My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2021-3-2_PR_Comm_Min
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Parks & Recreation
>
Parks & Recreation Commission
>
Minutes
>
2021
>
2021-3-2_PR_Comm_Min
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/19/2021 8:30:39 PM
Creation date
4/19/2021 8:30:38 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
fields from outside Roseville based upon numbers of Roseville residents and nonresidents playing in <br />the program. There are finite resources for fields in Roseville and it is a balance to get field space for <br />all of the teams who utilize them during the summer. Staff is committed to working through the <br />situation with the Association. <br />Chair Hoag asked for the makeup of the Roseville Fastpitch Association. Ms. Doefler responded that <br />it is all of School District 623. She added that the Association has reached out to the additional <br />District 623 cities (Little Canada, Shoreview, Lauderdale, and Falcon Heights) for fields. However, <br />the cities all want to charge money for field use while Roseville provides them free of charge. <br />Vice-Chair Dahlstrom disclosed that he is on the board of the Fastpitch Association. He shared that <br />as the Association is relatively small they have moved away from renting fields from the <br />surrounding cities to keep the costs down. In addition, he noted that the Association has concerns <br />with some of the conditions of the fields in Roseville (balls making odd jumps, etc.). <br />If necessary, staff offered to follow up with surrounding cities that the Association haskids <br />participating from to explain why Roseville provides fields free of charge and encouragethem to <br />provide resources to the Association as appropriate. <br />3) APPROVAL OF MINUTES – FEBRUARY 2, 2021MEETING <br /> <br />Vice-ChairDahlstrommoved to approve the minutes. CommissionerBaggenstoss seconds. <br />Roll Call <br />Ayes: Arneson, Baggenstoss, Brown, Dahlstrom, Hoag,Lenhart, O’Brien and Stoner. <br />Nays: None. <br />Abstain: None. <br /> <br />4) PARK DEDICATION – VICTORIA ST. N. AND ORCHARD LN./CO. RD. C2 <br />Staff provided a review of the Park Dedication process and options for the Commission. Staff next <br />presented details on the specific proposal for a subdivision adjacent to Lake Owasso on Victoria St. <br />N. at Orchard Ln. and Co. Rd. C2. The proposal includes 8 lots (5 new lots) on 9.13 acres. <br /> <br />This project would qualify for Park Dedication. The cash amount for the 5 additional lots/units <br />would be ($4,250 per additional lot).The land amount would be 10% of 9.13 acres or .913 acre. The <br />developer has suggested that cash be accepted in lieu of land. A map was displayed that showed the <br />lot locations relative to Lake Owasso and Victoria Street. This area is located in constellation D. <br />There are no specific plans identified in the Parks and Recreation System Master Plan for parkland <br />in this area. <br />2 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.