My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2020_09-22_PWETCpacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
202x
>
2020
>
2020_09-22_PWETCpacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/18/2020 11:24:01 AM
Creation date
9/18/2020 11:20:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
9/22/2020
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
152
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
120 <br />121 Mr. Freihammer indicated that was correct. <br />122 <br />123 Member Huiett asked if there was an opportunity for public comment. She thought <br />124 it was the responsibility of the City to open this up for comment because this might <br />125 take residents off guard. She wondered how the changes will be rolled out. <br />126 <br />127 Mr. Freihammer indicated the Ordinance Summary will get noticed when it goes to <br />128 the City Council. <br />129 <br />130 Mr. Culver explained that piece of education of what a homeowners' responsibility <br />131 is for both the watermain, the water service and the sewer service running from the <br />132 street to the resident's home is a constant battle. It is complicated because it does <br />133 vary from city to city. Some cities take responsibility all the way to the main, some <br />134 take it up to the curb stop for the water service, but for sewer, certain random cities <br />135 take responsibility up to the right-of-way line or up to a clean out if that is present. <br />136 The City of Roseville has been pretty consistent for a while though where the <br />137 resident takes responsibility for both service lines all the way to the mains. <br />138 <br />139 Motion <br />140 Member Wozniak moved, Member Huiett seconded, to recommend the City <br />141 Council approve the proposed changes to Chapters 801, 802 and 803 of the <br />142 City Ordinance as amended, discussed, and agreed to. <br />143 <br />144 Ayes:6 <br />145 Nays:0 <br />146 Motion carried. <br />147 <br />148 Youth Commissioner Lynch arrived at the meeting at 7:38 p.m. <br />149 <br />150 6. Community Survey Review <br />151 Mr. Culver reviewed the City's Community Survey with the Commission. <br />152 <br />153 Chair Wozniak recommended that for the questions regarding the Organics <br />154 Program, involving the Commission in crafting or drafting some of these questions <br />155 before the next version comes around because it is likely by 2022 the County will <br />156 be in a much better position to state that it is likely that a bluebag program that the <br />157 County is working on right now is going to be offered at no additional cost to <br />158 residents. <br />159 <br />160 Member Misra indicated when the City first went to curbside recycling, she <br />161 remembers that people did not think about recycling at all when the residents had <br />162 to haul it somewhere and curbside recycling really changed everything. What really <br />163 helped was when containers were provided to the residents. She thought the <br />164 numbers for the Food Scraps/Organics II Drop Off Site were encouraging and <br />165 showed that residents are participating even though it is not that convenient. <br />Page 4 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.