My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2021-1-5_PR_CommPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Parks & Recreation
>
Parks & Recreation Commission
>
Packets
>
2021
>
2021-1-5_PR_CommPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/31/2020 2:55:27 PM
Creation date
12/31/2020 2:55:09 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
106
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
120 are only named after fallen Roseville officers. Kysylyczyn brought up different examples of parks <br />121 that would need to be revisited if the park naming policy is no longer followed and parks are named <br />122 after people other than fallen Roseville officers. He noted that there is a specific naming policy and <br />123 he feels that the Parks Commission is obligated to follow that. Finally, he cautioned the Commission <br />124 that he feels members of the City Council may not appreciate the Commission engaging other <br />125 sovereign governments without approval. <br />126 <br />127 K.Vandre, Thanked Ms. Geshik for being at the meeting. She relayed that she lives in the <br />128 Pocahontas park neighborhood and she does not feel comfortable using the name of the park. She <br />129 relayed her appreciation to the Commission for taking up the issue. Also, she pointed out that if we <br />130 are worried about policies, Pocahontas was a real person. Therefore, if we are worried about having <br />131 parks named after people, and following policies, the park name should be changed. She also relayed <br />132 that the HRIEC should be involved in this process. In addition, she felt that the public should be <br />133 allowed to have a voice. She concluded by stating that the people whose land was taken should <br />134 especially have a voice in the discussion and not including them would be wrong. <br />135 <br />136 Commissioner O’Brien reconfirmed that the Commission is thinking about a strategy that would be <br />137 proposed to the City Council and is currently in the information gathering stage. Staff confirmed that <br />138 is where the Commission is at with gathering information to present at a joint meeting with the City <br />139 Council in early 2021. <br />140 <br />141 Commissioner Baggenstoss added that there is nothing wrong with bringing new voices to the table <br />142 and asking questions. He added that if in the end, the worst thing to come out of all of this is that <br />143 more people believe in government, the Commission is on the right track. <br />144 <br />145 The Commission discussed next steps in the process, including reaching out to representatives of the <br />146 Dakota Nation and the Roseville Historical Society. They also discussed meeting with the City <br />147 Council and if any additional information was needed prior to that meeting. <br />148 <br />149 Commissioner Stoner noted that he would like to potentially have this as a topic next month, if <br />150 possible. <br />151 <br />152 Staff clarified the process and reasoning for having a joint meeting with the City Council as a next <br />153 step, as it will ensure clear communication, guidance and support for the renaming of Pocahontas <br />154 Park to the Commission. <br />155 <br />156 <br />157 <br />158 <br />4 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.