 99 99 427 427 Upstream BIk Time (%) 6 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 8 1 Storage Bay Dist (ft) MO 240 140 Storage BIk Time (%) 0 3 3 0 1 6 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 5 0 Intersection: 6: Mall Entrance 3 & CR B2 W Move Directions Served R Maximum Queue (ft) 46 Average Queue (ft) 18 95th Queue (ft) 39 Link Distance (ft) 427 Upstream BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) SimTraffic Report Queuing and Blocking Report 5-Year Build IMP Two Way Ring Road PM Peak Hour Intersection: 7: Mall Entrance 4/Snelling Ave SB Ramps & CR B2 W Movement -6" EB EB EB WB WB WB WB i Directions Served L T T R L L T T L T R L Maximum Queue (ft) 315 332 305 185 181 153 198 182 69 201 50 134 Average Queue (ft) 167 180 163 47 103 72 102 97 22 83 44 26 95th Queue (ft) 272 272 260 142 168 127 167 159 54 171 55 79 Link Distance (ft) 687 687 667 667 147 147 147 Upstream BIk Time (%) 3 Queuing Penalty (veh) 3 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 160 270 270 150 Storage BIk Time (%) 1 0 8 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) MEnNINEWERM 0 Intersection: 7: Mall Entrance 4/Snelling Ave SB Ramps & CR B2 W — SB SB — Directions Served T R Maximum Queue (ft) 219 96 Average Queue (ft) 110 12 95th Queue (ft) 181 54 Link Distance (ft) 519 Upstream BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage BIk Time (%) 3 Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 8: CR B2 W & Snellina Ave NB Ram Mov MEINEWMIRIEr EB EB WB WB WB SB S Directions Served L T T T T R L R Maximum Queue (ft) 211 40 68 122 87 49 120 191 Average Queue (ft) 83 9 19 43 18 6 25 79 95th Queue (ft) 163 33 54 98 53 30 79 137 - Link Distance (ft) 667 667 1171 1171 380 Upstream BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 270 200 240 — Storage BIk Time (%) 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 SimTraffic Report Queuing and Blocking Report 5-Year Build IMP Two Way Ring Road PM Peak Hour Intersection: 9: Mall Entrance 1 Movement EB NB SB Directions Served L T T R Maximum Queue (it) 4 74 55 122 Average Queue (it) 0 40 28 20 95th Queue (it) 3 63 48 82 — Link Distance (it) 135 476 155 155 Upstream BIk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (it) Storage BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 10: Directions Served Maximum Queue (it) Average Queue (it) 95th Queue (it) Link Distance (it) Upstream BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (it) Storage BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) 143 28 83 63 11 45 111 33 69 331 331 155 Intersection: 11: Mall Entrance 2 Movement EB EB WB WB SB S Directions Served LT T T TR L R Maximum Queue (it) — 111 44 60 82 16 22 Average Queue (it) 53 4 29 37 1 5 95th Queue (it) 86 26 53 62 8 19 Link Distance (it) 182 182 357 357 264 264 Upstream BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (it) Storage BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) SimTraffic Report Queuing and Blocking Report 5-Year Build IMP Two Way Ring Road PM Peak Hour Intersection: 12: Rosedale Shopping Ctr & Mall Entrance 3 Movement EB WB Directions Served LT T Maximum Queue (ft) 98 79 Average Queue (ft) 43 42 95th Queue (ft) 74 69 Link Distance (ft) 493 589 Upstream BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 13: Mall Entrance 4 EB WB SB Directions Served T T L R Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Zone Summa Zone wide Queuing Penalty: 197 69 74 9 10 28 39 0 0 56 62 6 7 589 627 147 147 SimTraffic Report SimTraffic Performance Report 5-Year Build IMP Two Way Ring Road SAT Peak Hour 1: Fairview Ave & TH 36 EB Ramp Performance by movement Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Al Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.3 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.8 0.8 0.3 2.7 0.0 0.0 0.4 - Total Delay (hr) 1.1 0.7 2.7 0.1 3.9 1.0 9.6 Total DelNeh (s) 58.9 4.2 15.8 3.9 25.1 6.1 13.5 Vehicles Entered 68 639 612 89 551 582 2541 Vehicles Exited 68 638 610 88 551 582 2537 Houdy Exit Rate 68 638 610 88 551 582 2537 Input Volume 65 640 610 90 565 576 2546 %of Volume 104 100 100 98 98 101 100 2: Fairview Ave & TH 36 WB Ramps Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.3 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (hr) 1.4 1.5 0.2 0.5 1.6 1.4 2.5 12.1 0.6 4.4 4.4 0.2 Total DelNeh (s) 49.2 52.2 2.5 41.7 41.6 9.7 52.6 42.7 21.6 41.3 20.5 5.2 Vehicles Entered 98 100 317 45 141 532 166 994 94 380 770 157 Vehicles Exited 99 99 317 46 141 531 165 993 94 382 770 157 Houdy Exit Rate 99 99 317 46 141 531 165 993 94 382 770 157 Input Volume 95 100 320 50 145 535 175 985 95 385 770 155 %of Volume 104 99 99 92 97 99 94 101 99 99 100 101 2: Fairview Ave & TH 36 WB Ramps Performance by movement uemea ueay tnr/ U. i Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 Total Delay (hr) 30.9 Total DelNeh (s) 28.9 Vehicles Entered 3794 Vehicles Exited 3794 Houdy Exit Rate 3794 Input Volume 3810 %of Volume 100 SimTraffic Report SimTraffic Performance Report 5-Year Build IMP Two Way Ring Road SAT Peak Hour 3: Fairview Ave & Mall Entrance 1 Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL�S!! Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (hr) 0.1 0.1 0.0 4.1 0.2 0.7 2.1 9.7 1.3 3.6 8.9 0.2 Total DelNeh (s) 53.3 77.6 13.0 35.8 15.4 10.1 36.5 33.1 12.6 55.6 35.3 34.4 Vehicles Entered 6 5 5 407 40 246 208 1049 366 232 895 16 Vehicles Exited 6 5 5 406 41 246 208 1049 368 234 898 16 Houdy Exit Rate 6 5 5 406 41 246 208 1049 368 234 898 16 Input Volume 5 5 1 5 385 45 235 205 1054 355 240 920 15 %of Volume 120 100 100 106 91 105 101 100 104 98 98 107 3: Fairview Ave & Mall Entrance 1 Performance by movement Movement Al Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 Total Delay (hr) 31.0 Total DelNeh (s) 31.8 Vehicles Entered 3475 Vehicles Exited 3482 Houdy Exit Rate 3482 Input Volume 3469 %of Volume 100 4: Fairview Ave & CR B2 W Performance by movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Delay (hr) 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 2.7 0.6 2.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.9 0.4 0.3 Total Delay (hr) 1.1 3.1 2.3 2.8 2.2 1.2 2.9 2.7 1.8 1.4 6.1 1.4 Total DelNeh (s) 23.8 33.7 25.3 33.8 23.1 17.7 48.1 22.2 10.0 28.4 40.8 40.4 Vehicles Entered 163 329 316 297 337 250 213 430 649 169 529 124 Vehicles Exited 163 328 319 299 337 250 212 430 649 170 525 123 Houdy Exit Rate 163 328 319 299 337 250 212 430 649 170 525 123 Input Volume 165 345 325 320 336 260 220 416 650 175 530 125 %of Volume 99 95 98 93 100 96 96 103 100 97 99 98 4: Fairview Ave & CR B2 W Performance by movement Movement Al Denied Delay (hr) 0.6 Denied Del/Veh (s) - 0.6 Total Delay (hr) 29.0 Total DelNeh (s) 27.1 Vehicles Entered 3806 Vehicles Exited 3805 Houdy Exit Rate 3805 Input Volume 3868 %of Volume 98 SimTraffic Report SimTraffic Performance Report 5-Year Build IMP Two Way Ring Road SAT Peak Hour 5: Mall Entrance 2 & CR B2 W Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WB% NBL NBi t SBL�S!! Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.1 Total Delay (hr) 0.6 3.7 0.8 1.9 2.9 0.2 2.8 0.4 1.0 0.2 0.1 0.3 Total DelNeh (s) 20.9 20.0 7.1 25.4 15.3 11.4 41.3 34.6 12.5 33.8 37.1 13.8 Vehicles Entered 105 651 390 260 670 50 238 39 274 19 13 74 Vehicles Exited 104 648 390 260 669 49 239 39 273 19 13 74 Houdy Exit Rate 104 648 390 260 669 49 239 39 273 19 13 74 Input Volume 110 661 400 285 750 50 200 31 235 20 15 70 %of Volume 95 98 98 91 89 98 119 126 116 95 87 105 5: Mall Entrance 2 & CR B2 W Performance by movement Movement Al Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 Total Delay (hr) 14.6 Total DelNeh (s) 18.7 Vehicles Entered 2783 Vehicles Exited 2777 Houdy Exit Rate 2777 Input Volume 2827 %of Volume 98 6: Mall Entrance 3 & CR B2 W Performance by movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 _ Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.1 Total Delay (hr) 1.3 3.8 0.3 0.5 9.4 0.3 1.2 0.1 0.7 3.0 0.2 0.2 Total DelNeh (s) 26.3 21.8 6.4 26.4 41.0 15.2 42.0 38.9 15.7 41.6 39.5 9.3 Vehicles Entered 182 617 186 72 814 74 99 9 163 257 17 75 Vehicles Exited 181 615 187 73 813 75 98 9 163 258 17 74 Houdy Exit Rate 181 615 187 73 813 75 98 9 163 258 17 74 Input Volume 180 590 190 75 836 75 180 15 295 255 15 75 %of Volume 100 104 98 98 97 100 54 60 55 101 113 99 6: Mall Entrance 3 & CR B2 W Performance by movement Movement Al Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) - 0.1 Total Delay (hr) 21.1 Total DelNeh (s) 29.3 Vehicles Entered 2565 Vehicles Exited 2563 i Houdy Exit Rate 2563 Input Volume 2780 %of Volume 92 SimTraffic Report SimTraffic Performance Report 5-Year Build IMP Two Way Ring Road SAT Peak Hour 7: Mall Entrance 4/Snelling Ave SB Ramps & CR B2 W Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL'=NNJR"=1F1R Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.3 1.1 3.6 Total Delay (hr) 5.0 3.9 0.4 4.4 5.0 0.1 0.8 2.0 1.1 0.2 4.2 0.4 Total DelNeh (s) 47.5 24.5 11.1 40.4 27.3 3.9 46.6 44.2 22.2 61.3 54.8 5.2 Vehicles Entered 379 571 115 389 655 68 59 158 177 14 269 245 Vehicles Exited 380 570 116 388 658 67 58 158 176 14 269 246 Houdy Exit Rate 380 570 116 388 658 67 58 158 176 14 269 246 Input Volume 425 626 120 400 666 65 60 160 180 15 265 260 %of Volume 89 91 97 97 99 103 96 99 98 93 102 95 7: Mall Entrance 4/Snellina Ave SB Movement Al Denied Delay (hr) 0.4 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.4 Total Delay (hr) 27.6 Total DelNeh (s) 31.6 Vehicles Entered 3099 Vehicles Exited 3100 Houdy Exit Rate 3100 Input Volume i 3241 %of Volume 96 & CR B2 W Performance by movement 8: CR B2 W & Snelling Ave NB Ramps Performance by movement BT WBT WBR SBL SBR Al Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 1.0 _ Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.2 3.4 3.6 4.9 1.9 Total Delay (hr) 1.7 1.0 2.0 0.0 0.2 4.8 9.5 Total DelNeh (s) 18.8 7.9 16.7 1.8 32.6 24.6 17.9 Vehicles Entered 315 449 425 11 17 689 1906 Vehicles Exited 316 449 424 11 16 688 1904 Houdy Exit Rate 316 449 424 11 16 688 1904 Input Volume 335 490 440 10 15 690 1980 %of Volume 94 92 96 110 107 100 96 SimTraffic Report SimTraffic Performance Report 5-Year Build IMP Two Way Ring Road SAT Peak Hour 9: Mall Entrance 1 Performance by movement Movement EBL EBR NBT -.0." SBR 0 All Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (hr) 0.1 0.2 1.0 0.8 1.2 3.3 Total DelNeh (s) 1.6 1.7 14.8 8.1 6.4 6.3 Vehicles Entered 126 480 240 358 695 1899 Vehicles Exited 126 481 240 359 694 1900 Hourly Exit Rate 126 481 240 359 694 1900 Input Volume 130 470 245 336 665 1846 %of Volume 97 102 98 107 104 103 10: Performance by movement Movement WBL WBR NBT SBT Al Denied Delay (hr) 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.5 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.2 ' Total Delay (hr) 2.6 0.0 1.5 1.2 5.4 Total DelNeh (s) 19.0 4.1 14.7 6.4 12.1 Vehicles Entered 484 31 367 696 1578 Vehicles Exited 486 31 368 696 1581 Hourly Exit Rate 486 31 368 696 1581 Input Volume 490 30 376 620 1516 %of Volume 99 102 98 112 104 11: Mall Entrance 2 Performance by movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Al Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 1.5 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.4 Total Delay (hr) 2.8 0.6 2.2 1.0 0.5 1.0 8.0 Total DelNeh (s) 32.8 21.9 30.5 14.6 7.4 7.9 18.3 Vehicles Entered 302 95 260 248 227 436 1568 Vehicles Exited 302 96 260 248 227 436 1569 Hourly Exit Rate 302 96 260 248 227 436 1569 Input Volume 315 90 155 150 235 465 1410 %of Volume 96 107 168 165 97 94 111 SimTraffic Report SimTraffic Performance Report 5-Year Build IMP Two Way Ring Road SAT Peak Hour 12: Rosedale Shopping Ctr & Mall Entrance 3 Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Al uemea ueay tnr/ u.0 u.0 u.0 u.0 u.0 u.0 u.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.4 0.0 0.0 0.2 Total Delay (hr) 0.5 0.1 1.4 0.1 0.0 0.0 2.2 Total DelNeh (s) 11.1 3.1 16.2 3.2 0.7 1.0 7.9 Vehicles Entered 163 150 315 108 175 102 1013 Vehicles Exited 163 150 316 108 174 102 1013 Houdy Exit Rate 163 150 316 108 174 102 1013 Input Volume 160 154 110 330 175 105 1034 %of Volume 102 97 288 33 99 97 98 13: Mall Entrance 4 Performance by movement Movement EBT WBT WBR SBL SBT SBR Al Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 1.1 3.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 Total Delay (hr) 0.2 0.2 0.6 0.2 0.0 0.3 1.5 Total DelNeh (s) 3.0 13.0 5.9 1.6 1.7 2.9 3.7 Vehicles Entered 219 51 393 452 6 314 1435 Vehicles Exited 219 51 393 452 6 315 1436 Houdy Exit Rate 219 51 393 452 6 315 1436 Input Volume i 226 50 400 455 4 325 1460 %of Volume 97 101 98 99 141 97 98 Total Zone Performance Denied Delay (hr) 3.2 Denied Del/Veh (s) 1.6 Total Delay (hr) 193.7 Total DelNeh (s) 773.2 Vehicles Entered 7343 Vehicles Exited 589 Houdy Exit Rate 589 Input Volume 31787 %of Volume 2 SimTraffic Report Queuing and Blocking Report 5-Year Build IMP Two Way Ring Road SAT Peak Hour Intersection: 1: Fairview Ave & TH 36 EB Ramp Movement WB NB NB SB SB SB Directions Served LR T T L T T Maximum Queue (ft) 176 200 241 374 167 120 Average Queue (ft) 63 86 105 216 28 44 95th Queue (ft) 145 171 211 360 104 104 Link Distance (ft) 395 1169 1169 736 736 Upstream BIk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 380 Storage BIk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 2: Fairview Ave & TH 36 WB Ramps - EB EB EB WB WB NB NB NC�1B SB' Directions Served L T R LT TR L T T T R L T Maximum Queue (ft) 145 158 127 245 324 234 319 544 648 150 387 336 Average Queue (ft) 58 52 27 112 156 119 155 195 283 74 222 192 95th Queue (ft) 114 120 87 207 340 203 263 386 512 197 352 296 Link Distance (ft) 373 304 304 736 736 736 463 463 Upstream BIk Time (%) 0 3 0 1 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 2 3 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 170 170 210 100 Storage BIk Time (%) 0 0 0 0 2 40 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 2 0 = 2 3 38 Intersection: 2: Fairview Ave & TH 36 WB Ra Mov ISB Directions Served T R Maximum Queue (ft) 258 101 Average Queue (ft) 126 37 95th Queue (ft) 208 76 - Link Distance (ft) 463 Upstream BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 300 _ Storage BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) SimTraffic Report Queuing and Blocking Report 5-Year Build IMP Two Way Ring Road SAT Peak Hour Intersection: 3: Fairview Ave & Mall Entrance 1 Movement EB WB WB WB NB I NB M-_ Directions Served LTR L LT R L T T T R L T TR Maximum Queue (ft) 51 184 204 100 233 253 362 510 275 185 418 426 Average Queue (ft) 16 93 177 86 97 96 143 242 91 148 275 32C 95th Queue (ft) 43 170 221 137 181 184 303 443 276 222 457 456 Link Distance (ft) 241 135 135 463 463 463 392 392 Upstream BIk Time (%) 4 32 2 3 3 Queuing Penalty (veh) 12 105 12 16 20 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 50 260 250 160 Storage BIk Time (%) 52 4 0 0 7 0 16 13 Queuing Penalty (veh) 122 9 0 0 26 0 75 31 Intersection: 4: Fairview Ave & CR B2 W - EB EB EB S WB WB NB NB iae� Directions Served L T T R L T TR L T T R L Maximum Queue (ft) 167 184 321 285 203 274 266 218 281 249 83 214 Average Queue (ft) 77 85 105 119 127 116 146 114 93 101 3 85 95th Queue (ft) 135 150 223 234 219 248 241 210 204 191 61 17C Link Distance (ft) 1154 1154 260 260 392 392 392 Upstream BIk Time (%) JNNNW� 3 1 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 15 4 0 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 160� 300 180 200 30C Storage BIk Time (%) 0 1 0 1 9 0 5 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 16 1 10 0 Intersection: 4: Fairview Ave & CR B2 W Directions Served T TR Maximum Queue (ft) 292 383 Average Queue (ft) 165 207 95th Queue (ft) 290 347 Link Distance (ft) 1122 1122 Upstream BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage BIk Time (%) 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 SimTraffic Report Queuing and Blocking Report 5-Year Build IMP Two Way Ring Road SAT Peak Hour Intersection: 5: Mall Entrance 2 & CR B2 W Movement -&W.- EB EB E6 WB WB WB Directions Served L T T R L T TR LT R LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 75 271 268 380 145 290 180 247 231 122 Average Queue (ft) 42 137 120 52 88 74 52 150 88 55 95th Queue (ft) 83 242 231 240 154 212 139 236 181 103 Link Distance (ft) 260 260 260 1061 1061 264 264 128 Upstream BIk Time (%) 1 0 1 0 1 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 2 2 4 1 1 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 50 120 Storage BIk Time (%) 5 32 5 3 Queuing Penalty (veh) 17 35 16 9 Intersection: 6: Mall Entrance 3 & CR B2 W - EB EB EB EB WB WB WB SB SB Directions Served L T T R L T T R LT R L LT Maximum Queue (ft) 184 270 190 143 265 361 332 165 151 102 229 172 Average Queue (ft) 90 138 94 53 65 243 217 72 90 62 127 55 95th Queue (ft) 170 233 170 118 189 341 314 184 144 102 208 137 Link Distance (ft) 1061 1061 687 687 99 99 427 427 Upstream BIk Time (%) 13 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 33 2 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 140 Storage BIk Time (%) 1 6 5 0 0 13 30 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 10 23 0 Intersection: 6: Mall Entrance 3 & CR B2 W Directions Served R Maximum Queue (ft) 78 Average Queue (ft) 25 95th Queue (ft) 54 - Link Distance (ft) 427 Upstream BIk Time (%) - Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) - Storage BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) SimTraffic Report Queuing and Blocking Report 5-Year Build IMP Two Way Ring Road SAT Peak Hour Intersection: 7: Mall Entrance 4/Snelling Ave SB Ramps & CR B2 W Movement EB EB EB EB WB WB WB Directions Served L T T R L L T T L T R L Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) 324 435 230 171 243 227 256 221 243 215 159 112 50 142 104 164 143 173 315 295 190 116 218 177 235 211 279 687 687 667 667 147 25 33 f[Y�>f�7L�>f�lL�l Intersection: 7: Mall Entrance 4/Snelling Ave SB Ramps & CR B2 W Directions Served T R Maximum Queue (ft) 441 275 Average Queue (ft) 196 68 95th Queue (ft) 338 237 Link Distance (ft) 519 Upstream BIk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 250 Storage BIk Time (%) 25 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) s 67 0 Intersection: 8: CR B2 W & Snellina Ave NB Ram 66 52 174 59 48 23 66 53 90 147 147 150 Move EB EB WB WB WB SB Directions Served L T T T T R L R Maximum Queue (ft) 244 95 114 225 170 7 406 265 Average Queue (ft) 109 20 46 108 54 0 140 209 95th Queue (ft) 208 61 97 191 127 5 416 311 Link Distance (ft) 667 667 1171 1171 380 Upstream BIk Time (%) 6 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 270 200 240 Storage BIk Time (%) 0 0 0 16 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 0 1 2 SimTraffic Report Queuing and Blocking Report 5-Year Build IMP Two Way Ring Road SAT Peak Hour Intersection: 9: Mall Entrance 1 Movement EB EB NB SB SB SB Directions Served L R T T R R Maximum Queue (ft) 62 35 168 94 167 226 Average Queue (ft) 6 1 66 46 14 97 95th Queue (ft) 36 25 145 77 86 224 Link Distance (ft) 135 135 476 155 155 155 Upstream BIk Time (%) 0 0 0 6 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 0 21 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 10 SB SB Directions Served L R T T T Maximum Queue (ft) 354 219 149 80 104 Average Queue (ft) 129 27 81 45 54 95th Queue (ft) 273 112 151 70 86 Link Distance (ft) 331 331 155 182 182 Upstream BIk Time (%) 2 0 6 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 21 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 11: Mall Entrance 2 Movement EB EB WB F WB B30 B30 SB SB Directions Served LT T T TR T T L R Maximum Queue (ft) — 192 186 240 317 31 40 34 53 Average Queue (ft) 135 45 66 139 2 4 4 14 95th Queue (ft) 212 155 165 296 30 44 20 42 Link Distance (ft) 182 182 357 357 493 493 264 264 Upstream BIk Time (%) 8 0 0 2 Queuing Penalty (veh) 17 1 0 2 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) SimTraffic Report Queuing and Blocking Report 5-Year Build IMP Two Way Ring Road SAT Peak Hour Intersection: 12: Rosedale Shopping Ctr & Mall Entrance 3 Movement EB WB SB Directions Served LT T L Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) 124 183 19 58 87 1 101 139 10 493 589 99 Intersection: 13: Mall Entrance 4 Directions Served T T R L R Maximum Queue (ft) 53 208 201 26 7 - Average Queue (ft) 27 49 38 1 0 95th Queue (ft) 51 168 164 14 5 Link Distance (ft) 589 627 147 147 Upstream BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 Storage BIk Time (%) 0 2 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 1 Zone Summa Zone wide Queuing Penalty: 889 SimTraffic Report SimTraffic Performance Report 20-Year Background Two Way Ring Road PM Peak Hour 1: Fairview Ave & TH 36 EB Ramp Performance by movement Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT All - Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.4 0.4 0.4 2.7 0.0 0.0 0.3 - Total Delay (hr) 1.3 0.4 3.4 0.1 2.3 1.3 8.8 Total DelNeh (s) 57.7 3.6 16.8 4.1 22.3 6.8 13.4 Vehicles Entered 78 383 725 124 373 670 2353 Vehicles Exited 78 384 723 124 376 670 2355 Houdy Exit Rate 78 384 723 124 376 670 2355 Input Volume 80 380 720 130 375 651 2335 %of Volume 98 101 100 95 100 103 101 2: Fairview Ave & TH 36 WB Ramps Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (hr) 1.0 1.0 0.2 1.2 2.3 0.5 2.2 7.8 0.4 3.5 5.0 0.2 Total DelNeh (s) 41.3 44.5 2.3 42.3 41.1 4.4 44.3 34.0 11.9 41.8 29.1 6.5 Vehicles Entered 88 77 341 98 203 380 178 806 123 291 600 104 Vehicles Exited 87 77 341 98 203 379 178 811 123 291 604 104 Houdy Exit Rate 87 77 341 98 203 379 178 811 123 291 604 104 Input Volume 90 80 345 100 205 380 175 801 125 275 581 100 %of Volume 97 97 99 98 99 100 102 101 98 106 104 104 2: Fairview Ave & TH 36 WB Ramps Performance by movement uemea ueay tnr/ U. i Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 Total Delay (hr) 25.2 Total DelNeh (s) 27.2 Vehicles Entered 3289 Vehicles Exited 3296 Houdy Exit Rate 3296 Input Volume 3256 %of Volume 101 SimTraffic Report SimTraffic Performance Report 20-Year Background Two Way Ring Road PM Peak Hour 3: Fairview Ave & Mall Entrance 1 Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBTJ NBR SELLS!! Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (hr) 0.1 0.1 0.0 2.1 0.1 0.1 0.7 5.0 0.3 0.4 3.3 0.0 Total DelNeh (s) 50.4 46.8 11.1 40.1 8.9 3.4 19.6 17.8 8.0 16.4 14.8 11.1 Vehicles Entered 5 6 5 189 29 102 120 1017 141 82 801 9 Vehicles Exited 5 6 5 189 29 102 120 1013 141 82 802 9 Hourly Exit Rate 5 6 5 189 29 102 120 1013 141 82 802 9 Input Volume 5 5 1 5 170 25 95 120 1011 140 ' 80 780 10 %of Volume 100 120 100 111 115 108 100 100 101 103 103 90 3: Fairview Ave & Mall Entrance 1 Performance by movement Movement Al Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 - Total Delay (hr) 12.2 Total DelNeh (s) 17.4 w Vehicles Entered 2506 Vehicles Exited 2503 Hourly Exit Rate 2503 Input Volume 2446 %of Volume 102 4: Fairview Ave & CR B2 W Performance by movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Delay (hr) 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 2.4 0.5 2.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.9 0.4 0.3 Total Delay (hr) 1.1 5.5 0.6 1.6 1.2 0.7 2.2 4.6 1.0 1.5 4.4 0.8 Total DelNeh (s) 23.0 32.1 10.6 24.9 20.2 14.1 42.4 37.2 7.2 26.6 34.3 29.9 Vehicles Entered 168 614 216 226 209 174 180 439 499 199 450 95 Vehicles Exited 170 616 217 226 208 174 180 437 500 202 450 96 Hourly Exit Rate 170 616 217 226 208 174 180 437 500 202 450 96 Input Volume 165 605 205 235 215 180 180 445 485 205 430 95 %of Volume 103 102 106 96 97 97 100 98 103 98 105 101 4: Fairview Ave & CR B2 W Performance by movement Movement Al Denied Delay (hr) 0.6 Denied Del/Veh (s) - 0.6 Total Delay (hr) 25.2 Total DelNeh (s) 25.8 Vehicles Entered 3469 Vehicles Exited 3476 Hourly Exit Rate 3476 Input Volume 3446 %of Volume 101 SimTraffic Report SimTraffic Performance Report 20-Year Background Two Way Ring Road PM Peak Hour 5: Mall Entrance 2 & CR B2 W Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBPO NBL NBTJ NBR SBL�S!! Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 Total Delay (hr) 0.2 2.7 0.4 0.5 0.8 0.0 1.6 0.1 0.6 0.3 0.1 0.2 Total DelNeh (s) 11.0 9.1 6.2 15.1 5.4 3.8 45.2 40.9 15.2 36.5 52.0 15.8 Vehicles Entered 70 1044 205 108 537 28 122 7 129 32 6 35 Vehicles Exited 70 1046 207 108 537 28 123 7 129 31 6 35 Houdy Exit Rate 70 1046 207 108 537 28 123 7 129 31 6 35 Input Volume 70 1021 205 110 580 30 95 5 95 35 5 40 %of Volume 100 102 101 98 93 93 130 140 136 88 120 87 5: Mall Entrance 2 & CR B2 W Performance by movement Movement Al Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 Total Delay (hr) 7.3 Total DelNeh (s) 11.2 Vehicles Entered 2323 Vehicles Exited 2327 Houdy Exit Rate 2327 Input Volume 2291 %of Volume 102 6: Mall Entrance 3 & CR B2 W Performance by movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 _ Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.1 Total Delay (hr) 0.7 3.0 0.1 0.2 3.7 0.2 0.7 0.1 0.4 2.2 0.1 0.1 Total DelNeh (s) 16.9 10.7 4.5 22.3 23.8 8.7 44.1 39.7 14.2 42.9 35.9 5.5 Vehicles Entered 143 995 116 28 557 89 59 7 96 180 8 56 Vehicles Exited 143 992 117 28 558 89 59 7 97 181 9 56 Houdy Exit Rate 143 992 117 28 558 89 59 7 97 181 9 56 Input Volume 145 945 110 30 560 85 105 11 165 185 10 55 %of Volume 99 105 107 93 100 105 56 64 59 98 90 101 6: Mall Entrance 3 & CR B2 W Performance by movement Movement Al Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 Total Delay (hr) 11.5 Total DelNeh (s) _ 17.5 Vehicles Entered 2334 Vehicles Exited 2336 Houdy Exit Rate 2336 Input Volume 2406 %ofVolume 97 SimTraffic Report SimTraffic Performance Report 20-Year Background Two Way Ring Road PM Peak Hour 7: Mall Entrance 4/Snelling Ave SB Ramps & CR B2 W Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBLNS!! Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.7 0.9 3.5 Total Delay (hr) 2.8 4.8 0.2 2.5 2.4 0.1 0.3 0.7 0.2 0.3 1.4 0.2 Total DelNeh (s) 39.2 18.4 8.7 42.3 19.7 3.3 33.1 36.9 6.7 45.2 41.9 2.6 Vehicles Entered 259 939 80 209 432 68 35 71 94 25 118 234 Vehicles Exited 259 939 80 210 434 68 36 72 95 26 118 233 Houdy Exit Rate 259 939 80 210 434 68 36 72 95 26 118 233 Input Volume 280 955 70 205 435 75 35 70 80 25 125 235 %of Volume 92 98 114 102 100 91 102 102 119 103 94 99 7: Mall Entrance 4/Snellina Ave SB Movement Al Denied Delay (hr) 0.3 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.4 Total Delay (hr) 16.0 Total DelNeh (s) 22.3 Vehicles Entered 2564 Vehicles Exited 2570 Houdy Exit Rate 2570 Input Volume i 2591 %of Volume 99 & CR B2 W Performance by movement 8: CR B2 W & Snelling Ave NB Ramps Performance by movement BT WBT WBR SBL SBR AI Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.3 0.4 _ Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.2 3.0 1.0 3.6 0.8 Total Delay (hr) 1.0 0.9 0.4 0.0 0.4 0.8 3.5 Total DelNeh (s) 11.2 4.1 4.1 2.6 41.8 8.5 6.7 Vehicles Entered 316 744 372 64 30 339 1865 Vehicles Exited 315 744 371 64 31 338 1863 Houdy Exit Rate 315 744 371 64 31 338 1863 Input Volume 325 736 370 60 30 345 1866 %of Volume 97 101 100 106 102 98 100 SimTraffic Report SimTraffic Performance Report 20-Year Background Two Way Ring Road PM Peak Hour 9: Mall Entrance 1 Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR NBT Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 - Total Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.4 Total DelNeh (s) 0.4 0.8 1.3 6.3 5.9 0.7 1.9 - Vehicles Entered 73 1 156 60 90 320 700 Vehicles Exited 73 1 156 60 90 321 701 Hourly Exit Rate 73 1 156 60 90 321 701 Input Volume 75 1 150 60 85 290 660 - %ofVolume 98 133 104 100 106 111 106 10: Performance by movement Movement WBL WBR NBT SBT Al Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 - Total Delay (hr) 0.3 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.5 Total DelNeh (s) 5.8 2.2 3.3 1.2 2.9 Vehicles Entered 181 26 133 330 670 Vehicles Exited 182 26 133 329 670 Hourly Exit Rate 182 26 133 329 670 Input Volume 180 20 135 270 605 %of Volume 101 130 99 122 111 11: Mall Entrance 2 Performance by movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBT SBR Al Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (hr) 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.2 1.1 Total DelNeh (s) 6.4 6.7 9.2 2.4 4.7 2.5 4.4 5.4 Vehicles Entered 115 49 135 143 127 1 194 764 Vehicles Exited 114 49 136 144 127 1 194 765 Hourly Exit Rate 114 49 136 144 127 1 194 765 Input Volume 115 50 80 80 130 1 190 646 %of Volume 99 98 171 181 98 133 102 119 SimTraffic Report SimTraffic Performance Report 20-Year Background Two Way Ring Road PM Peak Hour 12: Rosedale Shopping Ctr & Mall Entrance 3 Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Al - Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.1 - Total Delay (hr) 0.1 0.1 0.6 0.1 0.0 0.0 1.0 Total DelNeh (s) 6.1 3.7 12.4 3.3 0.5 0.8 5.9 - Vehicles Entered 84 91 183 76 102 52 588 Vehicles Exited 84 92 183 76 102 52 589 Houdy Exit Rate 84 92 183 76 102 52 589 Input Volume 90 90 65 190 100 50 586 i %of Volume 94 102 280 40 102 103 101 13: Mall Entrance 4 Performance by movement Movement EBT WBT WBR SBL SBT SBR Al Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.2 3.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 Total Delay (hr) 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.6 Total DelNeh (s) 3.3 7.7 2.7 1.3 1.5 2.6 2.7 Vehicles Entered 153 49 200 226 1 182 811 Vehicles Exited 153 49 201 226 1 183 813 Houdy Exit Rate 153 49 201 226 1 183 813 Input Volume = 150 50 185 220 1 180 787 %of Volume 102 98 109 103 133 102 103 Total Zone Performance Denied Delay (hr) 1.8 Denied Del/Veh (s) 1.1 Total Delay (hr) 113.3 Total DelNeh (s) 614.3 Vehicles Entered 5981 Vehicles Exited 473 Houdy Exit Rate 473 Input Volume 23921 %of Volume 2 SimTraffic Report Queuing and Blocking Report 20-Year Background Two Way Ring Road PM Peak Hour Intersection: 1: Fairview Ave & TH 36 EB Ramp Movement WB NB NB SB SB S- - Directions Served LR T T L T T Maximum Queue (ft) 146 276 268 318 133 130 - Average Queue (ft) 67 114 116 149 40 58 95th Queue (ft) 121 244 241 271 101 118 Link Distance (ft) 395 1169 1169 736 736 Upstream BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 380 Storage BIk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Intersection: 2: Fairview Ave & TH 36 WB Ramps - EB EB WB WB NB NB NB NB NB SB SB Directions Served L T R LT TR L T T T R L T Maximum Queue (ft) 142 96 135 256 246 221 287 385 376 150 315 249 Average Queue (ft) 45 32 25 159 84 120 137 140 183 70 171 157 95th Queue (ft) 101 77 84 235 213 197 222 256 309 191 277 242 Link Distance (ft) 373 304 304 736 736 736 463 463 Upstream BIk Time (%) 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) _ 0 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 170 210 100 Storage BIk Time (%) 0 0 0 1 23 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 29 Intersection: 2: Fairview Ave & TH 36 WB Ra Mov ISB Directions Served T R Maximum Queue (ft) 248 84 Average Queue (ft) 141 34 95th Queue (ft) 227 71 Link Distance (ft) 463 Upstream BIk Time (%) + Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 300 Storage BIk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 SimTraffic Report Queuing and Blocking Report 20-Year Background Two Way Ring Road PM Peak Hour Intersection: 3: Fairview Ave & Mall Entrance 1 Movement EB WB WB WB i NB SB'==N-W=NmJR Directions Served LTR L LT R L T T T R L T TR Maximum Queue (ft) 61 115 185 100 112 205 295 400 231 158 275 332 Average Queue (ft) 14 47 96 31 47 92 106 151 14 44 97 176 95th Queue (ft) 43 96 172 104 91 173 224 307 105 98 208 325 Link Distance (ft) 241 135 135 463 463 463 392 392 Upstream BIk Time (%) 0 4 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 5 1 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 50 260 250 160 Storage BIk Time (%) 26 0 2 0 0 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 25 0 2 0 0 1 Intersection: 4: Fairview Ave & CR B2 W — EB EB EB SB SB Directions Served L T T R L T TR L T T L T Maximum Queue (ft) 185 319 290 206 171 156 207 212 222 200 180 259 Average Queue (ft) 89 168 150 63 94 51 94 104 103 118 96 125 95th Queue (ft) 174 266 242 120 162 114 165 188 183 191 165 224 Link Distance (ft) 1154 1154 260 260 392 392 1122 Upstream BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 160 —00 180 200 300 Storage BIk Time (%) 0 10 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 17 1 0 4 0 0 Intersection: 4: Fairview Ave & CR B2 W Move Directions Served TR Maximum Queue (ft) 296 Average Queue (ft) 165 95th Queue (ft) 261 — Link Distance (ft) 1122 Upstream BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) — SimTraffic Report Queuing and Blocking Report 20-Year Background Two Way Ring Road PM Peak Hour Intersection: 5: Mall Entrance 2 & CR B2 W Movement EB EB EB EB WB I WB WB NB Directions Served L T T R L T TR LT R LTR Maximum Queue (it) 74 276 297 322 95 53 66 160 125 109 Average Queue (it) 20 95 120 66 26 8 9 82 52 46 95th Queue (it) 55 242 289 271 65 34 38 143 95 92 Link Distance (it) 260 260 260 1061 1061 264 264 128 Upstream BIk Time (%) 0 1 1 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 2 6 5 0 Storage Bay Dist (it) 50 120 Storage BIk Time (%) 1 9 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 4 6 0 Intersection: 6: Mall Entrance 3 & CR B2 W - EB EB EB El WB WB WB WB SB SB Directions Served L T T R L T T R LT R L LT Maximum Queue (it) 144 223 189 128 92 230 231 165 111 105 185 145 Average Queue (it) 50 98 77 26 21 127 113 39 60 43 96 30 95th Queue (it) 105 186 153 81 65 207 188 111 117 79 157 83 Link Distance (it) 1061 1061 687 687 99 99 427 427 Upstream BIk Time (%) 3 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 4 0 Storage Bay Dist (it) 120 240 140 Storage BIk Time (%) 2 3 0 0 4 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 4 0 JAL 0 4 0 Intersection: 6: Mall Entrance 3 & CR B2 W Move Directions Served R Maximum Queue (it) 50 Average Queue (it) 17 95th Queue (it) 40 Link Distance (it) 427 Upstream BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (it) Storage BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) SimTraffic Report Queuing and Blocking Report 20-Year Background Two Way Ring Road PM Peak Hour Intersection: 7: Mall Entrance 4/Snelling Ave SB Ramps & CR B2 W Movement -LU.- EB EB EB WB WB WB WB NB Directions Served L T T R L L T T L T R L Maximum Queue (ft) 299 345 356 185 162 182 200 162 77 167 50 117 Average Queue (ft) 153 181 178 55 81 76 97 87 27 63 43 27 95th Queue (ft) 249 293 296 160 141 138 160 142 61 136 57 75 Link Distance (ft) 687 687 667 667 147 147 147 Upstream BIk Time (%) 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 160 270 270 150 Storage BIk Time (%) 0 1 9 0 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 Intersection: 7: Mall Entrance 4/Snelling Ave SB Ramps & CR B2 W Directions Served T R Maximum Queue (ft) 171 87 Average Queue (ft) 81 12 95th Queue (ft) 149 55 Link Distance (ft) 519 Upstream BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage BIk Time (%) 2 Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 8: CR B2 W & Snellina Ave NB Ram Mov MEINEWMIRIEr EB EB WB WB WB SB S Directions Served L T T T T R L R Maximum Queue (ft) 191 52 65 118 66 66 78 148 Average Queue (ft) 75 8 18 40 19 9 26 76 95th Queue (ft) 151 33 54 90 54 41 66 129 Link Distance (ft) 667 667 1171 1171 380 Upstream BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 270 200 240 Storage BIk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 SimTraffic Report Queuing and Blocking Report 20-Year Background Two Way Ring Road PM Peak Hour Intersection: 9: Mall Entrance 1 Movement NB SB SB - Directions Served T T R Maximum Queue (ft) 60 52 43 - Average Queue (ft) 28 23 2 95th Queue (ft) 51 39 23 - Link Distance (ft) 476 155 155 Upstream BIk Time (%) - Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) - Storage BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) - Intersection: 10: Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) _jL L R T 73 28 54 37 15 28 62 36 48 331 331 155 Intersection: 11: Mall Entrance 2 Mov EB EB WB WB SB S Directions Served LT T T TR L R Maximum Queue (ft) 83 25 73 116 15 27 Average Queue (ft) 47 1 31 39 1 3 95th Queue (ft) 73 12 56 76 7 18 Link Distance (ft) 182 182 357 357 264 264 Upstream BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) SimTraffic Report Queuing and Blocking Report 20-Year Background Two Way Ring Road PM Peak Hour Intersection: 12: Rosedale Shopping Ctr & Mall Entrance 3 Movement EB WB SB - Directions Served LT T L Maximum Queue (ft) 76 103 4 Average Queue (ft) 39 58 0 95th Queue (ft) 61 94 3 Link Distance (ft) 493 589 99 Upstream BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 13: Mall Entrance 4 EB WB - Directions Served T T Maximum Queue (ft) 57 61 - Average Queue (ft) 27 28 95th Queue (ft) 49 54 - Link Distance (ft) 589 627 Upstream BIk Time (%) - Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) - Storage BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) - Zone Summa Zone wide Queuing Penalty: 144 SimTraffic Report SimTraffic Performance Report 20 Year Background Two Way Ring Road SAT Peak Hour 1: Fairview Ave & TH 36 EB Ramp Performance by movement Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT All - Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.3 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.7 0.7 0.3 2.8 0.0 0.0 0.4 - Total Delay (hr) 1.1 0.7 3.1 0.1 4.5 1.0 10.6 Total DelNeh (s) 56.9 4.0 18.1 3.9 27.4 6.3 14.5 Vehicles Entered 69 664 612 97 588 589 2619 Vehicles Exited 68 664 610 97 587 589 2615 Houdy Exit Rate 68 664 610 97 587 589 2615 Input Volume 70 670 605 95 570 581 2590 %of Volume 97 99 101 102 103 101 101 2: Fairview Ave & TH 36 WB Ramps Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.4 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (hr) 1.3 1.6 0.3 0.5 1.7 1.4 2.9 11.7 0.2 5.2 5.3 0.3 Total DelNeh (s) 48.3 55.4 2.7 38.7 40.0 9.9 49.2 41.9 8.7 44.9 24.2 6.6 Vehicles Entered 93 100 362 44 157 509 207 972 96 407 780 165 Vehicles Exited 93 99 361 44 157 509 205 969 97 405 777 164 Houdy Exit Rate 93 99 361 44 157 509 205 969 97 405 777 164 Input Volume 100 105 345 50 155 525 190 986 100 395 760 170 %of Volume 93 95 105 88 101 97 108 98 97 103 102 96 2: Fairview Ave & TH 36 WB Ramps Performance by movement uemea ueay tnr/ u.z Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.2 Total Delay (hr) 32.3 Total DelNeh (s) 29.4 Vehicles Entered 3892 Vehicles Exited 3880 Houdy Exit Rate 3880 Input Volume 3880 %of Volume 100 SimTraffic Report SimTraffic Performance Report 20 Year Background Two Way Ring Road SAT Peak Hour 3: Fairview Ave & Mall Entrance 1 Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBR SBL�S!! Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (hr) 0.1 0.1 0.0 3.2 0.2 0.4 1.8 9.1 0.8 1.2 8.9 0.1 Total DelNeh (s) 46.7 53.5 13.5 36.5 15.2 8.2 33.7 28.6 12.8 31.5 30.8 29.0 Vehicles Entered 7 6 5 315 46 172 194 1144 232 140 1035 16 Vehicles Exited 6 6 5 314 46 172 194 1143 234 139 1034 17 Houdy Exit Rate 6 6 5 314 46 172 194 1143 234 139 1034 17 Input Volume 5 5 1 5 290 45 160 205 1170 235 145 1031 15 %of Volume 120 120 100 108 102 108 95 98 100 96 100 113 3: Fairview Ave & Mall Entrance 1 Performance by movement Movement Al Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 _ Total Delay (hr) 26.1 Total DelNeh (s) 28.2 _ Vehicles Entered 3312 Vehicles Exited 3310 Houdy Exit Rate 3310 Input Volume 3311 %of Volume 100 4: Fairview Ave & CR B2 W Performance by movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Delay (hr) 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 2.7 0.6 2.7 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.9 0.4 0.3 Total Delay (hr) 1.2 3.7 2.3 4.0 2.4 1.4 2.2 3.3 2.0 1.3 6.3 1.4 Total DelNeh (s) 25.2 35.6 26.3 41.2 24.9 20.6 40.6 26.7 10.0 27.7 40.8 40.2 Vehicles Entered 177 369 308 350 348 250 188 434 700 165 544 126 Vehicles Exited 177 370 305 346 348 250 188 435 697 168 539 128 Houdy Exit Rate 177 370 305 346 348 250 188 435 697 168 539 128 Input Volume 180 355 305 345 345 265 195 436 705 170 540 135 %of Volume 98 104 100 100 101 94 96 100 99 99 100 95 4: Fairview Ave & CR B2 W Performance by movement Movement Al Denied Delay (hr) 0.6 Denied Del/Veh (s) - 0.6 Total Delay (hr) 31.5 Total DelNeh (s) 28.3 Vehicles Entered 3959 Vehicles Exited 3951 Houdy Exit Rate 3951 Input Volume 3976 %of Volume 99 SimTraffic Report SimTraffic Performance Report 20 Year Background Two Way Ring Road SAT Peak Hour 5: Mall Entrance 2 & CR B2 W Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WB% NBL NBTJ NBR SELLS!! Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.2 Total Delay (hr) 0.7 3.3 0.6 1.3 4.1 0.2 2.5 0.4 0.9 0.1 0.2 0.3 Total DelNeh (s) 20.3 15.1 6.8 28.4 19.2 11.0 43.6 43.6 14.8 28.9 37.1 15.3 Vehicles Entered 116 789 331 168 761 52 207 33 211 14 17 73 Vehicles Exited 116 787 330 167 762 52 207 33 210 14 17 73 Houdy Exit Rate 116 787 330 167 762 52 207 33 210 14 17 73 Input Volume 110 770 350 190 829 50 160 25 160 20 15 70 %of Volume 106 102 94 88 92 103 129 131 131 70 113 104 5: Mall Entrance 2 & CR B2 W Performance by movement Movement Al Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 _ Total Delay (hr) 14.7 Total DelNeh (s) 18.9 _ Vehicles Entered 2772 Vehicles Exited 2768 Houdy Exit Rate 2768 Input Volume 2750 %of Volume 101 6: Mall Entrance 3 & CR B2 W Performance by movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 _ Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.3 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.2 Total Delay (hr) 1.4 3.5 0.4 0.4 9.0 0.3 1.1 0.1 0.6 3.0 0.1 0.2 Total DelNeh (s) 25.9 19.1 6.2 26.4 39.4 15.2 43.4 41.6 15.5 41.2 37.9 9.0 Vehicles Entered 193 659 208 48 814 80 90 9 143 258 14 85 Vehicles Exited 192 657 207 47 806 80 90 9 143 259 14 85 Houdy Exit Rate 192 657 207 47 806 80 90 9 143 259 14 85 Input Volume 180 620 190 50 816 75 180 16 275 255 15 75 %of Volume 107 106 109 94 99 107 50 57 52 102 93 114 6: Mall Entrance 3 & CR B2 W Performance by movement Movement Al Denied Delay (hr) 0.1 Denied Del/Veh (s) - 0.1 Total Delay (hr) _ 20.2 Total DelNeh (s) 27.7 Vehicles Entered 2601 Vehicles Exited 2589 Houdy Exit Rate 2589 Input Volume 2747 %of Volume 94 SimTraffic Report SimTraffic Performance Report 20 Year Background Two Way Ring Road SAT Peak Hour 7: Mall Entrance 4/Snelling Ave SB Ramps & CR B2 W Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL'=NNJR"=1F1R Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.4 1.0 3.5 Total Delay (hr) 5.2 3.8 0.4 4.2 4.6 0.1 0.7 1.4 0.7 0.2 2.8 0.3 Total DelNeh (s) 48.4 23.4 10.6 41.2 26.3 3.8 43.3 41.0 17.8 43.2 46.4 3.9 Vehicles Entered 382 574 128 359 628 70 60 122 136 17 215 258 Vehicles Exited 382 573 128 357 627 70 60 122 135 18 214 258 Houdy Exit Rate 382 573 128 357 627 70 60 122 135 18 214 258 Input Volume 420 635 120 350 634 65 60 120 140 20 215 250 %of Volume 91 90 107 102 99 107 100 102 96 90 99 103 7: Mall Entrance 4/Snellina Ave SB Movement Al Denied Delay (hr) 0.3 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.4 Total Delay (hr) 24.4 Total DelNeh (s) 29.5 Vehicles Entered 2949 Vehicles Exited 2944 Houdy Exit Rate 2944 Input Volume i 3030 %of Volume 97 & CR B2 W Performance by movement 8: CR B2 W & Snelling Ave NB Ramps Performance by movement BL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Al Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.7 _ Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.2 3.4 1.5 3.5 1.3 Total Delay (hr) 1.1 0.8 1.6 0.0 0.2 3.6 7.3 Total DelNeh (s) 14.7 6.4 14.1 1.8 27.3 19.7 14.4 Vehicles Entered 269 457 397 14 26 656 1819 Vehicles Exited 270 458 398 14 26 660 1826 Houdy Exit Rate 270 458 398 14 26 660 1826 Input Volume 295 500 405 15 20 645 1880 %of Volume 92 92 98 93 130 102 97 SimTraffic Report SimTraffic Performance Report 20 Year Background Two Way Ring Road SAT Peak Hour 9: Mall Entrance 1 Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR NBT Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 - Total Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.7 1.4 Total DelNeh (s) 0.4 0.4 1.4 6.9 7.1 4.6 4.1 - Vehicles Entered 121 7 251 100 189 534 1202 Vehicles Exited 121 7 251 100 189 533 1201 Hourly Exit Rate 121 7 251 100 189 533 1201 Input Volume 130 5 250 110 170 495 1160 - %ofVolume 93 140 101 91 111 108 104 10: Performance by movement Movement WBL WBR NBMBT Al Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 ' Total Delay (hr) 0.8 0.0 0.4 0.8 2.1 Total DelNeh (s) 9.1 2.4 6.5 5.7 6.7 Vehicles Entered 313 30 221 533 1097 Vehicles Exited 313 30 221 532 1096 Hourly Exit Rate 313 30 221 532 1096 Input Volume 320 30 240 450 1040 %of Volume 98 99 92 118 105 11: Mall Entrance 2 Performance by movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBT SBR Pill Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (hr) 0.7 0.2 1.1 0.4 0.4 0.0 0.5 3.2 Total DelNeh (s) 13.2 10.2 16.6 5.1 6.2 1.0 6.0 9.1 Vehicles Entered 186 65 231 263 213 1 300 1259 Vehicles Exited 187 65 231 263 213 1 302 1262 Hourly Exit Rate 187 65 231 263 213 1 302 1262 Input Volume 200 70 130 145 235 1 320 1101 %of Volume 93 93 178 181 91 133 94 115 SimTraffic Report SimTraffic Performance Report 20 Year Background Two Way Ring Road SAT Peak Hour 12: Rosedale Shopping Ctr & Mall Entrance 3 Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBT SBR Al - Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 - Total Delay (hr) 0.3 0.1 1.6 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.2 Total DelNeh (s) 9.4 2.6 17.3 3.0 0.6 0.3 0.9 8.0 - Vehicles Entered 126 140 332 116 185 1 82 982 Vehicles Exited 125 140 333 115 185 1 82 981 Houdy Exit Rate 125 140 333 115 185 1 82 981 Input Volume 140 155 110 330 175 1 80 991 %ofVolume 89 90 303 35 106 133 103 99 13: Mall Entrance 4 Performance by movement Movement EBT WBT WBR SBL SBT SBR Al Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.8 3.6 0.0 0.0 0.9 Total Delay (hr) 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.3 1.1 Total DelNeh (s) 2.9 10.4 3.7 1.5 2.9 3.0 Vehicles Entered 229 51 319 368 0 332 1299 Vehicles Exited 228 51 318 368 0 332 1297 Houdy Exit Rate 228 51 318 368 0 332 1297 Input Volume = 226 50 320 360 0 325 1282 %of Volume 101 101 99 102 102 101 Total Zone Performance Denied Delay (hr) 2.6 Denied Del/Veh (s) 1.3 Total Delay (hr) 177.1 Total DelNeh (s) 726.1 Vehicles Entered 6951 Vehicles Exited 568 Houdy Exit Rate 568 Input Volume 29739 %of Volume 2 SimTraffic Report Queuing and Blocking Report 20 Year Background Two Way Ring Road SAT Peak Hour Intersection: 1: Fairview Ave & TH 36 EB Ramp Movement WB NB NB SB SB SB - Directions Served LR T T L T T Maximum Queue (ft) 124 208 237 394 308 106 - Average Queue (ft) 55 95 113 244 36 40 95th Queue (ft) 107 187 223 395 180 94 Link Distance (ft) 380 1169 1169 734 734 Upstream BIk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 380 Storage BIk Time (%) 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 4 Intersection: 2: Fairview Ave & TH 36 WB Ramps - EB EB EB WB WB NB NB NB NB NB SB� Directions Served L T R LT TR L T T T R L T Maximum Queue (ft) 126 128 129 246 319 231 388 534 590 358 410 317 Average Queue (ft) 51 52 29 112 138 136 162 190 269 28 250 21C 95th Queue (ft) 107 108 84 186 324 223 290 357 467 216 379 302 Link Distance (ft) 373 304 304 734 734 734 734 463 463 Upstream BIk Time (%) 0 4 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 170 170 .210 Storage BIk Time (%) 0 0 0 2 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 0 0 = 2 Intersection: 2: Fairview Ave & TH 36 WB Ra Mov ISB Directions Served T R Maximum Queue (ft) 249 144 Average Queue (ft) 141 46 95th Queue (ft) 225 99 Link Distance (ft) 463 Upstream BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 300 Storage BIk Time (%) 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 SimTraffic Report Queuing and Blocking Report 20 Year Background Two Way Ring Road SAT Peak Hour Intersection: 3: Fairview Ave & Mall Entrance 1 Movement EB WB WB WB NB 0 NB NB NB SB'==N-W=NmJR Directions Served LTR L LT R L T T T R L T TR Maximum Queue (ft) 47 174 194 100 196 283 413 574 275 185 414 438 Average Queue (ft) 16 77 152 66 90 92 150 269 81 90 260 317 95th Queue (ft) 42 149 224 135 156 193 348 516 277 181 448 449 Link Distance (ft) 241 135 135 463 463 463 392 392 Upstream BIk Time (%) 2 18 0 5 2 5 Queuing Penalty (veh) 4 46 0 24 10 28 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 50 260 250 160 Storage BIk Time (%) 42 2 0 11 0 0 13 Queuing Penalty (veh) 66 4 0 26 0 2 20 - EB EB N NB NB NB SE Directions Served L T T R L T TR L T T R L Maximum Queue (ft) 185 252 214 261 205 299 278 206 206 196 134 25C Average Queue (ft) 85 101 104 117 156 157 165 103 89 96 7 8C 95th Queue (ft) 153 184 175 214 241 306 258 184 167 164 59 164 Link Distance (ft) 1154 1154 260 260 392 392 392 Upstream BIk Time (%) 9 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 44 5 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 300 180 200 30C Storage BIk Time (%) 1 2 0 17 1 1 0 C Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 30 2 2 0 C Intersection: 4: Fairview Ave & CR B2 W Directions Served T TR Maximum Queue (ft) 332 368 Average Queue (ft) 175 223 95th Queue (ft) 293 341 - Link Distance (ft) 1122 1122 Upstream BIk Time (%) - Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) - Storage BIk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 - SimTraffic Report Queuing and Blocking Report 20 Year Background Two Way Ring Road SAT Peak Hour Intersection: 5: Mall Entrance 2 & CR B2 W Movement —LU.— EB EB E6 WB WB WB MNB Directions Served L T T R L T TR LT R LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 75 275 � 371 144 382 194 229 258 125 Average Queue (ft) 43 127 119 62 64 100 61 141 84 55 95th Queue (ft) 83 251 257 278 141 333 153 225 181 106 Link Distance (ft) 260 260 260 1061 1061 264 264 128 Upstream BIk Time (%) 1 1 2 0 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 2 4 7 0 0 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 50 120 Storage BIk Time (%) 6 23 1 10 Queuing Penalty (veh) 24 25 4 19 Intersection: 6: Mall Entrance 3 & CR B2 W — EB EB EB EB WB WB WB SB SB Directions Served L T T R L T T R LT R L LT Maximum Queue (ft) 185 324 233 141 214 326 317 165 139 109 211 174 Average Queue (ft) 86 135 92 52 40 228 214 89 86 54 128 58 95th Queue (ft) 163 257 175 113 128 310 301 207 140 95 199 139 Link Distance (ft) 1061 1061 687 687 99 99 427 427 Upstream BIk Time (%) 11 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 25 2 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 20 240 140 Storage BIk Time (%) 1 5 3 0 10 30 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 5 23 0 Intersection: 6: Mall Entrance 3 & CR B2 W Directions Served R Maximum Queue (ft) 79 Average Queue (ft) 27 95th Queue (ft) 58 Link Distance (ft) 427 Upstream BIk Time (%) + Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) SimTraffic Report Queuing and Blocking Report 20 Year Background Two Way Ring Road SAT Peak Hour Intersection: 7: Mall Entrance 4/Snelling Ave SB Ramps & CR B2 W Movement EB EB EB EB WB WB WB --UM NI Directions Served L T T R L L T T L T R L Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) 324 471 287 167 213 220 244 202 242 223 160 114 57 121 112 151 136 144 320 318 211 131 198 185 213 199 249 687 687 667 667 147 14 15 300 4 14 f[Y�>f�7L�>f�lL�l Intersection: 7: Mall Entrance 4/Snelling Ave SB Ramps & CR B2 W Directions Served T R Maximum Queue (ft) 296 123 Average Queue (ft) 144 24 95th Queue (ft) 254 96 Link Distance (ft) 519 Upstream BIk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 250 Storage BIk Time (%) 9 Queuing Penalty (veh) .26 Intersection: 8: CR B2 W & Snellina Ave NB Ram 62 52 149 57 46 21 65 51 78 147 147 150 Mov MEINEWMIRIEr EB EB WB WB WB SB Directions Served L T T T T R L R Maximum Queue (ft) 182 83 106 189 156 7 402 265 Average Queue (ft) 86 16 39 90 42 0 76 195 95th Queue (ft) 159 57 83 161 108 0 286 295 Link Distance (ft) 667 667 1171 1171 380 Upstream BIk Time (%) 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 270 200 240 Storage BIk Time (%) 0 0 7 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 1 1 SimTraffic Report Queuing and Blocking Report 20 Year Background Two Way Ring Road SAT Peak Hour Intersection: 9: Mall Entrance 1 Movement NB SB SB SB — Directions Served T T R R Maximum Queue (ft) 72 56 96 200 — Average Queue (ft) 35 28 7 52 95th Queue (ft) 58 46 57 163 — Link Distance (ft) 476 155 155 155 Upstream BIk Time (%) 0 3 — Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 6 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 10 SB SB Directions Served L R T T T Maximum Queue (ft) 147 98 87 56 82 Average Queue (ft) 56 19 43 34 46 95th Queue (ft) 124 67 69 51 74 Link Distance (ft) 331 331 155 182 182 Upstream BIk Time (%) 1 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 11: Mall Entrance 2 Movement EB EB WB WB SB SB Directions Served LT T T TR L R Maximum Queue (ft) — 138 48 134 242 24 47 - Average Queue (ft) 63 4 41 79 3 8 95th Queue (ft) 106 24 94 174 15 30 - Link Distance (ft) 182 182 357 357 264 264 Upstream BIk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) SimTraffic Report Queuing and Blocking Report 20 Year Background Two Way Ring Road SAT Peak Hour Intersection: 12: Rosedale Shopping Ctr & Mall Entrance 3 Movement EB WB SB — Directions Served LT T L Maximum Queue (it) 111 200 23 — Average Queue (it) 50 97 1 95th Queue (it) 83 165 10 — Link Distance (it) 493 589 99 Upstream BIk Time (%) — Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (it) — Storage BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) — Intersection: 13: Mall Entrance 4 Directions Served T T R L Maximum Queue (it) 66 102 130 4 Average Queue (it) 28 31 17 0 95th Queue (it) 54 72 103 3 - Link Distance (it) 589 627 147 Upstream BIk Time (%) - Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (it) 200 - Storage BIk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Zone Summary Zone wide Queuing Penalty: 557 SimTraffic Report SimTraffic Performance Report 20-Year Build Two Way Ring Road PM Peak Hour 1: Fairview Ave & TH 36 EB Ramp Performance by movement Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Al Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.5 0.6 0.4 2.5 0.0 0.0 0.4 - Total Delay (hr) 1.3 0.4 4.3 0.2 2.7 1.2 10.1 Total DelNeh (s) 58.4 3.7 20.2 ■ 4.4 23.8 6.6 14.8 Vehicles Entered 79 398 753 130 408 674 2442 Vehicles Exited 79 399 751 130 407 677 2443 Houdy Exit Rate 79 399 751 130 407 677 2443 Input Volume 80 395 750 130 405 680 2440 %of Volume 99 101 100 100 101 99 100 2: Fairview Ave & TH 36 WB Ramps Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.3 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (hr) 1.1 1.0 0.2 1.1 2.4 0.6 2.1 8.4 0.5 3.5 4.9 0.2 Total DelNeh (s) 43.4 43.7 2.2 42.4 41.4 5.2 43.2 34.4 13.3 43.1 27.5 6.6 Vehicles Entered 87 81 350 94 206 406 173 853 124 286 638 103 Vehicles Exited 88 82 350 95 206 405 174 851 124 287 637 104 Houdy Exit Rate 88 82 350 95 206 405 174 851 124 287 637 104 Input Volume 90 80 345 100 205 405 175 846 125 290 640 100 %of Volume 98 103 . 101 95 100 100 99 101 99 99 99 104 2: Fairview Ave & TH 36 WB Ramps Performance by movement uemea ueay tnr/ U. i Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 Total Delay (hr) 26.0 Total DelNeh (s) 27.1 Vehicles Entered 3401 Vehicles Exited 3403 Houdy Exit Rate 3403 Input Volume 3400 %of Volume 100 SimTraffic Report SimTraffic Performance Report 20-Year Build Two Way Ring Road PM Peak Hour 3: Fairview Ave & Mall Entrance 1 Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBTM--"R SBL�S!! Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (hr) 0.1 0.1 0.0 2.6 0.1 0.3 0.7 6.3 0.5 0.7 3.7 0.1 Total DelNeh (s) 60.7 47.9 8.0 37.7 10.3 5.9 21.5 22.6 8.8 19.7 17.0 16.6 Vehicles Entered 5 5 5 245 29 159 125 1004 215 130 776 12 Vehicles Exited 5 5 5 244 29 158 125 1005 215 130 777 12 Houdy Exit Rate 5 5 5 244 29 158 125 1005 215 130 777 12 Input Volume 5 5 1 5 245 25 155 120 1011 210 140 780 10 %of Volume 100 100 100 100 115 102 104 99 102 93 100 120 3: Fairview Ave & Mall Entrance 1 Performance by movement Movement Al Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 ' - Total Delay (hr) 15.2 Total DelNeh (s) 20.1 - Vehicles Entered 2710 Vehicles Exited 2710 Houdy Exit Rate 2710 Input Volume 2711 %of Volume 100 4: Fairview Ave & CR B2 W Performance by movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Delay (hr) 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 2.5 0.5 2.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.4 0.3 Total Delay (hr) 1.3 6.7 0.8 1.6 1.2 0.7 2.6 5.4 1.1 1.8 4.4 0.7 Total DelNeh (s) 28.1 37.1 12.1 25.4 18.9 14.1 42.8 39.5 7.9 28.2 34.4 26.7 Vehicles Entered 171 646 246 220 231 188 208 484 476 219 453 89 Vehicles Exited 170 644 246 222 231 188 210 483 478 221 450 89 Houdy Exit Rate 170 644 246 222 231 188 210 483 478 221 450 89 Input Volume 165 620 235 235 231 195 210 475 485 220 460 95 %of Volume 103 104 105 95 100 96 100 102 99 100 98 94 4: Fairview Ave & CR B2 W Performance by movement Movement Al Denied Delay (hr) 0.6 Denied Del/Veh (s) - 0.6 Total Delay (hr) 28.3 Total DelNeh (s) 27.7 Vehicles Entered 3631 Vehicles Exited 3632 Houdy Exit Rate 3632 Input Volume 3627 %of Volume 100 SimTraffic Report SimTraffic Performance Report 20-Year Build Two Way Ring Road PM Peak Hour 5: Mall Entrance 2 & CR B2 W Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBit SBL�S!! Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.2 Total Delay (hr) 0.3 3.1 0.4 0.8 1.0 0.0 1.7 0.1 0.8 0.4 0.1 0.2 Total DelNeh (s) 13.2 10.6 6.5 16.8 6.2 4.2 46.2 21.1 16.6 37.5 36.7 14.8 Vehicles Entered 75 1037 231 170 549 28 134 12 166 36 5 38 Vehicles Exited 77 1034 231 170 549 28 134 12 167 36 5 38 Hourly Exit Rate 77 1034 231 170 549 28 134 12 167 36 5 38 Input Volume 70 1021 235 170 580 30 125 10 155 35 5 40 %of Volume 110 101 98 100 95 93 107 120 108 102 100 94 5: Mall Entrance 2 & CR B2 W Performance by movement Movement Al - Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 Total Delay (hr) 8.7 Total DelNeh (s) 12.6 Vehicles Entered 2481 Vehicles Exited 2481 Hourly Exit Rate 2481 Input Volume 2476 %of Volume 100 6: Mall Entrance 3 & CR B2 W Performance by movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 _ Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.1 Total Delay (hr) 0.9 3.9 0.2 0.3 4.9 0.2 0.7 0.1 0.6 2.2 0.1 0.1 Total DelNeh (s) 19.4 13.8 5.0 26.3 27.8 9.7 41.5 42.7 16.8 41.4 38.1 6.0 Vehicles Entered 161 1016 111 43 628 88 65 8 132 190 10 53 Vehicles Exited 162 1014 110 43 630 88 64 8 131 189 10 53 Hourly Exit Rate 162 1014 110 43 630 88 64 8 131 189 10 53 Input Volume 145 1005 110 45 620 85 105 10 180 185 10 55 %of Volume 112 101 100 95 102 104 61 80 73 102 100 96 6: Mall Entrance 3 & CR B2 W Performance by movement Movement Al Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) - 0.1 Total Delay (hr) 14.3 Total DelNeh (s) 20.3 Vehicles Entered 2505 Vehicles Exited 2502 Hourly Exit Rate 2502 Input Volume 2556 %of Volume 98 SimTraffic Report SimTraffic Performance Report 20-Year Build Two Way Ring Road PM Peak Hour 7: Mall Entrance 4/Snelling Ave SB Ramps & CR B2 W Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBLN] !! Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.5 0.9 3.6 Total Delay (hr) 3.3 5.6 0.2 2.8 2.9 0.1 0.3 0.9 0.2 0.3 1.7 0.2 Total DelNeh (s) 39.3 20.4 9.6 42.0 22.2 3.5 32.3 33.4 6.6 46.9 40.2 2.8 Vehicles Entered 302 977 65 233 468 86 37 91 114 25 146 256 Vehicles Exited 301 976 65 234 466 86 37 89 113 25 146 256 Houdy Exit Rate 301 976 65 234 466 86 37 89 113 25 146 256 Input Volume 310 1001 70 225 466 75 35 100 110 25 150 25C %of Volume 97 98 93 104 100 115 105 89 103 99 97 103 7: Mall Entrance 4/Snellina Ave SB Movement Al Denied Delay (hr) 0.3 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.4 Total Delay (hr) 18.4 Total DelNeh (s) 23.5 Vehicles Entered 2800 Vehicles Exited 2794 Houdy Exit Rate 2794 Input Volume i 2816 %of Volume 99 & CR B2 W Performance by movement 8: CR B2 W & Snelling Ave NB Ramps Performance by movement BT WBT WBR SBL SBR AI Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.4 0.5 Denied Del/Veh (s) _ 0.0 0.0 0.2 3.1 1.2 3.6 0.9 Total Delay (hr) 1.3 1.0 0.6 0.0 0.3 1.2 4.5 Total DelNeh (s) 12.8 4.9 6.3 2.6 41.2 9.9 8.2 Vehicles Entered 361 753 366 59 30 419 1988 Vehicles Exited 363 754 368 59 30 418 1992 Houdy Exit Rate 363 754 368 59 30 418 1992 Input Volume 370 766 365 60 30 400 1991 %of Volume 98 98 101 98 99 105 100 SimTraffic Report SimTraffic Performance Report 20-Year Build Two Way Ring Road PM Peak Hour 9: Mall Entrance 1 Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR NBT SBT Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.9 Total DelNeh (s) 0.4 0.2 1.4 6.8 6.1 1.6 3.0 - Vehicles Entered 72 2 277 161 186 433 1131 Vehicles Exited 72 2 276 161 186 433 1130 Houdy Exit Rate 72 2 276 161 186 433 1130 Input Volume 75 1 280 165 185 425 1131 - %ofVolume 96 267 99 98 100 102 100 10: Performance by movement Movement WBL WBR NBT SBT Al Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 - Total Delay (hr) 0.7 0.0 0.5 0.1 1.3 Total DelNeh (s) 8.6 2.5 7.0 1.1 5.0 Vehicles Entered 311 21 233 397 962 Vehicles Exited 311 21 233 397 962 Houdy Exit Rate 311 21 233 397 962 Input Volume 315 20 240 370 945 %of Volume 99 105 97 107 102 11: Mall Entrance 2 Performance by movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBT SBR Pill Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (hr) 0.5 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.4 1.6 Total DelNeh (s) 8.6 9.1 9.7 2.2 4.7 3.1 4.9 6.3 Vehicles Entered 194 69 119 116 125 5 278 906 Vehicles Exited 195 70 120 116 124 5 277 907 Houdy Exit Rate 195 70 120 116 124 5 277 907 Input Volume 205 65 95 85 130 5 275 860 %of Volume 95 107 127 137 95 100 101 105 SimTraffic Report SimTraffic Performance Report 20-Year Build Two Way Ring Road PM Peak Hour 12: Rosedale Shopping Ctr & Mall Entrance 3 Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Al - Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 - Total Delay (hr) 0.2 0.1 0.5 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.9 Total DelNeh (s) 6.5 4.0 9.6 4.3 0.6 0.9 5.1 - Vehicles Entered 103 93 172 102 97 66 633 Vehicles Exited 103 93 172 101 97 66 632 Houdy Exit Rate 103 93 172 101 97 66 632 Input Volume 105 90 90 190 100 65 640 - %ofVolume 98 103 192 53 97 101 99 13: Mall Entrance 4 Performance by movement Movement EBT WBT WBR SBL SBT SBR Al Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.2 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 Total Delay (hr) 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.8 Total DelNeh (s) 3.3 8.5 2.8 1.5 0.2 2.6 3.1 Vehicles Entered 146 101 243 272 1 173 936 Vehicles Exited 147 102 242 272 1 172 936 Houdy Exit Rate 147 102 242 272 1 172 936 Input Volume = 150 100 245 265 1 180 940 %of Volume 98 102 99 103 133 95 100 Total Zone Performance 2.1 Denied Delay (hr) Denied Del/Veh (s) 1.1 Total Delay (hr) 131.1 Total DelNeh (s) 725.2 Vehicles Entered 6499 Vehicles Exited 417 Houdy Exit Rate 417 Input Volume 26534 %of Volume 2 SimTraffic Report Queuing and Blocking Report 20-Year Build Two Way Ring Road PM Peak Hour Intersection: 1: Fairview Ave & TH 36 EB Ramp Movement WB NB NB SB SB Directions Served LR T T L T T Maximum Queue (ft) 142 235 337 353 133 134 Average Queue (ft) 67 126 146 163 38 56 95th Queue (ft) 117 236 280 297 104 118 - Link Distance (ft) 395 1169 1169 736 736 Upstream BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) ' 380 Storage BIk Time (%) 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) • 0 1 Intersection: 2: Fairview Ave & TH 36 WB Ramps - EB EB EB WB WB NB NB NB NB NB SB SB Directions Served L T R LT TR L T T T R L T Maximum Queue (ft) 149 125 120 292 267 224 254 355 376 150 313 284 Average Queue (ft) 47 34 24 158 96 115 140 146 202 73 169 163 95th Queue (ft) 105 89 78 235 229 192 220 260 335 195 273 252 Link Distance (ft) 373 304 304 736 736 736 463 463 Upstream BIk Time (%) 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) _ 0 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 170 210 100 Storage BIk Time (%) 0 0 0 0 24 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 1 