My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2021-3-2_PR_Comm Packet
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Parks & Recreation
>
Parks & Recreation Commission
>
Packets
>
2021
>
2021-3-2_PR_Comm Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/25/2021 4:00:49 PM
Creation date
2/25/2021 4:00:32 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
113
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SUMMARY OF CONVERSATION WITH WAYNE DUCHENEUX, EXECUTIVE <br />DIRECTOR OF THE NATIVE GOVERNANCE CENTER <br />Notes taken by Matthew Johnson, Assistant Director of Parks and Recreation <br />Phone Conversation, December 1, 2020 <br /> <br />Comments made by Wayne: <br /> The Parks and Recreation Commission deserved praise for taking on this issue and that <br />that showed a level of cultural awareness. <br /> Emphasized that the most important thing is that the Commission is transparent with their <br />process. In his experience, trying to hide anything when discussing an issue like this, <br />regardless of whether well-intentioned, will yield distrust. <br /> Also emphasized that it is important that the commission is accurate and thoughtful when <br />sharing why this is being considered and with all messaging. <br /> The name Pocahontas is not necessarily offensive to him personally, but the Pocahontas <br />imagery that most people know is based upon mis-information or stereotypes and is <br />likely not helpful to native communities. He also mentioned that Pocahontas has no ties <br />to Minnesota, so the name doesnto make much sense in Minnesota, regardless of <br />original intention. <br /> Recommended review of Reclaiming Native Truths research study on native identity and <br />representation in modern media. <br /> Recommended hearing from Dakota representatives since the land that the park is on was <br />likely Dakota land. <br /> Cautioned that although this issue is important, the Commission should be respectful of <br />Native American. This likely will not be as high of a priority for Native American <br />representatives as it is for the Commission, though that shouldn <br />they do not care or support the efforts. He also mentioned that the COVID-19 Pandemic <br />has hit the Native American Communities hard and that that may be impacting some <br />peoplebility to respond or participate in the conversation. <br /> Cautioned that these issues inflame tension and no matter where the commission lands, <br />there will likely be unhappy people on both sides. Encouraged the commission to follow <br />their process, make a sincere effort to understand the native American perspective and be <br />transparent when making their recommendation. <br /> In closing, Wayne reiterated his appreciation that the Commission is examining this issue <br />and for the thoroughness of the proposed process. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.