Laserfiche WebLink
• There is plenty of parking for the license center, for one. I like the A2 option as well, <br />but it does have less parking. <br />C Concept A2: Reuse of Existing Buildings <br />• 1 don't like the idea of wasting/demolishing buildings when they could be renovated <br />instead. I think it could save money while also keeping the nostalgia and history of <br />Roseville intact. <br />• Keeps costs down <br />• Appears to be lowest cost <br />• It would depend on cost of repurposing buildings, but in general I favor conserving <br />structures as more environmentally sound. <br />• I prefer the resuse of existing buildings to be fiscally conscientious. I also like that the <br />license center and other city building are closer together allowing for more ease of <br />access between them all. There is also green space which I appreciate but not too <br />much as to deter walking between buildings. <br />• Boy, these maps are awfully small and hard to read or figure out in this survey! So, I <br />am not fully confident of my choice. I support a plan that has adequate parking for <br />the license center and VFW so that the ice arena will not be negatively affected. <br />Parking is very tough in the winter with multiple practices happening inside and out. I <br />worry that people from outside roseville will not be aware of all the ice arena traffic <br />and that might present a safety hazard. <br />That also looks like a huge maintenance space. But it is hard to tell on these small <br />maps. <br />I also worry about all the additional traffic dumping on to county road c. Right now, I <br />sometimes wait several minutes to make a left after hockey practice. This will make <br />the situation worse. will a traffic light be installed? <br />• City taxes are high enough cut back on spending existing buildings work well <br />C Concept B: License Center on Lexington <br />• 1 don't prefer any of these concepts and believe what we have presently is good <br />enough. <br />• If you are taking out Veterans Park then it should be replaced with a park. Rerouting <br />Woodhill would be a terrible idea. <br />• 1 like that the VFW is separate. <br />• 1 like the larger green space. Provides an opportunity for a gathering space for <br />events. <br />• Most green space, seems like less space dedicated to parking <br />• 1 like the potential of the green space. It also makes everything visible from outside <br />roads which helps with directions. My second choice would be Al for the same <br />reasons. <br />• Probably my choice, but does the city now own the VFW? Are they condemning the <br />property so the city can take it? <br />• Maximal green space near the rink <br />