Laserfiche WebLink
2. Increased Traffic Enforcement—This is a program that targets traffic <br />violations near railroad crossings. The Quiet Zone submittal would outline <br />and document what the City has done to enforce traffic violations. <br />3. Partial Center Medians —This is where full length medians are not possible <br />on both sides and a median is installed on one side. The FRA will compute a <br />partial risk reduction, based on the crossing improvements. <br />Adjacent pedestrian crossings are not technically considered part of a Quiet <br />Zone. Good practice and simple consideration for residents' safety suggest <br />that options for the trails and sidewalks should be examined. The FRA also <br />strongly recommends a diagnostic review for safety concerns and <br />recommendations. At a minimum, signing should be provided warning <br />pedestrians that there will be no train horn. Other potential improvements <br />could include channelizing fencing to force pedestrians to look each way for <br />oncoming trains, or provide roadway crossing gates on the sidewalk or trail. <br />The rules also require that private at grade crossings be part of a quiet zone <br />diagnostic review. The rules state the private crossing serving less than four <br />residential properties or that have not public access can have pacify warning <br />devices such as stop signs. The rules for warning devices for other <br />commercial driveways are not well defined and are decided jointly by the <br />FRA, the crossing owner, and the local government agency. <br />The rules are silent on the liability to either the railroad or communities who enact <br />quiet zones. In the record of decision, the FRA discusses railroad and community <br />liability. On Page 66 of the record of decision, the FRA says "As for the public <br />authority that creates a quiet zone in accordance with this part, FRA expects that <br />courts will apply the standard of care set by this rule, inasmuch as any quiet zone <br />established in accordance with this part will have been established in accordance <br />with federal law and FRA's intention to preempt State laws expressly stated." This <br />rule, in effect, establishes the standard of care for the creation of quiet zones and <br />the sounding of train horns, providing reassurance both to railroads and <br />communities that no plaintiff will prevail on the basis that an audible warning has <br />been withheld. Further, this rule making does nothing to undermine the sovereign <br />immunity of State and local governments, where they have asserted it. <br />The FRA rules require communities to notify the FRA, the State Department of <br />Transportation, and the railroad that they are interested in creating a quiet zone and <br />provide a process for these interested parties to comment. The process has some <br />built in time periods that take 4 to 6 months to implement. If signal work is required, <br />a year or more is a normal time frame to implement a quiet zone. If SSMs are <br />installed according to the rules at all crossings, the community will receive an <br />automatic approval for a quiet zone. If ASMs or other exceptions are needed, the <br />FRA review and approval will be needed. <br />