30 Intersection: 2: Fairview Ave & TH 36 WB Ra Mov ISB Directions Served T R Maximum Queue (ft) 264 98 Average Queue (ft) 143 35 95th Queue (ft) 223 71 - Link Distance (ft) 463 Upstream BIk Time (%) i Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 300 - Storage BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) SimTraffic Report Queuing and Blocking Report 20-Year Build Two Way Ring Road PM Peak Hour Intersection: 3: Fairview Ave & Mall Entrance 1 Movement EB WB WB WB NB NB NB 5"==N-"=NMJR Directions Served LTR L LT R L T T T R L T TR Maximum Queue (ft) 46 156 191 100 126 226 235 289 185 184 326 372 Average Queue (ft) 14 57 127 61 49 109 119 159 23 64 112 193 95th Queue (ft) 42 119 212 136 91 199 212 268 128 134 243 337 Link Distance (ft) 241 135 135 463 463 463 392 392 Upstream BIk Time (%) 1 11 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 2 23 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 50 260 250 160 Storage BIk Time (%) 33 1 0 1 0 0 3 Queuing Penalty (veh) 51 2 0 3 0 1 4 Intersection: 4: Fairview Ave & CR B2 W - EB EB M NB NB NB SB Directions Served L T T R L T TR L T T R L Maximum Queue (ft) 185 392 342 213 190 134 208 220 255 232 59 219 Average Queue (ft) 108 188 163 76 96 55 101 121 125 134 2 103 95th Queue (ft) 202 344 315 176 167 113 179 207 213 211 43 18C Link Distance (ft) 1154 1154 260 260 392 392 392 Upstream BIk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 160 MMEREM66.,300 180 200 30C Storage BIk Time (%) 1 15 2 0 1 0 2 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) _.A� 1 0 4 0 Intersection: 4: Fairview Ave & CR B2 W Move Directions Served T TR Maximum Queue (ft) 224 254 Average Queue (ft) 123 159 95th Queue (ft) 203 233 - Link Distance (ft) 1122 1122 Upstream BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) i Storage BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) - SimTraffic Report Queuing and Blocking Report 20-Year Build Two Way Ring Road PM Peak Hour Intersection: 5: Mall Entrance 2 & CR B2 W Movement EB EB EB E6 WB I WB WB Directions Served L T T R L T TR LT R LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 74 282 302 371 133 105 64 181 182 134 Average Queue (ft) 24 128 143 78 45 12 11 86 66 53 95th Queue (ft) 62 280 319 300 99 44 40 154 127 100 Link Distance (ft) 260 260 260 1061 1061 264 264 128 Upstream BIk Time (%) 1 2 2 0 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 2 8 7 0 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 50 120 Storage BIk Time (%) 1 13 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 8 9 2 Intersection: 6: Mall Entrance 3 & CR B2 W - EB EB EB EB WB WB WB NB SB SB Directions Served L T T R L T T R LT R L LT Maximum Queue (ft) 169 257 219 145 153 257 244 165 123 114 188 158 Average Queue (ft) 62 126 99 36 30 160 137 57 65 58 104 30 95th Queue (ft) 138 227 183 103 87 247 225 151 124 103 167 99 Link Distance (ft) 1061 1061 687 687 99 99 427 427 Upstream BIk Time (%) 5 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 8 2 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 140 Storage BIk Time (%) 0 4 5 0 0 1 9 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 7 0 Intersection: 6: Mall Entrance 3 & CR B2 W Move Directions Served R Maximum Queue (ft) 49 Average Queue (ft) 16 95th Queue (ft) 38 Link Distance (ft) 427 Upstream BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) - SimTraffic Report Queuing and Blocking Report 20-Year Build Two Way Ring Road PM Peak Hour Intersection: 7: Mall Entrance 4/Snelling Ave SB Ramps & CR B2 W Movement -.66- EB EB EB WB WB WB Directions Served L T T R L L T T L T R L Maximum Queue (ft) 310 361 373 185 174 156 203 165 78 175 50 109 Average Queue (ft) 170 204 194 51 98 70 110 101 27 69 44 25 95th Queue (ft) 275 325 323 156 158 125 173 153 64 149 54 69 Link Distance (ft) 687 687 667 667 147 147 147 Upstream BIk Time (%) 0 2 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 1 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 300 160 270 270 150 Storage BIk Time (%) 0 1 10 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 7: Mall Entrance 4/Snelling Ave SB Ramps & CR B2 W - SB _ Directions Served T R Maximum Queue (ft) 188 77 Average Queue (ft) 95 14 95th Queue (ft) 157 55 Link Distance (ft) 519 Upstream BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 250 Storage BIk Time (%) 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 8: CR B2 W & Snellina Ave NB Ram Mov MEINEWMIRIEr EB EB WB WB WB SB S Directions Served L T T T T R L R Maximum Queue (ft) 200 78 104 131 92 63 131 196 Average Queue (ft) 91 8 25 51 22 6 33 95 95th Queue (ft) 171 39 67 109 65 33 99 160 Link Distance (ft) 667 667 1171 1171 380 Upstream BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 270 200 240 Storage BIk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 SimTraffic Report Queuing and Blocking Report 20-Year Build Two Way Ring Road PM Peak Hour Intersection: 9: Mall Entrance 1 Movement NB SB SB SB Directions Served T T R R Maximum Queue (ft) 64 61 30 128 Average Queue (ft) 38 28 1 17 95th Queue (ft) 59 47 22 78 Link Distance (ft) 476 155 155 155 Upstream BIk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 10: WB WB NB Directions Served L R T Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) 119 28 77 59 14 41 105 35 63 331 331 155 Intersection: 11: Mall Entrance 2 Movement EB EB WB WB SB SB Directions Served LT T T TR L R Maximum Queue (ft) — 93 31 53 102 11 44 - Average Queue (ft) 52 2 26 37 1 5 95th Queue (ft) 83 15 48 72 6 23 - Link Distance (ft) 182 182 357 357 264 264 Upstream BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) SimTraffic Report Queuing and Blocking Report 20-Year Build Two Way Ring Road PM Peak Hour Intersection: 12: Rosedale Shopping Ctr & Mall Entrance 3 Movement EB WB SB Directions Served LT T L Maximum Queue (ft) 83 102 10 Average Queue (ft) 43 45 0 95th Queue (ft) 67 76 6 Link Distance (ft) 493 589 99 Upstream BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 13: Mall Entrance 4 EB WB Directions Served T T Maximum Queue (ft) 55 76 Average Queue (ft) 26 37 95th Queue (ft) 50 61 - Link Distance (ft) 589 627 Upstream BIk Time (%) - Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) - Storage BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) - Zone Summa Zone wide Queuing Penalty: 240 SimTraffic Report SimTraffic Performance Report 20-Year build Two Way Ring Road SAT Peak Hour 1: Fairview Ave & TH 36 EB Ramp Performance by movement Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Al Denied Delay (hr) 0.1 1.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 1.3 Denied Del/Veh (s) 4.7 5.8 0.3 2.7 0.0 0.0 1.8 - Total Delay (hr) 1.2 1.0 3.8 0.1 5.3 1.1 12.6 Total DelNeh (s) 60.8 5.5 20.3 4.1 31.2 6.6 16.6 Vehicles Entered 72 678 661 90 609 607 2717 Vehicles Exited 71 677 661 91 611 606 2717 Houdy Exit Rate 71 677 661 91 611 606 2717 Input Volume 70 695 655 95 610 620 2745 %of Volume 101 97 101 96 100 98 99 2: Fairview Ave & TH 36 WB Ramps Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.5 2.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.0 12.1 13.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (hr) 1.5 1.5 0.2 0.6 1.8 3.0 2.9 17.1 1.2 5.3 4.8 0.3 Total DelNeh (s) 54.5 53.2 2.6 39.2 42.1 18.9 52.7 56.6 43.8 43.9 20.8 5.7 Vehicles Entered 97 103 339 54 156 559 192 1049 96 427 822 179 Vehicles Exited 97 103 339 54 156 555 193 1047 94 426 824 178 Houdy Exit Rate 97 103 339 54 156 555 193 1047 94 426 824 178 Input Volume 100 105 345 50 155 570 190 1060 100 415 835 170 %of Volume 97 98 98 107 101 97 101 99 94 103 99 105 2: Fairview Ave & TH 36 WB Ramps Performance by movement uemea ueay tnr/ 2.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 2.5 Total Delay (hr) 40.2 Total DelNeh (s) 35.0 Vehicles Entered 4073 Vehicles Exited 4066 Houdy Exit Rate 4066 Input Volume 4095 %of Volume 99 SimTraffic Report SimTraffic Performance Report 20-Year build Two Way Ring Road SAT Peak Hour 3: Fairview Ave & Mall Entrance 1 Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL�S!! Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (hr) 0.1 0.1 0.0 3.9 0.2 0.7 2.3 14.0 1.6 3.4 11.1 0.2 Total DelNeh (s) 52.7 55.8 9.4 33.0 16.0 10.1 40.6 43.5 16.0 54.3 39.1 42.2 Vehicles Entered 6 6 4 416 50 254 202 1146 352 224 1009 15 Vehicles Exited 6 6 4 417 50 254 203 1140 351 225 1007 15 Houdy Exit Rate 6 6 4 417 50 254 203 1140 351 225 1007 15 Input Volume 5 5 5 385 45 235 205 1170 355 240 1031 15 %of Volume 120 120 80 108 110 108 99 97 99 94 98 100 3: Fairview Ave & Mall Entrance 1 Performance by movement Movement Al Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 Total Delay (hr) 37.6 Total DelNeh (s) 36.3 Vehicles Entered 3684 Vehicles Exited 3678 Houdy Exit Rate 3678 Input Volume 3696 %of Volume 100 4: Fairview Ave & CR B2 W Performance by movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Delay (hr) 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 2.6 0.6 2.6 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.8 0.4 0.4 Total Delay (hr) 1.4 4.1 4.0 4.7 2.8 1.7 7.0 3.3 2.2 1.6 7.3 1.5 Total DelNeh (s) 27.0 38.6 42.0 49.6 27.2 22.6 102.2 25.4 11.2 28.8 44.7 40.8 Vehicles Entered 185 376 340 342 367 273 238 464 697 194 572 133 Vehicles Exited 185 376 334 341 366 273 232 462 696 194 573 133 Houdy Exit Rate 185 376 334 341 366 273 232 462 696 194 573 133 Input Volume 180 380 350 345 365 285 230 475 705 195 590 135 %of Volume 103 99 95 99 100 96 101 97 99 99 97 99 4: Fairview Ave & CR B2 W Performance by movement Movement Al Denied Delay (hr) 0.7 Denied Del/Veh (s) - 0.6 Total Delay (hr) 41.6 Total DelNeh (s) 35.3 Vehicles Entered 4181 Vehicles Exited 4165 Houdy Exit Rate 4165 Input Volume 4236 %of Volume 98 SimTraffic Report SimTraffic Performance Report 20-Year build Two Way Ring Road SAT Peak Hour 5: Mall Entrance 2 & CR B2 W Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WB% NBL NBTM--"R SBL�S!! Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.2 Total Delay (hr) 0.8 4.6 0.8 2.8 4.9 0.2 2.7 0.3 1.2 0.2 0.1 0.3 Total DelNeh (s) 27.1 21.1 7.3 39.5 22.8 15.4 40.5 31.0 14.9 33.8 32.9 14.6 Vehicles Entered 102 773 392 253 776 45 243 39 295 18 13 65 Vehicles Exited 101 773 392 253 773 45 243 39 295 18 12 65 Houdy Exit Rate 101 773 392 253 773 45 243 39 295 18 12 65 Input Volume 110 770 400 285 830 50 200 31 235 20 15 70 %of Volume 92 100 98 89 93 90 121 126 126 90 80 93 5: Mall Entrance 2 & CR B2 W Performance by movement Movement Al Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 Total Delay (hr) 18.9 Total DelNeh (s) 22.5 Vehicles Entered 3014 Vehicles Exited 3009 Houdy Exit Rate 3009 Input Volume 3016 %of Volume 100 6: Mall Entrance 3 & CR B2 W Performance by movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 _ Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.1 Total Delay (hr) 1.6 5.2 0.5 0.6 11.4 0.4 1.1 0.1 0.9 3.3 0.2 0.2 Total DelNeh (s) 30.4 24.9 8.5 32.4 44.4 18.5 41.4 51.3 17.9 47.6 38.7 9.1 Vehicles Entered 186 736 204 70 903 69 95 7 173 251 14 75 Vehicles Exited 185 739 204 69 905 69 95 7 173 251 15 75 Houdy Exit Rate 185 739 204 69 905 69 95 7 173 251 15 75 Input Volume 180 695 190 75 911 75 180 15 295 255 15 75 %of Volume 103 106 107 92 99 92 53 47 59 99 100 100 6: Mall Entrance 3 & CR B2 W Performance by movement Movement Al Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) - 0.1 Total Delay (hr) 25.4 Total DelNeh (s) 32.4 Vehicles Entered 2783 Vehicles Exited 2787 Houdy Exit Rate 2787 Input Volume 2960 %of Volume 94 SimTraffic Report SimTraffic Performance Report 20-Year build Two Way Ring Road SAT Peak Hour 7: Mall Entrance 4/Snelling Ave SB Ramps & CR B2 W Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL'=NNJR"=1F1R Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.3 1.1 3.4 Total Delay (hr) 8.3 5.5 0.5 4.6 5.6 0.1 0.8 1.8 0.9 0.3 4.1 0.4 Total DelNeh (s) 69.8 30.9 14.3 40.6 28.1 4.0 45.9 41.2 18.3 48.5 54.4 5.3 Vehicles Entered 423 640 125 405 700 70 61 156 170 20 266 280 Vehicles Exited 425 639 123 401 701 71 61 154 170 19 267 282 Houdy Exit Rate 425 639 123 401 701 71 61 154 170 19 267 282 Input Volume 455 695 120 390 726 70 60 159 175 20 260 275 %of Volume 93 92 103 103 97 101 101 97 97 95 103 103 7: Mall Entrance 4/Snellina Ave SB Movement Al Denied Delay (hr) 0.4 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.5 Total Delay (hr) 32.9 Total DelNeh (s) 35.2 Vehicles Entered 3316 Vehicles Exited 3313 Houdy Exit Rate 3313 Input Volume i 3405 %of Volume 97 & CR B2 W Performance by movement 8: CR B2 W & Snelling Ave NB Ramps Performance by movement BL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Al Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.8 1.9 _ Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.2 3.1 7.9 9.1 3.3 Total Delay (hr) 1.9 1.1 2.3 0.0 0.2 5.9 11.3 Total DelNeh (s) 20.7 7.4 17.9 2.0 35.2 29.1 19.8 Vehicles Entered 322 508 460 13 21 721 2045 Vehicles Exited 321 507 461 13 21 715 2038 - Houdy Exit Rate 321 507 461 13 21 715 2038 Input Volume 350 540 455 15 20 730 2111 %of Volume 92 94 101 87 105 98 97 SimTraffic Report SimTraffic Performance Report 20-Year build Two Way Ring Road SAT Peak Hour 9: Mall Entrance 1 Performance by movement Movement EBL EBR NBT -.0." SBR 0 All Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (hr) 0.1 0.2 0.9 0.8 1.1 3.1 Total DelNeh (s) 2.7 1.7 13.2 8.2 5.4 5.9 Vehicles Entered 131 451 238 367 719 1906 Vehicles Exited 131 450 239 366 720 1906 Houdy Exit Rate 131 450 239 366 720 1906 Input Volume 130 470 245 340 665 1850 %of Volume 101 96 98 108 108 103 10: Performance by movement Movement WBL WBR NB BT Al - Denied Delay (hr) 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.6 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.2 ' Total Delay (hr) 2.4 0.0 1.8 1.3 5.5 Total DelNeh (s) 17.4 5.4 17.1 0 6.5 12.4 Vehicles Entered 500 33 370 700 1603 Vehicles Exited 501 33 371 1 699 1604 Houdy Exit Rate 501 33 371 699 1604 Input Volume 490 30 376 620 1516 %of Volume 102 109 99 113 106 11: Mall Entrance 2 Performance by movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Al Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.7 1.4 0.0 0.0 0.4 Total Delay (hr) 3.1 0.6 2.2 1.1 0.5 0.9 8.4 Total DelNeh (s) 34.7 24.3 29.5 15.1 7.4 7.7 18.8 Vehicles Entered 314 89 266 263 222 435 1589 Vehicles Exited 315 89 266 262 222 434 1588 Houdy Exit Rate 315 89 266 262 222 434 1588 Input Volume 315 90 155 150 235 465 1410 %of Volume 100 99 172 175 95 93 113 SimTraffic Report SimTraffic Performance Report 20-Year build Two Way Ring Road SAT Peak Hour 12: Rosedale Shopping Ctr & Mall Entrance 3 Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Al - Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.7 0.0 0.0 0.2 - Total Delay (hr) 0.6 0.1 1.6 0.1 0.0 0.0 2.4 Total DelNeh (s) 12.4 3.3 17.3 3.1 0.7 1.0 8.4 - Vehicles Entered 158 141 328 117 179 109 1032 Vehicles Exited 158 141 327 117 179 109 1031 Houdy Exit Rate 158 141 327 117 179 109 1031 Input Volume 160 154 110 330 175 105 1034 - %ofVolume 99 91 298 35 102 104 100 13: Mall Entrance 4 Performance by movement Movement EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Al Denied Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.4 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.9 3.5 0.0 0.0 1.0 - Total Delay (hr) 0.2 0.2 0.5 0.2 0.3 1.4 Total DelNeh (s) 3.0 13.4 4.9 1.6 2.8 3.4 Vehicles Entered 218 46 388 465 327 1444 Vehicles Exited 219 46 387 465 327 1444 Houdy Exit Rate 219 46 387 465 327 1444 Input Volume i 226 50 395 445 325 1441 %of Volume 97 92 98 104 101 100 Total Zone Performance Denied Delay (hr) 7.9 Denied Del/Veh (s) 3.7 Total Delay (hr) 241.4 Total DelNeh (s) 902.5 Vehicles Entered 7757 Vehicles Exited 576 Houdy Exit Rate 576 Input Volume 33515 %of Volume 2 SimTraffic Report Queuing and Blocking Report 20-Year build Two Way Ring Road SAT Peak Hour Intersection: 1: Fairview Ave & TH 36 EB Ramp Movement WB NB NB SB SB S Directions Served LR T T L T T Maximum Queue (ft) 289 241 307 398 432 113 Average Queue (ft) 92 115 136 274 59 50 95th Queue (ft) 264 208 247 413 245 105 Link Distance (ft) 395 1169 1169 736 736 Upstream BIk Time (%) 3 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 380 Storage BIk Time (%) 0 3 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) Wo"M 9 0 Intersection: 2: Fairview Ave & TH 36 WB Ramps - EB EB EB WB WB NB NB SB� Directions Served L T R LT TR L T T T R L T Maximum Queue (ft) 149 144 124 319 341 235 558 639 759 150 407 358 Average Queue (ft) 59 53 32 157 212 144 227 314 428 92 261 197 95th Queue (ft) 122 115 94 306 399 233 446 629 781 211 396 313 Link Distance (ft) 373 304 304 736 736 736 463 463 Upstream BIk Time (%) 3 21 1 7 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 3 32 1 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 170 170 210 100 Storage BIk Time (%) 0 0 0 1 3 54 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 1 0 = 5 54 Intersection: 2: Fairview Ave & TH 36 WB Ra Mov ISB Directions Served T R Maximum Queue (ft) 271 97 Average Queue (ft) 133 41 95th Queue (ft) 229 75 Link Distance (ft) 463 Upstream BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 300 = Storage BIk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 SimTraffic Report Queuing and Blocking Report 20-Year build Two Way Ring Road SAT Peak Hour Intersection: 3: Fairview Ave & Mall Entrance 1 Movement EB WB WB WB NB I NB NB 57777_ Directions Served LTR L LT R L T T T R L T TR Maximum Queue (ft) 59 190 199 100 232 383 454 594 275 185 427 424 Average Queue (ft) 15 103 177 83 101 140 206 325 135 150 319 354 95th Queue (ft) 44 186 222 139 189 278 414 577 346 220 486 459 Link Distance (ft) 241 135 135 463 463 463 392 392 Upstream BIk Time (%) 5 30 0 0 9 5 7 Queuing Penalty (veh) 17 99 0 2 54 35 43 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 50 260 250 160 Storage BIk Time (%) 48 5 0 1 19 0 12 18 Queuing Penalty (veh) 114 10 0 3 67 1 62 42 Intersection: 4: Fairview Ave & CR B2 W — EB EB EB EB WB WB WB NB NB NB NB SB Directions Served L T T R L T TR L T T R L Maximum Queue (ft) 173 382 456 314 205 300 286 225 385 375 234 242 Average Queue (ft) 88 118 143 156 174 175 181 171 204 159 29 97 95th Queue (ft) 156 245 325 297 240 328 287 268 428 344 195 189 Link Distance (ft) 1154 1154 260 260 392 392 392 Upstream BIk Time (%) Anw— 9 2 4 2 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 46 11 18 7 6 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 160 300 180 200 30C Storage BIk Time (%) 1 3 0 6 21 1 34 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) _.A� 5 0 11 38 4 82 1 Intersection: 4: Fairview Ave & CR B2 W Move Directions Served T TR Maximum Queue (ft) 337 373 Average Queue (ft) 189 232 95th Queue (ft) 301 348 — Link Distance (ft) 1122 1122 Upstream BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage BIk Time (%) 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 — SimTraffic Report Queuing and Blocking Report 20-Year build Two Way Ring Road SAT Peak Hour Intersection: 5: Mall Entrance 2 & CR B2 W Movement -LU.