2021-4-6_PR_Comm Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

To: Parks and Recreation Commission From: Lonnie Brokke Date: March 30, 2021 Re: Notes for Meeting on Tuesday, April 6, 2021 1. Introductions 2. Public Comment Invited 3. Approval of Minutes of the March 2, 2021 Meeting Minutes Enclosed is a copy of the minutes of March 2, 2021. Please be prepared to approve or amend. Requested Commission Action: Approve/amend meeting minutes of March 2, 2021. 4. Introduction and Oath of Office for New Commission Members Included in your packet is an Oath of Office for new commission members Leah Ybarra and Nick Boulton. Chair Hoag will officially swear them in as the first agenda item of the meeting. Thank you for your willingness to serve the community. Requested Commission Action: Swearing in, welcome and thank you for willingness and interest to serve. Introduction of all commissioners. 5. Park Dedication Ordinance Analysis Discussion At the January joint meeting with the City Council, they requested a review of the Park Dedication Ordinances of neighboring communities to see what is being done or can be done differently in Roseville in order to be able to capture park dedication on developments that significantly impact the city’s park and recreation system. This request was made because there have been several recent high-density residential developments that have occurred that did not contribute park dedication under the current ordinance. State law allows cities to have a Park Dedication Ordinance (please see current enclosed ordinance) in their subdivision code whereby land, cash or a combination of such can be required to help satisfy plans for recreational facilities, open space and address the new needs that the development creates. To have a Park Dedication Ordinance, cities must have a Parks and Recreation System Master Plan, a Parks and Recreation Section in the City Comprehensible Plan and a Capital Improvement Plan of which Roseville’s is robust. To conduct this analysis, staff reviewed numerous neighboring community ordinances and followed up with the staff from those cities. A summary information chart of some of those ordinances that appear different from Roseville’s is included in your packet. With this preliminary analysis, it appears as though other communities are able to capture park dedication on these types of developments that we have not been. It still needs to be sorted out from a legal perspective but at this point for discussion, included in your packet is the current ordinance with potential struck and added in red language that may allow Roseville to better maximize park dedication on a greater number of these impactful developments.