My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2020-8-1_PR Comm Packet
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Parks & Recreation
>
Parks & Recreation Commission
>
Packets
>
2020
>
2020-8-1_PR Comm Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/27/2020 4:26:44 PM
Creation date
8/27/2020 4:26:24 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
127
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
May 18, 2020 <br />Dear Mayor Roe, Roseville City Council, and Roseville Parks and Planning Commission: <br />My wife, daughters, and I have lived at for 15 years. I have <br />watched with growing concern as the plan for the property at 2395 County Road B has become <br />more apparent. In a recent Parks Commission meeting which I attended, the developer offered <br />to sell a plot of land at 2433 County B to Roseville as a more palatable option to the unusable <br />park space they originally offered. This is not a viable option. <br />A quick visit to the site reveals that it is ill-suited to be a park. Though our entire <br />neighborhood –the area north of County B and west of Cleveland Ave.—is bordered on the <br />north and west by busy highways 36 and 280, virtually every visitor to our home over the years <br />has remarked how quiet and peaceful it is, due in large part to the old growth trees that cover <br />the area. The proposed park is on raised, mostly treeless land and will be stuck between an <br />apartment building and the proposed townhome development.The location of this land, <br />coupled with the removal of trees that will certainly occur once the developers begin clearing <br />the land for the townhome development, seems more like an urban park and not in harmony <br />with the rest of the area. <br />I realize that the city has been trying to address the lack of park and wilderness space in <br />this area, and the lure of tax dollars may be hard to resist; however, the developer’s proposed <br />solution seems to benefit them far more than the residents of this area and greater Roseville. <br />First, they can keep the sliver of land that they originally proposed, thereby preserving the <br />aesthetic of their townhome development. In its place, they will sell the city a different plot <br />across the street for the paltry sum of $650,000. It’s hard to see this as a mutually beneficial <br />solution. <br />I urge you all tosay “no” to the developer’s offer. Thank you for your time and <br />consideration to this matter. <br />Regards, <br />Dave and Rachael Ostrom <br />2223 Saint Croix St. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.