- EB EB E6 WB I WB WB Directions Served L T T R L T TR LT R LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 75 287 291 380 145 438 219 265 296 123 Average Queue (ft) 41 174 167 80 99 150 86 153 105 51 95th Queue (ft) 82 280 289 313 173 402 199 245 222 98 Link Distance (ft) 260 260 260 1061 1061 264 264 128 Upstream BIk Time (%) 1 1 2 0 1 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 5 5 7 1 3 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 50 120 Storage BIk Time (%) 8 36 10 9 Queuing Penalty (veh) 29 40 37 27 Intersection: 6: Mall Entrance 3 & CR B2 W - EB EB EB EB WB WB WB SB SB Directions Served L T T R L T T R LT R L LT Maximum Queue (ft) 184 350 265 145 264 418 388 165 142 127 263 195 Average Queue (ft) 103 177 132 75 95 283 257 78 91 64 135 63 95th Queue (ft) 194 300 236 156 259 395 358 198 148 115 225 159 Link Distance (ft) 1061 1061 687 687 99 99 427 427 Upstream BIk Time (%) 14 2 Queuing Penalty (veh) 35 5 Storage Bay Dist (ft) f 120 240 140 Storage BIk Time (%) 1 13 10 0 0 22 38 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 20 0 0 17 28 0 Intersection: 6: Mall Entrance 3 & CR B2 W Directions Served R Maximum Queue (ft) 65 Average Queue (ft) 24 95th Queue (ft) 53 Link Distance (ft) 427 Upstream BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) SimTraffic Report Queuing and Blocking Report 20-Year build Two Way Ring Road SAT Peak Hour Intersection: 7: Mall Entrance 4/Snelling Ave SB Ramps & CR B2 W Movement EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB NB Directions Served L T T R L L T T L T R L Maximum Queue (ft) 324 626 517 185 231 225 283 250 236 62 52 174 Average Queue (ft) 268 299 189 72 150 110 181 158 160 58 47 33 95th Queue (ft) 373 623 424 160 225 189 254 229 274 65 55 121 Link Distance (ft) 687 687 667 667 147 147 147 Upstream BIk Time (%) 1 0 20 Queuing Penalty (veh) 4 0 27 Storage Bay Dist (ft) ' _ 160 270 270 150 Storage BIk Time (%) 21 0 5 0 0 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 0 1 0 Intersection: 7: Mall Entrance 4/Snelling Ave SB Ramps & CR B2 W Directions Served T R Maximum Queue (ft) 388 275 Average Queue (ft) 198 75 95th Queue (ft) 339 242 Link Distance (ft) 519 Upstream BIk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 250 Storage BIk Time (%) 22 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) s 66 0 Intersection: 8: CR B2 W & Snellina Ave NB Ram Mov MEINEWMIRIEr EB EB WB WB WB SB Directions Served L T T T T R L R Maximum Queue (ft) 259 145 107 237 165 17 399 265 Average Queue (ft) 117 24 47 119 59 1 177 226 95th Queue (ft) 215 89 91 197 139 11 471 311 Link Distance (ft) 667 667 1171 1171 380 Upstream BIk Time (%) 15 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 270 200 240 Storage BIk Time (%) 0 0 0 26 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 2 5 SimTraffic Report Queuing and Blocking Report 20-Year build Two Way Ring Road SAT Peak Hour Intersection: 9: Mall Entrance 1 Movement EB NB SB SB SB Directions Served L T T R R Maximum Queue (ft) 85 157 97 153 222 Average Queue (ft) 9 60 46 16 93 95th Queue (ft) 48 120 81 86 207 — Link Distance (ft) 135 476 155 155 155 Upstream BIk Time (%) 1 0 0 4 Queuing Penalty (veh) 2 0 1 13 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 10 B WB NB SB SB Directions Served L R T T T Maximum Queue (ft) 321 147 164 78 90 Average Queue (ft) 125 27 86 45 56 95th Queue (ft) 257 109 165 68 80 Link Distance (ft) 331 331 155 182 182 Upstream BIk Time (%) 2 1 7 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 28 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 11: Mall Entrance 2 Movement EB EB WB WB B30 SB SB Directions Served LT T T TR T L R Maximum Queue (ft) — 197 180 257 389 24 48 78 Average Queue (ft) 141 36 63 145 1 6 13 95th Queue (ft) 219 134 151 305 16 27 43 Link Distance (ft) 182 182 357 357 493 264 264 Upstream BIk Time (%) 11 0 0 2 Queuing Penalty (veh) 23 0 0 2 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) SimTraffic Report Queuing and Blocking Report 20-Year build Two Way Ring Road SAT Peak Hour Intersection: 12: Rosedale Shopping Ctr & Mall Entrance 3 Movement EB WB SB Directions Served LT T L Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) 157 204 28 62 96 2 116 168 13 493 589 99 Intersection: 13: Mall Entrance 4 B WB WB SB Directions Served T T R L Maximum Queue (ft) 53 166 223 4 Average Queue (ft) 29 35 35 0 95th Queue (ft) 50 105 157 3 Link Distance (ft) 589 627 147 Upstream BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) - Storage BIk Time (%) 0 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) Zone Summary Zone wide Queuing Penalty: 1432 SimTraffic Report Kimley>Morn MEMORANDUM To: Jesse Freihammer, P.E. City Engineer / Assistant Public Works Direction City of Roseville From: Andy Berg, P.E. Date: January 31, 2020 Subject: Rosedale Center Traffic Impact Analysis Trip Generation Comparison Kimley-Horn has prepared a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) for the proposed Rosedale Center Master Plan, which proposed to redevelop the southern half of the property. The TIA was submitted to the City of Roseville in November 2019, and review comments were addressed in the January 2020 Update. Since the time of the November 2019 submittal, minor changes have been made to the development's master plan. The purpose of this memo is to quantify the changes in anticipated trip generation between the land uses that were assumed in the November 2019 TIA and what is currently being proposed. The memo will also provide discussion on any impacts to the off -site mitigation identified in the November 2019 TIA as it relates to the change in land uses. Table 1 provides a summary of the land uses assumed in the November 2019 TIA and the land uses that are currently being included in the master plan. Table 1— Changes in Land Use Land Use November 2019 TIA Market Rate Residential 250 Dwelling Units Proposed Master Plan 350 Dwelling Units Net Change +100 Dwelling Units Active Adult Residential 175 Dwelling Units 215 Dwelling Units +40 Dwelling Units Hotel 300 Rooms 340 Rooms +40 Rooms Office 100,000 SF 90,000 SF -10,000 SF Retail 220,000 SF 200,000 SF -20,000 SF Table 2 provides a summary of site trip generation for the weekday PM peak hour and the Saturday peak hour. Based on the comparison, the change in the master plan is anticipated to result in an increase of 35 weekday PM peak hour trips and 20 Saturday peak hour trips, both increases of less than 5%. Kimley>Morn Table 2 — Site Trip Generation (ITE 221) Market Rat7Residdential +100 Dwelling Units 110 110 155 155 Active AduITE 252) +40 Dwelling Units 45 60 55 70 +40 Rooms 180 215 205 245 O -10,000 SF 115 55 105 50 Retail (ITE 820) -20,000 SF 385 665 350 605 Total Site Generated Trips 835 1,105 870 1,125 Net Increase/Decrease in Site Generated Trips +35 +20 Based on the distribution provide in the November 2019 TIA, the increase in site traffic will have a minimal impact on the surrounding roadways. The site access along Fairview Avenue is anticipated to have the highest percentage of project traffic (+/- 45%). Based on this percentage, the change in the master plan results in a maximum increase of 15 trips during the PM peak hour and 10 trips during the Saturday peak hour at any of the study intersections (less than 1 % increase at any intersection). Based on the minimal increase in the site generated traffic resulting from the change in the Rosedale Center Master Plan, no additional off -site improvements are needed to provide acceptable LOS through the 2040 Horizon Year from what was included in the November 2019TIA. Appendix D Pedestrian Connections Rosedale Center EAW February 2020 0.5 Miles 10 Minutes to — — — — — — — — — — — --- I Rnc i4-P $5--Mr[Cs- -- J — COUNTY ROAD B2 10 Minutes to ----- ` ----------------- — � -- -- � \�' \ Rosebrook Park 10.3 Milesa---- 6 Minutes to ,�� �— _�— _ \ I \ \ \ \ osebrook Park d ,�� 0 11 p75 /����\\ _©� 132 /' vV [,PACES ACCESCIBLE'/�.FROM LrVEL I) 0.9 Milesl 0.5 Miles _ �� ` ��/, i/ 1 ROOF BELOW DAM , , \ 19 Minutes to 10 Minute to ,, a/! Z3 `�\\ �\ Willow Pond Park Post Of fice I i / - / ' �\ �I v �I RTILLO'S / JCPENNEY VON = / ` \ \` 0.9 Miles I W T,459 SF � 1 1B4,A2 SF(2 LEVELS) MAUR r \ RESTAURANT ` \ `\\ \ �i 0I �11 „p' 11.16AC- / / / I 5300SF V v\\ A�9 MInUt�s t0 u tl 715. 1 N 125,000 SF LEVELS) / I I - (SPACES ACCESSIBLE \ 2.19 AC. I W 9 FROM LEVEL2, 1 ® ? \ Roseville IHlgh © I G 4 Low` V k chool I \ I i OHO `\ IF I III RESTAURANT 38895E AMC 9THEATER \ IIII I IW I II _I I W I TRANSIT HUB a RETA L i II ,1 ,609SF 1 III I,II I I1 1 3R5E0T_3ASILF ' +1`I` I 1 �. �"II" I gl1 •y9•ps a e •+ y ri Q waflON�D+ o •� �1lI II I IMAS v 94539FI W (2 LEVELS+BASEMENT) PF 1249AC- it w O ♦ a I ` /� E I III AIL \ 1 ,E",6•s' any w,acn+ • I III 1\1 .' — ,'1 \� � -- ;wµ �cvsys �' • p,w• / \� / // IIRE S RANT < .. • ,ENS / / WSF----._ �� l\\^ \\\\ c_ - � �G�� / . �• 'w'B�(� /'/ // NORTH GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 0 60 120 zoo 17 Minutes (0.8 Miles) to Neighborhood Future Overhead Crossing from TRIJNK HIGHWAY NO. 36 Comprehensive Plan I 15 Minutes (0.7 Miles) to Brimhall Elementary LEGEND Interior Connections Existing Sidewalks Comprehensive Plan Bicycle Links 01 ■ ■ Future Pedestrian Connections External Destinations Green Spine Green Spine Entry Zone Indoor Mall Entry Tenant Entry A t Raised Ped Crossings I ROSe,MIN ENTER Kimley>»Horn @)JLL PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIVITYI 1 "■ '�r " I >♦ C V n'I ,YA '•YI�` ��� . ♦ � '� 1!� R y j �� ""�^a w w3. � �. .. � r+ i _ "�, f' Y � ,n ��•�� iF� . iR ...--14.y .y f�« _ f�' � 3' I� 4 I :: is .1�--i '�'y�" • s 1.i �rr rY � ..}� � t s�' '_i _ AWIT � 1•!]d ■ � ■ � � 1 � X._ � _ r Y ••4,-t✓ t'.Y` pia-• qr� CT rA � r .— .A "�r`.�ic l. r�l"!. 1 _ - M•!� I �- ~ , .1 ` � s. �i T I` .'�+ .. T"::r ...,r,i:.. {\ Ytit it M -a ;a .'� ■ ' i "'� "� �� T j " 17 Ilk Ft � � • • �\' n!' � � /�� • �� �, l'r� �.� � � � �f � i t � f }�' 1 R�7 II a • y r r i • - _ — ---- - _ _ x rr 41 4( - V - .� �` �_ Y l •eye � �� ` r r - s at t� .g � Y 4 ltfK► irIt '� ' -.aC • - .. -. -T "� - J •. �fu L•' 1 • � 1 • � 1 �� �►'! r NNNiiiLLl ■ "f' \ � :r,_1 � { <- r, yla. r. � ■ � �A i ., s ! �- - ! ' _ .1.•� s - r 1 _...; r L ,Y z � i •' y f Fir[ _ T > .' � - q ^ t • "• �. } e#� '�• - !"'��•. � 'ne � Y� '� * '� t'� ,� A "_- i ��•�- .I .'�� .IrV ..�_�is�. 1+ _'_--vvf� A4- 1T1,.j,i"• F U 1 '0 "�i`' "L - - ° a` Wo / / 'r ��{Ix(��•Aq +• _ - r I ei..q■rT� .+ �t r•� q w..T. i Fr,. y 1 _ M�•(rY _Tlf! '� , .I �..... y �I! Irv'"r:, Rr •! - T �+ i + �,af TL low IN _ .r .1 It �'•.^4 ''�g VI •:� _ - ! 'T �r'yr■�rj ,■i +li •M ,+�17 ,r. oui rryr! , Tw - r mow. '� - i1 �f �v,, �■, r1.+11�°�'"i���.•�-- - _ '-'F� ,i i a_i.-Y � r. i _ _� S:� 'I�-�•.'=Ll....��..� .� .. _._—.a�fK • - • .. Roseville Public Works, Environment and Transportation Commission Agenda Item Date: July 28, 2020 Item No: 6 Item Description: Civic Campus Master Plan Update The City is in the process of preparing a Civic Campus Master Plan for future improvements to buildings on the City Campus. Attached is the Request for Council Action (RCA) and associated materials for this item from the July 20, 2020 City Council meeting. Staff will run through the presentation and update the Commission on the Master Plan project. Recommended Action: Review the enclosed material, receive presentation and provide input and feedback to staff on the referenced projects. Attachments: A. Packet material on Civic Campus Master Plan from July 20, 2020 City Council meeting Attachment A REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Department Approval -,a--�� Item Description: Civic Campus Master Plan Update 1 BACKGROUND Date: July 20, 2020 Item No.: City Manager Approval 2 On January 60', 2020, the City Council approved a Professional Services Agreement with BKV s Group for the Civic Campus Master Plan. a The Master Plan project was started with the realization that there are long-term space needs, 5 particularly for the License Center and the Maintenance Facility, that will eventually need to be 6 addressed. Council members and City staff recognized that this shouldn't be done in a vacuum 7 looking at only those particular needs, and any action to address that should be done with some a overall plan for the entire campus, now referred to as the Civic Campus. It is important that an s action to address the License Center long term not prohibit or limit action to address the 1 o Maintenance Facility needs, and vice versa It was also important to review what future needs may 11 occur at City Hall, and if any of those needs could be addressed at the same time that we address the 12 other facilities' needs. 13 It is important to note that there are no planned major improvements or expansions in the City's 14 Capital Improvement Plan or any other planning document. The City is currently spending over 15 $60,000 per year for various leased space to address seasonal storage needs. At some point the City 16 would like to address those needs with City owned space. With the new Fairview Community 17 Center, the City has also lost storage for recreational activities and affiliated association storage. 18 These are additional needs that should be addressed long term. 19 Once this plan is completed, staff will eventually start planning for some capital improvements and 20 expansions, but only after considerable discussions with the City Council and the public. A major 21 component of those discussions would be how to fund those improvements. 22 PROJECT UPDATE 23 On May 180', 2020, Council received a presentation with the first preliminary concepts. City staff 24 and BKV took feedback from that meeting and compiled additional concepts for review and 25 comment by the Council. The presentation with those new concepts is included as Attachment A. 26 A public engagement effort was also started in late June with direct mailings to residents adjacent to 27 the Civic Campus and an online survey for the general public to complete. The survey used very 28 general questions to first familiarize the public with the concept of the Civic Campus and to generate 29 general feedback from the public. Over 150 people completed the survey. The results of the survey so are summarized in Attachment B. 31 There was also some conversation about the Master Plan on social networks such as Facebook and 32 NextDoor. We have included what we could find, as of July 130', in Attachment C. Page 1 of 2 33 Feedback from the Council and the public will be used to further develop the concepts, provide some 34 analysis on staging and implementation and produce some very preliminary and conservative cost 35 estimates. This information will be presented to the Council in August. 36 Prior to that, an additional public engagement effort will start up within the next two weeks. This 37 will include another online survey with much more detailed questions about specific elements and 38 impacts of the concepts as well as a walking tour of the City Campus. 39 It is anticipated a final report will be presented to the Council sometime in September or October 4o FINANCIAL IMPACTS 41 Preliminary cost estimates for the various concepts are planned to be presented at a Council meeting 42 in August. There are currently no planned improvements or capital expenditures as a result of this 43 study. 44 STAFF RECOMMENDATION 45 Receive an update on the City Campus Master Plan from staff, BKV Group and Zan Associates and 46 provide feedback on the information presented. 47 REQUESTED COUNCIL ACTION 48 Receive an update on the City Campus Master Plan from staff, BKV Group and Zan Associates and 49 provide feedback on the information presented. Prepared by: Marc Culver, Public Works Director Attachments: A: Presentation B: Survey Results C: Social Media Public Comment Page 2 of 2 Campus Master Plan Study City Council Update - July 20, 2020 Attachment kOLSEpIL Minne_ Ct STEPS COMPLETED TO DATE: • Department kickoff meeting • Questionnaires issued to departments • Interviews held with each department to review questionnaire & preliminary space programming • Final space programs reviewed with departments • Initial conversations with Doug Setley, Commander of the VFW • Reviewed initial campus master plan concepts • Initial public engagement CITY OF ROSEVILLE CIVIC CAMPUS MASTER PLAN STUDY a:Nlei N**V]a11L�1q Q,,,ECTS t+ R KUV PROJECT GOALS: • Operational efficiency • Cohesive civic campus • Address current and long-term needs of stakeholders • Increase community access • Enhance civic identity • Balance fiscal responsibility and value CITY OF ROSEVILLE CIVIC CAMPUS MASTER PLAN STUDY I »_1212112lexelo7_1IM Q,,,ECTS t+ R KUV Existing infrastructure identified to remain: 0 Fire Station • City Hall • Communication Towers • Skating Center + Oval • Geothermal field VEIERAW PARK trjw^ WOODHILL DRIVE P 11 0 Comm ,W,R i 1U COMM. HOWARD TOWER JOHNSON PARK 134 r I MEMORIAL PARV 33 p" )2 (P) 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - HWY C 146 CITY OF ROSEVILLE CIVIC CAMPUS MASTER PLAN STUDY CIVIC CAMPUS MASTER PLAN - EXISTING BKV ,TECTS G R 0 U P MASTER PLAN OPTIONS: A.1 - Woodhill Drive Retained SUMMARY + Maintenance facility on one site consolidates construction + Flexible maintenance plan + Structures and landscape as buffer at residential areas + New central park/green space + License Center & VFW in shared facility + License Center parking can be used for overflow after-hours - Maintenance near residential increases design standards with possible higher costs - Yard space is enclosed, requiring a circulation loop for exit NTT .. F4. 4 _WOODHILL DRIVE HOWARD JOHNSON PARK F t J nalow,' I a Z ❑ o A n IZ X IF 7 J n 1 IF_ EEI O I P) I Uf I (P, O 'r ) IJ< MEMORIAL O PARK P; HWY C �liili !«, f�Awc:•ti...T✓� ... l:�R�Y,�"1- _ ..._ ': �'..-.�-«s�o-.ccp�� .. _... _ �i�Y 1,.. _ .-- CITY OF ROSEVILLE � CIVIC CAMPUS MASTER PLAN STUDY CIVIC CAMPUS MASTER PLAN - OPTION A.1 SRRc�irecrs BR K V MASTER PLAN OPTIONS: A.2 - Woodhill Drive Retained SUMMARY + Maintenance facility on one site supports phase construction + Separation of traffic flows from Woodhill Dr. and Lexington Ave. + Separate maintenance site work areas with opt. rear site entry + Structures and landscape as buffer at residential areas + New park/green space frames view to City Hall from Woodhill + License Center & VFW in shared facility + New parking lots for multiple uses - Maintenance vehicle storage has pinched access iml WOODHILL DRIVE J C'J I� W p. o z X • � W 0 I se P` XOWARD JONNSON PARK ►r) 124 l as I I Pi _ — _ _ _ _ _ — _ _ _�— _ — _ _ _ — _ — _ _ _ _ _ — _ _ _ _ I HWY C E CITY OF ROSEVILLE /TeL B K V CIVIC CAMPUS MASTER PLAN STUDY CIVIC CAMPUS MASTER PLAN - OPTION A.2 �1rECTs c R 0 u P MASTER PLAN OPTIONS: B - Woodhill Drive Adjusted SUMMARY + Maintenance facility screens work activities from residential areas + License Center remains visible and accessible from Lexington Ave. r--I - Maintenance Vehicle Storage is not as efficient - Maintenance Yard allows for less expansion than other options - Fuel -Wash -Park flow is in less desirable location given site constraints - Woodhill Dr. requires adjustment to the south to accommodate Maintenance and License on same site 71'r, s r *A a W4. Alm �i pp Lu I Q 2 0 w 1 35 p O HOWARD v 1 JOHNSON PARK MKMOR-AL C P f PARK 1]3 I- — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - WOODHILL DRIVE U HWY C w ��y��y�� ,•ems, "."-,� �- � -_� {'� CITY OF ROSEVILLE /TeL B K V CIVIC CAMPUS MASTER PLAN STUDY CIVIC CAMPUS MASTER PLAN - OPTION B HTBCTS c R 0 u P MASTER PLAN OPTIONS: a •` - C - Woodhill Drive Rerouted SUMMARY + Most generous site area for Maintenance functions + Screened Maintenance work areas and flexible building plan + Most direct fueling access for all City departments - Requires re-routing Woodhill Dr. to the north - Limited green space on campus - Created double -fronted residential lots - Limited available area for VFW - Phasing of construction would require temporary relocation of all maintenance activities during construction process 10, cp> i W la X �J WOODHILL DRIVE 0 I P, P .. 36 HOWARD 12 JOHNSON PARK r� 20 I,P� IC., r ua Y I u MEMORIAL !P� 4 PARK 12 2 - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — r - HWY C CITY OF ROSEVILLE /TeL B K V CIVIC CAMPUS MASTER PLAN STUDY CIVIC CAMPUS MASTER PLAN - OPTION C H1recTs c R 0 u P MASTER PLAN OPTIONS: D.1 - Maintenance Facility Off -site SUMMARY + Off -site maintenance allows for flexible future development of north side of site O or+uni+ for redevelo men+ of MAINTENANCE FACILITY RELOCATED OFF CAMPNS VETERANS PARK I r 1 w I I Q eo �FUTU RE Z P �NICIr 1 MOICIP6ll � ® i BNIdNG 1 � � I1 Z I13 p13 strip mall for future municipal i - — l - - P' -- -- -- n I - building + VFW remains in-placeGREE! 36 CE + License Center parking can be " I used as overflow after-hours I HOWARD l JOHNSON PARK Separation of municipal functions l 134 MFMORIAI P such as fueling and interaction , `ARK l with City Hall staff changes ° CPS operational procedures P Limited available sites in City for an ,lam.. — _ — _ — _ — _ — - — - — - — - off -site Maintenance Facility - — - — - — - — - — - (12 acres rec'd) ,,, _ " WOODHILL DRIVE I f s J CITY OF ROSEVILLE g CIVIC CAMPUS MASTER PLAN STUDY CIVIC CAMPUS MASTER PLAN - OPTION D.1V R.irecrs G R K MASTER PLAN OPTIONS: D.2 - Maintenance Facility Displaces Howard Johnson Park SUMMARY + Large site area for Maintenance Facility w/ efficient layout + Opportunity for phased construction + Opportunity for redevelopment of strip mall for future municipal building + VFW remains in -place + Large park/green space on campus - Howard Johnson Park is displaced - Costly to reconstruct stormwater treatment and wetlands - License Center adjacent to City Hall may create daily congestion k r VETERANS PARK 1 r WOODHILL DRIVE I J 1 10 F1 136 ( (P) MFMCRIAI IAAR 33 P� �P1 HWY C � / WARR iEANF[IER AORMWRI AFAl1.1AI N 1�= Siir sk CITY OF ROSEVILLE CIVIC CAMPUS MASTER PLAN STUDY CIVIC CAMPUS MASTER PLAN - OPTION D.2RNirecrs BR K V SUMMARY OF MAINTENANCE OPTIONS: Facility Footprii F and Size Notes 105,000 sf 105,000 sf 99,350 sf 105,000 sf 105,000 sf CITY OF ROSEVILLE CIVIC CAMPUS MASTER PLAN STUDY 177,250 sf 173,250 sf 109,000 sf 198,350 sf 180,350 sf Meets program requirements. Meets program requirements. Additional program SF option at second floor. Reduced yard size re: shared site. Meets program requirements. Additional yard space. Meets program requirements. Additional yard space. 