My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2021-5-4_PR_Comm Packet
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Parks & Recreation
>
Parks & Recreation Commission
>
Packets
>
2021
>
2021-5-4_PR_Comm Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/29/2021 4:08:24 PM
Creation date
4/29/2021 4:08:17 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
41Mr. Weber thanked staff for listening to resident feedback and added that as a former basketball <br />42coach he would never want to do anything to discourage younger participants of the sport. <br />43 <br />44Future Commissioner Ybarra asked staff if the basketball hoop that was in the parking lot at Autumn <br />45Grove would be replaced. Staff responded that typically thedepartment policyhas been to not <br />46replace basketball hoops that are in parking lots due to safety concerns. <br />47 <br />483) APPROVAL OF MINUTES – FEBRUARY 2, 2021MEETING <br />49 <br />50Commissioner Baggenstoss moved to approve the minutes. Vice-Chair Dahlstrom seconds. <br />51 <br />52 Roll Call <br />53 Ayes: Arneson, Baggenstoss, Brown, Dahlstrom, Heikkila,Hoag,Lenhart. <br />54 Nays: None. <br />55 Abstain: None. <br />56 <br />57 4) INTRODUCTION AND OATH OF OFFICE FOR NEW COMMISSION MEMBERS <br />58 The Oath of Office was completed by Commission Chair Hoag for new Commission members Leah <br />59 Ybarra and Nick Boulton. The new Commissioners introduced themselves to the group and provided <br />60 a brief overview of why they chose to join the Roseville Parks and Recreation Commission. <br />61 <br />62 5) PARK DEDICATION ORDINANCE ANALYSIS DISCUSSION <br />63 Background Information <br />64 January 25, 2021 – Joint Meeting with the City Council <br />65 o City Council expressed interest in Park Dedication <br />66 What others are doing, what can be done differently to maximize Park <br />67 Dedication <br />68 Mentioned recent examples <br />69 New development by Sandcastle Park <br />70 Former Boaters Outlet located at Co. Rd. C <br />71 o Both of these examples brought in a significant amount of new <br />72 residents which directly impacts park usage. However, they did <br />73 not qualify for Park Dedication under the current language in <br />74 Roseville’s ordinance as the new developments did not replat <br />75 or subdivide <br />76 Review of neighboring communities and ordinances <br />77 Consideration of two other areas in the ordinance <br />78 o Park Dedication amount <br />79 o Utility Dedications not being qualified <br />80 <br />2 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.