2020_11-24_PWETCpacket - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

119 Member Spencer asked if staff has ever looked at having St. Paul take over the 120 water infrastructure. 121 122 Mr. Culver indicated he has looked back at some information for this question. He 123 noted Roseville currently buys its water from the St. Paul Regional Water Authority 124 and the reason why it is called that is because that authority provides water as the 125 water provider to many other cities besides St. Paul. Maplewood is a good example. 126 He believed ten or so years ago the City of Maplewood sold their water system to 127 the City of St. Paul for $1 and the City of St. Paul took it over and essentially 128 became the water utility for the City of Maplewood. That means the St. Paul 129 Regional Water Authority bills everybody in Maplewood for their water and the 130 meters that are in the residents' homes are owned by the St. Paul Regional Water 131 Authority, not the City of Maplewood. When a watermain break happens in 132 Maplewood, St. Paul Regional Water Authority fixes it. Roseville can do the same 133 thing and have not had any detailed or serious conversations with St. Paul Water in 134 quite sometime about that possibility. 135 136 Mr. Culver presented a spreadsheet to show what the residents would pay for given 137 the different scenarios. He noted particularly if under the twenty -thousand -gallon 138 level a resident can save money if St. Paul was providing that service. This does 139 not analyze the apartments or commercial users and staff would have to do a more 140 in-depth analysis to see what the total impact would be to all of the customers. 141 There are two really strong factors outside of cost to the customers that staff needs 142 to consider for the City of Roseville. One is coordination of what streets will be 143 worked on in any given year along with the infrastructure of utilities under those 144 streets. Staff has the flexibility to program its own watermain and everything else 145 because the City operates that utility. If St. Paul Water operates the City utility then 146 the City loses some of that flexibility. 147 148 The other factor is personnel for winter maintenance. Currently, the majority of the 149 utility staff is used for plowing streets during a snow event. If we lost half or more 150 of the staff in that division we would have to find other personnel to backfill the 151 plow routes. 152 153 Member Joyce asked when Ehlers was doing the analysis, were the fund balances 154 for this bond multiple years. 155 156 Mr. Culver indicated the bond repayment would be over ten years. 157 158 Vice Chair Huiett thought in regard to the two Ehlers options, both options do 159 represent a more fair and equitable distribution of costs and consumption passing 160 along to the users. She felt that both options represent strong consideration for 161 making the behavior changes that the City and residents really want. She sensed 162 that option two might do that a little differently as far as cost because some of the 163 fixed costs and the base rate are built in differently. It does provide that greater Page 4 of 7