1J1►_112114 2 F_l 2IN 41 ETS] I I II CA %,,, Ts BR K V SUMMARY OF COMMUNITY OUTREACH: MASTER PLAN WEBSITE Purpose: Gateway for Master Plan information, connecting residents with project information and engagement resources. ONLINE SURVEY - PART I (Open now through self -guided tour) 154 responses as of 7114120 Purpose: Connect community with Master Plan Process. Elicit preliminary feedback about the Civic Campus, connection with City resources, and vision. Outcome: Survey responses will be analyzed and reviewed by the Project Team CITY OF ROSEVILLE CIVIC CAMPUS MASTER PLAN STUDY SOCIAL MEDIA POSTINGS Purpose: Cultivate positive energy for Master Plan process and connect residents with resources. SELF -GUIDED TOUR (7/22 — 8/7) Purpose: Encourage citizens to physically explore the current campus. Outcome: Resident familiarity with the existing campus. ONLINE SURVEY - PART II (Dates to be confirmed) Purpose: Elicit specific feedback on aspects of the proposed design options. Outcome: Survey responses will be analyzed and reviewed by the Project Team X03,711J11112111 rK014I [7 FiTel:l WTErE�Ts BR K V CITY OF ROSEVILLE CIVIC CAMPUS MASTER PLAN STUDY NEXT STEPS: • Continue neighborhood & community outreach • Review Campus Master Plan options with departments • Refine Campus Master Plan options, including final locations for additional vehicle storage and shooting range • Develop phasing strategies for Master Plan options • Develop cost estimates for Master Plan options • Issue draft of compiled Campus Master Plan Study document • Issue final Campus Master Plan Study 21 WA MP QF,,ECTS t+ R KUV I ENRICHING LIVES AND STRENGTHENING COMMUNITIES CHICAGO 2AS South LaiThe Book ery,Suite 920 CMcago, I L PM604 P 312.2]9.00]0 DALLAS HANOI, VIETNAM MINNEAPOLIS WASHINGTON, DC 1412 Main Street No 1 Doe D WAnn Street 222 NotlF Second Street 10543P6lreet NW Adolphus Tower, Suite 700 Ocean Park Building, Long& Kees Building, Suite 101 CanalSgoare,SOIte 410 Dallm-, TX 752M Suite 15, Room 1508 Minneapolis, AN 55401 Washington, DC flIDo] P 069A05.1196 Phoong Mal Ward Dong Do District P612.W9.3I52 P202.595.3173 HalVietnam P 469.405.1 NO W W W.BKVGROUP.COM BKV G R O U P PUBLIC SURVEY: PART I • 156 Responses - 83% of respondents 55+ • 52% of people visit once a month or once a week • 47% visit only once a year • 76% of respondents visit by car • 84 respondents provided email addresses to stay informed about project progress CITY OF ROSEVILLE CIVIC CAMPUS MASTER PLAN STUDY Q1 What are the characteristics of the City of Roseville that you appreciate most? many spaces roads biking paths proximity city services good schools sidewalksfriendly Location Parks trail S Easy access good convenient safe park system shopping quiet community proximity downtowns City plenty green spacedowntownsparkswell-maintainedIotS paths g re at Roseville close trails love beautiful trees clean ne i g h bors convenience area Everything services businesses Walling Minneapolis St Paul well maintained walks bike access st Paul All [,TMA2i0*1=:1*1114IE&'Nt013 Ill 14 QCHETECTS BR 0 C P Q3 How much time do you spend at the Civic Campus when you visit? Answered: 154 Skipped:2 Less 3-5 ho 5 hours 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Q5 Why do you visit the Civic Campus? (check all that apply) Answered:151 Skipped:5 Permits am Licensini City Hall VFW Ice Rink Paying a bill Other (pleas 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% CITY OF ROSEVILLE / G TeL K V CIVIC CAMPUS MASTER PLAN STUDY SURVEY PHASE I —RESULTS TO -DATE HTBCTS R o � P Q8 Please provide any other comments or suggestions that would improve the Civic Campus: license center many space needs give City keep vfw tl meS better m on ey Fairview Community Center s p ac a people b u i l d i n g s campus n e e d Center parks None use pandemic taxeS nice city hall current years meetings new stop n kept Increase Q10 Is there anything additional you would like us to know, or anything further you would like to comment on? really spend money spending increase taxes money maintenance WI I Igo Space departments ke e p build new C I ty residents p ar k i n g families n e e d I rnprovernents ti m e reduce R O s eV I I I e Thank b u i l d i n g s moving area better Please place taxes police use want tax Increases CITY OF ROSEVILLE CIVIC CAMPUS MASTER PLAN STUDY SURVEY PHASE I — RESULTS TO -DATE Q�T L r5 BR K V ATTACHMENT The City of Roseville - Civic Campus Master Plan Q1 What are the characteristics of the City of Roseville that you appreciate most? Answered: 139 Skipped: 17 1/15 The City of Roseville - Civic Campus Master Plan Q2 How often do you visit the City of Roseville's Civic Campus? Answered: 154 Skipped:2 F I 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% ANSWER CHOICES Frequently (at least once per week) Occasionally (at least once per month) Rarely (at least once per year) RESPONSES 13.64% 20.13% 47.40% Never 8.44% Other (please specify) 11.04% Total Respondents: 154 21 31 73 13 17 2/15 The City of Roseville - Civic Campus Master Plan Q3 How much time do you spend at the Civic Campus when you visit? Answered: 154 Skipped:2 Less than l . minutes 1 hour 1 . 1-3 he 3-5 hours 5 hours or 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Less than 30 minutes 53.25% 82 1 hour 27.92% 43 1-3 hours 17.53% 27 3-5 hours hour 0.65% 1 5 hours or more 0.65% 1 TOTAL 154 3/15 The City of Roseville - Civic Campus Master Plan Q4 How do you travel to the Civic Campus? (check all that apply) Answered: 152 Skipped:4 Bus Car W Other ANSWER CHOICES Bus Car Bike Walk/run 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% RESPONSES - 0.00% 0 76.32% 116 5.26% 8 13.16% 20 Roll 0.00% Other (please specify) 5.26% TOTAL e 4/15 The City of Roseville - Civic Campus Master Plan Q5 Why do you visit the Civic Campus? (check all that apply) Answered: 151 Skipped:5 Permits an . Licensin City Hall . ir Payin Other 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Permits and Licensing 66.89% 101 City Hall 32.45% 49 VFW 22.52% 34 Ice Rink 31.79% 48 Paying a bill 10.60% 16 Other (please specify) 25.83% 39 Total Respondents: 151 5/15 The City of Roseville - Civic Campus Master Plan Q6 How often do you use the City of Roseville's website? Answered: 154 Skipped:2 F I 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Frequently (at least once per week) 11.04% 17 Occasionally (at least once per month) 57.14% 88 Rarely (at least once per year) 25.32% 39 Never 3.90% 6 Other (please specify) 2.60% 4 TOTAL 154 6/15 The City of Roseville - Civic Campus Master Plan Q7 What features would you like to see improved at the Civic Campus? Answered: 143 Skipped: 13 One building III for all my... Better accesI Mi gath n Q 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES One building for all my government needs 21.68% 31 Better access 9.79% 14 More parking 12.59% 18 Safety (lighting, etc.) 7.69% 11 Public gathering space 30.07% 43 More online options 27.27% 39 Other (please specify) 46.15% 66 Total Respondents: 143 7/15 The City of Roseville - Civic Campus Master Plan Q8 Please provide any other comments or suggestions that would improve the Civic Campus: Answered: 72 Skipped: 84 8/15 The City of Roseville - Civic Campus Master Plan Q9 For those living adjacent to the Civic Campus, what do you find are advantages and disadvantages of your proximity to the Campus? Answered: 60 Skipped: 96 9/15 The City of Roseville - Civic Campus Master Plan Q10 Is there anything additional you would like us to know, or anything further you would like to comment on? Answered: 65 Skipped: 91 10 / 15 The City of Roseville - Civic Campus Master Plan Q11 How would you like to receive project and construction updates? (select all that apply): Answered: 143 Skipped: 13 Email Soc Ph C text Local n Roa( othf 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Email updates 72.03% 103 Social media 35.66% 51 Phone calls 0.00% 0 Cell phone text messages 4.20% 6 Local newspaper 19.58% 28 Road signage 9.79% 14 Mailings 21.68% 31 Other (please specify) 8.39% 12 Total Respondents: 143 The City of Roseville - Civic Campus Master Plan Q12 Do you want to sign up for email updates? If yes, please provide your email below. Answered: 84 Skipped: 72 12 / 15 The City of Roseville - Civic Campus Master Plan Ur Other ANSWER CHOICES Under 18 18-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ Other (please specify) TOTAL Q13 What is your age? Answered: 142 Skipped: 14 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% RESPONSES 0.00% 0.00% 11.97% 14.79% 14.08% 25.35% 33.10% 0.70% 0 0 17 21 20 36 47 1 142 13 / 15 The City of Roseville - Civic Campus Master Plan Q14 What is your gender? Answered: 143 Skipped: 13 I pr Other 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Male 37.76% 54 Female 57.34% 82 1 prefer not to say 4.90% 7 Other (please specify) 0.00% 0 TOTAL 143 14 / 15 The City of Roseville - Civic Campus Master Plan Q15 What is your race or ethnicity? Answered: 141 Skipped: 15 BI Af Hisp Middle or Multir Mul Americ Hawaii Anotl or eth 0% 10% 20% ANSWER CHOICES Asian 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% RESPONSES 0.00% 0 Black or African American 0.00% 0 Hispanic or Latino 1.42% 2 Middle Eastern or North African 0.00% 0 Multiracial or Multiethnic 0.00% 0 Native American or Alaska Native 1.42% 2 Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander 0.00% 0 White 90.78% 128 Another race or ethnicity, please describe below TOTAL 2.13% 3 141 15 / 15 Q1 What are the characteristics of the City of Roseville that you appreciate most? many spaces roads biking paths proximity nay serinmes good schools sidewalks friendly Eocaoon Parks trai Is Easy acness good convenient safe perk yMem shopping g.let co m u n ity proximity downtowns City plenty green spacedavimownsparkswell-mantainetllots paths great Roseville close nails love beandml trees clean neighbors convenience area Everything services basmesses walking Minneapolis StPaul well maintained walks bike access st Paul The City of Roseville - Civic Campus Master Plan Q1 What are the characteristics of the City of Roseville that you appreciate most? nswered:140 Skipped:17 1/6 The City of Roseville - Civic Campus Master Plan # RESPONSES DATE 1 The many parks and outdoor spaces are Roseville's greatest assets. 7/14/2020 10:23 PM 2 3 Parks, convenience to mostly everything, mostly peaceful and safe Currently wondering that myself. 7/14/2020 10:00 AM 7/14/2020 6:51 AM 4 Parks, beach, walkable 7/14/2020 12:41 AM 5 Parks, outdoor activitie 7/13/2020 3:44 PM 6 The parks 7/13/2020 9:15 AM 7 When I filled out this form before I forgot to add one of the most important things I appreciate-- the parks. 7/13/2020 7:01 AM 8 1 like the size - not too big. Also, there are many places to shop. The parks are great. 7/11/2020 3:28 PM 9 Healthy parks with spaces for families as well as healthy ecosystems that are educational (natives, controlled invasive plants etc) 7/11/2020 12:03 AM 10 the parks 7/10/2020 9:30 PM 11 Clean 7/10/2020 6:56 PM 12 1 love the proximity to both downtowns and all the green space. 7/10/2020 5:49 PM 13 1 love the proximity to both downtowns and all the green space. 7/10/2020 4:37 PM 14 location 7/10/2020 3:48 PM 15 The parks, open space. 7/10/2020 3:35 PM 16 The Police Department. They are heroes and so darn sweet. 7/10/2020 2:06 PM 17 The parks, wood and trails 7/10/2020 1:49 PM 18 The parks, wood and trails 7/10/2020 1:44 PM 19 Safe, friendly, accessible, smart 7/10/2020 1:29 PM 20 Friendly. Very safe. Close to both downtowns of Minneapolis and St Paul. Great park system. Many recreational opportunities. Top notch community engagement opportunities (Arboretum, sports, bands, Rosefest, etc). 7/10/2020 1:26 PM 21 ? 7/10/2020 1:25 PM 22 Location 7/10/2020 1:17 PM 23 the connected park system 7/10/2020 1:12 PM 24 Safe place to live 7/10/2020 1:11 PM 25 My neighbors 7/10/2020 12:52 PM 26 Location to Mpls and St. paul 7/10/2020 12:49 PM 27 Road maintenance; police, fire and parks. 7/10/2020 12:27 PM 28 Convenience to metro area and shopping, low density in residential areas and parks and green space 7/10/2020 12:21 PM 29 -Well-maintained roads and timely plowing -trees -paths and parks 7/10/2020 12:10 PM 30 Organized, great parks 7/10/2020 12:04 PM 31 Ease off access, green spaces 7/10/2020 11:59 AM 32 Parks, retail, roads. 7/10/2020 11:52 AM 33 Clean layout and roads that are kept in good condition. 7/10/2020 11:17 AM 34 Parks; having license & passport centers; recorded council meetings; great volunteers 7/10/2020 10:36 AM Q1 - 2/6 The City of Roseville - Civic Campus Master Plan 35 convenient 7/10/2020 10:10 AM 36 The parks, the license center 7/10/2020 9:44 AM 37 First ring suburb, quiet neighborhoods, easy access to the freeway, access to shopping and 7/10/2020 9:42 AM dining. Safety 38 Road maintenance. Police department. 7/10/2020 9:31 AM 39 We enjoy the roll in movies, the Valentines "Daddy Daughter" Dance. Other than that, we don't 7/10/2020 9:30 AM really come to the campus much. 40 The police presence is adequate. Never enough though. They do a great job. The parks are also well maintained. 7/10/2020 9:13 AM 41 Neighbor hood parks. green space, Twin Cities access but small town feel 7/10/2020 8:54 AM 42 Safety and responsibility to all 7/10/2020 8:49 AM 43 Parks and trails 7/10/2020 8:33 AM 44 It's a livable, affordable, welcoming mix of various kinds of housing and businesses. It flies in the face of the hatred and destruction provided by the White House. 7/10/2020 8:31 AM 45 city services 7/10/2020 8:28 AM 46 Ease of use 7/10/2020 8:26 AM 47 Greenary 7/10/2020 8:18 AM 48 Parks, bikeways, lakes with public access 7/10/2020 8:15 AM 49 The parks and recreation. It's safety. 7/10/2020 8:12 AM 50 51 52 53 54 55 Green spaces, cleanliness, the change to a more diverse population... Kind, friendly police force. Clean, well -kept. Parks and proximity to St. Paul/Mpls central location Convenient to both metro downtowns. Proximity to Minneapolis and St. Paul. 7/10/2020 8:06 AM 7/10/2020 7:55 AM 7/10/2020 7:29 AM 7/10/2020 7:13 AM 7/10/2020 2:25 AM 7/10/2020 1:10 AM 56 Well maintained 7/9/2020 6:59 PM 57 Parks and biking paths 7/9/2020 3:50 PM 58 Simple yet functional. Keep it that way although there is a need for some expansion and upgrading. 7/9/2020 2:48 PM 59 The natural beauty, particularly all the trees. 7/9/2020 12:37 PM 60 Clean and well maintained parks 7/9/2020 11:03 AM 61 The natural beauty, particularly all the trees. 7/9/2020 9:39 AM 62 close to everything 7/8/2020 3:54 PM 63 The schools are getting more diverse. I love the library and the parks. 7/8/2020 3:19 PM 64 Parks/paths/green space Winter plowing is excellent. 7/8/2020 2:46 PM 65 green space and delivery of services 7/8/2020 1:00 PM 66 Green spaces 7/8/2020 12:32 PM 67 There is a lot of options in one area. 7/8/2020 12:20 PM 68 Bike trails and parks, good schools, lots of retail, close to MSP 7/8/2020 10:24 AM 69 Cleanliness, ease of mobility, fast & thorough snow removal, great parks & facilities, and much more. 7/8/2020 9:36 AM Q1-3/6 The City of Roseville - Civic Campus Master Plan 70 1 like that Roseville is close to everything. The parks are fantastic and one of the best features of the city. 7/8/2020 8:52 AM 71 The parks 7/8/2020 7:47 AM 72 How it feels like a small town, the parks, the oval, the shopping 7/8/2020 7:42 AM 73 The parks and open spaces and many walking trails . The beautiful tree lines streets that fill many areas. 7/8/2020 7:37 AM 74 None. You are taxing me and NY neighbors out if our homes and this area. Quit spending. 7/8/2020 7:19 AM 75 Walking paths, biking paths, Lake Josephine public beach 7/8/2020 3:44 AM 76 Land. I like the parks and wild areas. There's been too much developing of land around here. Leave some open space with lots of green. 7/7/2020 10:06 PM 77 Location in the metro area. Lately it's been nice seeing neighbors out for walks and bike rides. This has thrown the disastrous division of the city be Snelling and 36 into unfortunately sharp relief. 7/7/2020 9:43 PM 78 Everything is close together. 7/7/2020 8:12 PM 79 Friendly, safe, lots of parks, lots of activities 7/7/2020 8:05 PM 80 Parks and trails 7/7/2020 7:38 PM 81 Easy access to shopping restaurants and parks. 7/7/2020 7:32 PM 82 central park 7/7/2020 6:52 PM 83 Parks 7/7/2020 6:20 PM 84 Well maintained... Lots of trees... Friendly neighbors... Racially diverse... 7/7/2020 4:48 PM 85 Quiet, well -maintained and low crime (other than at Walmart, the malls and those shitty motels near 35E) 7/7/2020 4:48 PM 86 Parks, trails, quiet and sense of local community. 7/7/2020 4:40 PM 87 Parks Police and Fire 7/7/2020 4:33 PM 88 Police 7/7/2020 12:35 PM 89 1 walk in the Howard Johnson Park daily, and I so appreciate having a nearby park with trail and animals, especially during Covid. We also love that city hall is a drop -site for our CSA, providing a convenient pick-up site for our community. Before Covid, I frequently took advantage of the walking space in the Skating Center, especially during poor weather. 7/7/2020 10:06 AM 90 Quality homes, kind friendly families, clean safe streets, swift and smart police and fire protection. 7/7/2020 12:54 AM 91 Well -maintained parks, plenty of walking and bike paths 7/6/2020 9:01 PM 92 Investment of Law enforcement and Fire safety. 7/6/2020 8:25 PM 93 Safe, great city staff, lots of green space, beautiful Central Park 7/6/2020 8:12 PM 94 The parks, trees, green space 7/6/2020 7:40 PM 95 The parks 7/6/2020 7:12 PM 96 Parks, sidewalks, and paths. Trees. 7/6/2020 6:19 PM 97 Parks and proximity to downtowns 7/6/2020 3:58 PM 98 It's a fairly quiet community that's close to the cities. It has good schools and is safe. 7/6/2020 12:24 PM 99 Parks 7/6/2020 11:04 AM 100 Parks, trails, diversity„ well -cared for 7/6/2020 7:39 AM 101 Parks, easy access to freeways, reasonably well -maintained streets 7/5/2020 2:42 PM Q1-3/6 The City of Roseville - Civic Campus Master Plan 102 Roseville has easy access to major highways and both St. Paul and Minneapolis. 7/5/2020 12:45 PM 103 Everything we need is in the city itself. Groceries, shopping, entertainment, quality childcare. We are in close proximity to several wonderful parks, as well. 7/4/2020 9:56 PM 104 Green space, lakes, parks, and trails. 7/4/2020 7:34 PM 105 106 The parks, quality education, the shopping and restaurants, the central location within the twin cities. Suburban living with more diversity and closer access to the cities than outer tier suburbs. 7/4/2020 11:45 AM 7/4/2020 6:30 AM 107 Proximity to downtown; good schools; plenty of shopping; quiet neighborhoods; plenty of parks 7/4/2020 6:23 AM 108 Parks 7/3/2020 10:47 PM 109 Plenty of parks & playgrounds. 7/3/2020 9:01 PM 110 The parks, Nature, the ability to get around on foot or bike 7/3/2020 7:51 PM 111 Excellent city services and several high quality parks 7/3/2020 6:56 PM 112 Nothing right now it is going down hill in a hurry under current administration 7/3/2020 6:28 PM 113 Businesses. Proximity to metro 7/3/2020 6:11 PM 114 Lots of things to do outside, and friendly those outside (able to go walking, biking, or do other things without getting run over by drivers). 7/3/2020 5:53 PM 115 Welcoming, really nice parks 7/3/2020 5:53 AM 116 The neighbors, and I like that Roseville is colorful. 7/212020 11:04 PM 117 Environmentally aware; increased accessibility to build community through the Oval & the many capacities it serves. 7/212020 9:01 PM 118 Suburb with good facilities and services, residents and businesses in good repair, plus close access to St Paul and Mnpls. Good schools. 7/212020 8:42 PM 119 Lots of parks, good city services 7/212020 2:10 PM 120 Parks and restaurants 7/212020 12:47 PM 121 There are really no Roseville services that I use regularly except roads/sewer/utilities, etc. 7/1/2020 8:23 PM 122 Convenience to Saint Paul and Mpls. Parks. Safe neighborhoods. 7/1/2020 5:53 PM 123 Cc locating services into a service center model One stop shopping for residents 7/1/2020 3:25 PM 124 1 love the green space with trees and flowers. The clean well -maintained buildings. The sense of calm that comes over me when I enter Roseville from other cities. 7/1/2020 3:07 PM 125 Proximity to Twin Cities, mature trees, mid century homes, parks 7/1/2020 1:20 PM 126 it's variety 7/1/2020 1:19 PM 127 Parks and trails, arboretum and flowers 7/1/2020 1:17 PM 128 Safe neighborhoods, good schools, convenient access to needed goods and highways. 7/1/2020 12:31 PM 129 The friendly people. I think the beautiful parks bring people together: walkers greet each other and birdwatchers share what they see. I love the volunteer programs, which also create community. I love being close to cultural icons like the MIA and the Guthrie, yet from my home I look out on a natural landscape replete with wood duck and foxes. I appreciate that we have cultural diversity, although I think a lot of us are struggling to make sense of the BLM protests and what it says about inequality in our community and surrounding area. I appreciate that government is fairly open and transparent, roads and sidewalks are maintained. 7/1/2020 12:25 PM 130 Lakes, parks, good balance of residential, business, and recreational spaces. 7/1/2020 12:24 PM 131 Easy access 7/1/2020 12:15 PM 132 The parks! 7/1/2020 12:11 PM Q1-3/6 The City of Roseville - Civic Campus Master Plan 133 Lots of parks, sense of community 7/1/2020 11:44 AM 134 Quiet, local businesses, bars/restaurants in/near neighborhoods, easily accesible 7/1/2020 11:41 AM 135 Walking trails. Convenience to both downtowns. Great snowplowing. Swift police response in an emergency. 7/1/2020 11:38 AM 136 All of the parks 7/1/2020 11:37 AM 137 1 like the size of Roseville and the proximity to Minneapolis and St Paul. I love the park system. Great neighbors and community. 7/1/2020 11:35 AM 138 parks and green spaces, sidewalks connecting green spaces 7/1/2020 11:27 AM 139 Pathways, Parks, proximity to highways, downtowns, shopping 7/1/2020 11:14 AM 140 1 like that the parks are well maintained and the City seems pretty actively involved in the city. 6/30/2020 12:06 PM Q1-3/6 The City of Roseville - Civic Campus Master Plan Q8 Please provide any other comments or suggestions that would improve the Civic Campus: Answered: 72 Skipped: 85 Q8 - 1/4 The City of Roseville - Civic Campus Master Plan # RESPONSES DATE 1 Do not take away the VFW, its important to our vets 7/14/2020 10:19 AM 2 Do not take away the VFW, its important to our vets 7/14/2020 10:18 AM 3 Nothing currently. Now is NOT the time to tap into residents or their pocketbooks. 7/14/2020 10:00 AM 4 More spaces for meetings that the community could use 7/11/2020 3:28 PM 5 Possible to have a water park like Shoreview or Maplewood? 