My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2020_10-27_PWETCpacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
202x
>
2020
>
2020_10-27_PWETCpacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/20/2020 1:40:49 PM
Creation date
11/20/2020 1:38:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
10/27/2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
132
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
164 Member Hammer indicated she was thinking about some of the groups that have <br />165 come to the Commission meetings in the past, Resilient Roseville and Do Good <br />166 Roseville and some organizations that already have high engagement with folks <br />167 that are interested in things like this. She wondered if the City had relationships <br />168 with those folks and knew who they were to engage them to see if some members <br />169 would be interested. <br />170 <br />171 Chair Wozniak explained Resilient Roseville would certainly be interested. <br />172 <br />173 Mr. Culver indicated staff does have good ties with organizations in the City. The <br />174 key will be to reach out to them for good candidates. <br />175 <br />176 Member Misra thought the City should also be looking at socio-economic diversity <br />177 as well. She suggested checking with other Commission Members to see if there <br />178 are any other connections that could be looked at. <br />179 <br />180 Chair Wozniak opened up the floor for public comment with no one wishing to <br />181 speak. <br />182 + <br />183 Chair Wozniak asked what the timeline might look like. <br />184 <br />185 Mr. Culver indicated staff really wants to be deliberate in trying to recruit members <br />186 to the team to attain that diversity. He indicated there will be some sort of blasting <br />187 and media blast. He hoped within the next five to six weeks there will be a team <br />188 and atimeline. <br />189 <br />190 6. Recycling RFP Discussion <br />191 Environmental Specialist Johnson explained the City entered into a five-year <br />192 comprehensive recycling agreement with Eureka Recycling starting on January 1, <br />193 2017 and ending on December 31, 2021. He reviewed the Recycling RFP with the <br />194 Commission. <br />195 <br />196 Vice Chair Huiett thought the question of who owns the cart seems a little <br />197 ridiculous and wondered if someone could explain why this is important and why <br />198 can't the City buy the cart from the current contractor so there is not really a swap <br />199 and what happens to the carts. She did not think this seemed like a high-level <br />200 priority but when looking at the dollars it starts to make sense <br />201 <br />202 Chair Wozniak also flagged the cart issue as a discussion point because he thought <br />203 in the previous contract or maybe in the current contract with Eureka the City had <br />204 the option of buying the carts the City had for $175,000 and he believed those carts <br />205 were new five years ago. <br />206 <br />207 Mr. Culver noted the carts were new from a previous contract and were three years <br />208 old at the time and are going on seven years old. <br />209 <br />Page 5 of 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.