My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2020-08-25_PWETC_Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Minutes
>
202x
>
2020
>
2020-08-25_PWETC_Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/25/2020 1:51:21 PM
Creation date
9/25/2020 1:51:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
8/25/2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Culver thought that was a good analogy and he thought this is starting off better <br />then the recycling program did. He continued with his review of the survey. <br />Member Misra indicated she was curious about the demographics portion at the <br />beginning of the report and wondered if that represented the demographics of the <br />people who took the survey and not the demographics of the City. <br />Mr. Culver indicated that was correct. <br />Member Misra wondered if the demographics in the survey is representative of the <br />City. <br />Mr. Culver explained that is a hard statistic to keep up on and he thought 2021 the <br />City will have a better understanding of the demographics as a result of the Census. <br />What is interesting is the School District does keep a pretty good demographic data <br />about enrollment and their numbers are really starting to increase on some of the <br />racial diversity numbers. It could be that this is more reflective of the community <br />then the City thinks. <br />Member Misra thought it was kind of astounding from an age perspective as well <br />as cultural diversity. <br />Member Joyce asked if staff knows if this was a random sampling and if the data <br />can be broken down into the four groups. <br />Mr. Culver indicated the consultant could probably drill down further on these <br />things if the City wanted them to. He thought there was some level of anonymity <br />to be maintained. <br />7. Year in Review/Preliminary 2020/2021 Calendar <br />Mr. Culver reviewed the Preliminary 2020/2021 Calendar and Year in Review with <br />the Commission. <br />Member Huiett wondered if staff could include the Master Plan progress in one of <br />the upcoming meetings or would that be more appropriate in a separate format. <br />Mr. Culver indicated the next update with the Council is September 21sr and the <br />PWETC meeting is September 22°d so he thought potentially, depending on how <br />detailed the Utility Rate Schedule discussion is there could be an opportunity to <br />have a discussion on that at the October meeting. <br />Chair Wozniak indicated several new members are on the PWETC and he <br />wondered if a tour of the Public Works Facility could be included in a future <br />meeting, either a virtual tour or socially distanced tour. <br />Page 5 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.