7/11/2020 12:03 AM 6 Please hold off on this project for now. We have many financial obstacles due to Covid 19. 7/10/2020 6:56 PM More taxes, projects, etcnd 7 none 7/10/2020 3:48 PM 8 It would be nice to have all departments in close proximity to each other. That said, not too long 7/10/2020 2:06 PM ago, the new City Hall was constructed. Our Mayor and City Council should have been more future sighted. 9 It seems like we've spent a lot of money in recent years on park facilities, etc. with the economy 7/10/2020 1:44 PM and the corona virus it t would be better to use any extra money, if there is any, to help with that, not new improvements. 10 Thank you for continuing to make Roseville an awesome place to live. 7/10/2020 1:29 PM 11 better space and public awareness of the Roseville Historical Society 7/10/2020 1:26 PM 12 None 7/10/2020 1:25 PM 13 You folks have done a great job 7/10/2020 1:11 PM 14 Stop spending taxpayers money until pandemic is over and people are back to work ! 7/10/2020 12:52 PM 15 Doesn't need anything right now, my taxes are too high as it is 7/10/2020 12:49 PM 16 in determining Space needs, are services provided to other cities and other local governments, 7/10/2020 12:21 PM e.g. IT, being taken into account and are those users being asked to share in any expense related to space needs for those functions? Also, is change in consumer habits re: licensing and passports being taken into account, i.e. are increasing use of online services for licenses and passports being taken into account in space needs determination. 17 - 7/10/2020 12:10 PM 18 In this time of Covid-19, I believe that there should be a freeze on any new projects. Too many 7/10/2020 11:17 AM people are out of jobs or in financial difficulty to consider any new projects. 19 No improvements needed. Quit spending tax dollars on it. 7/10/2020 9:44 AM 20 Wait until financial concerns are addressed. I realize we need more police for safety in 7/10/2020 9:42 AM neighborhoods but we shouldn't be raising taxes and spending money until people can recover sone from the financial crisis. Also stop giving huge tax breaks to large businesses. Use that money to fund things for the safety concerns they contribute to. 21 Please do not increase our taxes during a pandemic for this. It is not needed. Our taxes go up 7/10/2020 9:13 AM every year for things we don't really need. This is a great example. 22 Use NCR bldg, existing, abandoned bldgs, do not take parks 7/10/2020 8:54 AM 23 Public pool or indoor playground? 7/10/2020 8:49 AM 24 I think we should be putting off all upgrades until we get out of this covid-19 pandemic. We 7/10/2020 8:28 AM need to give the tax payers some relief from the constant tax increases. We should be in crisis mode and save money where ever we can. Please stop the tax increases during these very difficult times es 25 Not sure 7/10/2020 8:26 AM 26 Quit spending money. Maybe replace dead trees on boulevard. 7/10/2020 8:18 AM 27 N/a 7/10/2020 8:15 AM Q8 - 2/4 The City of Roseville - Civic Campus Master Plan 28 Swimming park 7/10/20205:58 AM 29 1 wasn't aware of the need for expansions until I comments on NextDoor. 7/10/2020 2:25 AM 30 Reduce workforce and cut back. 7/10/2020 1:10 AM 31 Larger and faster licensing and passport services 7/9/2020 6:59 PM 32 We are in a recession and this will likely impact citizen incomes for 8 + years. There is no 7/9/2020 3:50 PM projected major increase in population expected (4K or more) so spending yet more money on the Civic Campus would be irresponsible. Over the last 30 years there has been constant growth in buildings for fire dept, police, city hall, etc. Yet RV has never seriously added amenities for families, e.g., a fitness center with pool. It has been left to the school district to shoulder and it is done in a marginal manner at the school district (check out their open swim times for ex.) as they have significant costs associated with school functioning. You are not even marginally competitive in competing for young adults or families with kids as your amenities are pretty much dated park and rec classes or neighborhood parks. And the parks have limited value in the winter months. I encourage you to look beyond all the bells and whistles desired to make the Civic Campus premium level and look at the needs of the citizens and improve amenities to attract them to RV. 33 See above 7/9/2020 2:48 PM 34 i hope there is still time to change the concept after the second survey 7/8/2020 3:54 PM 35 n/a 7/8/2020 3:19 PM 36 Be frugal 7/8/2020 12:32 PM 37 n/a 7/8/2020 12:20 PM 38 No improvements needed. Keep up what is there. 7/8/2020 9:36 AM 39 1 have never had to visit the campus in the 6 years that I have been a homeowner in Roseville. 7/8/2020 8:52 AM 40 Its fine as is. Quitlooking for ways to spebd my money. 7/8/2020 7:19 AM 41 Sell the skating center to a private company. 7/8/2020 3:44 AM 42 1 like that the buildings are fairly close together. The DMV and passport departments are 7/7/2020 10:06 PM farthest away, it close enough to be reasonable. 43 ? 7/7/2020 4:48 PM 44 Bring back holiday lights 7/7/2020 4:33 PM 45 Not sure if its possible, but the pond in Howard Johnson Park would be awesome if it wasn't 7/7/2020 10:06 AM green/scummy all summer 46 Use the strip mall for small business - restaurant, gift shop (along with DMV, etc). Ensure the 7/6/2020 8:37 PM gas station is kept up and safe. Nice having so many city functions in adjacent locations - don't change that. 47 1 think there needs to be more indoor space for youth sports and recreation. Outdoors is not 7/6/2020 8:25 PM always an option in our harsh climate. 48 Bigger license center 7/6/2020 8:12 PM 49 The current campus serves my needs. 7/6/2020 12:24 PM 50 Youth is the future - provide and enhance area large already in use and plan for additional space 7/6/2020 11:04 AM 51 The inside of the ice arena could use a lot of updating. It would be great to have a nice facility for athletes to do dryland training and weightlifting. 7/6/2020 7:39 AM 52 1 am not sure of the relationship between the Civic Campus and the Fairview Community Center. Does the Fairview Community Center fall under the City of Roseville. I live close to the Fairview Community Center and I was not aware of any planning meetings for the new facility. It could be that I was not paying attention or missed reading about. 7/5/2020 12:45 PM 53 A library would be wonderful to have within close walking distance! 7/4/2020 9:56 PM Q8 - 3/4 The City of Roseville - Civic Campus Master Plan 54 None 7/4/2020 7:34 PM 55 Better rooms for community education 7/3/2020 7:51 PM 56 Don't do it 7/3/2020 6:28 PM 57 More decorative plantings would be nice 7/3/2020 5:53 PM 58 1 think It needs more color, more life. Maybe Some small local business could attract more 7/2/2020 11:04 PM people towards that area. 59 1 took the survey before but have comments after reviewing the Master Plan. I believe the plan 7/2/2020 9:30 PM is a traditional outdated and inadequate approach. Its Key Goals do not but should include sustainability and environmental goals. I did not review and have no comment on the space needs. However the layouts shown if continued as is will produce only cookie cutter designs and buildings that meet current energy codes. I want the city to step up to the worlds current environmental problems and develop a plan that has adaptable multiuse buildings with net zero or minimal energy requirements constructed with sustainable materials. They should qualify as LEED buildings at minimum. Where are the ideas for earth bermed/sheltered buildings, green roofs, solar panels and wind turbines? The layouts shown would seem to make these impossible. 60 Completely energy efficient. 7/2/2020 9:01 PM 61 Green and seating spaces. Minimum or net zero energy use. Green roofs. 7/2/2020 8:42 PM 62 More space in the license center 7/2/2020 2:10 PM 63 We need a Community Center 7/2/2020 12:47 PM 64 Sidewalk expanded on Woodhill to walk from the Oval/City Hall to Howard Johnson Park. 7/1/2020 3:07 PM 65 keep the Fairview fire station and build the license/passport center there. it would increase 7/1/2020 1:19 PM profits dramatically, would reduce crowds because of limited parking, and would insure access to the water tower. build a new building on the east side of city hall to place all departments except for IT and police, creating 30 year space for them. let IT and police expand into the current city hall. the entry for city hall would be a huge lockerroom addition for police. this would give parks a new entrance, along with the rest of city hall. build a new maintenance department on shopping center property with a warehouse, which can be expanded later for more vehicle space. keep the vrw where they are. if you don't want to move the license center to Fairview, then move the VFW to the Fairview fire station property. 66 Remodel the license center! It needs more room and more staff asap. Wait times are ridiculous 7/1/2020 12:31 PM (before the pandemic, no idea what its like now) and its hard on staff to deal with that environment. 67 1 love the prairie out front. It could use some signage to explain benefits of prairie landscaping 7/1/2020 12:25 PM though! would like to see more trees generally, esp for shade in parking lots, parking islands with native plantings, 68 Assuming bus service resumes, provide an enclosed structure to protect from rain/snow 7/1/2020 12:24 PM 69 N/A 7/1/2020 12:11 PM 70 more recreation on the campus to bring people together there. 7/1/2020 11:44 AM 71 keep the vfw 7/1/2020 11:41 AM 72 Keep the VFW 7/1/2020 11:37 AM Q8 - 4/4 Q8 Please provide any other comments or suggestions that would improve the Civic Campus: license center many space netts gme City keep.r,.,times better money Fame~ Commnnycemerspace pecpie build i ngs campus need centerparksn.neusepandemic taxesnice city hallcmrem years meefi, new stop n kept increase The City of Roseville - Civic Campus Master Plan Q9 For those living adjacent to the Civic Campus, what do you find are advantages and disadvantages of your proximity to the Campus? Answered: 61 Skipped: 96 Q9 - 1/4 The City of Roseville - Civic Campus Master Plan # RESPONSES DATE 1 It's convenient living close to the driver's license/tabs center 7/14/2020 10:23 PM 2 Easy access to skating lessons and family skates around the oval. Easy to get in line early at 7/14/2020 12:41 AM license passport center. The only disadvantage is traffic and full street parking for blocks around during tournaments. I live on Ferwood and Judith. 3 NA 7/11/2020 3:28 PM 4 Need to be put on hold. Resources will be needed for the current and future responses to 7/10/2020 6:56 PM Covids implications for Roseville. 5 We can often hear the activities at the Oval. Most of the time these are just during the day time, 7/10/2020 3:35 PM but the Untapped and Uncorked concerts are loud a little later than I would like. We also hear the sirens from the fire dept and police dept, but those are just background noise at this point. I don't know that there are particular advantages, other than slightly reduced insurance rates due to proximity to the firehouse, and my little ones like seeing the police cars and fire trucks when we're on our walks. 6 NA 7/10/2020 1:26 PM 7 the license bureau is an important part of the needs 7/10/2020 1:12 PM 8 N/a 7/10/2020 1:11 PM 9 no idea 7/10/2020 12:52 PM 10 NA 7/10/2020 12:21 PM 11 - 7/10/2020 12:10 PM 12 1 don't live adjacent to the Civic Campus. 7/10/2020 11:17 AM 13 Can walk there. 7/10/2020 9:44 AM 14 1 live about 4 blocks away and don't find any drawbacks to it. It is nice being close when you 7/10/2020 9:42 AM have to go there. 15 NA 7/10/2020 9:13 AM 16 It's ok as long as it doesn't become monolithic... 7/10/2020 8:54 AM 17 None 7/10/2020 8:49 AM 18 easy access 7/10/2020 8:28 AM 19 Na 7/10/2020 8:26 AM 20 None 7/10/2020 8:18 AM 21 N/a 7/10/2020 8:15 AM 22 na 7/9/2020 6:59 PM 23 N/A 7/9/2020 2:48 PM 24 1 do not feel there are any advantages or disadvantages to living close to the Campus other 7/9/2020 12:37 PM than the proximity of getting my driver's license renewed. 25 1 do not feel there are any advantages or disadvantages to living close to the Campus other 7/9/2020 9:39 AM than the proximity of getting my driver's license renewed. 26 n/a 7/8/2020 3:19 PM 27 n/a 7/8/2020 12:20 PM 28 Does not apply. 7/8/2020 9:36 AM 29 1 live by Central Park. The sirens are annoying, but were expected when moving here. 7/8/2020 8:52 AM 30 Being in walking distance is great! 7/8/2020 7:47 AM 31 The walking places are fantastic. I use them daily. I seldom use the convenience store, but 7/8/2020 7:37 AM Q9 - 2/4 The City of Roseville - Civic Campus Master Plan have gotten gas there five times in the last 2 years. License Bureau is used once a year. All other businesses in that small strip mall I do not use at all. 32 N 7/8/2020 7:19 AM 33 None 7/8/2020 3:44 AM 34 N/A 7/7/2020 10:06 PM 35 We live about a half mile away. Not directly adjacent, but we appreciate the options available within biking distance 7/7/2020 7:38 PM 36 NA 7/7/2020 4:33 PM 37 We love being able to go walking at Howard Johnson Park daily, and that our CSA pick-up is in walking distance at city hall. The biggest disadvantage to our location has been when events are going on that we don't know about ahead of time. Sometimes when there are big hockey events there is a lot of extra traffic on our usually quiet road that'd be helpful to anticipate ahead of time. It'd be helpful if there was a public calendar that advised of likely crowd size (sort of like the state fairgrounds provide) to let neighbors plan ahead if they may be having company and need to arrange parking. Similarly, for parades and events, we've sometimes been caught off guard by closed streets which can be challenging if you are trying to make an appointment. 7/7/2020 10:06 AM 38 No 7/6/2020 8:25 PM 39 Na 7/6/2020 8:12 PM 40 Easy access. I don't see many disadvantages 7/6/2020 7:40 PM 41 Park n ride, safety needs 7/6/2020 3:58 PM 42 N/A 7/6/2020 12:24 PM 43 Na 7/6/2020 11:04 AM 44 NA 7/6/2020 7:39 AM 45 N/A 7/5/2020 2:42 PM 46 Fast response time for emergency services, easy access to licensing. Other than the gas station, we really don't have use for the other businesses located in that space. 7/4/2020 9:56 PM 47 Enjoy the idea of being close to everything if needed. The emergency vehicle sirens can be obnoxious at times but I understand its necessary. 7/4/2020 7:34 PM 48 Advantage: next to park/ ice rink. Disadvantage: parking on game days 7/3/2020 10:47 PM 49 N/a 7/3/2020 7:51 PM 50 Lots of sirens but my 3 year old son loves watching all the police cars, fire trucks and ambulances go by. We love Howard Johnson park, or as he says, "his police and firefighter park"! 7/3/2020 6:56 PM 51 Move far away to another city 7/3/2020 6:28 PM 52 NA 7/3/2020 5:53 PM 53 It's easy to walk to. 7/2/2020 11:04 PM 54 N/A 7/2/2020 9:01 PM 55 NA 7/2/2020 2:10 PM 56 - 7/2/2020 12:47 PM 57 N/A 7/1/2020 3:07 PM 58 Not applicable 7/1120201:20 PM 59 N/A 7/1/2020 12:24 PM 60 1 live a block away, I like the accessibility, i dislike that the use of space takes up space that could be used by local businesses 7/1/2020 11:41 AM Q9 - 3/4 The City of Roseville - Civic Campus Master Plan 61 It's convenient when I forget some paperwork and need to go back home. The passport center 6/30/2020 12:06 PM mall is pretty ugly, though. It's not horrible, but it's not appealing, either. Q9 - 4/4 Q9 For those living adjacent to the Civic Campus, what do you find are advantages and disadvantages of your proximity to the Campus? time Nw� live sirensparking disadvantage NAwalkIV Easy access use �,. need go The City of Roseville - Civic Campus Master Plan Q10 Is there anything additional you would like us to know, or anything further you would like to comment on? Answered: 66 Skipped: 91 Q10 - 1/5 The City of Roseville - Civic Campus Master Plan RESPONSES DATE I'm glad the city is engaged in long-range planning. I hope city officials continue to be cost 7/14/2020 10:23 PM conscious especially now with so many out of work due to the pandemic slow -down and those who may still lose their jobs, health care and possibly their homes because of the virus. Personally, I am a retired, single, homeowner with cancer living on a modestfixed disability income. Another property tax increase no matter how modest will have a negative impact on me. 2 Again, enough spending. 7/14/2020 10:00 AM 3 No new spending at this time. We don't know how today's catastrophes are going to fully impact 7/14/2020 6:51 AM us, and neither do you. I do know however who is going to get to pay for it. And that is whether you lose a portion or full income. I recommend that due to the Covid 19 pandemic, we shut down all new spending and try real hard to cut an additional 10%. Shut down new spending. 4 1 think a crosswalk at fernwood and woodhill would improve safety for families accessing the 7/14/2020 12:41 AM walking path. 5 None at this time 7/11/2020 3:28 PM 6 1 really like the idea of the campus project, just postpone for now. Thank you 7/10/2020 6:56 PM 7 no need to change 7/10/2020 3:48 PM 8 Now is not the time to be spending more money. Wait for things to normalize before even 7/10/2020 3:00 PM considering this. 9 1 understand the importance of progress, but it seems insensitive to propose this large tax 7/10/2020 2:06 PM burden on those that have lost their jobs due to the pandemic. Our elder population is barely squeaking by on Social Security checks to begin with. If it is true that Roseville's population will only increase by 700 people by 2040, 1 think this plan should be scrapped altogether. It is not that big of a deal to drive one more block to the licensing bureau. One of my complaints about Roseville is that we don't have a "downtown" area such as other cities have. Also, Roseville's "affordable" senior housing monthly rent is more than most elder's total Social Security check. How is that supposed to work for them? If you want to spend our money, put it to use by creating a department that helps elder citizens, who can't afford a personal care attendant, stay in their homes. 10 Does it do any good to do this survey? It seems like it's merely a formality and you've already 7/10/2020 1:49 PM decided what you will be doing. Where is this money coming from topay for this? 11 Thanks! 7/10/20201:29 PM 12 1 can't take the increases in taxes much longer. This is not the time to do this! In the middle of a 7/10/2020 1:25 PM pandemic, people out of work, and costs are too much for some. We don't need our taxes going higher right now. Please NO! 13 Nope Keep up the great work 7/10/2020 1:11 PM 14 Figure out how many people will be left after this pandemic to realize that the City's budget may 7/10/2020 12:52 PM not be available in the future for expenditures such as this and adjust your thinking accordingly 15 Hold off on new projects until other things are paid off, taxes are too high 7/10/2020 12:49 PM 16 This is not the time for a major tax increase. People are hurting and this needs to wait until the 7/10/2020 12:27 PM school improvements are finished. 17 With loss of local news paper, what is city doing along with overlapping jurisdictions, e.g. school 7/10/2020 12:21 PM district, to keep residents better informed? 18 - 7/10/2020 12:10 PM 19 Really miss the Roseville Review. Difficult to keep informed such as the council candidates for 7/10/2020 10:36 AM the primary. Need independent source to interview & get the word out. Also, missing events because they're posted so late on Nextdoor.com 20 At this time with the economy in turmoil, be careful in how you plan to spend money for this 7/10/2020 10:10 AM 21 No improvements needed. Taxes are rising too fast. Stop spending tax dollars unnecessarily. 7/10/2020 9:44 AM Q10 - 2/5 The City of Roseville - Civic Campus Master Plan 22 No 7/10/2020 9:42 AM 23 Please so not take on any project's at this time, that would raise taxes. Between the increased 7/10/2020 9:31 AM property values and increase in taxes, plus water, sewer, and recycling, we can not keep up. I'm retired and my husband gets about 1-2% annual raise. To cover the increases, we have to reduce spending on groceries. Thank you. 24 Please do not increase our taxes during a pandemic. Many people have lost their jobs or won't 7/10/2020 9:13 AM get raises this year and we don't want to pay more in taxes for something we don't need. 25 Don't go for "city", keep it a'town" 7/10/2020 8:54 AM 26 None 7/10/2020 8:49 AM 27 Please, No more tax increases! We are getting hammered out here and we need some relief. 7/10/2020 8:28 AM Again, I recommend we pause all new projects until we can recover. Thank you 28 No 7/10/2020 8:26 AM 29 N/a 7/10/2020 8:15 AM 30 1 love Roseville. My biggest fear right now is safety; so many car thefts and garage thefts. I hate 7/10/2020 7:29 AM feeling afraid in my own neighborhood. 31 1 dont see need for improvements. 7/10/2020 6:40 AM 32 Stop wasting taxpayer money. 7/10/2020 1:10 AM 33 more code enforcement for rental property owners. 