My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2020_10-27_PWETCpacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
202x
>
2020
>
2020_10-27_PWETCpacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/20/2020 1:40:49 PM
Creation date
11/20/2020 1:38:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
10/27/2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
132
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Attachment A <br />Memo <br />To: Public Works, Environment & Transportation Commission <br />From: Michelle Pietrick, Finance Director <br />Date: October 27, 2020 <br />Re: Review the 2021 Proposed Utility Rates <br />Background <br />Unlike many city services that are supported by property taxes, our utility or enterprise operations are <br />funded primarily by user fees and are operated as separate, stand-alone functions. Over the past several <br />months, city staff has been reviewing the City's utility operations to determine what customer rate <br />adjustments are necessary for 2021. The City engaged Ehlers to perform a comprehensive utility rate <br />study of the Water and Storm Drainage Funds based on the cash situations in these two funds. <br />Operational Review <br />Water Fund Operations <br />At December 31, 2019, the Water Fund had to internally borrow $1,234,554 from other funds to <br />eliminate the cash deficit. This fund has had a steadily declining cash balance for the past four years. <br />Staff identified that the rate setting formula was changed in 2014 which unfortunately has an error <br />when converting the water purchased from St. Paul from cubic feet to the Roseville system which is <br />billed in gallon units. In addition, the capital projects done for the water system have exceed the <br />averages used in the formula We engaged Ehlers to perform a utility study on this fund, attached is a <br />copy of the Ehlers power point that was presented to the Council on October 19u'. Commission <br />members are encouraged to view this meeting for details on the rate structure and the council <br />comments. <br />Ehlers presented two separate options, both introduce new water usage tier rates for Residential, <br />Commercial and Apartment properties. Both options realign who pays for water versus who uses <br />water to provide more equity and the definition of fixed costs versus variable costs adheres to the <br />industry standards. Option 2 provides for an average of capital costs to be included in the fixed costs, <br />which is more in line with our current structure. Option 1 would put the average capital costs on the <br />usage/variable side of the rates. The City Council is looking for input on these two options. <br />Storm Drainage Operations <br />The City provides for the management of storm water drainage to prevent flooding and pollution <br />control, as well as the street sweeping program. The cash balance in this fund had been steadily <br />declining so this fund was included in the utility rate study done by Ehlers. The study showed that the <br />current rate structure is equitable and needs a steady increase of 4% for the next four years to build up <br />some reserves to pay for the capital needs in this fund. After four years, the rate increases will level <br />off to about 1% annually thereafter. Staff will continue to monitor this fund and the needed capital <br />proj ects. <br />Page 1 of 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.