My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2021-6-1_PR_Comm Packet
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Parks & Recreation
>
Parks & Recreation Commission
>
Packets
>
2021
>
2021-6-1_PR_Comm Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/27/2021 4:33:06 PM
Creation date
5/27/2021 4:32:53 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
70
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
40The Commission reviewed location maps ofthe parcel and the proposed site plan for the <br />41 development which would include a proposedsidewalk along Eustis. This parcel is located in <br />42constellation J. There has been a long standing and strong desire for additional park and recreation <br />43 opportunities in this area of the city. <br />44 <br />45 The project qualifies for Park Dedication. The proposal summary for Midland Legacy Estates <br />46 includes: <br />47 Total Acreage = 6.1 <br />48 11 new lots (10 new) <br />49 Cash Amount: $42,500 ($4,250 per unit X 10) <br />50 Land Amount: .61 Acres <br />51 <br />52 Staff noted that a similar plat proposal on this same property was reviewed by the Parks and <br />53 Recreation Commission in May and June of last year. For that proposal, the Commission made a <br />54 recommendation to accept useable parkland somewhere along County Rd B, and specified an area <br />55 on the south and southwest side of the development as a preferred location. That overall proposal <br />56 ultimately was not approved by the City Council. On this new proposal, the developer focused on the <br />57 Commissions previous parkland dedication recommendation for useable parkland on the south side <br />58 of the parcel. The developer has stated that the proposed land dedication will be turned over to the <br />59 city as useable parkland that is 95% flat and seeded. Additionally, the developer has committed to <br />60 protecting the three large existing oak trees on the east side of the current driveway which would <br />61 allow for existing tree cover to the new park space. <br />62 <br />63 Chair Hoag reminded everyone that the role of the Commission is not to scrutinize the development <br />64 but to recommend land or cash to the City Council to satisfy Park Dedication. <br />65 <br />66 The Commission discussed the development location in order to orientate themselves with the exact <br />67 location of the parcel. They also discussed what a .61 size park could potentially look like. <br />68 <br />69 Commissioner Baggenstoss asked if there will be trail connections as part of this development. Staff <br />70 responded that pathways would be outside the scope of Park Dedication. However, it is staffs <br />71 understanding that the developer has the intention to create pathways as part of the Pathway Master <br />72Plan along the south and west side of the parcel. <br />73 <br />74 The Commission looked at pictures and discussed the large oak and maple treesthat the developer <br />75 has proposed to save as part of the parkland. <br />76 <br />77 Commissioner Baggenstoss thanked the developer for bringing back a creative proposal that <br />78 addressed the Commissions requests that were made in the previous park dedication <br />79 recommendation. <br />2 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.