7/9/2020 6:59 PM 34 You really need to take a serious look at Roseville governments values to have what I perceive 7/9/2020 3:50 PM as an "gotta have the best' at the Civic Campus departments. Spending needs to be more cautious with a "bigger picture" sense of what Roseville still needs significant improvements in, e.g., affordable fitness center for families and adults. Look around you. The other suburbs starting doing this long ago. Quit making decisions and offering amenities like it's 1965. Do a better job spending funds with an eye towards the present and future needs of Roseville residents. It is not all about police, fire, city hall, license and maintenance. That limited view is so outdated. Time to begin more progressive urban planning! It is over due and your urban competition is beating your pants off. 35 Not specifically. 7/9/2020 2:48 PM 36 No. 7/9/2020 12:37 PM 37 No. 7/9/2020 9:39 AM 38 Keep it as it is and use the money for upkeep. 7/8/2020 7:20 PM 39 place the license/passport center at the Fairview fire property. buy existing warehouse space for 7/8/2020 3:54 PM seasonal park/red storage - way cheaper than building new. place a new entrance and office space connected to the east side of current city hall for a new entrance for parks and office space for all departments except police and IT. let IT and police expand into the space in the current city hall that is being left by other departments moving. this would give parks their new, safer entrance. IT would not have to move, just expand. police would not have to move, just expand. the license/passport center would see a huge increase in revenue from visitors to the rosedale area. the small parking space there would limit the number of people in the building at one time. it would keep easy access for the city to the water tower. you could build around the VFW and not need to move it, and all city space in that north area could go to public works. right now build a new maintenance facility for public works and 20,000 sf of warehouse. this should free up room in the current public works building for more parking of equipment. build this new building in such a way that it is easy to expand for equipment parking in the future. 40 Be frugal 7/8/2020 12:32 PM 41 no 7/8/2020 12:20 PM 42 In light of recent situations such as the Pandemic and Social Unrest in the cities, it may be a 7/8/2020 9:36 AM wise idea to hold the budget and see what happens in a year or so. 43 The website is where I go to get all of my resources for city business as well as information 7/8/2020 8:52 AM related to local government. It would be nice if the website had more self -serve options for Q10 - 3/5 The City of Roseville - Civic Campus Master Plan residents. More electronic forms and information would be great. I do not visit the campus ever so I cannot speak to how well the building and space function. As long as the space is functional I think that it can remain as -is. 44 The northeast corner of Lex/Co. C will house ALOT of people in the upcoming near future and 7/8/2020 7:37 AM create more traffic in this area. Keep all of the walking spaces and any decision that is made, I hope will consider the automobile congestion and future traffic congestionn at that intersection intersection. I live in an apartment facing south and look out at the north park (basketball) area and VFW. The ballpark, basketball area and playground is used by ball players and dog walkers and Lexington residents and should not be changed in my opinion. 45 Why do surveys... you don't listen to the taxpayers you do what YOU want 7/8/2020 7:19 AM 46 No more property tax increases. Instead of using time and money to re -arrange or add to the 7/8/2020 3:44 AM campus, put some time and money into how to reduce our property taxes. 47 Not really. I'm quite happy with Roseville and the civic buildings. Parking is great and the 7/7/2020 10:06 PM location is nice. It might be nice to publish the names of the buildings and what you can do there. Maybe a couple times a year in the newsletter you could highlight one of the buildings. 48 more parking, at this point in history, would be outrageous. Any city renovations/improvements 7/7/2020 9:43 PM that center cars are a step in the wrong direction. 49 Please add meaningful bike parking. The current bike rack at the ice rink is impossible to lock a 7/7/2020 7:38 PM bike to properly 50 We moved to Roseville last year and live a block from City Hall. We've been impressed by the 7/7/2020 10:06 AM care that the city provides to the parks in the area. Just last week, a tree in Howard Johnson park was damaged due to weather, and it was trimmed the next day. It'd be helpful if there were more public recycling and trash canisters in the area. I've brought bags with me to pick up litter in parks in the area, and I think we would do this more often if there were more canisters in the area to easily dispose of trash instead of needing to carry it all home and use our own bins. 51 Thank you for asking for feedback! Greatjob. 7/6/2020 8:37 PM 52 It's important to keep up on maintenance on buildings and facilities. Keep things nice like the 7/6/2020 8:25 PM fire station. 53 Appreciate City employees looking to better Roseville always. 7/6/2020 8:12 PM 54 The VFW is a special place. Feels like family is there, great friends and needed for the vets. 7/6/2020 7:40 PM 55 Please don't kill the VFW. Our Veteran organizations are important. The VFW represents 7/6/2020 7:12 PM America and pulls our community together. 56 Any expansion or renovation of the campus should only be done if it improves the functionality 7/6/2020 12:24 PM or effectiveness of city services. 57 The Oval was a great addition to roseville- when it was done... like everything updating and 7/6/2020 11:04 AM enhancing will continue to engage the youth community ... The oval and ice arena needs updating... while doing this adding a field house / additional space- it will get younger families here and keep the ones here already from moving 58 Better connectivity with bike paths, better mix of housing and retail (really mucked up the 7/5/2020 2:42 PM opportunity with the area where Walmart now sits), cohesive community outreach to help those with limited funds to maintain property 59 Does Roseville have any special programs for the elderly to help them stay in their homes, 7/5/2020 12:45 PM transportation to doctor appointments? I would like to see senior housing in a townhome style not just the multi floor condo buildings. There is a great senior living complex or campus that is in Waukee, Iowa that has a combination of townhomes with finished basements, an independent living condo, and an assisted living condo. Residents of all three living styles can use the same amenities (theater, beauty shop, optional dining, optional morning coffee, activity room, planned outings and activities). It really has a Community feel and the younger independent seniors become very active and help those residents that require more assistance. I hope the new Fairview Community Center will include an outside splash pad or wading pool like the one in Rosebrook Park. Thank you for taking these comments into consideration. 60 It would be wonderful to have dining options other than the VFW in this area! Something to 7/4/2020 9:56 PM consider for the Lexington Shops. Q10 - 4/5 The City of Roseville - Civic Campus Master Plan 61 Nope 7/4/2020 7:34 PM 62 More sidewalks on Woodhill 7/3/2020 10:47 PM 63 Add lighting to residential streets, crosswalk signals to County Rd C, reduce County C to 2 7/3/2020 9:01 PM lanes to improve driver & pedestrian safety. Add additional 2 police to staff, they've sounded swamped on the scanner. 64 No 7/3/2020 7:51 PM 65 Stop wasting our money 7/3/2020 6:28 PM 66 1 would like to see locally owned restaurant or bistro, perhaps feature local artwork for sale etc. 7/212020 9:01 PM Within the adjacent property. If it is also going to be a City facility, we should ensure it features just that- the City. Q10 - 5/5 Q10 Is there anything additional you would like us to know, or anything further you would like to comment on? really spend money spending increase taxes money maintenance wl II go space depanments keep "hint newcity,esidenN parki n g families need improvements ti m e redoes Rosevi I le thank bu i Idings moving area beds, Please place taxes police use want tax increases The City of Roseville - Civic Campus Master Plan # RESPONSES DATE 1 Rcloutier50@gmail.com 7/14/2020 10:20 AM 2 3 4 5 6 Rcloutier50@gmail.com mary57ch@yahoo.com t100masanz@yahoo.com Justinalspanier@gmail.com kathy.macomber@gmail.com 7/14/2020 10:19 AM 7/14/2020 10:01 AM 7/14/2020 6:53 AM 7/14/2020 12:42 AM 7/13/2020 3:45 PM 7 8 9 deniseutechpratt@gmail.com mbmgr108@gmail.com Lifeoreilly197@msn.com 7/13/20209:16 AM 7/11/2020 3:29 PM 7/10/2020 6:56 PM 10 Dkmack0ll5@gmail.com 7/10/2020 2:07 PM 11 Mwschultz7@gmail.com 7/10/2020 1:50 PM 12 jpsilliman@comcast.net 7/10/2020 1:28 PM 13 Gheimann@yahoo.com 7/10/2020 1:12 PM 14 gjertson935@aol.com 7/10/2020 12:52 PM 15 mttibbs@hotmail.com 7/10/2020 12:51 PM 16 No 7/10/2020 12:11 PM 17 noodlucci@yahoo.com 7/10/2020 12:05 PM 18 paladin192@comcast.net 7/10/202011:18 AM 19 mleg20@juno.com 7/10/202010:39 AM 20 Daguthrie7@gmail.com 7/10/20209:45 AM 21 nlavanty@yahoo.com 7/10/2020 9:42 AM 22 gedl@comcast.net 7/10/2020 9:32 AM 23 eric@cozzi.us 7/10/2020 9:31 AM 24 Icoleman02@comcast.net 7/10/2020 9:14 AM 25 Iaurie carr@comcast.net 7/10/20208:55 AM 26 pwesterm@luthersem.edu 7/10/20208:33 AM 27 alan.livingston@comcast.net 7/10/20208:29 AM 28 ojoseywales@yahoo.com 7/10/2020 8:27 AM 29 asklo@msn.com 7/10/20208:16 AM 30 caephus@hotmail.com 7/10/20208:13 AM 31 timmer56@gmail.com 7/10/2020 8:07 AM 32 smr1974cpr@gmail.com 7/10/20207:55 AM 33 oleleah@yahoo.com 7/10/2020 7:29 AM 34 Iemay360@gmail.com 7/10/2020 7:14 AM 35 no 7/10/2020 6:41 AM 36 mness@comcast.net 7/10/2020 6:00 AM 37 vhtsr@yahoo.com 7/10/2020 1:11 AM 2/4 The City of Roseville - Civic Campus Master Plan 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 Mikehoen651@gmail.com rkkmail@comcast.net rogerhessjr@aol.com la.williams@mac.com palmerojma@gmail.com kenhanson55@gmail.com dougmentes@gmail.com No troyasabean@gmail.com 7/9/2020 7:00 PM 7/9/2020 2:50 PM 7/8/2020 3:55 PM 7/8/2020 3:19 PM 7/8/2020 1:00 PM 7/8/2020 12:21 PM 7/81202010:25 AM 7/8/2020 9:37 AM 7/8/2020 8:52 AM 47 millers1528@comcast.net 7/8/2020 7:43 AM 48 ellenvondrashek@comcast.net 7/8/2020 7:38 AM 49 Cappyulrich@gmail.com 7/8/2020 7:21 AM 50 nvogelgesang@comcast.net 7/7/2020 10:07 PM 51 lettieandtom@gmail.com 7/7/2020 8:13 PM 52 mikele@mninter.net 7/7/2020 6:53 PM 53 robertaroepke@aol.com 7/7/2020 4:50 PM 54 bobb2845@comcast.net 7/7/2020 4:34 PM 55 dustyshouse@comcast.net 7/7/202012:55 AM 56 helenmcintyre001@comcast.net 7/6/2020 8:37 PM 57 Rynettarenford@hotmail.com 7/6/2020 8:13 PM 58 Joybrownl0@gmail.com 7/6/2020 7:41 PM 59 Cbartels2@gmal.com 7/6/2020 3:59 PM 60 jmama9@aol.com 7/6/2020 12:24 PM 61 Schmitt.cassie@gmail.com 7/6/2020 7:40 AM 62 ternes99@gmail.com 7/5/2020 2:42 PM 63 gtogoat7l@yahoo.com 7/5/2020 12:48 PM 64 bill.cleveland4@gmail.com 7/4/2020 9:56 PM 65 Mike.a.schmidt@gmail.com 7/4/2020 7:35 PM 66 matthewkrey@yahoo.com 7/3/2020 10:23 PM 67 jesscarlsgrl@gmail.com 7/3/2020 9:02 PM 68 Allie.lynn.olson@gmail.com 7/3/2020 6:57 PM 69 rkvshop@me.com 7/3/2020 5:54 PM 70 dannah.waukazo@gmail.com 7/2/2020 9:04 PM 71 dbcnly@gmail.com 7/2/2020 2:11 PM 72 sarahjmcneal@gmail.com 7/2/2020 12:59 PM 73 bamjuly23@gmail.com 7/1/2020 3:07 PM 74 1 already receive city updates 7/1/2020 1:20 PM 75 rogerhessjr@aol.com 7/1/2020 1:20 PM 3/4 The City of Roseville - Civic Campus Master Plan 76 rivarddm@gmail.com 7/1/2020 1:18 PM 77 asnewton3@gmail.com 7/1/2020 12:26 PM 78 anneecbc@comcast.net 7/1/2020 12:25 PM 79 jmhochschieldt@aol.com 7/1/2020 12:16 PM 80 No 7/1/2020 12:12 PM 81 kevin_viken@yahoo.com 7/1/202011:45 AM 82 kcassmick@gmail.com 7/1/2020 11:39 AM 83 1 am currently signed up for email updates from the City. 84 chunter32@gmail.com 7/1/2020 11:36 AM 6/30/2020 12:07 PM 4/4 ATTACHMENT C CIVIC CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PUBLIC COMMENTS RECEIVED VIA FACEBOOK AND NEXTDOOR 7/8/2020 — 7/14/2020 Facebook comment Anita Reutiman How about reasonable bike parking as part of the master plan? The bike rack at the oval is impossible to lock a bike to properly. The license center has nothing. Cars aren't the only mode of transportation. I've filled out the survey. Nextdoor comments Pen S. Lake Owasso V Roseville property taxes will go up thanks to changes they are making to City Hall campus. July 14 is the last day to do the survey about their plans for new buildings for maintenance and other remodeling. Let your views be known by completing the survey. They say 'demands for city services are increasing' and that drives their plans to change City Hall campus. But population projections say Roseville will add a total of 700 new residents between now and 2040. We have 35,000 residents, so adding 700 people should not require adding services and a new maintenance building and remodeling additional buildings. roger h. McCarrons Community U if done right, our taxes won't skyrocket from this program - first pay off existing debt - stop handing out TIF to any large company/developer who asks (the TIF money that has been approved so far would support millions in construction bonds). build this project in steps, over a few years. compared to other cities of roseville's size, our buildings and outside storage is tiny. we know crime is going up so police need more space (unless we turn policing roseville over to the ramsey county sheriff as other surroundings cities do). IT provides services to dozens of other cities and school districts and needs to keep expanding, and this department saves roseville taxpayers money. the Page 1 of 4 ATTACHMENT C license/passport center brings in revenue and helps keep taxes down, and can pay for its own building, and has needed a new building for years. i say, place it on the old Fairview fire station property where it would be near rosedale and revenue there would skyrocket, if operations there were more efficient! the smaller parking lot would limit crowds at the license/passport center. parks and rec, which is at the entrance to city hall, needs a safer entry, which would mean safety for everyone in the building. parks and rec and public works need more storage space for supplies, vehicles, and equipment. the maintenance facility where the city repairs and maintains vehicles and equipment is beyond antiquated, and needed replacing long ago. this could be built on the land north of city hall, along with a medium size warehouse for storage, in such a way that a vehicle/equipment storage garage could be added on at a later date, along with more outdoor storage space. at this time, moving the maintenance facility would free up more vehicle storage space in the current public works garage. the other city departments don't need much more space, but building a small office building on the east side of city hall would give us a new, safer entrance and building, which could hold all departments except for IT and police, allowing those two departments to take over all of the current city hall, which would not cost very much. if done in steps there should not be a large increase in property taxes. right now, build a new license/passport center (which would pay for itself). add about 12,000 square feet of office space, as 2 levels, east of city hall and let the police and IT take over the current city hall. a new maintenance facility, medium warehouse and outdoor storage north of the city campus, which can be added onto years in the future. Vince T. Reservoir Woods LWJ They should be cutting back, not expanding. Residents need a break from the constant gauging. al I. Hamline I agree with Vince and Rogers comment and would reiterate that we should halt all new projects until our city can recover from this pandemic. I would also like to ask any one to explain how a person can survive in this city when we get tax increases of 4-6 % every year and I only get 2-3 % increase from my employer? Keep in mind that this is the city only and then the county comes with Page 2 of 4 ATTACHMENT C there 4-6% tax increases. Is there some new math that I can do that shows how I can survive the annual TAX increases? Gena Z. McCarrons Community V We're just getting used to the new property tax hit on our budget! Has Roseville taken any look at the potential for the many, many new homeless that may occur from people being out of work, who can't afford their rent and possibly being evicted due to the COVID-19 pandemic? These are and will continue to be be tough times for everybody. Yes, Roseville will need to upgrade their facilities, but NOW?! It seems foolish and uncaring. Bill D. Capitol View V I'd like to thank the City for its active efforts to make project details and the ability for citizens to provide feedback more readily available. For a long time, citizens would see something new erected and ask when that was discussed and the City was like, 'Well... we held four meetings and had a public feedback period and no one showed up, so we thought you wanted us to do the thing." And the residents were like, "Oh my God! We didn't even know about the thing because we have been working extra hours or attending baseball games or whatever excuse caused us not be be fully engaged in our community." Making these notices, especially for big projects, this available helps everyone interested to get involved and, I think, is a much more defensible position for the city to say, "We tried telling you about it." For that, I thank you! Page 3 of 4 ATTACHMENT C Karen M. Langton Lake v I agree with other respondents that our property taxes are already very high, and mine went up 15% this year. This recession is not the time to be adding to people's financial burdens. A friend with a home in Eagan comparable to mine pays 45% less in taxes than do 1. Gregory H. Reservoir Woods U I agree that Roseville should hold off on expansions while we are in the covid caused instability However, the worst thing the City can do is not assess the needs of the community and not put together long range plans. Sharon S. Reservoir Woods V This is NOT the time to do this. This is not in the best interest of residents. Don't need property tax increases. Good Grief! Page 4 of 4 Roseville Public Works, Environment and Transportation Commission Agenda Item Date: July 28, 2020 Item No: 7 Item Description: PWET Commission Year in Review and Future Agenda Outline Each year, generally associated with the Commission's Joint Meeting with the City Council, the Commission takes some time to review past activity and to discuss potential items for discussion in the coming year. It should be noted that staff does not know what the schedule for interaction with the Partners in Energy program will be, assuming we are selected as a partner City, and so that and other topics will no doubt be sprinkled into the agenda as listed. There will no doubt be other topics that arise that will need to be addressed. Recommended Action: Review of previous years' agenda items and set preliminary agenda for 2020/2021. Attachments: A: Previous Commission topics and proposed topics for upcoming meetings Attachment A Roseville Public Works, Environment and Transportation Commission 2019/2020 Review Below is a list of topics discussed at the PWET Commission Meetings from July 2019 — June 2020. 2019 July: Review of City Council Joint Meeting Public Works Department Overview — Tour of Maintenance Facility August: Recycling Rates and Costs Discussion September: Best Management Practices for Lawns October: Installation of Youth Member Review of Turf Grass Presentation Utility Rates Sustainability Efforts in Community Development November: Public Works 2020 Work Plan Metropolitan Council Member Peter Lindstrom 2020 January: Sustainability Super Meeting! St Louis Park Climate Action Plan Neel Energy Partners in Energy Presentation City of Roseville Sustainability Update February: Sump Pump Enforcement Sustainable Roseville Update March: No Meeting (Pandemic) April: No Meeting (Pandemic) May: No Meeting (Pandemic) June: MS4 Annual Meeting Annual Green Team Update Roseville Public Works, Environment and Transportation Commission 2020/2021 PRELINIINARY AGENDA 2019 August: City Campus Master Plan Update and Review Partners in Energy Program (if selected and timely) Ordinance Updates September: Recycling Contract— new Request for Proposal October: Utility Rate Discussion Government Alliance on Race and Equity Presentation November: Public Works 2021 Work Plan Possible second touch on Recycling REP 2020 January: Sustainability Super Meeting #2 February: Review final REP for Recycling Services March: April: Green Team Annual Meeting Eureka Annual Report Presentation May: Review proposals and staff recommendations for Recycling Contract (perhaps June) MS4 Annual Meeting Roseville Public Works, Environment and Transportation Commission Agenda Item Date: July 28, 2020 Item Description: Look Ahead Agenda Items/Next Meeting August 25, 2020 Suggested Items: • City Campus Master Plan Update and Review • Partners in Energy Program (hopefully!) • Ordinance Updates Look ahead — Preliminary 2020 Calendar Item No: 8 • September: Recycling Contract— new Request for Proposal • October: Utility Rate Discussion • November: Public Works 2021 Work Plan / Possible second touch on Recycling REP Recommended Action: Set preliminary agenda items for the August 25, 2020 Public Works, Environment & Transportation Commission meeting.